User talk:Paris 16/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 21:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 21:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:People_of_Paris_needing_categories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Notre Dame, Paris, France. Aerial view.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

ComputerHotline (talk) 09:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Chéries-Chéris & Sébastien Lifshitz (Les Invisibles) débat dans le salle 300 (8077185217).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Queryzo (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Embassy of Australia, Paris 13 December 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Eppstein (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Historical images by Paolo Monti

Hi Paris 16, thank you for your interest in our work in bringing the photos by Paolo Monti into all Wikimedia projects. We noticed you changed the standard category Category:Historical images of France by Paolo Monti to Category:Photographs of France by Paolo Monti. Unfortunately this is not compliant to the standards we used with the other images in the Paolo Monti Archive on Commons (17.000 photos!), accordingly to the existing categories of Commons we found in any other city (we added about 100 categories "Historical images of ... by Paolo Monti", as sub-categories of the existing "Historical images of ..."). So I'm sorry, but we need to revert few of your edits on the images of Paris by Monti. I wish to propose you the alternative to move the photos into a new and more specific Category:Historical photographs of Paris by Paolo Monti. Let me know what alternative you prefer, and thanks you for your patience and collaboration. --Marcok (talk) 10:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Je comprends pas pourquoi ils chargent ces photos. La plupart ne sont pas localisées et n'ont aucun intérêt encyclopédique. Mais je charge des photos d'Italie ces temps ci et j'en ai trouvé là des aussi tartes. Et impossible d'espérer les faire supprimer vu les frilosités des admins. Et en plus, ils sont plusieurs à charger tout ça. C'est pas l'idée d'un contributeur isolé. --Tangopaso (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
En fait @Tangopaso: il s'agit, à ce jour, de la plus grande donation de photos sous license libre d'un artiste reconnu à Commons, dans le cadre du projet BEIC. C'est normal qu'ils soient plusieurs à y travailler! :) Tu trouveras tous les clichés sur Category:Photographs by Paolo Monti.
Ce que Marcok voulait savoir c'est pourquoi les images relativement anciennes (années '50,'60,'70) ne sont pas placées dans una catégorie à part, dénotée par "Historical images of ...", comme on fait sur Commons pour tous les autres pays? --Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Ce n'est pas parce que des photos sont anciennes ou la plus grande donation de photos sous license libre d'un artiste reconnu à Commons qu'elles ont un intérêt encyclopédique. J'en ai recatégorisé certaines en Italie dans les Cinque Terre. Je persiste à dire que leur intérêt encyclopédique est nul, notamment parce que leur environnement (quelle ville ? Où dans la ville ?) est inconnu. Je ne suis pas admin de Commons (et ne souhaite pas l'être). Mais la majorité des photos de Paolo Monti devraient être à mon sens supprimées. Car dans les Cinque Terre ou à Paris, on ne sait pas où elles ont été prises. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Je doute que ce soit une raison valable pour la suppression des photos (mais un admin t'en dira plus), de plus celles-ci sont encore en cours de catégorisation. Celles que j'ai rencontré ont une catégorie très générique, qui s'affinera dans le futur; mais dire qu'elles "ne sont pas encyclopédiques" est équivalent à éliminer les quatre cinquièmes neuf dixièmes du contenu de Commons :D
En redevenant sérieux, "encyclopédique" ne veut pas dire "catégorisé", sinon tu jetterais à la poubelle tout le travail de Fae, par exemple, qui n'est pratiquement pas catégorisé au départ. Je t'invite donc, comme tu as fait et comme j'ai fait aussi, de faire le possible pour rendre ces images précieuses pour le projet (car fruit d'une longue négociation pour les obtenir) facilement joignables et utilisables en les catégorisant le mieux possible… comme j'ai fait aussi. C'est un travail crispant parfois, je le comprends, mais ça fait partie du travail dans un projet collaboratif. --Ruthven (msg) 17:06, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Je suis d'accord. Je catégorise patiemment, notamment aussi les images dans la category to be checked. Je ne propose pas leur suppression, car de toute façon elle ne serait pas acceptée. Mais je pense que Commons croule sous les images sans intérêt. Qu'est-ce que ça deviendra dans 10 ans ? Un fond d'images exceptionnelles avec, je suis d'accord sur la proportion, 9/10 de photos sans intérêts ou de contenu indéterminé. Je pense qu'il y aura une grosse opération de ménage.--Tangopaso (talk) 18:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Salle des bronzes antiques au Louvre

Bonjour,
Je t'informe que j'ai chargé dans Commons File:Salle des Terres cuites du musée Napoléon III au Louvre.jpg, comparable au File:Musée Napoléon III.jpg que tu as chargé. Parce que mon fichier a une plus grande définition que le tien (sinon, je ne me serais pas permis). Le tableau se trouve dans le nouveau centre d'interprétation du pavillon de l'Horloge. Le nom du fichier est celui du panneau d'information. Et ce panneau donne Charles Giraud comme peintre (et pas ceux que tu as indiqués). Mais je n'en sais pas plus. Amitiés. --Tangopaso (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Salut Tangopaso! Je sais rien du tout. Les deux noms que j'ai indiqués, j'ai les trouve dans le web du Louvre. Mais Charles Giraud, qui était avocat ou quelqu'un d'autre?--Paris 16 (talk) 13:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Non, un homonyme : fr:Sébastien Charles Giraud. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Untitled (Picasso) - Sans titre (Picasso) - 1998 - Maurizio Cattelan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Pourquoi vouloir supprimer des images 3D par une image 2D

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que tu avais créé des images 2D extraites d'images stéréoscopique (3D). Sur le principe, il n'y a rien contre et c'est aussi plus facile à utiliser comme illustrations. Mais pourquoi les images d'origines ont-elles été marqué pour remplacement ? C'est de la perte d'information puisque l'on passe de 3D à 2D. Comment enlever la mention fichier remplacé ? Liste des images concernées :

--AliothdeMegrez (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

De ce que j'en sais, la mention le fichier à été déplacé (superseded) est excessive. C'est plutôt il est recommandé d'aller voir l'autre fichier. Ce qui est à mon sens justifié car le fichier 2D est plus lisible. Mais le fichier originel (ici le 3D) ne sera pas supprimé. ----Tangopaso (talk) 20:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Boutique 38 rue Bonaparte.jpg

Bonjour, vous avez nominé la photo File:Boutique 38 rue Bonaparte.jpg dont je suis l'auteur pour promotion sur la liste des Images de Qualité. Or, du fait des nombreux problèmes rencontrés, je ne souhaite pas que mes contributions soient soumises à cette procédure de nomination. En conséquence, en dépit de sa promotion, j'ai passé le statut de la photo à "Withdrawn". Je vous remercie de bien vouloir respecter ma volonté à l'avenir.--Albert Bergonzo (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Roland Garros 20140528 Suzanne Lenglen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Map of the Père-Lachaise Cemetery - OSM 2016.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good job with no mistakes. And now, we need an interactive map with the numerous famous graves !!--Jebulon 09:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Divisions of the Père-Lachaise Cemetery - OSM 2016.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Jebulon 09:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Streets in the Père-Lachaise Cemetery - OSM 2016.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support--Jebulon 09:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

File:AccorHotels Arena @ Bercy @ Paris (27693980051).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Bercy Arena entrance, Paris 16 January 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Domaine national de Saint-Cloud (27710303664).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:43, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, lNeverCry 07:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, lNeverCry 07:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, lNeverCry 07:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

This category is consistent with Template:Montibycity. It is impossible to change the category in your way without template rebuiding... This causes errors. Wieralee (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

It is OK now?--Paris 16 (talk) 10:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

NoUploads

Bonjour. Je vois que tu as retiré le modèle {{NoUploads}} ici. Soit c'est une erreur involontaire, soit tu n'es pas au fait du problème. Je t'encourage donc vivement à lire les pages indiquées dans ce modèle. Cordialement. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Belleville @ Paris (27876658623).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Belleville @ Paris (28209073650).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Belles et Buth @ Street art @ Petite Ceinture du 15ème @ Paris (29504846861).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Beaubourg @ Paris (28314172266).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:"Couic!" @ Paris (28387025982).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:"Couic!" @ Paris (28387025982).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:"Goldofuck" @ Street art @ Paris (27815204002).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:"Goldofuck" @ Street art @ Paris (27815204002).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:11, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Christian Jacq, au Salon du Livre de Paris 2013 (8594182587).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dereckson (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

P.S. J'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit d'un compte de https://www.actualitte.com/ et non du compte du photographe. Il nous faut donc une autorisation OTRS pour republier ici, il n'y a aucune raison de faire confiance à une entreprise pour ne pas enfreindre les droits d'auteur du photographe sans vérification préalable.

Fotos de Paolo Monti

Salut, je t'écris sur cette modification au template des photos de Paolo Monti organisées par ville ([1]). @Marco Chemello (BEIC): est en train de suivre le chargement de toutes les photos de Paolo Monti et modifier un template sans l'accord préalable d'autres membres de Commons (au moins de ceux qui travaillent sur le projet) peut créer de sérieux ralentissements, car il touche 17.000 photos. Les photos sont classées "historiques" car il s'agit d'une archive d'importance historique, qui couvre bonne partie du XXième siècle. Ça ferait bizarre qu'uniquement les photos de la France soient classées de manière différentes du reste du monde! :) Si tu as des suggestions donnée ta longue expérience, tant mieux et on trouve un classement meilleur, mais s'il te plais, essayons d'avancer ensemble. Merci! --Ruthven (msg) 10:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavillon Sully, Louvre Museum, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavillon de l'Horloge, Louvre Museum, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
East facade of the Pavillon Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois, Louvre Museum, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
West facade of the Pavillon Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois, Louvre Museum, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South facade of the Pavillon de Marsan, Louvre Museum, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South facade of the Aile de Marsan, Louvre Museum, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Two things:

When you nominate images for QI, try - as a matter of respect - to assess pictures from other photographers. And second, also as a matter of respect: You cannot change a image when it´s already QI! You have to use the derivate template! And have you asked the photographer if he really wants it? --Hubertl 02:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

And please (the same) do not upload images for other authors. Hopefully you asked the author. I'd found two of my images not declared as derivative or extractraction: File:Paris, Notre Dame -- 2014 -- 1466 -- Derivat.jpg, File:Paris, Notre Dame -- 2014 -- 1467 -- Derivat.jpg. I'm not happy about this and I've fixed this. May be the same here: File:Tympanum of the Portail du Jugement Dernier, 6 July 2011.jpg (by User:Alvesgaspar), File:Galerie des chimères of Notre-Dame de Paris, 20 March 2014.jpg (by User:DXR), File:Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 05 bis.jpg (by User:Kadellar), ... --XRay talk 17:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
You really think that it is useful to say nothing? --Hubertl 10:17, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Établissements publics territoriaux du Grand Paris.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Visite de la Tour Saint-Jacques, Paris août 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 16:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The 10 most expensive streets in Paris - Meilleurs Agents 2015.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support good quality. --Nikhilb239 04:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Établissements publics territoriaux du Grand Paris et trois départements.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support good quality. --Nikhilb239 04:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Question technique

Bonjour, On tente de découvrir pourquoi et depuis quand le fichier dont il est question dans Commons:Deletion requests/File:École des Chartes - Occupation de la Sorbonne de 2006.jpg ne s'affiche plus. Savez-vous s'il s'affichait correctement immédiatement après ce renommage de 2014 ? -- Asclepias (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Bibliothèque Francois Mitterand à Paris August 16, 2009 n2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.204.122.134 17:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Bibliothèque nationale de France Site Tolbiac R0010882-35.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.204.122.134 17:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Arc de triomphe du carrousel in Paris France.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arc de triomphe du carrousel in Paris France.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Exposition La Pente de la rêverie à La maison Victor Hugo (8).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

File:La Régulière, Paris 25 November 2016 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 17:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 23:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Transfert d'images de Paris depuis Flickr

Bonjour Paris 16,
Il me semble que tu ne devrais pas charger toutes ces images de Paris depuis Flickr :

  • La plupart ne sont que des ajouts de monuments déjà beaucoup (trop) photographiés comme la tour Eiffel et l'arc de triomphe.
  • Certaines sont des photos d'oeuvre d'art qui enfreignent la non liberté de panorama en France.
  • Ces photos n'ont pas de descriptions autres que des successions de mots-clés.
  • Elles ne sont pas catégorisées. Le travail de recatégorisation sera très lourd et inutile pour les monuments déjà beaucoup photograhiés. C'est casse-pied de chercher de quel coté la tour Eiffel est photographiée pour la mettre dans la bonne catégorie.

Certaines des photos sont intéressantes, comme celles de l'immeuble Lavirotte que j'ai recatégorisées. Mais il me semble que tu ne devrais charger que ces photos vraiment intéressantes. En soignant la description (nom immeuble, arrondissement) et la catégorisation. Qu'en penses-tu ? --Tangopaso (talk) 22:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Salut Tangopaso!

  • Je pense que la valeur des photos n'est pas que "ou", mais aussi "quand". Donc, nous sommes toujours bienvenues les photos de la tour Eiffel and l'arc de triomphe.
  • C'est ma faute. Je suis deja passe les photos des récent bâtiment, mais quelquefois j'ai oublie.
  • La plupart des photos des Guilhem Vellut (Flickr) ont bien nomme et on peux les catégoriser. Et on peux aussi voir les panneau, lex plaque... pour savoir le lieu des photos.

D'apres moi, la plupart des photos des Guilhem Vellut sont intéressantes. Pour toi, un parisien, les photos des restaurants, des magasins... sont "boring", mais les étrangers ne pensent pas ça.--Paris 16 (talk) 04:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Wouaw ! Je suis impressionné ! Tu as recatégorisé (de façon très précise) toutes les photos de la Category:Paris ! Il y en avait encore plus de 400 il y a quelques jours, c'est vraiment du (bon) boulot. J'en avais recatégorisé certaines, vers la tour Eiffel ou des parcs et jardins. Puis j'avais renoncé, car toi et panoramio-bot chargaient de nouvelles photos aussi vite que je les recatégorisais. J'ai aussi demandé la suppression d'autres qui à mon sens (mais ca se discute) violent la non liberté de panorama. Je reste sceptique sur l'intérêt des photos de monuments déjà beaucoup photographiés, mais je respecte ton opinion. Félicitations ! --Tangopaso (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tangopaso (talk) 12:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tangopaso (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Gare Haussmann - Saint-Lazare @ Paris (31301504852).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 13:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Pont des Arts @ Flood @ Seine river @ Paris (26843276384).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Street art @ Paris (31410228706).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 21:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Kraken @ Street art @ Les Halles @ Paris (27576156024).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 21:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Eiffel Tower in 2009 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Compare your lives to mine and then kill yourselves! 🍺💲🚬 08:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Eiffel Tower at night, July 27, 2009.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

That's all I'm programmed to do! 🍺💲🚬 11:37, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Eiffel Tower and Front de Seine quarter from Pont Mirabeau, 12 April 2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

That's all I'm programmed to do! 🍺💲🚬 11:38, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Eiffel Tower at night, July 27, 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:53, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tangopaso (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Fondation Louis Vuitton @ Paris (28348854936).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feu d'artifice 14 juillet 2014 - Paris (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I'll have to check my program 🍺💲🚬 16:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feu d'artifice 14 juillet 2014 - Paris (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I'll have to check my program 🍺💲🚬 16:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Feu d'artifice du 14 juillet 2014 - Tour Eiffel (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I'll have to check my program 🍺💲🚬 16:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Musée d'Orsay 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Paris (31114842605).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Paris (25529918216).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Paris (14601581464).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

#invoke:Autotranslate Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

File:BnF (Bibliothèque nationale de France) - Salon du Livre de Paris 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Remi Mathis (talk) 12:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Taivo ([[User talk:Taivo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Catégorie Les Berges de Seine

Bonjour,

Pourriez vous me dire pourquoi vous avez créé la catégorie "Les Berges de Seine" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Les_Berges_de_Seine). Elle me semble inutile et redondante avec la catégorie mère "Banks of the Seine in Paris". En effet, Banks = Berges et l'anglais prime sur Commons (si j'ai bien compris). Ne devrait-on pas la supprimer ?

Cordialement, --Liozone ([[User talk:Liozone|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Salut! Les Berges de Seine is Promenade des Berges de la Seine, not Banks of the Seine in Paris.--Paris 16 ([[User talk:Paris 16#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Paris 16. I see you working with Paris-related things fairly often, so I thought I'd ask you about this. Can you tell me what is wrong with the names of the files in this category? Thanks. --Auntof6 ([[User talk:Auntof6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello ! I am also working sometimes on the photos of Paris and I try to answer to your question about photos in Category:Files of Paris with bad file names.

--Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup, Template:Ping. Would it be OK if I rename some of them? (I have the filemover right.) Are there specific names or name formats that are wanted? I don't think I'd try renaming all the types you list, maybe just the ones that don't say what they show. --Auntof6 ([[User talk:Auntof6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping For me there are no rules for the file names of Paris. It should be nice to rename with the object of the photo. When the name of the object is already use as a file name, you may add into the file name the date of the photo D20170110 for example. But it should be nice also to categorize when it is not done. I would prefer to wait for the advice of User:Paris 16, the owner of the present page. He makes a great job by uploading photos from Flickr, and then rename and recategorize. Friendly yours and thanks for your interest to Paris. --Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping For me, the rule is: "What" + "where" + "when". For example: Chez Paul restaurant, Montmartre, Paris 30 December 2016.jpg. And thank Tangopaso!--Paris 16 ([[User talk:Paris 16#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll keep that in mind if I rename any. I don't know about the date, though. Many people put the upload date instead of the date a photo was taken, so I don't always trust the indicated date. --Auntof6 ([[User talk:Auntof6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:03, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa ([[User talk:Civa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Chargement de photos de Paris (encore...)

Bonjour, Paris 16,
Je te signale que certaines photos que tu as chargées soi disant de Paris n'en sont pas. Certaines dont le nom commence par Paris img4xx. La cathédrale de img400 et 423 n'est pas Notre-Dame. Je pense que c'est Reims. La statue de Jeanne d'Arc de img420 n'est pas celle de la place des Pyramides. Il y a aussi des photos de la galerie des glaces à Versailles (img408) ou de la place du Chateau (img469).
Je suppose que c'est un touriste qui a fait un séjour en France et a tout chargé sous le nom de Paris.
A quoi servent ces chargements de tombereaux d'images de monuments déjà trop photographiés (pour lesquels on ne trouvera pas de category assez fines pour les classer), de portes ou de rues anonymes de Paris que personne ne pourra jamais identifier, de sculptures qui ne respectent pas no-FoP et maintenant de photos qui ne sont même pas des photos de Paris et seront difficiles à détecter et indentifier.
Je reconnais que dans le tas des photos chargées, il y en a quelques unes intéressantes.
Mais non aux chargements industriels de photos (15 à la minute !). Oui aux chargements artisanaux au coup par coup et en analysant un peu avant. --Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:15, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Tuileries Palace

Bonjour, Paris 16
Y a un rigolo qui a renommé les category Palais des Tuileries et Palais du Luxembourg en Tuileries Palace et Luxembourg Palace. A quand Cour Carrée renommée en Square Yard ??? --Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Ping Salut Tangopaso! Il y a aussi Category:Louvre Pyramid, Category:Père-Lachaise Cemetery, Category:Tuileries Garden. Si tu veux les remomer, je pense il faut ouvrir un discussion.--Paris 16 ([[User talk:Paris 16#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Non, non, je ne veux pas revenir en arrière. La règle de choix entre le français et l'anglais ne me semble pas claire. Dans l'article en:tour du coin, ils ont fait plusieurs rename en corner tower. C'est un peu débile, mais tant pis.--Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:51, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:06, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Tangopaso ([[User talk:Tangopaso|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa ([[User talk:Civa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa ([[User talk:Civa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, Thesupermat ([[User talk:Thesupermat|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Paris images from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

I've moved these to Category:Images from Metropolitan Museum of Art (Paris project) to be more specific, and to fit in the broader Category:Images from Metropolitan Museum of Art. Thanks for your uploading efforts!--Pharos ([[User talk:Pharos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, G I Chandor ([[User talk:G I Chandor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)