User talk:Petebutt/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 04.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 04.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 03.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 02.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Super Constellation crash Belize International 19 May 1976 01.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Taff O'Dea F-G hide Belize 1979.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Taff O'Dea F-G hide Belize 1979.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Taff O'Dea F-G hide Belize 1979.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:VC10 Big White Gozzome Bird.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:VC10 Big White Gozzome Bird.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:VC10 Big White Gozzome Bird.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 23:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Williamson Hangar RAF Belize 1979.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Williamson Hangar RAF Belize 1979.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Williamson Hangar RAF Belize 1979.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 23:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Please use sub-categories
––Apalsola t • c 20:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- That is what Iam trying to do. It is not always obvious which sub-category an aircraft category might be in, so ALL aircraft categories should be in the manufacturer category, other sub-categories are incidental!! The over-categorisation is due to others creating unnecessary sub-categories--Petebutt (talk) 06:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Petebutt: Edits like this one create COM:OVERCAT violations for no discernible purpose. The category already has been placed in the relevant sub-category Category:Douglas military aircraft, so placing it also at Category:Douglas aircraft serves no purpose. Apalsola (talk · contribs) is right to point the correct method to use. If you feel a category is unnecessary, us Commons:CfD to discuss and resolve it. Josh (talk) 02:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Nonsense edits
Hello. Yet a couple of such things as Revision of Category:Mikulin piston aircraft engines and I’ll request your account to be blocked indefinitely. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
As has been explained to you on multiple occasions, "Unidentified" and other maintenance categories exist for clear reasons - to help images get labelled, described and categorized properly. Yet you persist with edits like this, this, and this. It's really a shame, because you have substantial knowledge about aircraft and I wish you would simply contribute constructively. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Themightyquill: instead of waiting 6 months for yet another burst of category disruption (see the thread immediately above), I propose an indefinite topic ban on any changes to pages already existing in the Category: space. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- IMHO #Nonsense edits in certain categories can’t fix some other nonsense by third parties. The user may be admitted to the [edit] button, and even could be permitted to categorize files, but I don’t expect any mild solution—short of categorical (pun intended) prohibition to touch anything in the namespace 14 with possible exception for red categories—to have merit. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Any chance of repeating that in English?--Petebutt (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
File:Junkers Ju 287 V2 top-view silhouette.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Extrapolaris (talk) 01:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
Drawings and images of the Junkers Ju 287 V2
I recently got copies of the books Junkers Ju 287: The World's First Swept-Wing Jet Aircraft by Horst Lommel and Jet Planes of the Third Reich: The Secret Projects, Volume 2 by Manfred Griehl, and even though some historical Nazi aviation sources considered the EF 131 to be the same as the Junkers Ju 287 V2/V3 and the Junkers Ju 287 V3 to be the armed prototype, the drawing that the Airwar.ru website on the Ju 287 identifies as the Ju 287 V2 actually depicts the Ju 287 V3, because drawings and photos of the Ju 287 V2 on pages 51 and 70-74 of Lommel's book clearly show that it had the same airframe as the Ju 287 V1 except that it was powered by six turbojets, the tailwheel was removed, and the horizontal stabilizer was set 30 cm lower. The Ju 287 V3 indeed had the same airframe as the Ju 287A-1 but lacked armament, and the drawing labeled as the Junkers Ju 287 V3 at the Airwar.ru link on the Ju 287 actually is of the Ju 287A-2, because the Ju 287A-2 was to have two of its six Junkers Jumo 004s mounted on the sides of the fuselage, and the remaining four mounted in pairs below the wings.
As a side note, three more prototypes of the Junkers Ju 287 were ordered, of which V5 was to be the first armed Ju 287 prototype, and the V4 was to be the prototype of the Ju 287A-2 (see page 293 of Griehl's book).
Therefore, you may want to upload images from Lommel and Griehl's books of the Junkers Ju 287 V2 before and after being destroyed by the Germans to avoid capture by the Allies. That said, even though the EF 131 was a different plane than the Junkers Ju 287 V2 in having armament, the V2 did not have the same airframe as the production Ju 287 or EF 131 an instead had the same airframe as the first Ju 287 prototype.Extrapolaris (talk) 02:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
- Why are these images put up for deletion by a known sockpuppet?--Petebutt (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The image I nominated for deletion comes from a web link that's no longer active. Also, the image was incorrectly labeled Ju 287 V2 when in fact it is of the Ju 287 V3. You can inform Greg Goebel that the image I've nominated for deletion that he created actually depicts the Ju 287 V3 because the V2 had the same airframe as the V1.Extrapolaris (talk) 02:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian
Important message for file movers
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)