User talk:PBA Lille

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PBA Lille!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contacts wikimuseum

[edit]

Bonjour je profite de cette page pour d'une part vous indiquer mon pseudo sur Commons, d'autre part montrer la manière dont on peut notifier un autre utilisateur qu'une discussion le concerne : @Lamiot: avec le code {{Notif|Lamiot}}. Cordialement, Dominique --Cbyd (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage content

[edit]
@INeverCry: Bonjour. Ce message fait-il suite à une contribution en particulier ? Ou est-ce un message automatique de "bienvenue" ? Pour information, ce compte est créé pour le compte d'une institution dans le cadre d'un GLAM, c'est donc un compte sérieux, dans l'optique d'apporter du contenu inédit et intéressant. Pas du vandalisme ! Pour toute velléité de suppression ou demande de sanction contre cet utilisateur, merci de le notifier d'abord soit à moi, soit à @Lamiot:  : nous participons au GLAM pour la partie "wiki" et nous tâchons de faire acte de pédagogie en expliquant les attentes de la communauté, pas toujours patiente avec les nouveaux... Merci également de rétablir la page utilisateur supprimée cette nuit et de d'abord discuter et expliquer ce qui fait défaut avant de faire fuir des contributeurs dès le début du projet. Je reste à votre écoute s'il faut clarifier. Cordialement. --Cbyd (talk) 09:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored it. If details about the GLAM project connection could be added, that would be helpful in avoiding any further confusion. INeverCry 19:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci !

[edit]

Thanks ! --Roxanebardin (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much to you, and all your colleagues.--F. Lamiot (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Et voilà, c'est parti pour les étudiants associés à la collecte WikiMuseum

[edit]

Remarque concernant la mini wiki-formation de ce jour : Certains étudiants n'avaient qu'un ordinateur pour deux et se sont créés un compte commun ;
Pour information : Après la mini-formation faite ce jour à la bibliothèque du Musée, je viens de demander (via leurs pages de discussion) aux étudiants inscrits sur la page préparée par D. (et dans cette situation) de se créer maintenant un compte unique et personnel, car quand ils vont importer des fichiers, le logiciel leur demandera s'ils sont l'auteur d'une image (et légalement on considère qu'il existe en général un seul auteur à une photo).
Un compte individuel sera en outre plus pratique pour l'évaluation de leur travail individuel (et collectif car ce travail est et doit plus que jamais être collaboratif).
Il faut que tout le monde inscrive bien son nom sur la page dédiée (quand toute l'équipe sera bien inscrite, on fera un beau tableau bien propre).

J'espère que tout les débutants trouveront rapidement le temps de s'entrainer un peu, notamment en téléversant quelques images sur Commons ou en corrigeant ou améliorant quelques éléments sur wikipédia ou dans la description d'une image sur Commons par exemple, et en apprenant à discuter avec un ou l'autre des collègues du projet (via les pages de discussion), sinon ils vont vite oublier ce qu'ils ont appris aujourd'hui. C'est la suggestion que j'ai fait à tous ceux qui étaient déjà inscrits ce soir.

Rappel : Nous leur avons proposé de systématiquement (quand ils téléverseront une image dans le cadre du projet) :

  1. catégoriser l'image avec attention (plusieurs catégories existantes sont possible, il y en aura à inventer tant que cela nous paraitra pertinent ;
  2. ajouter les deux lignes de code préparées par Dominique (merci à lui) dans la description des photos téléversées.

Concernant les photos du jour : il faudra faire un tri fin des photos faites ce jour pour enlever (ou flouter) les personnes prises involontairement et sélectionner les plus intéressantes.

Bonne continuation et encore merci au musée pour la préparation de la visite, de la séance en bibliothèque et le travail de l'informaticien qui a préparé le matériel.

PS, il nous faut réfléchir aux sous-catégories à créer dans commons (pas si facile dans le cas de ce GLAM car on ignore ce que la collecte va ramener. Essayons d'anticiper
--F. Lamiot (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait de Maurice Masson, un donateur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait de Augustin Ozenfant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Coupure du journal Nord-Matin.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Le personnel du musée en 1934.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Licences incorrect

[edit]

Greetings: You have uploaded a lot of photos with incorrect licenses. Work that was done by other is not own work. Images copied from other places are also not own work. Please cease uploading until you have repaired the licenses on your previously uploaded images. See COM:L for assistance, or ask for help! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niki de Saint Phalle, Nana Jaune, montage exposition Joie de Vivre, 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scénographie exposition Rubens PBA Lille 2004 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 11:51, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Please have an eye on COM:OVERCAT (do not put an image / category in the parent and the child category). Commons categories are primarily in English, so there is no need and no possibility (at the moment) to add mult-language categories (like Museu, Mostra, Museum, …). Please try to check also for non-existing categories (they are shown in red), maybe there is a typo in the category name. Check the content of even obvious categories, to avoid surprises like Category:Palais des Beaux Arts. I have already done the above changes on Category:Catalogs of the Palais des Beaux Arts de Lille. Cordialement --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atrium, exposition Sesostris III 2014-2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exposition "Avigdor Arikha".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asclepias (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo du Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille, format carré.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bloody-libu (talk) 08:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:L'affiche pour l'exposition "Berthe Morisot".jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:L'affiche pour l'exposition "Berthe Morisot".jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Affiche d'une conférence.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Affiche d'une conférence.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 22:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]