User talk:Pline/archive 1
Cliquez sur ce lien pour me laisser un nouveau message ! / Click here to add a discussion
Hello, these images are derivative works of copyrighted originals. We need the name and a licence of the original author to keep these images:
If you could please supply them. The images will have to be removed otherwise. --Wikipeder 22:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- You can delete these ... derivative works but keep the kids...--Gébé 23:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Bonjour. Je viens de créer une catégorie pour le parc de la Tête d'Or et j'hésite vraiment à y inclure ta photo car je ne vois pas très bien de quel endroit il s'agit! Il me semble que ce n'est pas le parc de la Tête d'Or! Peut-être ses abords (peut-être des arbres qui dépassent) mais àmha c'est abusif de parler du parc sur cette photo. J'attends tes commentaires et précisions... Cordialement. --TwoWings (jraf) * Wanna talk? ;-) 13:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Bonjour, la photo est prise du pont Winston Churchill. Effectivement le commentaire devrait plutot parler des abords du parc. Je corrige. Cordialement--Gébé 14:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Bassin-du-Danube.gif
[edit]Hi,
In Image:Bassin-du-Danube.gif, Montenegro is shown to be much bigger then it is. This left part of its coast, south of Bosnia, is Croatian. Couls you please fix it. --78.3.120.21 14:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello.
This image has a wrong source at flickr and I have been not able to find the right link. could you please correct it? thank you -- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 09:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- you are right. Finally I found the link but forgot to cancel the message. Sorry.-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 15:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Dessins
[edit]Salut,
Tu fais de jolies photos de trains, métro, etc. J'ai un ami qui dessine magnifiquement les trains, bus, métro, etc. de tous modèles et époques. Je lui ai proposé de contribuer à Commons, avec ses oeuvres. Il ne connait pas du tout Commons, n'a ni ordinateur, ni adresse mail. Aurais-tu des conseils à me donner, pour que je les lui transmette ? Quels sujets, par exemple, serait intéressants qu'il traite. Il connait, de mémoire, une quantité inimaginable de véhicules et les dessine fort joliment.
Merci !
Basili 07:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Bonjour, J'ai crée un site sur les transports urbains ( [1] ) et dans le cadre de l'info trafic RATP, j'ai besoin de photos des différentes lignes. J'ai fait appel à un ami mais il ne possède pas de photo de METEOR m'autorisez vous à publier cette photo : http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Metro-Paris-ligne-14-statio.jpg ?
Merci de votre attention et bonne soirée ! --Billy69150 16:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Bonjour, toutes les photos sur wikipédia sont libres de droit et peuvent donc être utilisées. Bon courage pour votre site : pour l'agglomération parisienne vous ne mentionnez pas le transilien qui transporte pourtant par exemple à la gare Saint-Lazare 1/2 million de passagers / jour (le rush du matin y est d'ailleurs particulièrement impressionnant). --Pline (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality images nomination
[edit]Dear Pline, Thank you for uploading Image:Chausey flotille de voiliers a maree bassemaree basse.JPG and Image:Chausey maison de Marin Marie.JPG, I nominated your images for Quality images, your images are listed here. ■ MMXXtalk 13:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! Image Image:Chausey flotille de voiliers a maree bassemaree basse.JPG, which was nominated for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. ■ MMXXtalk 19:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Tradale
[edit]Tu fais bien de me rappeler cette traduction en cours, j'allais oublier ! C'est comme tu veux. A priori il n'y aura pas d'éléments particuliers à la France puisque c'est une politique Commons.
Je suis au courant pour Bologne, l'une des plus belles collections françaises de céramiques grecques hors de Paris... Bibi Saint-Pol voulait y aller avant de découvrir que les photos étaient interdites :( Un peu dans le même genre, j'ai dans le collimateur le musée Vivenel de Compiègne. J'espère que ça sera OK pour les photos... Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Bonjour, je viens de remarquer que vous avez modifié cette catégorie pour qu'elle redirige vers Category:Parks and open spaces in Paris. Premièrement, je ne pense pas qu'on puisse dire qu'un jardin est exactement la même chose qu'un parc. Et deuxièmement, cette catégorie fait partie d'une liste dans Category:Gardens in France by department, donc elle me semble utile. La seule redondance que je voie, c'est avec Category:Public gardens in Paris, mais je pense qu'il serait judicieux de la déplacer vers Category:Gardens in Paris justement, pour plus d'uniformité. Je voudrais donc défaire votre modification, mais je pense qu'il est plus constructif de se mettre d'accord avant. Qu'en pensez-vous? --Tryphon (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Page France
[edit]Bonjour,
Oui, je suis passé sur cette page par hasard. Comme je m'interessais à la partie Bourgogne, j'ai cherché à l'améliorer avec des illustrations trouvées rapidement. De fil en aiguille, j'ai fait ce que je pensais être quelques améliorations de présentation. Je viens de regarder la page de la Pologne, ma première impression c'est que c'est très bien fait et les documents photographiques sont de meilleure qualité que ceux que je trouve pour le moment pour les régions françaises. Pour la page France il y a déjà un gros travail qui est fait. Mais il reste encore du boulot pour atteindre une bonne qualité. Il est certainement difficile de trouver ou de choisir l'illustration qui est la plus représentative de la région concernée.
Il y a une chose à laquelle il faut peut-être faire attention : c'est le message d'avertissement concernant le poids de la page : AVERTISSEMENT : cette page a une longueur de 62 Kio ; certains navigateurs Web gèrent mal la modification des pages approchant ou dépassant 32 Kio. Peut-être devriez-vous diviser la page en sections plus petites.
Je ne sais pas trop ce qu'il faut en penser. G CHP (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riviere-restonica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bouchot baie de Wissant P1030356.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Rame-MF2000-portes-ouvertes.jpg
[edit]Salut, oui, je voulais juste enlever la cat ligne 7 puisque l'image n'en montre pas grand chose et que dès lors, la catégorie n'apporte pas d'élément d'information intéressant à la photo (et vice versa). La suppression de la cat MF 2000 est une manipulation trop rapide. Désolé. greenski (talk) 01:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Peut etre que l'on se connait ? !
[edit]Bonjour
Je suis un ancien du CNES... Peut etre que l'on se connait ! J'ai vu avec plaisir, (pour ne pas dire... "avec attendrissement" !), que votre illustration 2009 pour "Orbite héliosynchrone" réalise (en beaucoup mieux, et en couleurs...) ce que j'avais essayé de faire, il y a 23 ans... lors de la redaction du "Guide des utilisateurs de données SPOT" pour le compte de SPOT Image !
Bien amicalement
R. Zaharia raymond.zaharia [ at ] wanadoo.fr
Club des Argonautes -> [2]
- Bonjour,
- Non je n'ai jamais travaillé au CNES (j'aurais aimé mais j'ai fait des mauvais choix d'orientation ...). J'en profite pour vous signaler que les articles de Wikipedia relatifs au programme spatial français et européen (Kourou, Ariane, Diamant, satellites et sondes spatiales francaises ou européennes) manquent de photos (et de schémas); vous disposez peut être d'illustrations de votre cru ou réalisés par votre entourage qui pourraient enrichir Wikipedia. En effet le CNES et de l'agence spatiale européenne ne mettent pas sous licence libre les photos réalisées par leurs photographes ou les sondes spatiales contrairement à la NASA ce qui interdit leur utilisation. Les articles sur nos programmes spatiaux sont du coup pauvrement illustrés (on peut par exemple comparer les articles Delta et Ariane ou Centre spatial guyanais et Complexe de lancement 39). Les photos pertinentes et de qualité chargées dans Commons (sur ce site) sont généralement réutilisées dans les articles de tous les wikipedia de la planète (anglais, allemand, japonais...), la célébrité anonyme assurée... Si vous disposez de photos vous pouvez soit les charger vous même (fonction importer dans Commons) ou me contacter sur cette page pour que je puisse vous guider dans le maquis des licences libres ... Amicalement --Pline (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort National (Saint-Malo).
File:Cercle-reflexion-Lenoir.jpg
[edit]Bonjour Je m'appelle Manuel Capdevila, et j'ai travaillé 30 ans chez Bull, a part d'avoir naviguée les dernières 50 années Je vous felicite pour vos colaborations a Wikipedia mais j'ai du inserir ce commentaire a votre fichier. This file is unproperly named for it's a Mendoça's reflecting circle, as stated by Jean Randier in his book "L'instrument marine" ISBN 2-7003-0213-3, page 127. I reproduce the text commenting the very same instrument: "Cercle à reflexion de Mendoza. On distingue parfaitement les deux cercles gradués concentriques e l'étrier support des axesde ces deux cercles, caractéristiques dans ce type d'appareil, Grâce a ses deux poignées, le circle de Mendoza peut être utilisé pour la mesure des distances angulaires a plât aussi bien que verticales"
Celui-ci c'est un vrai Borda-Lenoir... comparez les deux File:Cercle de reflexion img 2600.jpg
Cordialment --Mcapdevila (talk) 11:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Merci pour cette correction. Je retournerais au fr:musée de la Marine à Paris (mais pas tout de suite) pour vérifier qu'il s'agit d'une erreur de ma part (plusieurs instruments de marine étaient exposés côte à côte) ou s'il y a une erreur d'étiquetage dans la vitrine auquel cas je la signalerais au conservateur du Musée (hypothèse assez improbable car ce sont, je pense, de bons professionnels). Je vous tiens au courant. Pline (discuter) 4 janvier 2010 à 17:33 (CET)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Sellers translating along truss during EVA-3 on STS-121.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sellers translating along truss during EVA-3 on STS-121.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Propagande socialiste
[edit]Bonjour pas très honnête cette propagande insidieuse pour le parti socialiste dans l'article France. De une, les deux "madones" (comment les qualifier autrement, je pensais à "idoles des wikipidiens socialistes" mais j'ai opté pour le choix le plus neutre) ne sont pas des "Hommes politiques", de deux elles ne représentent rien à part les wikipidiens socialistes qui ont voté pour elle et voudré bien les voir à l'égal des présidents, tous les autres sont des présidents. les "hommes politiques" sont en réalité des "présidents de la Ve république" d'où la section séparée pour les deux rombières et l'ajout de "(chef du gouvernement)" à fillon qui n'est pas chef d'état comme les autres. et de trois mettre la photo des deux socialistes est une imposture et de la propagande, car le fait qu'elle soient socialistes ne justifie pas qu'elles puissent bénéficier de la propagande des wikipidiens du même bord, de même que rien ne justifie qu'elles méritent de figurer ici plus que les autres représentants du parti socialiste et leur grosse trompe, ni ne justifie leur présence ici plus que les candidats des autres partis. à quand les portraits de robert hue, georges marchais, neunoeil de st.cloud, le vicomte du puy du fou, bayrou et ses oreilles, le facteur du npa, ou le chasseur nihous?! aussi avant d'accuser les autres gratuitement comme vous venez de le faire, sachez de quoi vous parlez. Madame Grinderche (talk) 16:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- exposer des faits et une argumentation n'est pas de la paranoia, mon action était totalement justifiée, si vous avez un problème avec les esprits égalitaristes allez vous faire voir. Madame Grinderche (talk) 20:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Palette navigation
[edit]Bonjour,
Hum, oui, disons que ça me paraissait une bonne idée quand je l'ai faite pour la placer sur une toute nouvelle page de Règle ; elle me paraissait déjà une beaucoup moins bonne quand sur d'autres pages il m'a fallu enlever la palette d'aide globale pour mettre celle-là. Puisque ça ne te paraît une bonne idée du tout, tu as bien fait de remettre celle d'avant.
Toutefois, petit bémol concernant ton commentaire de modif : « palette navigation doit être conçue pour les utilisateurs pas pour les admin ». Mon but n'était pas de la faire pour les admins (je pense que la plupart connaissent toutes ces pages) ; mais bien pour les utilisateurs souhaitant en apprendre plus sur les règles et recommandation. Ce sont quand même les pages les plus importantes (hors aide, mais je me comprends : la politique de blocage est en elle-même plus importante que la page d'aide de conversion SVG — même si cette dernière est sans doute plus utile pour l'utilisateur lambda).
Personnellement, je trouve la palette d'aide actuelle hyper-dense (tellement que je ne m'en suis jamais servie). D'un point de vue ergonomique, ça me semble pas idéal de vouloir caser à peu près tous les items de Commons:Table des matières de l'aide dans une palette. De même, des pages comme Commons:Patrouille ou Commons:Révocation n'intéressent probablement pas le contributeur lambda, cible de cette palette.
Mais bon, le fait est que je n'ai pas mieux à proposer, et que je débarque un peu avec mes gros sabots alors que cette palette a de toute évidence une histoire et fait l'objet de réflexions et de discussions. Un peu d'humilité de ma part quoi .
Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 13:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
File:Bassin-fluvial-de-l-Ob.png
[edit]Tarko-Salé n'est pas une capital régionale. C'est Salékhard. Pourriez-vous le corriger? — Klimenok (talk) 08:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Bassin de l'Arsenal
[edit]Bonjour, je me suis permis, en vieux parisien, de rajouter une petite note sur votre photo concernant l'Opéra Bastille. Et je vous recommande, si vous ne le connaissez pas, le petit restaurant (poissons), là, au bord de l'eau.--Jebulon (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Re. Je suis nouveau, et j'ai trop de photos déjà prises à offrir: donc peu de choses sur Paris, comme tu peux le voir. ça va s'arranger !--Jebulon (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Luna 9
[edit]Hola, estoy escribiendo sobre astronomía y esta imagen me vendria muy bien, es para publicar en una enciclopedia, quisiera saber si puedo usarla y bajo que condiciones, muchas gracias! LauraP
- Hola, Cualquiera puede copiar, usar y modificar cualquier fichero de los que hay disponibles aquí para cualquier propósito incluido el uso comercial; siempre y cuándo se acredite la fuente y los autores y siempre y cuándo sus versiones de las copias/avances garanticen la misma libertad de uso para otros. De nada. --Pline (talk) 08:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Images for ISS Science and Research Facilities
[edit]I created 'ISS Facilities' Category before checking for existing categories, my bad. I intend to do a lot more uploading, and would like to solve as many issues, before it's too much. Please check Research and Science on the International Space Station for better picture (no pun intended). I propose a new group 'ISS Research and science facilities' and will start move with my files in about 12 hours. ThorX13 (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have not moved a thing, had a bit of second thoughts, because i already use link to that category on a couple of places. I have to clean that up, and don't fell like it right now, to be honest. The least painless solution to this laziness would be, to put existing images temporary in both categories, and upload new images to the new category. I have also received hints, that words after ISS should start with lower-case, which means = ISS research and science facilities. I apologise for not replying sooner, was not on Commons.--ThorX13 (talk) 07:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- They are all moved to Category:ISS research and science facilities, and all links are updated. --ThorX13 (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chausey bateau de pêche à marée basse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Toile dont le peintre est inconnu (?)
[edit]Bonjour. Je voudrais savoir qui est le peintre auteur de ce tableau svp. : http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Lorient-au-18-eme-siecle.jpg Merci par avance de me renseigner. ;-) JRH (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Jean-R%C3%A9my_Homand)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Passerelle Base de Plein Air de Cergy Pontoise P1030534.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Barges in Paris P1000596.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
I placed a Category:River locks discussion in the village pump
[edit]Today a new category Category:River locks was introduced. I wonder if this is a useful category, as we already have Canal locks and it is not so simple to categorise locks in rivers with a parallel lock canal. Please transfer this item to another discussion forum when appropriate. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- Transferred to Commons:Categories_for_discussion --Stunteltje (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa arcachonnaise P1050162.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! River floating dry dock P1050226.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal d'Orléans P1050352.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dune du pyla 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of la Genevraye P1050471.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Le Loing a Nemours P1050502.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Tugboat in ... Morbihan, Finistère
[edit]L'affectation des remorqueurs change régulièrement. L'Abeille Languedoc est je crois basé à La Rochelle. La catégorie créée ne me semble pas très pérenne. Le port d'attache pourrait être également utilisé mais il est souvent peu significatif (Brest pour l'Abeille Languedoc). Pline (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Bonjour Pline,
- je suis nouveau sur Commons (pas sur Wikipédia France) donc je ne maîtrise pas forcément les ficelles de la catégorisation des illustrations. Je n'ai pas inventé le rangement que j'ai fait mais ai copié la catégorisation des bateaux de pêche (exemple : Category:Trawlers in Charente-Maritime). Le nom de la catégorie dit "in Charente-Maritime", donc on parle ici de localisation du bateau et non pas de l'origine. C'est ce que j'ai fait en me basant sur le lieu de la prise de vue et non pas sur le port d'attache du bateau.
- Je peux me tromper, ou ces catégories peuvent être superflues. Si vous estimez que c'est le cas, merci de corriger mes erreurs.
- Cordialement. Badzil (talk) 07:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal de l'Ourcq pres de Vignely P1050588.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Acheres la Foret P1050637.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Relais Herzien sur le plateau pres de Retolut P1050721.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Entree Forum des Halles et Bourse de Commerce P1060107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bourse de Commerce P1060092.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Eustache et Jardin des Halles Paris P1060104.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Eustache church Paris P1060101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Concorde Air France Musee du Bourget P1020006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image Centre spatial de Kourou
[edit]At this Image in the map symbology is the colum railtracks listed. But nowhere are any railtracks drawned. Question: are there no railtracks?
In diesem Bild ist in der Legende die Zeile Bahnline enthalten. Aber es sind nirgends Bahnlinien eingezeichnet. Frage: Gibt es da keine Bahnlinien?
Mon français n'est pas encore très bien. Je regrette.77.189.143.200 21:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ja, es gibt Bahnlinien, aber sie sind nur auf dieses Bild - File:Carte Detail port spatial de Kourou.svg - mit mehr details, aufgezeichnet. Pline (talk) 22:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! P1080469.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal de l'Ourcq a Bondy P1080487.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Place Henri-Frenay P1070112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal de l Ourccq pres de Claye Souilly P1080301.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour Solidor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windmill de Choix near Gastins Seine et Marne P1080838.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Confluence du Mort et de l'Orge à Villiers sur Orge P1090246.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Axe majeur P1100061.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise de Rampillon P1100388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église de Saint Loup de Naud P1100431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roofs of Bonnieux Provence France P1110634 14-06-2011 10-24-52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ménerbes P1110794 14-06-2011 13-48-52 14-06-2011 13-48-52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Les Taillades Provence France P1110929 14-06-2011 16-02-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Medieval fortifications of Provins P1120608.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Medieval fortifications of Provins P1120605.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise-de-Saint-Hilliers-P1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Photos moches
[edit]Eh bien désolée, on m'a quasiment sommée d'importer mes vieilles photos de MH, alors je l'ai fait. Si elles ne te plaisent pas, propose-les à la suppression, que veux-tu que je te dise ? Ce n'est pas facile de prendre un soleil levant à travers un bâtiment quand il fait froid, qu'on est fatigué, qu'il n'y a rien pour s'appuyer et que l'appareil photo n'est pas de très grande qualité. Si tu les juges indigne de commons, supprime-les. Je n'ai jamais prétendu être une photographe professionnelle. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Je n'exige rien, mais comme, au fil du temps, comme le nombre de photos ratées du même sujet se multipliait (il y en a quand même une soixantaine), je me suis inquiété .... Puis ca fait un peu tache pour les contributeurs français dans le cadre d'une compétition amicale européenne. Par ailleurs la présence d'un grand nombre de photos non utilisables est un des facteurs qui contribue à rendre le contenu de Commons plus difficilement exploitable avec le temps. --Pline (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Avec des termes tels que « pellicule foirée » ou le fait de parler directement d'« une soixantaine de photo ratée », je pense que les limites de l'amabilité ont été dépassées. Quant au nombre, il n'y a pas de murs limitant la quantité sur Commons. Pour moi, les participations d'Harmonia ne sont pas un problème. Ton attitude l'est d'avantage et j'espère pour tout contributeur à Commons que cela n'est pas une habitude chez toi. Trizek here or on fr:wp 18:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Objectivement, oui : libre à chacun de faire. Mais je lui dis gentiment que pour avoir toutes ses chances, il faudrait mieux en sélectionner quelques unes. Tu as raté le coche. Trizek here or on fr:wp 08:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ta réponse est un amalgame malheureux entre un incident isolé et l'ensemble de tes contributions sur lesquelles il n'y a rien à dire, bien au contraire. Pour ma part, je n'ai de reproches à te faire que sur tes remarques à Harmonia, bien trop brutales. Je ne saisis toujour spas pourquoi tu as été aussi dur, alors que tu as prouvé plus d'une fois que tu étais un contributeur de talent. Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Concernant ta réponse sur la page de Trizek, si tu as des reproches à faire à des gens fait le en face, pas indirectement. Concernant les photos moches trizek a déjà tout dit. PierreSelim (talk) 22:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ta réponse est un amalgame malheureux entre un incident isolé et l'ensemble de tes contributions sur lesquelles il n'y a rien à dire, bien au contraire. Pour ma part, je n'ai de reproches à te faire que sur tes remarques à Harmonia, bien trop brutales. Je ne saisis toujour spas pourquoi tu as été aussi dur, alors que tu as prouvé plus d'une fois que tu étais un contributeur de talent. Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:21, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Objectivement, oui : libre à chacun de faire. Mais je lui dis gentiment que pour avoir toutes ses chances, il faudrait mieux en sélectionner quelques unes. Tu as raté le coche. Trizek here or on fr:wp 08:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Avec des termes tels que « pellicule foirée » ou le fait de parler directement d'« une soixantaine de photo ratée », je pense que les limites de l'amabilité ont été dépassées. Quant au nombre, il n'y a pas de murs limitant la quantité sur Commons. Pour moi, les participations d'Harmonia ne sont pas un problème. Ton attitude l'est d'avantage et j'espère pour tout contributeur à Commons que cela n'est pas une habitude chez toi. Trizek here or on fr:wp 18:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour Pline,
Je viens de supprimer une de tes photos qui représent un bâtiment récent (un édicule Guimard). Il n'y a en effet pas de liberté de panorama en France, et même si c'est bien dommage, Commons se doit de respecter cette interdiction. Cette image sera restaurée en 2013.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Il y a déjà eu plusieurs PàS sur le sujet (dont une qui concernait spécifiquement des édicules Guimard : Commons:Deletion_requests/French_architects), donc non, il ne me semble pas nécessaire de re-repasser par une PàS.
- La photo est : File:Station Pigalle P1050879.JPG.
- Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Je ne crois pas qu'on puisse couper court à une procédure de suppression notamment en cas d'application de la clause de minimis (on ne peut pas être à la fois juge et partie dans ce domaine). Ma liste de suivi m'indique que tu as supprimé une autre photo File:Metro parís .JPG. Vu son nom je vais avoir un peu de mal à la retrouver dans mes archives. Est ce que je suis à l'origine de son chargement ou est ce que je suis simplement intervenu en modif ? Les droits de Guimard tombent dans 6 mois, faut peut-être pas non plus faire de zèle ... --Pline (talk) 11:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Tu veux sérieusement prétendre au de minimis pour une photo dont le titre et le sujet principal est l'objet illégalement représenté ? Si c'est le cas, je veux bien restaurer et lancer un PàS mais il est très peu probable que l'issue soit la conservation.
- Pour File:Metro parís .JPG, tu as juste faire une catégorisation.
- Aux dernières nouvelles, Hector huimard est mort 20 mai 1942. Ses œuvres ne sont donc pas dans le domaine public avant le 1er janvier 2013, soit dans 15 mois.
- Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Je ne crois pas qu'on puisse couper court à une procédure de suppression notamment en cas d'application de la clause de minimis (on ne peut pas être à la fois juge et partie dans ce domaine). Ma liste de suivi m'indique que tu as supprimé une autre photo File:Metro parís .JPG. Vu son nom je vais avoir un peu de mal à la retrouver dans mes archives. Est ce que je suis à l'origine de son chargement ou est ce que je suis simplement intervenu en modif ? Les droits de Guimard tombent dans 6 mois, faut peut-être pas non plus faire de zèle ... --Pline (talk) 11:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise de Themericourt et ancienne croix du cimetière P1120428 14-07-2011 14-06-51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Laon Liszt
[edit]Salut.
- Mes grands-parents s'étant mariés dans cette église (et je possède leur maison à 15km), je suis toujours intéressé et ému par les images de cette Cathédrale de Laon qui couronne si bien sa montagne.
- J'ai donc examiné avec intérêt ton image et sa légende, et n'ayant pas trouvé de musicien se nommant "Litz", j'ai pensé que tu voulais parler de Liszt (je ne parle pas non plus le magyar...). J'ai donc modifié en conséquence, avec les liens. J'ai aussi mis le lien pour le "stub" de l'orchestre "Les Siècles".
- J'espère ne pas avoir commis d'erreur.
- Amitiés asiniennes, --Jebulon (talk) 15:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- PS, pour info, le concert ayant eu lieu le 9 septembre, ta photo doit dater du 8.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orgue et rosace ouest de la cathédrale de Laon DSC 0185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porte de Soissons Laon DSC 0689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cloitre de l'ancienne abbaye-S-Martin de Laon DSC 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cloitre de l'ancienne abbaye-S-Martin de Laon DSC 0638.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Icone serbe de la Sainte-Face conservée dans la cathedrale de Laon DSC 0152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Intérieur de l'église de l'abbaye Notre-Dame du Bec-DSC 0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Remparts de Provins format jpg DSC 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel de la Coquille a Provins DSC 0239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont Wilson a Tours DSC 0461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roche du Sault a Villecerf utilise pour l escalade sur bloc DSC 0335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chaire et ancienne grille du choeur de la collégiale Saint-Quiriace de Provins format jpg DSC 0179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Pline,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vitrail Collégiale Saint-Gervais-Saint-Protais de Gisors .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Installation du port de Rouen près du pont de Brotone DSC 0218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dock flottant dans le port de Rouen DSC 0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferry of La Bouille on Seine River DSC 0104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse 55 de Saint Eau DSC 0424.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal de Bourgogne vers Pouillenay DSC 0187.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont Gissey sur Ouche DSC 0412.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal entre Commissey et Tonnerre DSC 0379.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint Vinnemer DSC 0340.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port au niveau de Marolles sous Ligneres DSC 0420.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont à Cry sur Armençon DSC 0172.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lac de Der DSC 0062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal de la Morge DSC 0401.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse vers Percey DSC 0445.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nacelle Audouin Dollfus DSC 0204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--Vera (talk) 12:18, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vitrail-eglise-Ceffonds-193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Voie verte
[edit]Bonjour Pline. Merci pour ton travail de catégorisation des voies vertes (au passage, il n'y a plus de majuscule). Il reste cepedant une petite incertitude à régler aussi avec Coyau: la redirection de Category:Voie Verte. La question est: une voie verte est-elle dans 100% des cas une ancienne voie ferrée ? Si oui, la redirection est justifiée, sinon, il faut inclure la 1ère dans la 2ème. Je laisse ce message aussi chez Coyau. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Tout ce qui suit ne concerne que le territoire français. Une voie verte est un aménagement cyclable qui répond à un cahier des charges défini par des instances françaises. Une ancienne voie ferrée lorsqu'elle est aménagée donne souvent lieu à l'aménagement d'une voie cyclable mais peut faire place à chemin interdit aux vélos. Si c'est une voie cyclable, elle peut répondre au cahier des charges des voies vertes (le plus souvent) ou non. Le fait que le terme voie verte ne figure pas dans l'intitulé de la piste cyclable ne veut pas dire que la piste en question n'est pas une Voie verte. Site de référence malheureusement pas toujours à jour Pline (talk) 10:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse amont de Pont d'Ouche sur le canal de Bourgogne DSC 0572.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse canal de Bourgogne entre Veuvey sur Ouche et la Forge DSC 0578.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse du canal de Bourgogne du Banet entre Gissey sur Ouche et Sainte Marie sur Ouche DSC 0635.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc Buffon a Montbard DSC 0011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse situee a l aval de Fleurey sur Ouche sur le canal de Bourgogne DSC 0659.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse canal de Bourgogne entre Veuvey et la Forge DSC 0590.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison éclusière sur le canal de Bourgogne a Courcelles lès Montbard DSC 0407.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pigeoonier et chenil de l'abbaye de Fontenay DSC 0149.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
map of russia -> 1945
[edit]hello,
there is a little bug in your map: Alaska is sold to USA in 1867 (and not 1876). Sincerely yours. Thomas Goussu
- Corrigé. Done Pline (talk) 12:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nord est paris vu depuis le dome du Sacré Coeur DSC 0239.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sud-de-Paris-vu-depuis-le-dôme du Sacré-Cœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont d'Arcole et Hotel de ville de Paris DSC 0046.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of Paris North west from the dome of Sacré Coeur DSC 0047.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rue Lamarck haut de la butte Montmartre DSC 0410.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris view from Sacre Coeur DSC 0371.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse pres de Bazolles DSC 0707.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Charolais dans le Nivernais DSC 0553.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau-de-Villemolin-DSC 0466.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse de Marcy DSC 0577.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crue de l'Yonne pres de Crain DSC 0361-001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paysages du Morvan DSC 0493.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison-de-1328-a-Cravant-DS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau-de-Villemolin-0484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grain sur Paris DSC 0154.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Nivernais DSC 0726.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port de Sardy-les-Epiry sur le canal du Nivernais DSC 0598.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise de l'abbaye St Germain à Auxerre DSC 0007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse sur le canal du Nivernais près de Sardy-les-Epiry DSC 0604.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Echelle d'écluses sur le canal du Nivernais pres de Sardy lès EpiryDSC 0637.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Anguison à Corbigny DSC 0544.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! TER a la Gare de Chatel-Censoir DSC 0322.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Anguison a Corbigny DSC 0406.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale d'Auxerre DSC 0010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fosse-Dionne-a-Tonnerre-DSC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Château de Tanlay DSC 0236.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bazolles et le canal du Nivernais DSC 0716.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau de Tanlay DSC 0211.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Abbaye St Leonard a Corbigny DSC 0414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapelle St Georges Pacy Sur Armançon DSC 0341.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse pres de Panneçot DSC 0869.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Denis de Merry-sur-Yonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amphibie utilisé par les mytiliculteurs de la baie du Mont st Michel DSC 0337.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vieux gréement au port de Cancale DSC 0383.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vieux gréement à Cancale DSC 0388.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Barrage sur le Couesnon au Mont St Michel DSC 0312.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mairie de Courtils DSC 0172.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moteur d avion SALMSON type P9 1915 DSC 0077.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mont St Michel DSC 0212.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mont Saint-Michel DSC 0203.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vieux gréement à Cancale DSC 0386.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mont St Michel Attention aux moutons DSC 0155.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse sur le Canal du Rhone au Rhin vers Bretagne DSC 0374.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Usine Solvay a Tavaux DSC 0629.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Silos sur la Saône pres de Esbarres DSC 0668.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway Mulhouse DSC 0107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway-Mulhaouse-DSC 0047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway Mulhouse DSC 0098.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway Mulhouse DSC 0165.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau de Sully sur Loire DSC 0143.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau-de-Sully-sur-Loire-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau de Sully sur Loire DSC 0098.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port fluvial de Saint-Jean de Losne DSC 0658.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bras du Doubs à l'Isle sur le Doubs DSC 0812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau de Sully sur Loire DSC 0188.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porte-St-Jean du chateau de Chateau-Thierry-DSC 0007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau-de-Sully-DSC 0182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway de Reims pres de la gare DSC 0257.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway de Reims pres de la gare DSC 0252.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parc scientifique du Près-la-Rose sur l'Allan a Montbéliard DSC 0563.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau de Sully DSC 0152.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse de Mont Saint Père sur la Marne DSC 0079.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vallée de la Marne vers Courcelles DSC 0121.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La montagne de Reims DSC 0226.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise de Ceffonds DSC 0167.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vignoble vers Courcelles DSC 0124.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway de Reims pres de la gareDSC 0248.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise de Verneuil Marne DSC 0132.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vignobles de Champagne pres d Ay DSC 0267.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vignobles de Champagne pres d Ay DSC 0204.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pulvérisateur pour vignes DSC 0249.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Marne a Dormans DSC 0117.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ecluse sur le canal du Rhone au Rhin près de l'usine Solvay de Tavaux DSC 0626.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fontaine place de la Révolution a Besançon DSC 0254.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Allan vers Fesches le Chatel DSC 0449.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Le Doubs vers Audelange DSC 0575.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Le Doubs a Dole DSC 0611.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Usine Solvay a Tavaux DSC 0632.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison Loewenfels a Mulhouse DSC 0125.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Yonne à Villeneuve sur Yonne DSC 0422.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Poterne de Moret-sur-Loing DSC 0022.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont de Moret sur Loing et Porte de Bourgogne DSC 0018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port de Larros DSC 0044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port de Larros DSC 0056.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Voilier dans le port de Larros DSC 0032.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taichi plage Pereire Arcachon DSC 0089.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Voilier dans le port de Larros DSC 0026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Baignade surveillée a la TesteDSC 0158.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eglise-de-Nonville-DSC 0071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Piste cyclable a Arcachon DSC 0120.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Port de Larros a sec DSC 0023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau d Eguilly DSC 0044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chateau d Eguilly DSC 0050.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maison a Arcachon DSC 0149.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 août 0209 Canal vers St Urbain Maconcourt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 août 0412 Pont-canal sur la Marne à Foulain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 août 10395 la Bèze à Mirebeau sur Bèze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 août 0330 écluse Choignes canal Marne Saone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 août 0400 Pont-levant sur le canal à Luzy sur Marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image du jour Wiki Loves Monuments 2012
[edit]Your picture File:2012 10248 Chateau de Fontaine-Française.jpg has been selected by the volunteers of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 in France as picture of the day from the volunteers of 1 September 2012.
|
--PierreSelim (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 Eglise-de-Seine-sur-Vingeanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 10353 Chateau-de-Rosieres-à-Seine-sur-Vingeanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0191-Chateau-de-Oigny-en-Valois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0170 Mausolée du général Charpentier à Oigny en Valois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0208-Hôtel-de-Ville-de-Villers-Cotterêts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0281 La Ferté Millon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0335 Abbaye-Notre-Dame-de-Lieu-Restauré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0346 Chapelle-de-Pondron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 10176 Commanderie de la Romagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0248-enceinte-fortifiée-du-Château-de-Noüe-à-Villers-Cotterets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0229-Eglise-St-Nicolas-de-Villers-Cotterêts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0092-Chateau-de-La-Ferté-Millon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012
[edit]Bonjour et merci pour ta participation à Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.
Je viens de remarquer que tu as téléchargé le fichier File:2012--DSC 0545-Eglise-de-Martainville.jpg sans l'inclure dans le concours. Pourtant cette église est bien un monument historique. Cet oubli est-il volontaire ?
Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 07:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Toutes mes excuses, j'ai regardé un peu trop rapidement. J'ai confondu Martainville (Eure) avec Martainville-Épreville (Saine-Maritime) et je me suis laissé abusé par le modèle Mérimée utiliser sur le fichier, désolé.
- Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0164-Eglise-de-Bézu-la-Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0302-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0236-Eglise-de-Beauficel-en-Lyons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0605-Chateau--de-Martainville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0320-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Description photos abbaye
[edit]Bonjour, Pline. Ne t'en fais pas : je ne demande aucune justification (de quel droit d'ailleurs ?). Ma remarque n'était qu'une suggestion qui peut permettre un vote plus facile (!) et, peut-être, un choix plus simple pour d'éventuels utilisateurs. Je me heurte parfois au même problème, faisant moi aussi mes photos au hasard de mes déplacements, lesquels se font à pied ou... en voiture ! -- Cordialement. JLPC (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0416-Le-manoir-de-Colmont-et-'église-St-Etienne-a-Perriers-sur-Andelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 DSC 0265 Eglise de Lyons la Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0476-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0206-Eglise-de--Fleury-la-Foret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0311-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0365-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0179-Eglise-de-Bézu-la-Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0341-Abbaye-de-Mortemer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0523-Maison--a-Ry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Abbaye de Mortemer
[edit]Même si je suis long à la détente, une question au sujet de ta photo en discussion : n'as-tu pas utilisé un "high-pass filter" qui a été enregistré en léger décalage avec la photo ? Cela m'est déjà arrivé et j'ai l'impression que le léger trait qu'on voit sur la gauche tout au long du bâtiment est un indice. Rien de sûr toutefois : si tu juges que ça en vaut la peine et si tu as conservé l'original, tu peux, éventuellement, vérifier et modifier. -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- J'utilise effectivement les fonctions du logiciel photo notamment pour corriger le contraste mais je ne pense pas que cela ait pu laisser des traces de ce type. Peux tu me rappeler la photo concernée ? --Pline (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0029-Croix-de-St-Denis-le-Ferment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0020-Eglise-de-St-Denis-le-Ferment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0073-Halle-de-Lyons-la-Forêt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0239-Pigeonnier-du-chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0254-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0248-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0500-Eglise-abbatiale-abbaye-de-St-Germain-a-Auxerre-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0302-Tour-de-l'Horloge-à-Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0466-Abbaye-de-Saint-Germain-a-Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0389-23-rue-de-la-Fécauderie--a-Auxerre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012 10254 Chateau de Fontaine-Française.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2012--DSC 0178-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Pline, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
--PierreSelim (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Je t'ai envoyé un mail il y a 8 jours pour la cérémonie de remise des prix. Je crois que tu n'y as pas encore répondu, tu peux vérifier dans ta boîte mail que tu l'as bien reçu ? Merci, GuillaumeG (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Yet another price from Wiki Loves Monuments
[edit]Bonjour :) Un petit message pour t'annoncer que File:2012--DSC 0178-Chateau-de-Vascoeuil.jpg vient de gagner le prix "MH privé" de Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Léna (talk) 09:17, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Palais-de-Tokyo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bob247 (talk) 02:53, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vierge à l'enfant de Jean-Jacques Caffieri Eglise Saint-Antoine a Compiegne DSC 0276.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tramway-line-T3B-in-Paris-near-canal-de-l'Ourcq-DSC 0048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
WLM Barnstar
[edit]