User talk:Pudelek/Archive7

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudawka (Rudauka) - old house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 18:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road Sztabin - Krasnybór (Poland).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 18:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stare Leśne Bohatery (Старыя Лясныя Багатыры) - chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Strange chapel :) --Myrabella 21:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nowe Leśne Bohatery (Новыя Лясныя Багатыры) - PKS.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slezské zemské dráhy - Pivní vagón D ú 842.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, please add english description.--ArildV 08:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ČSD Class TU 38.0 in Osoblaha (Hotzenplotz) (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ČSD Class TU 38.0 in Osoblaha (Hotzenplotz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ČD Class 005 in Osoblaha (Hotzenplotz) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ČD Class 005 in Osoblaha (Hotzenplotz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opole (Oppeln) - Klein-Venedig.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 23:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Złota 44 (06.2013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:46, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

ateneul roman

hi the name of the building isn't ateneul roman, but Atheneul Român greez lukas

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Wolfsthal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Florstein 16:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hainburg an der Donau - Rathaus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --The Photographer 17:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg - Residenzschloss Geyerswörth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Nino Verde 11:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg - Atles Rathaus (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right building make sense of falling. But the overall image is straight. Strange feelings) --Nino Verde 11:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Třemešná (Röwersdorf) - chapel near church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avia A31 - fire engine in Slezské Rudoltice (Rosswald).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Deschowitz (Odertal O.S.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 15:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckov castle - panorama (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Modra (Modern, Modor) - Horná brána.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 10:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogue in Senec (Szenc) - detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurzyniec Lock, Augustów canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 06:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamberg - Atles Rathaus (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpening haloes, added note about it --Nino Verde 11:27, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Comment for me this is OK --Pudelek 13:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Yes, but acceptable IMO.--Jebulon 14:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Zdjęcie Gora Zar.jpg

Szanowny Panie Marcinie,

zgodnie z Pańską prośbą, przekazuję informację o wykorzystaniu Pańskiego zdjęcia o nazwie Gora Zar.jpg, które użyłam w artykule dotyczącym magazynów energii opublikowanym w trzecim wydaniu magazynu "Dzisiaj" 3/13 (w jego tabletowej wersji) wydawanym przez ABB Sp. z o.o.

Dziękuję i pozdrawiam, Anita Romanowska Departament Komunikacji ABB Sp. z o.o. e-mail: anita.romanowska@pl.abb.com

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Opole (Oppeln) - Klein-Venedig.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opole (Oppeln) - Klein-Venedig.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jewish cemetery in Lipsk (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sharpness. --Mattbuck 19:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zámek Slezské Rudoltice (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zámek Slezské Rudoltice (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smolenický hrad (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sivac (Szivác, Siwatz) - Orthodox church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sombor (Zombor) - orthodox church - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sombor (Zombor) - town hall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:00, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smederevo fortress (Smederevska tvrđava) - by Pudelek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good--Jebulon 14:16, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smederevo fortress (Smederevska tvrđava) - by Pudelek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Synagogue in Senec (Szenc).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of St Martin, Bratislava (Pressburg, Pozsony) - by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:34, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smederevo fortress (Smederevska tvrđava) - by Pudelek 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smederevo fortress (Smederevska tvrđava) - pano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bravo. --Tufta 21:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirotski Grad (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 6.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 5 - East Gate.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 13:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smederevo fortress (Smederevska tvrđava) - by Pudelek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 17:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

POV names of some of your images

I think that you had not bad intention, but names of some images of Serbia that you uploaded are POV. I suggest that you rename those images. To be more precise, I do not understand why you use Hungarian or German names for places in Serbia. See this one as example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:B%C3%A1csfeketehegy_%28Feketi%C4%87,_Feketitsch,_Schwarzenberg%29_-_Calvinist_church.JPG Official name of that place is Feketić and it is name used in English. It is not only that you used Hungarian and German name here, but you used Hungarian name first. That is very POV. Another example is this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sivac_%28Sziv%C3%A1c,_Siwatz%29_-_main_street_and_Calvinist_church.jpg Most of people in that place are Serbs and nobody use Hungarian or German name. Here you used Hungarian and German name even for Serbian Orthodox church: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sivac_%28Sziv%C3%A1c,_Siwatz%29_-_Orthodox_church.jpg Is there any connection between Serb church and Hungarian and German name? Absolutely not! So, I suggest that you rename your images to official names of these places, which are used in English. Otherwise, most people who live in these places will think that your images are insulting because you support Hungarian and German irredentism in this way. I repeat, I do not think that it was your intention because you are Polish, but this is how it looks to some people. I believe that most Poles will be insulted too if somebody upload pictures of their settlements with German and Russian names. Serbia1918 (talk) 13:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Permission to Use Your Photo in Materials

My name is Jeanne Combos and I oversee the annual appeal for the Catholic Diocese of Arlington, Virginia (USA). I have seen your photo of a stained glass image St. Francis of Assisi and wanted to consider using it for our 2014 appeal materials. This would be a one-time usage, as we use a different image every year..

Could you please grant us permission to use your photo? Of course we would give you artwork credit on the materials. Thank you very much for your consideration. My email address is j.combos@arlingtondiocese.org

In peace, Jeanne Combos Catholic Diocese of Arlington (USA) 11 Oct. 2013

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava) 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop is a bit tight at the top, but OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 16:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beogradska zadruga (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:22, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirot fortress and old swimming pool.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mediana, Niš (Medijana).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamzigrad - Felix Romuliana (by Pudelek) 7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraskevi of Iconium church in Kwiatoń (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Demetrius church in Czarna (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul's Church in Bač (Bács).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 16:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pirotski Grad (by Pudelek).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pirotski Grad (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 16:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I Cemetery nr 151 in Lubaszowa (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I Cemetery nr 151 in Lubaszowa (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:21, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Ascension of Christ in Gładyszów (Ґлaдышiв) - (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael Archangel church in Brunary (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mattbuck 19:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel Nalezení svatého kříže a klášterní zahrady v Litomyšli (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanok - wooden church from Bączal Dolny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I Cemetery nr 60 in Przełęcz Małastowska (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I Cemetery nr 151 in Lubaszowa (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Zdjęcia

Witaj! Zauważyłem Twoją kandydaturę zdjęcia w Valued Images Candidates. Piszę, aby spytać się, czy zamierzasz tam także oceniać zdjęcia? Jak się okazuje, obracamy się w podobnych terenach, czyli zarówno Śląsk jak i Bałkany. Mam stąd kilkanaście tysięcy zdjęć, które zamierzam z czasem wrzucać tutaj na Commons. Byłoby fajnie, jakbyś czasami mógł poprzeć jakieś moje kandydatury, w ramach propagowania naszego kochanego Śląska:) Tam, poza mną, oceniającymi są prawie wyłącznie Francuzi, więc dobrze byłoby mieć także jakąś inną opinię no i Śląskowi przydałoby się więcej Wartościowych Grafik. Tak tylko pytam, jeśli nie masz na to czasu lub ochoty, to okej, nie ma problemu. Pozdrawiam! Halavar (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Dzięki za odpowiedź. Jak na razie większość moich VI ma swoje artykuły, w tym także Baszta więzienna w Raciborzu :) Nie ma jednak w wymaganiach zasady własnego artykułu, ale jest to o czym pisałeś, czyli to, że obiekt powinien być znany. Jak tutaj przyszedłem to zauważyłem, że te zasady nie były przestrzegane. Ale jak dla mnie to okej. Gorze, że nie były przestrzegane inne zasady, czyli dotyczące jakości zdjęć. Bo kryteria co do jakości zdjęcia powinny być znacznie niższe niż w przypadku QI, natomiast obecnie "rządząca" tam francuska ekipa uważa inaczej i nie stosuje się do zapisów kryteriów, a dokładniej kryterium nr 3. I z tego powodu było moje zdziwienie i moje spory z nimi, bo dążenie do perfekcji zdjęcia jest u nich zbyt duże. Dają oni więc swoją aprobatę jedynie tym zdjęciom, które są albo idealne albo bliskie ideałowi, nie patrząc na inne kryteria i wartości zdjęcia, w tym także to, że zdjęcia jest najlepsze w swojej kategorii lub jest jedynym istniejącym. I stąd też te czepianie się wręcz obsesyjne perspektywy czy kolorów. I mimo tego, że zdjęcie spełnia wszystkie 6 kryteriów, tak jak są zapisane, ma wymiar encyklopedyczny, jest używane w różnych artykułach Wikipedii i jest najlepsze jakościowo w swojej kategorii, to nie dostaje statusu VI, bo jest "Perspective distortion". Problem w tym, że człowiek nie ma czasu, aby przy każdym zdjęciu "dłubać" w programie graficznym, a jestem bardziej fotografem niż "obrabiaczem grafiki". A gdy mam na razie jakieś ponad 20 tysięcy zdjęć, ze Śląska, Bałkanów, Turcji, Europy Wschodniej, Rosji, Mongolii, Chin itd. i chciałbym je tutaj na Commons wrzucić to miałbym robotę na najbliższe kilka lat. A gdy jedno zdjęcie ma ponad 10 MB, a wszystkie geokoduje i dodaje inne tagi, to cały proces trochę czasu zajmuje. A tak się składa, że mam wiele zdjęć których nie ma na Commons i byłyby na pewno albo przeze mnie albo przez innych Wikipedystów używane w różnych artykułach. Więc warto aby one się pojawiły i miały status VI. Tylko te czepianie się dystorsji perspektywy oraz ogólne dążenie do idealności zdjęcia są tam ewidentną przesadą i zwalniają moje tempo wrzucania zdjęć... Co do wzajemnego popierania się. To o to bym się nie bał, że to zarzucą mi lub Tobie, bo to obecnie tam tak działa w grupie francuskiej, która jest większością na VI. I to powoduje, że obecnie na Commons większość zdjęć VI to zdjęcia z Francji, a potem z Niemiec, UK i USA. Przechył na Zachód jest więc gigantyczny a tym samym nieobiektywny i nie odzwierciedlający rzeczywistości. Dlatego ja chciałbym ten balans wyrównać wrzucając zdjęcia z ogólnie rzecz biorąc kierunku wschodniego. Dlatego miło mi będzie jeśli czasem jak tam wejdziesz i zobaczysz jakieś moje fotki przykładowo z Cieszyna, Rybnika, Belgradu, Ochrydy, Ulcinja, Tirany, Jałty, Lwowa czy Irkucka, a będą spełniać wszystkie 6 kryteriów, tylko że francuskiej ekipie oceniającej będzie przeszkadzać jakaś mała dystorsja, a jeśli dla Ciebie zdjęcie będzie okej, to proszę o Support:) Pozdrawiam. Halavar (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Vranov nad Dyji03(js).jpg

Cześć, muszę przyznać, że jestem zdziwiony Twoim komentarzem do tej fotki. Na swoim monitorze (EIZO CG246) nie widzę wyliczanych przez Ciebie wad. Natomiast widzę wyraźnie stroje poszczególnych osób, bez rozmyć - a znajdowały się one w odległości ponad 1 km od aparatu - może komuś sprawi przyjemność przyglądanie się szczegółom i dlatego nie widzę powodu dla zmniejszania oryginalnego rozmiaru zdjęcia. Dodatkowo obiektyw, mimo, że to zoom, rysuje wyjątkowo ostro i nie był ustawiony na pełny otwór. Przy ISO 125 i sporej matrycy aparatu pojawienie się szumów też jest mało prawdopodobne. Jeśli nawet pojawiły się jakieś przepalenia to tak minimalne, że nie zwróciłem na nie uwagi i na pewno nie powinny wpływać na ocenę zdjęcia. Gdybym je widział to z oryginału w RAW-ie na pewno bym je wyeliminował. Proszę, podaj mi gdzie widzisz przepalenia, gdzie są szumy i gdzie nieostrości. Rzadko widzę sens w poważniejszej obróbce wykonanych poprawnie zdjęć (chyba, że były wykonywane w jakichś ekstremalnie trudnych warunkach) spróbuj mnie przekonać, że się mylę.Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) - Smetanovo náměstí.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) - dům, Smetanovo nám., Vodní Valy 46 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel Nalezení svatého kříže v Litomyšli (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Seldac Ossuary - the Schwarzenberg coat-of-arms.jpg

Dear Pudelek (Marcin Szala) My name is Mark Elson and I am the Saguenay Herald with the Canadian Heraldic Authority. I am writing this note to you to inform you that we will be using the Seldac Ossuary - the Schwarzenberg coat-of-arms.jpg - as it displays a coat of arms using bones as part of our FaceBook Halloween post. Thank you very much for allowing us this use your image. We will credit you by name and link you as as Pudelek (Marcin Szala).

Mark Elson Saguenay Herald Canadian Heraldic Authority

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bač fortress, Serbia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) - nová radnice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Písečná (Sandhübel) - kostel .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Třebovice (Triebitz) - kostel sv. Jiří.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Česká Třebová (Böhmisch Trübau) - radnice (erb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) - Smetanovo náměstí (pano).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --JLPC 14:56, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żory (Sohrau) - market place.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Jakość obrazu

Szanowny Pudelku, czy to nie wstyd dawać takie ciemne zdjęcia? Od czego Photoshop? Wolałbym już wcześniejszą, znacznie lepszą wersję (po wyprostowaniu wycinka). A tak przy okazji - brakuje w ogóle zdjęć Wieży Wrocławskiej! Pozdrowienia - Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 13:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC) P.S. Szanowny Pudelku, bardzo proszę o udostępnienie pierwszej wersji, z wieżą w naturalnym kolorze czerwieni, z widokiem na wejście z rzeźbą lwa nad drzwiami. Nie "zamiast" tylko "obok" tamtego. Bardzo mi na tym zależy. Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 14:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Drogi Panie Marcinie, jak to miło spotkać się z życzliwością! Zdjęcie natychmiast zamieściłem w niemieckiej wersji artykułu. Nie rozumiem tylko zarzutu, że zdjęcie wieży wskutek rozjaśnienia straciło na szczegółach. Nie zmieniałem niczego, oprócz jasności samej wieży (z wyłączeniem nieba!). W moich pracach staram się wykorzystać całą skalę tonalną obrazu - od bieli do czerni - z zachowaniem szczegółów w światłach i cieniach.

Serdecznie pozdrawiam i życzę wielu sukcesów --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 16:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sivac (Szivác, Siwatz) - main street and Calvinist church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sombor (Zombor) - main street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 14:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forest Railway of Gemenc - passenger car.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! C50-Z - Forest Railway of Gemenc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Żory (Sohrau) - lutheran church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Litomyšl (Leitomischl) - radnice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 08:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Použitá fotografie

Dobrý den, na stránce popisující jednu z Vašich fotografií jste uvedl přání být informován o použití fotografie mimo Wiki.

Vaše fotografie: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunt%C3%A1l_(Freudenthal)_-_market_square.jpg

Použitá na stránce: http://msk.mistnisnem.cz/br/

Brzy budou doplněny informace o autorovi fotografie včetně odkazu na originální fotografii (na Wikimedia Commons).

Pokud Vám vadí způsob použití Vaší fotografie, napište mi email a provedu její odstranění.

Děkuji Vám a přeji příjemný den.

Jan Rejchrt rejchrt@promoters.cz

---

English -------

Greetings, on page describing one of your photography you have noticed a wish to be informed when someone use your photography outside the Wiki.

You photography: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunt%C3%A1l_(Freudenthal)_-_market_square.jpg

Used on: http://msk.mistnisnem.cz/br/

Some information about author with link to the original photography will be added to page very often.

If you don't agree with use of your photography, please send me email and I'll remove it.

Thank you and wish you a nice day.

Jan Rejchrt rejchrt@promoters.cz

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sivac (Szivác, Siwatz) - bus station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 23:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Osman Đikić tomb in Mostar.jpg

File:Osman Đikić tomb in Mostar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feketić (Bácsfeketehegy, Feketitsch, Schwarzenberg) - main street and Lutheran church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyundai - school bus in Bulgaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kula (Кула) - Castra Martis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feketić (Bácsfeketehegy, Feketitsch, Schwarzenberg) - Calvinist church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:34, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Road in Bulgaria, near Belogradchik (Белоградчик).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar

Dzień dobry, chcielibyśmy poinformować Pana, że zdjęcie (Wiki-Commons) przedstawiające kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela i św. Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej / Świerzawa – oczywiście po podaniu informacji dot. praw autorskich – zostało umieszczone na stronie naszego niekomercyjnego projektu << Kalendarza FVKS "W Podróży" 2013 >>. Motywem przewodnim są "wieże". Nie wykluczone, że pojawią się tam kolejne zdjęcia Pana autorstwa. http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/ http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/2013/10/26/wieza-kosciola-sw-jana-chrzciciela-i-sw-katarzyny-aleksandryjskiej-swierzawa-pl/ Mamy nadzieję, że wszystko się zgadza. Pozdrawiamy FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. (Stowarzyszenie Promocji Miasta Kultury Görlitz-Zgorzelec t.z.) kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 13:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Shipka pass (Шипка) - central Monument 2.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Shipka pass (Шипка) - central Monument 2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, YiFeiBot (talk) 15:36, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belogradchik Fortress (Белоградчишка крепост) - by Pudelek 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 22:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belogradchik Fortress (Белоградчишка крепост) - by Pudelek 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belogradchik Rocks (Белоградчишки скали) - by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 11:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belogradchik Fortress (Белоградчишка крепост) - by Pudelek 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could use a bit more sharpening, but good quality. --Jastrow 11:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Such nice photos with really style behind the camera

Dear Friend,

We hope to use some of your photos (obviously giving you credit) for now we are working on a passport like tourist product utilizing photos from the USA and Canada that I took of capitals and welcome signs and then we will be working with another organization with photos of the Caribbean for the next passport book and then finally to Europe. My wife and I used to have a postcard company in Kansas (300 different cards) and I believe that your images are so fine. We hope to also send in hundreds of photos from the more than 200 countries that we have visited in future. Thanks for all your help. The photos will only be the size of a large postage stamp as we have two countries on pages the size of passports but they still had a geographical touch. My wife and I (me retired) are both teachers, me geography and her Spanish at the high school level. drsnipe@aol.com

Most sincerely,

Ron and Betsy Snipe Port Angeles, Washington, USA (near Seattle and Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - fresco 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 22:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - fresco.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 22:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - fresco 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 22:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belogradchik (Белоградчишк) - view from fortress.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please geotag --Moroder 12:55, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belogradchik Rocks (Белоградчишки скали) - by Pudelek 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good but could you reduce the highlights a bit (especially the sky)? --Tuxyso 20:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC) I think it's OK as-is. Mattbuck 23:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banderitsa valley (Бъндерица), Pirin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muratovo Lake (Муратово езеро), Pirin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Banderishki Chukar (Бъндеришки чукар).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihren (Вихрен), Bulgaria - by Pudelek 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a bit too strong sharpening, but OK for QI --A.Savin 13:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kostel Nalezení svatého kříže a klášterní zahrady v Litomyšli (by Pudelek).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kostel Nalezení svatého kříže a klášterní zahrady v Litomyšli (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Pudelek, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Vihren peak.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Vlahini Lakes (Влахини езера).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rila (Рила) - town.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now! --Cccefalon 16:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Domyślne kategorie

Witaj! Mam pytanie do Ciebie, jako doświadczonej osoby na Commons, czy wiesz może, czy istnieje możliwość, aby zdjęcia które uploaduje miały domyślne kategorie, aby za każdym razem nie musiał dodawać np. kategorii usera, czyli mojej?

P.S. Będziesz nominował do Valued Images swoje zdjęcie File:Kostel Nalezení svatého kříže a klášterní zahrady v Litomyšli (by Pudelek).JPG? Bo dodałem współrzędne geograficzne kościoła, tak więc możesz je wykorzystać do zdjęcia, i tym samym będzie ono spełniało kryteria Wartościowej Grafiki:)

Pozdrawiam Marcin, Halavar (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Zdjęcie nadaje się do VI, jeśli w nominacji dodasz stronę z której zdjęcie było zrobione (np. View from S-E), czy też stronę budynku (np. Southern elevation). TAk właśnie robimy na VI, bo zdjęcie jakiegoś obiektu nie od strony fasady także może być Wartościową Grafiką i takie też się przydaje w artykułach jako drugie dodatkowe zdjęcie jakiegoś obiektu.

Pozdrawiam Marcin, Halavar (talk) 17:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihren (Вихрен), Bulgaria (by Pudelek) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 12:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - hiking trail from Vihren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - by Pudelek.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice! --Moroder 16:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint John Aliturgetos, Nesebar (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bansko (Банско) - abandoned hotels 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Kabata (Кабата) and Hvoynati Vrah (Хвойнати връх).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice view. --XRay 19:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vihren (Вихрен), Bulgaria (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but there’s a strange soft area (see annotation). And I would like geocoding. --Kreuzschnabel 20:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC) New version --Pudelek 15:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Nice. Mattbuck 17:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kutelo (Кутело), Pirin.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port in Nesebar, Bulgaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Sophia in Nesebar (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Holy Saviour, Nesebar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bansko (Банско) - abandoned hotels.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chateau Slezské Rudoltice, Czech Republic. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. P.S. I've added name of the country and "facade" to the scope. Hope you'll agree. Halavar (talk) 11:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Kazana shelter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - hiking trail from Premkata pass.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - fresco 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - fresco 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 08:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nesebar - city wall.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - hiking trail from Banderitsa to Kazana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - sign to Vihren.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Vihren peak 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Vihren peak 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pirin - hiking trail from Vihren.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pirin - hiking trail from Vihren.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinemorec - rocks.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:25, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sozopol - Northern tower of fortress.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirin - Vlahini Lakes (Влахини езера) (3 lakes).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinemorec - Butamiata beach (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice view, good composition. --XRay 07:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pirin - Vihren peak.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pirin - Vihren peak.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silistar beach - rocks pano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rezovo, BUL - border with Turkey - beach.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Debelt (Дебелт) - ruins of Deultum .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --P e z i 23:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinemorec - beach near Veleka river 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veleka river (Велека) in Sinemorec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy.--ArildV 08:44, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silistar beach - rocks.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinemorec - beach near Veleka river 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Pleclown 12:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinemorec - beach near Veleka river.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Pleclown 12:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sinemorec - Butamiata beach pano (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Pleclown 12:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka Memorial Church (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 21:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silistar (Силистар) beach by Pudelek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 10:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ropotamo (Ропотамо) river - boat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That appears to be a box. Not exactly aquadynamic. --Mattbuck 10:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality nomination vandalism

On December 17 in 21:33, while you nominate your images for QI, you committed vandalism deleting another candidate. Can you correct it?--MrPanyGoff 08:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Pudelek, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - Monument of Russian Soldiers (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava) 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bač fortress (Bačka tvrđava) 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - guns.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - view from Tsarevets.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - guns 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 16:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - Monument of the Russian emperor Alexander II (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yambol (Ямбол) - Georgi Benkovski neighbourhood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Useful --Moroder 09:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - view from Tsarevets 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. I guess a panorama from the same view point showing more of the left side will be very nice and interesting.--ArildV 01:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - view from Tsarevets 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 01:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yambol (Ямбол) - Georgi Benkovski neighbourhood 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Tsarevets.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Pudelek, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:09, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kutelo, Pirin, Bulgaria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 12:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Church of St Demetrius of Thessaloniki 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Asenova Mahala quarter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 01:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Tsarevets (Palace).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 17:17, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Tsarevets 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the sharpest, but OK for QI --NorbertNagel 16:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - view from Tsarevets 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Museum of Occupation of Latvia image question

I should first mention, great pictures! (from someone who studied photography in art school)

Regarding your [1] picture of the Gulag reconstruction, do you remember if the exhibit mentioned how many inmates would have been housed in one cabin? If you have a chance, please respond on EN Wikipedia ([2]). Dziękujemy! I'll check the museum's web site in the meantime. Vecrumba (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Request to use photo

I am writing a book on my family history. My g-g-g grandparents were married in the Cathedral at Nysa. I would like to use your picture of the St. Jacob and Agnes Church in the book. I will use the caption "St. Jacob and Agnes Church used by permission of Marcin Szala". The book will only be of interest to family members so I expect it will only sell between 35-50 copies. Richard Klapper rklapper@yahoo.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Petka, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting composition.--ArildV 15:16, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Bristol, Belgrade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belgrade - Old Sava Bridge and old ship.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat unfortunate crop on the left side, but all in all good quality. --Smial 08:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branko's bridge (Brankov most), Belgrade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbanasi (Арбанаси) - Church of Saint Demetrius.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 20:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - SS.Forty Martyrs Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Asenova Mahala quarter 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 07:30, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Church of St Demetrius of Thessaloniki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National Art Gallery, Bulgaria (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 00:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Party House, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 00:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banya Bashi Mosque, Sofia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 00:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Party House by night, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ivan Vazov National Theatre, Sofia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halicki 22:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:50, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sinemorec - rocks.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sinemorec - rocks.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balatonföldvár - harbor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop out the rest of the tree at the very right and the tiny parts of the shop at the very left. Nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 23:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ušće Tower by night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Another crop (with less sky) and reduced lights would be good for the image.--XRay 08:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Just crop it a bit, though IMO this is QI anyway. Mattbuck 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC) You're right, Mattbuck. It's OK. --XRay 17:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Bankau 1944-45

Marcin,

Hello, my name is Mel and my interest in Bankau is that my Father Kenneth Hughes was interned as a POW at Stalag Luft VII.

I have investigated the precise location of the camp and researched this very thoroughly. I know that the Russians took over the camp until (probably) the late 1980's and now have a very detailed plan showing the location of the four camps - although I can only show the huts in the two earlier camps.

I have also been in contact with a local guy called Tomasz (unknown surname) who helped me but who has now away at college.

I have been searching for anyone at Bankau who is interested in my research and would be interested in discussing the camp and what happened there in 1944-45.

Any help you can give will be much appreciated.

Kindest regards

Mel

Bankau 1944-45

My contact email is mel.hughes@garwood74.freesave.co.uk

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
TV tower on Praděd, Czech Republic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks good. Yann (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:15, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	these are fine pics. I have taken cloth hall museum room pictures for presentation to our cutomers. Thanks. Harukazetravel (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Т8М-700IT Inekon in Sofia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 17:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanok - Wooden Manor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra T6A2 in Sofia (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra T6A2 in Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cserépfalu and Bükk mountains.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:39, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galician market square in Skansen, Sanok - GOPR house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bükk mountain - view from Odorvár.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 00:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Répáshuta (Répášska Huta), Hungary.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sátoraljaújhely, HUN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lébény - WWI memorial.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Tsarevets.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Veliko Tarnovo (Велико Търново) - Tsarevets.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bükkszentkereszt (Nová Huta) - cross.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bükkszentkereszt (Nová Huta), Hungary.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:10, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bükk mountain - view from Odorvár - Hór valley.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Very Weak Support Good quality, but hazy. --XRay 11:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kateřinská jeskyně (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Halavar 21:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punkevní jeskyně - Masarykův dóm (by Pudelek).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Halavar 21:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel svatého Bartoloměje v Pardubicích - vitráž.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel svatého Bartoloměje v Pardubicích v noci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Party House by night, Sofia (by Pudelek, cropped by ArionEstar).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Party House by night, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubice (Pardubitz) - Winternitzovy mlýny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubice (Pardubitz) - Náměstí Republiky.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ředitelství pošt a telegrafů - Pardubice (Pardubitz).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Zdjęcia

Cześć. Świetne zdjęcia, bardzo ładne i ciekawe miejsca. A te zdjęcia z Bułgarii pobrałem na mój komputer:) Jak myśli, które zdjęcie będzie zdjęciem roku, z której kategorii?:P Drzewianin (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC).

Z tego co zauważyłem, to dodałeś dwa zdjęcia z Pirinu:) Oczywiście zagłosowałem na nie. Ale mają mało głosów, widziałem lepsze, czy też bardziej ciekawsze zdjęcia bynajmniej z Bułgarii, może jakbyś je wrzucił o ile jest to możliwe jeszcze?:) No tak masz rację trudno wytypować i ja najwięcej z kategorii krajobrazy i natura głosowałem, ale także z miast i zwierząt, ale panoramy najciekawsze. Tak, lepiej, żeby jakiś wikipedysta wygrał, a są za to jakieś nagrody? Drzewianin (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC).

Aha rozumiem, dzięki za wyjaśnienia:) Ciekawe, które tym razem wygra:) Drzewianin (talk) 22:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bač (Bács) - gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Sofia (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubice (Pardubitz) - town hall - detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubický zámek - panorama.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 19:09, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubický zámek v noci.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentWhite speck (or trash?) on left side, can it be cloned out? Otherwise good. --Ll1324 01:15, 22 January 2014 (UTC) Where is this white speck? --Pudelek 13:01, 22 January 2014 (UTC) I can't see one. Mattbuck 21:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kostel svatého Bartoloměje v Pardubicích - vitráž 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:55, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubice (Pardubitz) - town hall by night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardubice (Pardubitz) - Přihrádek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I'd love to see EXIF data --Moroder 00:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Interior of Alexander Nevski cathedral

Hello!

I would like to use the picture about the interior of Alexander Nevski cathedral in a tourism publication about Tallinn. Is it possible to use the picture for free as marked on Wikimedia Commons page?

Jüri Põld

Hello. Yes, you can use this photo for free, but you have to keep the license terms. Pudelek

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Hotel Priessnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (geocoding would be appreciated) --P e z i 20:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Punkevní jeskyně - Masarykův dóm (by Pudelek).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Punkevní jeskyně - Masarykův dóm (by Pudelek).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Wettersäule.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - Monument of Russian Soldiers (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 00:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - Monument of the Russian emperor Alexander II (by Pudelek) - detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 00:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka Memorial - interior.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - central Monument 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shipka pass (Шипка) - central Monument.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeseníky by night - view from Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive7⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prudnik (Neustadt in Oberschlesien) - tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Hotel Hrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Nino Verde 12:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Polský pramen (Polnische Quelle) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Polský pramen (Polnische Quelle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Vorwärts Quelle (pramen Pokroku).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Enhuberův hrob (Enhubers Grab).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Wiener Quelle (Vídeňský pramen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Freundschafts Quelle (pramen Přátelství).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Quelle der Eintracht (Svatební pramen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Mecklenburský pramen (Mecklenburger Quelle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bujaków (Bujakow) - botanical garden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Mikołów-Bujaków (Nikolai-Bujakow).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praděd (Altvater) - view from Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good IMO, but a bit tilted, see note -Lmbuga 03:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Corrected! --Pudelek 10:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 11:39, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lázně Jeseník (Bad Gräfenberg) - Hotel Priessnitz - vchod.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Wykorzystanie zdjęcia soboru św. Aleksandra Newskiego

Cześć, W związku z: "Feel free to use my photos, but please mention me as the author and send me a message to Wikimedia Commons or to polish Wikipedia page."

Wysyłam wiadomość, że chciałbym użyć Twojego zdjęcia na moim blogu: http://kawairakija.wordpress.com Nie wysyłam linka do konkretnego tekstu, bo ten dopiero się pojawi.

Pozdrawiam, Jarosław Kowalczyk

dzięki za informacje --Pudelek (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chopok - Jasná Ski Resort (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bytča (Großbitsch, Nagybicscse) - railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small but still ok --Poco a poco 21:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chopok - Jasná Ski Resort.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 18:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Sunflower from Silesia

I would like to use your picture "Sunflower from Silesia" in a scientific poster to be presented at the EBMT conference.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - Kosodrevina and Ďumbier.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chopok - Jasná Ski Resort (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liptovský Mikuláš - Akadémia ozbrojených síl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift to Chopok (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 13:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but please, remove the dust spot (see note) --Poco a poco 19:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC) Corrected :) --Pudelek 19:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Isiwal 10:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ďumbier (Gyömbér) in winter .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Pudelek,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glatzer Schneeberg (Śnieżnik) - ruins of the observation tower.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Międzygórze (Wölfelsgrund) - villa Marianna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasná Ski Resort - gondola lift Kosodrevina - Chopok (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside cross in Petrovičky (Petersdorf) .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kamieńczyk (Steinbach) - old house.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothflössel (Czerwony Strumień) - ruins of the chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 14:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Międzygórze (Wölfelsgrund) - lapidarium.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothflössel (Czerwony Strumień) - ruins of the statue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

wykorzystanie zdjec.

Dzien dobry, chciałabym wykorzystać Pana zdjęcia do realizacji autorskiego projektu portalu wrotapolski.info (portal w chwili obecnej jeszcze nie dziala, podejrzec mozna na stronie: dev.wrotapolski.info). Będą to zdjęcia z województw: śląskiego, opolskiego i lubuskiego i oczywiscie zostanie Pan podpisany jaki ich autor.

pozdrawiam, alfatv.pl

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothflössel (Czerwony Strumień) - statue of the John Nepomuk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothflössel (Czerwony Strumień) - border with the Czech Republic.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mokre (Mokrau) - Kalkofen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bujaków (Bujakow) - wayside cross (1884).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 19 April 2014 (UTC) 16:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mokre (Mokrau) - Kalkofen 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lesica (Freiwalde) - view.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pleasant composition but I think the left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 17:30, 18 April 2014 (UTC) Looks ok to me. Mattbuck 22:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mokre (Mokrau) - Kalkofen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 18:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saints Peter and Paul in Paniowy (Gross Paniow).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Myrabella 20:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mokre (Mokrau) - Kalkofen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 13:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jasienica stream in Paniowy (Groß Paniow).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 12:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mokre (Mokrau) - Swedish chapel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of St. Lawrence in Mokre (Mokrau), Silesia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelwitz (Jemielnica) - Kriegerdenkmal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelwitz (Jemielnica) - Kriegerdenkmal 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:04, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barut (Liebenhain) - Gůrny Ślůnsk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mokre (Mokrau) - Kalkofen 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 14:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelwitz (Jemielnica) - Teich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:10, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jemielnica (Himmelwitz) - main square.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himmelwitz (Jemielnica) - Kriegerdenkmal 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keltsch (Keilerswalde, Kielcza) - Gasthaus Franz Krawietz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keltsch (Keilerswalde, Kielcza) - Gasthaus Franz Krawietz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keltsch (Keilerswalde, Kielcza) - Friedhof.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Heuschrecke 11:47, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Use of Pocitelj Image

Hello,

We are using your superb picture of Pocitelj in our travel blog, Mr&MrsG-Travel.

http://mjg1886.wordpress.com/

The article it will be used in will be a coach trip we made from Dubrovnik to Mostar via Pocitelj in 2005.

Thank you.

Mark & Yvette gillespie

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pohorelská Maša a Nízke Tatry.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biatorbágyi Viadukt, HUN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Iifar 06:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branko's Bridge in Belgrade by night.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality. --Iifar 06:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Státní znak ČSSR - Muráňská planina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Geo location?) --XRay 16:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrdzavá dolina - pohľad z obce Muráň (Murányalja).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image.--Peulle 15:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muránska planina - sunrise in Nižná Kľaková.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --NorbertNagel 06:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brezno -stanica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pohronská Polhora (Erdőköz) - kostol sv. Michala.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muráň (Murányalja, Unter-Muran) - radnica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No problem with the sky. I appreciate to see the upper end of the clouds.Good quality IMO --Cccefalon 19:02, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Nazi WW II poster from Latvia.JPG

File:Nazi WW II poster from Latvia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davidwr (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthodox church of the Pokrov in Zubacze (Зубачы).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 15:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oder in Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

wykorzystanie zdjęcia

Witam

Zgodnie z proźbą piszę w sprawie wykorzystania zdjęcia: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:%C4%8Eumbier1.JPG tutaj: http://www.skpb.waw.pl/wyjazdy/akcja-lato/2014/wyjazdy/2664-wyjazd-na-slowacje-w-nize-tatry.html. W razie zastrzeżeń proszę o kontakt (adres pod linkiem).

pozdrawiam

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eishaus - Oppeln.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though a bit tight on the top side. --Kreuzschnabel 18:45, 29 June 2014 (UTC)