User talk:Odder/Archive 003

Archives: 1, 2

NWMAC_Logo

This logo is original and totally my own work. Please do not delete it from commons. It has been the NWMAC club logo for over ten years and as such it is in no way copyright infringement. If I have uploaded or marked the logo incorrectly which caused this deletion then please accept my apologies in advance.

Zgłoszenie do kasowania

Nie bardzo się, jeszcze orientuje w wiki. Commons ale przypadkiem trafiłem na obrazek który jest zdecydowanie nielegalnie uploadowany i ma dodane fałszywe prawa autorskie. W związku z tym wydaje mi się, że powinien zostać natychmiast skasowany. Jest tutaj [1]. Jakbyś potem, mógł mi jasno napisać co robić w takich przypadkach, byłbym wdzięczny. Pozdrawiam.

--Verwolff (talk) 10:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EK

Witaj,

Nie za bardzo orientuję się w odrębnych zasadach i polityce na Commons, a właściwie to nie chcę się uczyć panujących tu zasad (jestem wikipedystą). Dowiedziałem się, że usunąłeś jakąś grafikę rastrową ponieważ pojawiła się wersja wektorowa SVG, a wersja rastrowa nie jest już nigdzie wykorzystywana. Ja miałem podobną sytuację z plikami Image:Flaga powiatu brzeskiego (opolskiego).jpg oraz Image:Herb powiatu brzeskiego (opolskiego).png, ale zostałem opier******, że z tych właśnie przyczyn usunąć tego nie mogę i muszę się z tego wycofać. Zostawiając moją sprawę (co mogę a czego nie) na boku —— proszę Ciebie o rozważenie możliwości usunięcia ww. plików. Tak jak napisałem, nie są wykorzystywane i zostały zwektoryzowane.

Pozdrawiam, Rozek19 (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Hi Odder, thanks for participating in my RfA, which passed with all 26 participants supporting. I appreciate the trust that the community is put in me and I look forward to closing DRs and deleting obvious copyvios. Thanks, Anonymous101 ^talk 12:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of namespace-rename "Image" -> "File"

Dear user, the MediaWiki developers recently announced that the "Image:" namespace is going to be renamed to "File:". "Image:" will remain an alias. The canonical namespace name wgCanonicalNamespace will change from "Image" to "File".

I noticed that you use wgCanonicalNamespace in either your monobook.js page or a JavaScript file in your userspace (check this list).

Please check and replace all occurrences of

wgCanonicalNamespace == "Image"

with

wgNamespaceNumber == 6

to ensure that your scripts keep working. Thanks! --Dschwen (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions regarding use of Flickr picture

Hello. I have some questions regarding possible use of certain Flickr picture in Wikipedia Commons. It is a beautiful mosaic from late 7th century showing Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine IV (with his brothers Heraclius and Tiberius) granting Bishop of Ravenna with "privilegia" (privilege) of tax immunity.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sacred_destinations/2930854330/

I would like to use it in Wikipedia's article of Constantine IV - [2] A picture of the mosaic is already in the commons, but it is in very small resolution and the colouring is not quite right. Therefore, I would be delighted if I could use this picture from Flickr - but can I? I ask you because this is the first time I am dealing with a picture form Flickr. Yes, I read the guide about using Flickr pictures, but I want to be sure.

Your quick reply is appreciated.

--Kurt Leyman (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arturo Sordo y Álvarez

Hi! Attending to your request I have translated and categorised the page. Cheers!--Balbo (talk) 11:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Najczęściej zadawane pytania

Witaj, szkoda, że nie zajrzałeś do COM:BAR, w Commons:Centrum koordynacji tłumaczeń też zacząłem tłumaczyć FAQ, Commons:Centrum koordynacji tłumaczeń/Commons:Najczęściej zadawane pytania. Yarl ✉ 20:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Hi Odder/Archive 003, I would like to express my gratitude for your participation at my recent RfA, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of 100 % support. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and I promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. Please do feel free to get in touch if you feel you can improve me in any way; I will be glad to listen to all comments. Again, thanks,Abigor talk 17:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tank you

Thank you for your proposal. It is very kind of you. However, I'd rather decline your invitation. I am a rather opinionated person, I don't think I would make a good administrator. But thanks agains for thinking so. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 07:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Skyscrapers in New York

Hi, I have re-established the Category:Skyscrapers in New York you have deleted in 2006. But this category is now for the State of New York --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 21:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strange things in Poland ?

Hi, I noticed that you fell over the same things as I did. It might be a good idea to give some assistance to this contributor which is most probably from your country. Enjoy. --Foroa (talk) 12:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A comment from you

here would be appreciated. Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tablica Hulskie .mit.JPG

Could you have a look at this one please, it's been requsted for speddy del but the reason is giben in Polish. Thanks, Finn Rindahl (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason Freinsheim 67.svg

I created a version of the CoA of Freinsheim in the style of the Coat of arms in French Wikipedia, especially for the Freinsheim article in French wikipedia. You deleted it. But why? Only cause there were several versions of Freinsheim CoA? Okay, it is useless to have versions that are not in use, but I especially created that one for the French Wikipedia. So, where is the reason to delete it? Bayernraute (talk) 00:35, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burmese Textiles - cover.png

You have delete this file from 1910. Can I get a explanation? haabet 21:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Small coat of arms of the Czech Republic.svg

Please also protect File:Small coat of arms of the Czech Republic.svg, thank you. --Ragimiri (talk) 22:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Likörfläschchen.jpg

Hello Odder,

thank you for deleting File:Likörfläschchen.jpg. Could you please copy the revision history to File talk:Liquor bottles.jpg? I forgot to do so before requesting deletion, sorry. — Merlin G. (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-1990-0526-003,_Chemnitzer_FC_-_1._FC_Magdeburg_1:0.jpg

You deleted File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-1990-0526-003,_Chemnitzer_FC_-_1._FC_Magdeburg_1:0.jpg as "superseded by". Sadly the log does not show the name of the file you are referring to and therefore projects depending on the picture are hanging in the air. Agathoclea (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

see w:en:Stefan Minkwitz as examaple Agathoclea (talk) 10:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Agathoclea (talk) 12:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image protections

Hello Odder,

I noticed on my watchlist that you protected some high risk images. Thank you very much for that, but would you consider to lower the protection to autoconfirmed? New accounts and IPs wouldn't be able to edit such images anyway, and this would still allow established users to edit those pages (recategorizing, adding description translations, tweaking colours, etc). Thanks, Patrícia ^msg 10:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, you are right, I forgot about the upload part, silly me. Well, unfortunately we'll have to live with this, then. Cheers, and thank you for your prompt reply, Patrícia ^msg 11:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, something more: I just noticed this discussion. You will want to have a look at it. Patrícia ^msg 12:14, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting

That you don't understand something is definitely not a valid reason for deleting anything. Those file were deleted as (scaled down) duplicates of other files. When deleting duplicates redirects should be made so that links to those files are not broken. In some cases when the deleted files have very bad names redirects are not needed, but that is when the names are misleading, completely wrong, or totally nonsense (some examples are wrong species name or files named "img 123.jpg"). Another case when redirects may not be needed is new duplicates that are deleted soon after uploading, before there is time for reusers to link to them. /Ö 17:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SVG und PNG

Nach Rücksprache mit dem Heraldiker Jörg Mantzsch, der gegenwärtig wohl einer der führenden Kommunalheraldiker Deutschlands ist, wird es abgelehnt, Wappenbilder vom PNG-Format in SVG zu wandeln und einzustellen. Das hat mehrere rechtliche und faktische Gründe: 1. Wappen sind Hoheitszeichen, deren Gebrauch streng eingeschränkt ist. Der Gesetzgeber erlaubt ihren Gebrauch für Dritte nur zur staatsbürgerlichen Bildung bzw. zur Forschung innerhalb der Heraldik. Die Innen- und Staatsminister der Bundesländer haben hierzu unterschiedliche Runderlässe veröffentlicht, denn Wappenrecht ist Länderecht. Ausdrücklich ist jegliche Veränderung - auch geringfügig - eines körperschaftlichen Wappens untersagt. 2. Um Missbrauch der Hoheitszeichen zu verhindern, reicht eine Darstellung der Wappen im PNG-Format mit entsprechender Größe und Auflösung wie bei den Wappen des Heraldikers Mantzsch völlig aus. Das SVG-Format würde Dritten ermöglichen, einzelne Elemente einer offenen Vektorgrafik problemlos zu verändern. 3. Wappen unterliegen zudem einem Copyright, das der Urheber definiert. So sind in den neuen Bundesländern nach der Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands hunderte Gemeindewappen entstanden, deren Schutzrecht für den Autoren 70 Jahre gilt. Wenn sich Autoren also verweigern, offene Vektordateien ins Netz zu stellen, die Dritten ermöglichen, Elemente aus einer Vektorgrafik zu selektieren, um sie in andere Wappen zu übernehmen, so ist das ihr gutes Recht. Es ist mir überdies von der Sache her völlig unverständlich, was es an der Wappendarstellung z.B. von der Gemeinde Lübars (Möckern) zu kritisieren gibt; die Darstellung ist optimal.--Repgow (talk) 17:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ich würde Dir mal dringend raten, Dich mit der Materie der deutschen Heraldik gründlicher und eingehender zu beschäftigen. Besonders mit den rechtlichen Hintergründen! Außerdem fordere ich Dich hiermit auf, den schwachsinnigen Einsatz des Convertbausteins PNG to SVG in Zukunft zu unterlassen. Die von Repgow und mir eingespielten PNG-Wappen entstammen als Originaldatei vom Heraldiker Jörg Mantzsch, der diese zur Veröffentlichung im WP bereitstellte, sich jedoch wie Repgow weiter oben schon beschrieben hat, einer offenen und freien Vektorgrafik verweigt! Aus oben benannten Gründen und diese PNG-Wappen reichen in ihrer Größe und Darstellung vollkommen für WP aus und müssen nicht noch durch SVG-Freaks überarbeitet werden. Soetwas schießt völlig am Sinn der WP vorbei und ist kontraproduktiv. Für Dich privat kannst Du machen was Du für richtig empfindest, doch spätestens die Veröffentlichung Deiner auch nur geringfügig veränderten Wappen ist rechtswidrig. Das bitte ich Dich in Zukunft doch zu beachten bei der Bearbeitung von Wappen. Gruß --Ollemarkeagle (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linkujące i wiadomości usuwań

Hej, hej! Mógłbyś sprawdzać linkujące, gdy usuwasz duplikaty? Usunąłeś File:File-White nectarine and cross section02 edit.jpg bez sprawdzania linkujących i został link do pliku w File:Owoce Nektarynka.jpg [3]. Ewentualnie zostaw w informacji o usunięciu link do duplikatu, żeby wiedzieć, gdzie mamy później linkować. Hołek ҉ 18:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Wheel and edit war at File:Dömitz Wappen.png

Hi Odder, after having seen this notice I noticed the wheel war that took place for this file and posted a notice regarding this case at the administrators' noticeboard. It would be kind if you could tell us your side of the story there. Thanks, AFBorchert (talk) 22:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And please, checkout COM:DEL/Superseded; this rule has been introduced specifically to avoid World War III. –Tryphon ^☂ 22:48, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SUL

Hi, you can use Odder as your user name in zh wiki now. Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:600px_Black&Red_stripes_on_white.png

Could you please explain the reason to delete this file. It was used and is in project scope like many others flags of football teams from Category:Association football flags. Thanks — NickK (talk) 11:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Polish stamps

Polish stamps it's PD. Be so kind as to restore all remote files. Removal of a stamp of the Kingdom Polish, being in PD-old is especially strange. Сдобников Андрей (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, write here - Template talk:PD-Polishsymbol why Polish stamps do not fall to this license --Butko (talk) 11:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation needed whatever the language

You are needed here to explain the rules you use for your Polish stamps mass-deletion, please. Sebjarod (talk) 05:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsches Reich - Generalgouvernement.jpg

This is not a polish stamp. Please restore. Deutsches Reich means German empire --Nightflyer (talk) 09:08, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe File:GGstamps.jpg too. I am not sure. --Nightflyer (talk) 09:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

znaczki Solidarności Walczącej

Jakkolwiek najprawdopodobniej słusznie likwidujesz oficjalne polskie znaczki pocztowe i skarbowe, to akurat File:Znaczki SW1983-1985.jpg nie należą do tej samej grupy, bo wydane zostały w II obiegu (jako wydawnictwo "Poczty Solidarności Walczącej", cokolwiek ten termin miałby znaczyć), autor projektu jest znany i jest zgoda przekazana przez Romualda Lazarowicza w imieniu Solidarności Walczącej za pośrednictwem systemu OTRS, która uprawniała do zastosowania licencji {{CopyrightedFreeUse}}. Dlatego ten skan przywracam.

Julo (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Widzę, że tak samo od siekiery potraktowałeś jeszcze kolejne pliki: File:SolidarnoscWalczaca-Morawiecki-50.jpg, File:SolidarnoscWalczaca-Pilsudski50.jpg, File:SolidarnoscWalczaca-JanPawel-II.jpg, File:PocztaPolskiNiepodleglej.jpg, które mają to samo pochodzenie i tę samą zgodę. Porządkowanie kategorii trzeba robić jednak z zachowaniem zasad, a nie znalazłeś nawet czasu, by mnie o tym powiadomić. Julo (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Szablony OTRS znajdują się we wszystkich plikach poniżej szablonu licencji, i pewnie dlatego ich nie zauważyłeś. W jednym z nich natomiast (ale tylko w jednym, ostatnim z tych pięciu) szablonu wcześniej brakowało, choć licencja była ta sama, i było w słownym opisie, że nie jest to oficjalny dokument. Julo (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Licencje herbów

Herby podwójnie licencjonuję (za doradą WarXa), ponieważ herb jako taki jest zgodnie z Prawem autorskim w domenie publicznej, jednakże zastrzegam aby było podane kto wykonał wersję wektorową tego herbu. Nie jestem specjalistą od licencji, ale polskie prawo nie zabrania takowego zastrzeżenia. Co do daty to akurat nie wiedziałem, że jest taka funkcja. Zrewertowałem dlatego, że taką "2009-05-10" datę odczytuję jako dzień 2009. miesiąc maj rok 10 n.e. czyli całkowicie bez sensu ;) ale widzę, że Anglicy (tak jak ruskie) muszą mieć wszystko na odwrót ;).

Herb Bolechowa może być na polskiej licencji mimo tego, iż obecnie miasto należy do Ukrainy, dlatego że jest to herb z czasów przynależności do Polski. Ukraiński "herb" jest tutaj.

Oczywiście każdy może dokonywać merytorycznych edycji, jednakże samowolne zmienianie licencji nieswoich plików uznałem za działanie nie w porządku.

Jak ostatnio liczyłem załadowałem około 800 plików. Teraz będzie ich pewnie już z 1000. Datę można zmienić, co do licencji muszę jeszcze dokładnie sprawdzić i przemyśleć. Dużo herbów pochodzi z czasów gdy nie był używany szablon opisu więc przydałoby się jego również dodać (robię to gdy aktualizuję jakiś herb jednakże kompleksowego przejrzenia jeszcze nie wykonywałem). Obecnie mam sesję i nie mam za dużo czasu. Odezwę się w czerwcu w sprawie bota. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Spain.svg

Finished. Thank you for unprotection. SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 10:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Featured article star.svg

Finished. Thanks again for unprotection. SkyBon^{Talk\Contributions} 07:16, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flag of Western Sahara.svg

Hey, since all files are protected now and this is basically odder.wikimedia.org, you should probably change "English: The obverse side of the flag of Western Sahara. Note that the hoist side is on the right." to "English: The flag of Western Sahara", as the former is unfounded (see Talk). Ta. ¦ Reisio (talk) 12:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Any time you get a chance. ¦ Reisio (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me of that, I forgot. Have just changed the description as you wished. odder 12:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The preservation of "The obverse side of" remains misleading. ¦ Reisio (talk) 15:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nature reserve Skarpa Storczyków

Dzięki, tak rzeczywiście jest lepiej, dopiero dzisiaj się zarejestrowałem i zaczynam rozumieć o co chodzi... :) Pozdiam Yevaud PL (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kasowanie

Hej, witam. Napisałeś mi kiedyś, że jak będzie potrzeba usunięcia plików, to w taki sposób będzie najszybciej. Chodzi mi o usunięcie dwóch nieaktualnych plików dotyczących podziału na osiedla w Warszawie. Znowelizowałem niektóre pliki ale dwa są do usunięcia. Oto linki:File:PL_warsaw_nowe_bródno_location.svg oraz File:PL_warsaw_stare_bródno_location.svg. Tutaj link zewnętrzny do obowiązującego podziału ze strony Warszawskiego ZDM [4]. Pozdrawiam. --Verwolff (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Republic of China.svg

Hi, I check the protection log of File:Flag of the Republic of China.svg, and know that you are the admin that put this file under full protection.

I presume you have noticed my request on that file for a lighter blue shade since Nov 2008, and the recent presenting of many different kinds of evidence, all point to the fact that admin Zscout370 has made a wrong judgment when he used #082567 instead of #0000AA, due to the suggestion by IP user:128.208.37.203 , who has contributed to none other page.
Admin Zscout370 did agree that There are no official shades, I checked already. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 02:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC), this is the reason why there are so many different blue shades, even on Republic of China official websites.
Because of the reason There are no official shades, I suggest using en:File:Zhongshan12.jpg as the standard, and model the blue shades accordingly. In modern time, during state funeral, the VIP's coffin would be covered by the national flag. Sun Yat-sen was one of the prominent creators of both Kuomintang and Republic of China, so that Blue Sky White Sun flag on his mausoleum ceiling is the original Republic of China national flag, which has the original, and the official Blue shades. In this case, wikicommons can stand up to any kind of question regarding the Blue shades, and settle this question once and for all. Because no Chinese can argue against the fact, the fact being that Sun Yat-sen was both the creator of Republic of China, and it's national flag, together with another Chinese revolutionary Luk How Tung(陸皓东)
I know that this flag is being used by thousands of wiki pages, so it is paramount to pick the right Blue shades, and my opinion is, the right Blue shades is the original Blue shades, shown on the ceiling of Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum. Arilang ^talk 05:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting admin assistence

Please admin Odder, please make a prompt dicision to pick the right color shade, thanks. Arilang ^talk 12:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another request

Admin Odder, please give your opinion on File talk:Flag of the Republic of China.svg, thanks. Arilang ^talk 21:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Condemnation on Changing the Shade of the Flag before Any Agreement

Any change should not be done since the discussion is still going on.--Contributions/72.45.35.93 23:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the shade of blue of File:Flag of the Republic of China.svg

Hi! May I ask why have you changed the shade of blue on all files which are derivations of the "White Sun on Blue Skies" symbol as the discussions seem to be ongoing and a concensus for change has not yet been reached? The emblem of the Nationalist Party of China (the KMT) which was taken from the advertisement banner above the navigation bar on the KMT website is rendered incorrectly. If you would compare the current emblem with that of the older, you would see that the 12 isosceles triangles symbolic of the sun's rays as rendered incorrectly, according to their flag and emblem law, it should simply be a circle of blue placed between the rays and disk (i.e., the older emblem was correct). The KMT emblem that was chosen to be the basis for the current Commons file was taken from the advertisement banner of the website, this is inadvisable as these logos are often subjected to heavy graphical enhancements to serve as a better decoration, accuracy is often sacrificed. Moreover, on the same website there is a page specifically dedicated to the flag and emblem of the KMT here, and as you would scroll down to find, there is a flag with a different (and darker) shade of blue here. If it is convenient for you, could you please rollback the changes to the sapphire blue before the this set of discussions? Afterwards, should a concensus be reached for changes in the file, the systematic changes called for could then be made. Thanks in advance! --Shibo77 02:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@user Shibo77, may I ask you why is it that you keep on making immature comments?

Quote:The KMT emblem that was chosen to be the basis for the current Commons file was taken from the advertisement banner of the website, this is inadvisable as these logos are often subjected to heavy graphical enhancements to serve as a better decoration, accuracy is often sacrificed. User Shibo77, who do you think you are? Sun Yat-sen? Or Chiang Kai-shek? Or Ma Yin-jeou? to serve as a better decoration, accuracy is often sacrificed. How do you know what is accurate, and what is inaccurete? Are you saying logos on KMT official web site is inaccurate? Shouldn't you be talking to KMT web-master first, tell them to fix whatever inaccurate there is, then come back here and talk, please. Arilang ^talk 05:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's some misunderstanding here. The KMT emblem is not the same as the ROC emblem or the flag. The KMT may choose to change the color of their emblem to light blue (and I believe they did) but it doesn't mean that the flag of the ROC and its emblem change too. Even though, historically, the flag got its blue star from the KMT emblem, today they are two different things. So I hope you can revert back all the pictures (except for the KMT emblem, which now has the right color). Thanks, WikiLaurent (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the KMT logo

The KMT emblem on Wikimedia is fine and closely matches the version on the KMT website. User:Shibo77 says it comes from an advertisment banner but that's not true - that emblem is everywhere on both the English and Traditional Chinese website and the color and shapes are always the same. The color should be light blue and the triangles should have straight sides (as opposed to the curved ones in the ROC emblem), so the current version on Wikimedia is the right one. WikiLaurent (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Laurent that ROC emblem and KMT emblem can be modified differently, although KMT emblem in everywhere except in its official website is in darker blue and curved triangles. But the first thing Odder needs to do is to convert the color back to the December version until all disputes are settled.--216.189.167.118 15:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and the earlier the better as all these pictures are on high traffic articles. We've been spreading disinformation for five days now. WikiLaurent (talk) 18:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

user WikiLaurent, quote:We've been spreading disinformation for five days now Unquoted is incorrect, to say the least. If you care to look at the file history of Blue Sky White Sun flag, before Nov 2008 the dark sapphire color #082567 had never been used before, have you ever asked this question: Why do we need to use dark sapphire color #082567 at all?

And according to e-mail from the Minister of interior, 憲法規定為紅地左上角青天白日, please tell me, how can anyone associate dark sapphire color #082567 with 青天白日? Arilang ^talk 02:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's a definitive color for the flag and emblem since the government doesn't provide any specific guideline. My personal preference would go for a pure dark blue as suggested by the email from the Minister of Interior. i.e. #0000XX (XX being between maybe 77 and DD?). Since it appears to be mostly a matter of preferences, maybe we should organize a vote so as to find out which color most people think is "right"? WikiLaurent (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Color of the ROC pictures

Hi, I've added a comment about the color of the ROC pictures here. Please could you give us your feedback? Thanks, WikiLaurent (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Emblem

Thank you for converting back the shade to the original one. But I think the national emblem should be converted as well.--72.45.35.93 18:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Internationaler Bergwanderweg Eisenach-Budapest.png

You have deleted the icon of the international hiking path Eisenach-Budapest. This is for me not comprehensible. Have you read my arguments against a copyright violation (Discussion)? What is your opinion to it? What could and should I do anymore to revute this assertion? --Bernd Bergmann (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mika Urbaniak.jpg

Witaj. Usuń to zdjęcie. To nie Mika Urbaniak. Ewentualnie wstaw z prawidłową nazwą. Chyba Dominika Buczak. Może kiedyś powstaną o niej artykuły. Pozdrawiam. Mzopw (talk) 01:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

cześć jak czołg

Czy mógłbys "przelecieć" botem~spod swojego konta wkład Wykształciucha oznaczony "rename", zeby je oznaczyć jako nadające sie do przeniesienia? Całe to :trusted user approval". Z góry dzięki. Masur (talk) 03:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]