User talk:Poco a poco/2012-11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 20:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasaje de Santa Catarina, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and good quality --DKrieger 21:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good shot, QI to me --DKrieger 21:36, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Torre de TV de Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de TV de Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not perfect sharpness at the upper part, but ok for QI imo.--ArildV 11:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, vistas panorámicas desde Toompea, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What a great picture. QI to me --DKrieger 21:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)  Comment Imho it will be better if you add a bit more exposure. --Iifar 06:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María (Toomkirik), Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment dust spot remove side left.--Rjcastillo 21:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done, gracias no lo vi Poco a poco 22:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC) good quality --Rjcastillo 23:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colina de las Cruces, Lituania, 2012-08-09, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA needs correcting. Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ new try Poco a poco 22:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Still noticable CA on the right. Mattbuck 12:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 22:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 08:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colina de las Cruces, Lituania, 2012-08-09, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA needs correcting. Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ 4th attempt Poco a poco 22:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 12:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 15:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
English: Very nice photos.
Deutsch: Sehr schöne Fotos.
Steinsplitter (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar, I am glad you enjoy them as I do! Poco a poco (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

¡¡Gracias!! --Kadellar (talk) 15:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Monumento a los descubrimientos

Hola, acabo de ver que tienes una nueva FPC. ¿No está un poco torcida hacia la izquierda? ¿O es así el monumento? ¿Has probado a cortar el poste de la izquierda? ¡Que vaya bien! --Kadellar (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Gracias por el aviso, tomé como referencia las paredes de la estructura y por algún motivo la cosa quedó torcida. De todas formas creo que esa candidatura va a durar más bien poco, ¡saludos! Poco a poco (talk) 12:47, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rzuwig 21:36, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Estonia Evangélica Luterana, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail --Moroder 23:08, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good immage --THWZ 22:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasin (Antilope cervicapra), Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is it just me again who sees strange artefacts? Look at the background grass in 100% view... - A.Savin 21:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ New version uploaded I processed it again from scratch, what do you think? Poco a poco 22:19, 30 October 2012 (UTC) OK, actually I cannot say that the artefacts are away completely, but for a QI it's now acceptable I think. - A.Savin 09:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universidad de Tallin, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Roof slightly distorted ; otherwise QI. --JLPC 21:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ FixedPoco a poco 22:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
✓ Right version uploaded Poco a poco 16:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
OK. --JLPC 16:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Kooli, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--ArildV 10:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Estonia Evangélica Luterana, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some CA on crosses, but good for QI. - A.Savin 21:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
CA was fixed, though Poco a poco 22:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagadi manor, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Belém, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality!!! --Steinsplitter 11:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Altstadt, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde la iglesia de San Olaf, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 11:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 11:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Torre, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 20:22, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Torre de TV de Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 21.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de TV de Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--JLPC 21:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Maximiliano I, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment qood quality for me. Solo elimina dust spot en la parte superior derecha --Rjcastillo 20:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 20:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC)  Comment OK. good quality --Rjcastillo 23:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Heilig-Geist-Gasse, Parroquia católica San Martín, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 17:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Isar, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. - A.Savin 13:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not sure: nice, but rather blurry in the left part. - A.Savin 13:54, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Agree, that I can see :) ✓ cropped outPoco a poco 16:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
OK now. - A.Savin 19:55, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The car bothers a bit, but nice view otherwise. However, when I look at the sky and parts of the facade, I see artefacts again! Is it possible that you exaggerate with the compression a bit?? - A.Savin 20:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your comments, can you add a note to an area where the artefacts are obvious to you? --Poco a poco 19:48, 1 November 2012 (UTC) No need for notes imo, watching full resolution I see it everywhere on the sky and the clouds, but maybe it's just me indeed, who knows. - A.Savin 20:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok, I tried it once more, please, let me know Poco a poco 12:56, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Enough for QI. - A.Savin 19:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 02:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltamontes de alas azules (Oedipoda caerulescens), Ágreda, España, 2012-08-28, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems ok. --Mattbuck 02:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de los Jerónimos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Leans in at the top on the left - please distort and correct. Mattbuck 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ New version uploaded --Poco a poco 20:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 15:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Belém, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del Comercio, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FOP in Estonia

I'm not familiar with Lithuanian cases, but with Estonian FOP cases they were copied to Estonian Wikipedia before deletion in Commons (so they will be not completely wasted images). But I don't know which template was used to remark those images. Regards, Ivar (talk) 16:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltamontes de alas azules (Oedipoda caerulescens), Ágreda, España, 2012-08-28, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 13:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia del Espíritu Santo, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de los Jerónimos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 13:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de Don Juan I, Plaza de Figueira, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 00:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI. - A.Savin 10:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Opera Nacional Estonia, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Nacional Estonia, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Libertad, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altja, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 07:08, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Bestimmung

Nerodia rhombifer?

Hallo Poco a poco, bist du dir sicher bei der Bestimmung der Art? Sieht mir eher nach einer Anakonda aus (Größe erwachsen: ~ 9 Meter) als nach einer Wassernatter (Größe erwachsen: ~ 1,5 Meter) aus. Hellabrunn scheint eine Große Anakonda (Eunectes murinus) zu halten: [1]. – Felix Reimann (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Felix, deine Argumente sind mehr als ausreichend. Tatsächlich handelt es sich um eine Anakonda. Ich habe die Beschreibungen aktualisiert und die Daten umbenannt. Vielen Dank für die Hilfe und deine Nachricht! Poco a poco (talk) 04:04, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Torre, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --THWZ 19:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftshaus, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --THWZ 19:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftshaus, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is the building curved, or just distorted due to some parts being closer? Mattbuck 02:33, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
The building is not straight and is made out of 2 facades in different angles Poco a poco 18:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
OK then. Mattbuck 16:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vistas de Lisboa desde Miradouro da Graça, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CAs need fixing. Mattbuck 17:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 20:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 16:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de Belém, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CAs need fixing. Mattbuck 17:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 18:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 16:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortensia (Hydrangea macrophylla), Calatayud, España 2012-05-16, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA --The Photographer 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. No CA. If you see any, feel free to add image note. - A.Savin 21:15, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
After getting a note from The Photographer and amplifying to 200% I saw something, I have tried to fix it. Poco a poco 23:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral Nueva, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective Distortion --The Photographer 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 Support No distortion, good quality to me, stop nonsense reviews pls. - A.Savin 21:13, 6 November 2012 (UTC)  Comment you owe me an apology, the fact that you can not see, not signic that this does not exist, be more assertive, presumably in good faith --The Photographer 22:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The Photographer, in my humble opinion, you are overacting and rejecting or commenting issues that are negligible. I have only seen some of your issues in 200%. Poco a poco 23:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm adjusting my level of demand, I have not rejected any photograph unless it's something that can not be corrected. There is always the possibility of an argument, is just my second day assessing please with me. My idea is to create a section getting better. --The Photographer 01:35, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition but Hight contrast --The Photographer 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Is hight contrast a problem? I reworked the curves (looking always for a wide dynamic range) Poco a poco 21:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, when HC, the image details are lost --The Photographer 22:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial Rusalka, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tiled and underexposed --The Photographer 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Agree with the underexposure (fixed), cannot see any tilt Poco a poco 21:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Dust cleaned Poco a poco 23:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
QI for me --The Photographer 01:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torreón Kiiu, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA --The Photographer 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Where?! Poco a poco 21:57, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
That CA was not a comment worth but I fixed it Poco a poco 23:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, only fix the underexposed in top --The Photographer 23:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
What? Underexposed areas in a picture are not a reason not to accept a picture. Shadows do exist and belong to the pictures. I will not manipulate the picture applying a selective addtional exposure, this is not about QI Poco a poco 23:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
You are right --The Photographer 02:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment and far right --Rjcastillo 01:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
No he entendido tu respuesta. Eso sí, he subido una nueva versión tras haber detectado una mota de polvo Poco a poco 20:58, 6 November 2012 (UTC) Comment Disculpa quise decir que del lado derecho tambien habia una mota de polvo --Rjcastillo 01:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC) QI --Rjcastillo 01:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Lenbachplatz, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overexposed --The Photographer 20:43, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
According to the histogramm it was not, but I have uploaded a version darkening the brigther spots Poco a poco 21:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Castillo Trausnitz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 18.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castillo Trausnitz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 18.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Estonio de Historia, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. - A.Savin 09:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good - A.Savin 09:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praça do General Humberto Delgado, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde la iglesia de San Olaf, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Erlueta, Calatayud, España, 2012-08-24, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted --The Photographer 15:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 03:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Viru, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Smallest CA, QI for me --The Photographer 15:29, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Señales en la entrada de Huérmeda, España 2012-05-16, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial Rusalka, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --The Photographer 15:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Torre, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, calle Altstadt, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CAs need fixing. Mattbuck 17:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 20:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
OK. Mattbuck 16:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ländtor, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 10:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeropuerto Internacional de Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 07:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Estonia Evangélica Luterana, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 10:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagadi manor, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 07:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtresidenz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Claustro de la Colegiata del Santo Sepulcro, Calatayud, España, 2012-09-01, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosa de alabastro (Echeveria elegans)

Saludos,

  La imagen es muy buena, te pregunto solo por curiosidad. Porque usastes un ISO 400 ? . otra pregunta si no te molesta existe una regla
general que pueda tomar o deba aprender para los diferentes valores (ISO, exposición, distancia focal) según la imagen a fotografiar. Gracias .

--Rjcastillo (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hola, el papel de la ISO es importante sobre todo en la fotografía nocturna, en la diurna la regla general es que el ISO debería ser lo más reducido posible. Las condiciones de luz que tuve para hacer esta foto no fueron las mejoras (era un zona en sombra), por eso tuve que subir el ISO, y reducir la velocidad de obturación a un valor límite (por debajo de 1/80 corro el riesgo de que salga borrosa) para conseguir una buena calidad. Con mi cámara puedo hacer fotos de buena calidad con valores de ISO relativamente altos (hasta unos 1600 a partir de ahí la calidad se reduce considerablemente y los puntos son visibles). Saludos! Poco a poco (talk) 13:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rua de São João, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspective distortion --The Photographer 15:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 03:26, 8 November 2012 (UTC)  Info only fixed the shadows, the inclination is still there, is minimal --The Photographer 13:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I also addressed the distortion, the corner of the building in the note you added is NOT straight, please, look again Poco a poco 03:56, 9 November 2012 (UTC)  Info each floor seems to have a different level, you're right --The Photographer 13:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Neustadt, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 03:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua Os Meninos, Avenida dos Aliados, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:09, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodega Sandeman, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 10.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good (though I'd prefer more crop at the top). - A.Savin 10:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 04:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Estonio de Historia, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is purple ca at the stair and green ca at the small roof. --Berthold Werner 16:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
oops, gross error, ✓ fixed now, thanks for the review Poco a poco 03:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Cannot understand your complete File:Rathausmarkt-Altes-Rathaus-Rathausturm.jpg

Thanks for your review of my photo. I think you were right with the crop (I think you mean at lamp at the left side of the photo). I've slightly modified it. I've also modified exposure: Please look to the histogram (e.g. in Lightroom): Hightlights and shadows are well defined, no overexposured sky. And note the speciality of the photo: It is a backlit scene. Please re-review. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hortensia (Hydrangea macrophylla), Calatayud, España 2012-05-16, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 08:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio presidencial Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:19, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagadi manor, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 04:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, calle Altstadt, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. - A.Savin 11:16, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Coímbra desde la Universidad, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot, needs perspective correction at the right. - A.Savin 09:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 13:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks.  Support now - A.Savin 19:53, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia Estonia Evangélica Luterana, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit blurry at the top, but OK to me. - A.Savin 21:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia del Espiritu Santo, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a bit too bright and upper part not straight imo (both are easy to fix). --JLPC 09:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Improved Poco a poco 23:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Good. --JLPC 09:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colina de las Cruces, Lituania, 2012-08-09, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio en Travessa Ocidental do Lago, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cayena (Hibiscus rosa-sinensis), jardín del molino, Sierra de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality  Comment minimum distortion --Rjcastillo 14:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altja, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Anillo y el hotel Charles, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality  Comment trace of CA at the ring --Rjcastillo 14:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caballo Haflinger, Tierpark Hellabrunn, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-06-17, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and good q --The Photographer 15:58, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodega Croft, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CA --The Photographer 20:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Harsh review, I fixed some slight CA though, Poco a poco 21:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)  Info Good work, however, one thing does not convince me, I'd like to hear other opinions. --The Photographer 13:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC) Good for QI. Does Lara live here ?--Jebulon 14:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rosa de alabastro (Echeveria elegans), jardín del molino, Sierra de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa de alabastro (Echeveria elegans), jardín del molino, Sierra de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Image CA and Cuted.JPG y demás

Buenas tardes Poco a poco, aquí las 2:05 pm, hora de Venezuela. Antes que nada, muchas gracias por escribirme, es un placer siempre recibir comentarios para mejorar. Con respecto a la imagen, la he promovido, la corrección de CA está aceptable junto con el superior ya no recortado. Con respecto a la geolocalización, tiene mucho sentido y parece ser una buena práctica lo que me comentas, sin embargo, debería haber una forma o regla para aplicarlo, de esa forma no se estaría redundando en localización. Yo mismo he encargado un dispositivo GPS para la camara y de esa forma fijar la posición en el EXIF de la imagen. Por otro lado, en relación al comentario importante, te comento que apenas tengo dos semanas realizando revisiones, a mis revisiones nunca leo el autor quien propone la fotografía para evitar subjetivismos, y leo con mucha pena tus palabras, siento mucho haber causado esa impresión, mi intención es estimular la sección, sin embargo, quizás me he excedido en mis revisiones. Me gustaría saber que me recomiendas hacer?, gracias por habérmelo dicho, de otra forma no habría caído en cuenta, eres la primera persona que me lo dice y agradezco en el futuro cualquier otro comentario adicional, cuenta conmigo en cualquier apoyo que necesites, Muchas gracias. --The Photographer (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huérmeda, España 2012-05-16, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:19, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiek in de Kök, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rzuwig 21:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments chromatic aberration, please see note --The Photographer 14:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Totally agree, ✓ fixed now Poco a poco 04:13, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Opera Nacional Estonia, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Nacional Estonia, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 17:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo Trausnitz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pequeño Arco de Almedina, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done --The Photographer 13:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmse manor, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality, nice texture in shadowns and composition --The Photographer 13:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de los Jerónimos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:53, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikk Hermann, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Whashed-out colours. The original was better. --Esquilo 06:25, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Improved Poco a poco 02:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)  Info QI now --The Photographer 13:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Convento de la Concepción, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --The Photographer 12:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Geotag missing

Geben Sie bitte ein Geotag für dieses Bild. --Ximeg (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

✓ Erledigt, Poco a poco (talk) 23:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Almeida Garrett, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Selbymay 12:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please Add Geotag, QI for me --The Photographer 14:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand, if it is a QI, it is a QI, nothing to do with geotag, that is NOT a prerequisite for QI. I added it though Poco a poco 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)  Info Gracias por agregar la geolocalización. Tienes razón, no es un requisito, estás en lo correcto, sin embargo, es un valor agregado, QI for me --The Photographer 17:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del ayuntamiento, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ca and cuted, please add geotag --The Photographer 14:39, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Cannot see any CA where you added the note (and it is definitely not "cuted" (sic)), I copied the geodata from the category Poco a poco 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)  Info Please, see the note, thanks --The Photographer 17:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)  Info QI now, well done --The Photographer 18:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de Don José I, Plaza del Comercio, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, please add geotag --The Photographer 18:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 11:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaani Tooma, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 11:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de Neptuno, Antiguo Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 11:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Duero a su paso por Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Selbymay 15:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Müürivahe, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI. - A.Savin 20:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia ortodoxa de San Nicolás, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo, overexposed parts on the bell tower, maybe it can be fixed. - A.Savin 20:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Improved Poco a poco 00:59, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
OK to me now. - A.Savin 09:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Jebulon 15:37, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but isn't a slight perpective correction needed ? --JLPC 17:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 19:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
QI now. --JLPC 21:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch...

...zu mehr als 1000 QIs! --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank Berthold! Ja, es sind jede Menge, und wir machen weiter :) Poco a poco (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

AJAX patrol

Hello, I see that you use AjaxPatrolLinks. I have good news for you: AJAX patrolling is now in core! On Wikimedia projects, it should arrive with MediaWiki 1.21wmf5, between 2012-11-26 and 2012-12-5. You should disable this gadget when the new feature change is enabled, because it will become redundant and to avoid double patrolling. Thanks, Nemo 08:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre, Jaray, España, 2012-09-01, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 20:49, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:35, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeropuerto Internacional de Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. However, it would be better to use a neutral gradient filter to darken the sky a bit. --Ximeg 22:59, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rua de Trinta e Um de Janeiro, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Shivaji Maharaj Raigad.jpg

Sir, Thanks for review. The original doesn’t look very tilted to me,Would you please be kind enough to have another look to this QI candidacy? --Cj.samson (talk) 13:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altja, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 21:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Altstadt, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment good picture but slightly tilted, imo ...? --Rjcastillo 21:00, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Improved Poco a poco 21:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)very good. QI. See notes --Rjcastillo 23:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pequeño Arco de Almedina, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Identification of the CoA (and relevant categorization) please ? (easy) --Jebulon 18:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 20:44, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and unusual --Archaeodontosaurus 09:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de Viru, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagadi manor, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment La imagen es agradable y de calidad , pero árbol del lado izquierdo distrae algo. Un poco más adelante o desde el camino de piedra hubiera sido mejor. En mi opinión... --Rjcastillo 23:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
No vi posibilidad de acercarme desde ese ángulo por no patear el césped. Para tratar de remediarlo he recortado la imagen, Poco a poco 20:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC) better --Rjcastillo 20:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: File:Vista desde la torre de observación...

You're welcome.
You're right with the color standard: the Adobe RGB is much better (because larger) than the sRGB and you're perfectly right to shoot in that standard and in RAW.
There are several reasons why I converted the picture in sRGB (but I could have left it as well in Adobe). First, the Web standard is the sRGB so most of the visitors will see it as it really meant to be, that's because the very large majority of the LCD monitors of the common visitors wont be able to display all the Adobe colors, and probably not even the whole range of the sRGB.
Another reason is that the purpose of the images on Commons is also mainly for printing and here again, a large majority of printing labs only accept sRGB.
But the most important is that during the conversion and comparing back and forth the result, I didn't perceive noticeable change in the colors. If I did, I would have left it in Adobe RGB.
In conclusion: continue to shoot in RAW and Adobe RGB, work the revealed files in the same color standard and Tiff 16 bits and deliver the final release (print. Web, …) in sRGB 8 bits, except if the client asks or is able to cope with larger gamut.
Good work! Clin Sting (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 46.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 46.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pikk Hermann, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 19:45, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universidad de Tallin, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viru Bog, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 66.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well, what do we have here, something taken 5 minutes after your FP ;-) --King of Hearts 19:40, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Torre, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 20:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Altstadt, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 20:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Comment see notes --Rjcastillo 20:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I removed the minor CA Poco a poco 20:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ajedrezada tórrida (Pyrgus cirsii), Ágreda, España, 2012-08-28, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de los Jerónimos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:10, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biblioteca Estatal de Baviera, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. --Selbymay 08:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista desde la torre de observación, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hermosa , Please add geotag --The Photographer 13:00, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtresidenz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Church of St. Francis of Assisi, Goa.jpg

This is the QI candidate of 19th November. I have fixed the over-exposed area on the right. Can you please take a re-look? Thanks --Dey.sandip (talk) 18:45, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

I have reviewed it, but, believe me, I don't need reminders, I scan the pictures I comment in a regular basis Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Estatua de los Soldados Rojos, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 07:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Rascacielos del Swedbank, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 07:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Hotel Radisson Blue en Brivibas iela, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Rascacielos en Eksporta ilea, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 07:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Puente Vanšu, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 07:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 10.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 08:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Tallinn Song Festival Grounds, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vamps (talk) 08:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rabelos en el río Duero, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice photo and good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 14:21, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a los Descubrimientos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (and seems to be a VI imo). --JLPC 16:40, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a los Descubrimientos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quite good, a pity that the framing is so extreme. Otherwise it might be a good FP candidate. Alvesgaspar 17:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
I have uploaded a more genereous crop, still think of FP? I've missed a bit more of water for the reflexion Poco a poco 23:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aloe arborescens, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Kadriorg, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de Neptuno, Centro Portugués de Fotografía, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Somewhat tight crop. Good quality. --Smial 10:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Roque, Calatayud, España, 2012-08-31, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Se observa forzada la inclusión de la Luna en la composición lo que origina un exceso de cielo, adicionalmente el rancho sobre la pradera se observa desenfocado o poco claro, en el caso de la subexposición de la misma pradera no está del todo mal en fotografías a contraluz de atardeceres --The Photographer 14:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
¿Cuál es la conclusión?, a propósito, he mejorado la ligera AC, pero no creo que ese fuera el problema para QI Poco a poco 15:32, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 Support Good one! --Smial 17:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vistas panorámicas desde la iglesia de San Olaf, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. Very Good --Rjcastillo 14:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Luis, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle Müürivahe, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Did you make selective perspective corrections? Something is confusing me here: All lines are straight, but my visual impression is different: Especially the green tower looks slightly CW tilted. --Tuxyso 14:33, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
The buildind with the green tower is not at the same plane like the closer building, I cannot help that Poco a poco 21:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 Support Thanks for the info, then QI for me. Just wanted to make sure that no selective perspective corretion was made. --Tuxyso 22:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de Neptuno, Antiguo Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me - A.Savin 10:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Opera Nacional Estonia, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Nacional Estonia, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:41, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de los Jerónimos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice. Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:39, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de Luis IX, Duque de Baviera, Dreifaltigkeitsplatz, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - A.Savin 23:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a Maximiliano I, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. Nice. --Selbymay 20:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Re:1500 WLM2012 QIs!!

Hi Diego,
thank you for your kind words; I would've normally sent that e-mail to you as well, but I didn't have your e-mail address at hand that time, and it was just a quick message that I sent to the mailing list. It is me who should be thanking you for the great efforts that you put into taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and the beautiful pictures you uploaded to Commons. It is people like you — among others, of course :-) — that make my work on WLM seem worthwhile, and give me energy to keep it up. PS Sorry for not answering in Polish; I prefer to keep my conversations in English here on Commons, hope you don't mind it. Również pozdrawiam, odder (talk) 10:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Torre, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Hübsch --Moroder 21:19, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de Luis I de Baviera, Múnich, Alemania, 2012-04-30, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not bad --Moroder 21:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a los Descubrimientos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Base soviética de submarinos, Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Potencial for Featured Image. --W like wiki 19:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)