User talk:Olybrius/档案/2020年

File:Grenade - Rue de l'Égalité - 20140121 (1).jpg

File:Grenade - Rue de l'Égalité - 20140121 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pourquoi colorer vos photos en sépia ?

Bonjour, quel intérêt encyclopédique voyez-vous à colorer vos photographies en sépia ? Cordialement, --FHd (talk) 20:00, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Draining_boards

Draining boards has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salamanca - Calle cerrada del Corrillo - 20160401 (1).jpg

File:Salamanca - Calle cerrada del Corrillo - 20160401 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Severed heads and penises of two Algerian men - 1956.jpg

This image appears in https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linciaggio and shouldn't be used in any Wikipedia article. This is something nobody gonna want to casually see it by mistake, especially children. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put it there but its presence on a article about lynching seems rather relevant. - Olybrius (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colomiers - Allée Maurice Ravel - 20120712 (2).jpg

File:Colomiers - Allée Maurice Ravel - 20120712 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 18:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blagnac - Rue Max Fischl - 20120307 (2).jpg

File:Blagnac - Rue Max Fischl - 20120307 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 07:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colomiers - Allée Maurice Ravel - 20120712 (1).jpg

File:Colomiers - Allée Maurice Ravel - 20120712 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 09:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clemenceau et non Clémenceau

Bonjour,
J'ai reverté vos changements sur la Category:Rue Georges Clémenceau (Vichy) et tout remis dans la Category:Rue Georges Clemenceau (Vichy) initiale qui est le bon nom de catégorie. Georges Clemenceau, contrairement à une erreur fréquente et malgré sa prononciation, s'écrit sans accent. Cdt. TCY (talk) 12:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christopher_McCandless'_abandoned_bus

Christopher McCandless' abandoned bus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

RadioKAOS (talk) 00:48, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Urban_exploration_in_Alsace

Category:Urban_exploration_in_Alsace has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

L'Oiseau Lybre (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coffeehouses vs. cafés in Seattle

I'm trying to understand what you are doing here.

In Pacific Northwest / Cascadian usage, café doesn't mean much. It can be anything from a tiny place serving coffee & pastries to a full-blown restaurant and bar. Also, despite the etymology, it might or might not be a place where you can get a decent cup of coffee: some places with café (or the Italian caffè) in their name are simply bars.

Coffeehouse, on the other hand, is much clearer: definitely centered on espresso, probably some baked goods and maybe simple meals; no hard liquor; beer & wine might be available but anyone who tried to order more than one or two per person would be told they were in the wrong place, this is "not a drinking establishment" or words to that effect. About 5% actually roast their own coffee. Size is very variable, from a handful of tables to a capacity of about 100, and also it can be anything from a privately-owned one-off to part of a big chain like Starbucks.

So making Category:Coffeehouses in Seattle a subset of Category:Cafés in Seattle doesn't make a lot of sense. Also, removing Category:Coffeehouses in Seattle from Category:Coffee in Washington (state) doesn't make a lot of sense: these are coffee-centered establishments. Similarly, for the two photos that are in Category:Cafés in Seattle and not in Category:Coffeehouses in Seattle: Caffè Umbria is arguably a restaurant and a coffeehouse, but adding café doesn't really clarify; Couth Buzzard is a bookstore with a counter that serves espresso, simple pastries, and a couple of types of sandwich, mainly because they have a small space for author readings and the occasional small acoustic concert, and they want to be able to sell people something when they come for those. It's barely even a coffeehouse; no one here would call it a café.

Do you have some specific intent here harmonizing this with other locations? And, if so, are the criteria in question clear? Because by local usage (I'm originally from New York, but live in Seattle) this terminology just seems wrong. - Jmabel ! talk 15:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should just stick to what each establishment calls itself and not try to interpret what they might actually be, just being humble scribes, reporting the facts. So, if a place advertises itself as a café, then it's a café even if it's also or even mostly a restaurant. There is actually little difference between all these coffee shops, coffee houses, bars, cafés, brasseries, pubs, only the names change. And in some countries, cafeteria also means café/coffee house, like in Italy (caffetteria). So that's quite a mess and categorizing it perfectly is rather impossible. I generally read the signs and categorize accordingly, like for Caffè Umbria: caffè -> café, paninoteca -> sandwich restaurant, gelateria -> ice cream shop.

As for putting "Coffeehouses in Seattle" in "Cafés in Seattle", I was just reproducing the categorization at "Category:Cafés in the United States" which was the parent of Category:Coffee shops in the United States, but that wasn't consistent with the root categories, see Category:Coffee shops, so I changed and it will also create a Coffee shops arborescence for Seattle and Washington and put both 'cafés' and 'coffee houses' inside, which will be more sensible I think.

PS: You will notice that there is actually no Category:Coffee houses in the United States ;) - Olybrius (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Nor is there a Category:Coffeehouses in the United States, which would be the correct spelling.)

If we had a photo of the Ethiopian Restaurant "Chef Cafe" (which we don't) would it belong in this category? Beth's Cafe (a "greasy spoon" on Aurora Avenue)? Category:Merchant's Café (Seattle) (a bar dating back to the 1890s)? (I could easily give more examples.) All these things have in common is that they sell food and/or drink and that they have cafe or café in their name. This is why we have categories like Category:Buildings called tower that are about the names of things, distinct from what they are.

Please, would you stop moving things until we get some sort of consensus here, which is liable to involve bringing in more than two people who disagree with each other? I believe this had all been hashed out a decade or more ago, but I have no idea now where the discussion was, and don't have time right now to go look for it. - Jmabel ! talk 17:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I'd have no problem with a Category:Establishments called cafe in Seattle. - Jmabel ! talk 17:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That seems rather vague and very encompassing but why not if there are many cafés that aren't actually (or no longer) drinking/eating establishments (like cafés chantants?). But for those that still serve café, beverages and food, more descriptive and smaller subcategories of cafés (cf. Category:Cafés by type) seem preferable to me, like Category:British cafes, or stuff like Cafés (diners), Cafés (greasy spoons) or even Cascadian cafés if the term 'café' corresponds to something very specific and unique in the Cascades region. I think I will also create an Italian-style cafés category as they seem quite fashionable, at least in the US, and there could be other nationalities too maybe? - Olybrius (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blagnac - Magasin Alinéa - 20110421 (1).jpg

File:Blagnac - Magasin Alinéa - 20110421 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Lizier, septembre 1882 (8190563520).jpg

Hi. Re your addition of Category:Images to be flopped back to File:Saint-Lizier, septembre 1882 (8190563520).jpg in this edit, I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I can't flop that image back at present due to the issue I reported at Commons talk:DerivativeFX#Problem with Flickr-no known copyright restrictions license. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 04:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it's been like that for so long, it can wait a bit more to be fixed. Thanks for letting me know. - Olybrius (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got tired of waiting, so when I got back to my laptop, I did it myself. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 21:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, there was no hurry but that's nice to have a normal version eventually. Maybe it's even been mirrored since it was first developed, that would be quite some time! - Olybrius (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surnames_by_country

Category:Surnames_by_country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

HarryNº2 (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surnames_by_original_language

Category:Surnames_by_original_language has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

HarryNº2 (talk) 13:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aurillac - 20170105 (2).jpg

File:Aurillac - 20170105 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (4).jpg

File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cjp24 (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs_by_Olybrius_-_Toulouse_-_2010

Bonjour, je souhaite obtenir les coordonnées de l'auteur des photographies, Olybrius. Voici mes coordonnées toulousemagazine@gmail.com Cordialement, Stéphane Reynier 2A01:CB19:834F:1D00:F044:F19C:BF26:5AE8 18:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2018_in_Da'an_District,_Taipei

Category:2018_in_Da'an_District,_Taipei has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Erased_heads_on_photographs

Erased heads on photographs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 17:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Olybrius/档案/2020年

Contents

File:Grenade - Rue de l'Égalité - 20140121 (1).jpg

Pourquoi colorer vos photos en sépia ?

Category:Draining_boards

File:Salamanca - Calle cerrada del Corrillo - 20160401 (1).jpg

File:Severed heads and penises of two Algerian men - 1956.jpg

File:Colomiers - Allée Maurice Ravel - 20120712 (2).jpg

File:Blagnac - Rue Max Fischl - 20120307 (2).jpg

File:Colomiers - Allée Maurice Ravel - 20120712 (1).jpg

Clemenceau et non Clémenceau

Category:Christopher_McCandless'_abandoned_bus

Category:Urban_exploration_in_Alsace

Coffeehouses vs. cafés in Seattle

File:Blagnac - Magasin Alinéa - 20110421 (1).jpg

File:Saint-Lizier, septembre 1882 (8190563520).jpg

Category:Surnames_by_country

Category:Surnames_by_original_language

File:Aurillac - 20170105 (2).jpg

File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (4).jpg

Category:Photographs_by_Olybrius_-_Toulouse_-_2010

Category:2018_in_Da'an_District,_Taipei

Category:Erased_heads_on_photographs

Navigation menu

User talk:Olybrius/档案/2020年

Pourquoi colorer vos photos en sépia ?

Clemenceau et non Clémenceau

Coffeehouses vs. cafés in Seattle

Navigation menu

Search