| This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content,
File:Propuesta de escudo de Hispania.svg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and
policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review
our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects:
Wikipedia,
Wikibooks,
Wikisource,
Wikinews,
Wiktionary and
Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an
alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at
Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.
--Miguels (talk) 02:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have no objections for deletion. --Oren neu dag (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
BotMultichillT 06:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Greetings!
Regarding
your file
Lukhot Habrit.svg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lukhot_Habrit.svg
the 9th comandment is WRONG written.
please see the correct version at: http://silvianguranda.evonet.ro/Lukhot_Habrit.svg
thank you!
Silvian Guranda
silvianguranda@gmail.com
78.97.175.109 13:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment, i've made the needed corrections. --Oren neu dag (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Seal_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Reverse_State_seal_of_Texas.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Iran_flag_with_emblem_1964-1979.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Bhutan_emblem.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Jordan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Flag_of_San_Francisco.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Kingdom_of_Hawaii.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
|
File:State_Seal_of_Texas.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Rocich (talk) 11:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi; you uploaded this blazon, which is a derivative work from the flag I've made. So, I think it would be, at least, nice from you to cite my contribution and, by the other hand, I do not think it is fair to reclaim rights from this blazon.
I put the flag in public domain exactly to be free to be used, but it is not right to intend copyrights of such a derivative work which almost altered nothing from the original. I strongly suggest that you reconsider the permission and put it in public domain. Cheers. --Tonyjeff (talk) 15:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- In addition, the blazon is an ancient civic/royal symbol of Portugal, in public domain for many reasons: it is ancient, it is/was an official civic symbol and it is not more being used. According to Portuguese copyrights laws no work based on such a symbol may request copyright – even if it is used as a trademark. --Tonyjeff (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
:A Note to myself: this is my true and working TUSC account. --Oren neu dag (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
- A Note to myself: this is my true and working TUSC account. --Oren neu dag (talk) 12:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
תודה תודה תודה Thanks! Thanks! Thanks! תודה רבה תודה רבה תודה רבה Thank you very much! Thank you very much! Thank you very much!--Ralile (talk) 03:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Gracias a ti también por tu trabajo. Me alegro que no te importaran mis pequeñas modificaciones, a mí también me han modificado, a veces no sienta bien por el esfuerzo realizado. Existen muchos archivos por eso no he creado otros nuevos. Te animo a continuar trabajando y también estoy dispuesto a colaborar contigo. Hay más detalles como los retoques hechos, por ejemplo, si miras las banderas y escudos de antes del siglo 18 verás que han introducido un nuevo modelo de castillo para esa época. El león que he introducido es más semejante a la heraldica y lo usan cada vez más en banderas y escudos de España del wikiproyecto.
Un buen consejo es ver las recomendaciones de User:HansenBCN (te indica que colores usar en banderas) es muy útil y consultar la web FOTW. Hace poco me he dado cuenta que las banderas quedan mejor sin líneas o con líneas de color dorado (fíjate en banderas hechas como . Exporta los colores de la bandera y el grosor y el tono dorado de las líneas con el programa y fíjate bien en los tamaños, muchas banderas españolas actuales tienen 3:5 de ancho por alto.
Espero que te sirvan como a mí estos trucos y que diseñes nuevas banderas y también mejores la calidad de las imágenes ya existentes.
Un saludo
User:Proof02 (Discusión) 20:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Yuval Y § Chat § 07:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
The File:Bandera del GRAPO.svg flag should not have two tones of red. This is a tricolor flag. The red of the star and the red of the upper part of the flag have to become exactly the same color. Please change. User:Xufanc
- Gracias por correctando me. immediatamente despues que leí tu mensaje ya subí un nuevo y fijo version del archivo. Oren neu dag (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Gracias a ti por la rapidez. User:Xufanc