User talk:OAlexander~commonswiki/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Copyright status: File:Flag of San Marino.svg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of San Marino.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Lokal_Profil 15:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Flag
Please do not reduce the size of the flag. I am uncomfortable because of your contributions. This is the last warning.--SouthSudan (talk) 02:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have requested, that your issue will be seen to by an administrator. OAlexander (talk) 13:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:RKopa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Polarlys (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Brasao Estado SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
Olá. É, parece que eles ainda não seguem o próprio manual de identidade. Agora a diferença entre das cores do brasão no manual e as especificadas não é tão berrante, mas mesmo assim não batem. Por isso fiquei na dúvida se vale a pena manter aquela tabela de cores (que eu adicionei hoje na descrição do arquivo). Giro720 (talk) 01:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Shkendija Tetovo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Valderrama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DS (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
File:ClarkJim(blauesHemd)1966Aug.jpg
Hello OAlexander, I ask you kindly to change my photo of Jim Clark no more. For your version is much too fade. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Partido Democrático Trabalhista (BR).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
INeverCry 20:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Brasão Forquilha CE.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jose Carioca-Star.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 22:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Anne-Francis-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
suppression : Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG
Ce débat de suppression est clos. Merci de ne pas modifier cette archive. File:Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG
La page babette de rozieres comporte une photo à caractère publicitaire évidente, contraire aux conditions d’utilisation et aux règlements applicables de la communauté de wikipedia (voir votre règlement). On y voit clairement les titres de ses livres et on devine sa maison d'édition : orphie. Devons-nous pas rester NEUTRE dans nos textes et photos ? Apparemment tous ne sont pas égaux chez wiki. P.danseur6.2 (d) 07:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
omg, she presents one of her 13 books! LOL and Symbol keep vote.svg Conserver
Symbol keep vote.svg Conserver. Thierry Caro (d) 09:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Conserver speedily. OAlexander (d) 23:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Symbol keep vote.svg Conserver P.danseur6.2, la neutralité s'applique à Wikipédia et non à Commons. Quant à l'aspect publicitaire, ce n'est pas non plus une règle de commons comme le prouve la catégorie Category:Advertising. Mirgolth (d) 15:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Kept Well known author. She writes books, so why not show two of them? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Réponse : Bonjour, Effacement refusé pour quel motif svp ? Aucun commentaire et je m'en doutais un peu ... Détournement des règles et principes fondamentaux (c'est pas moi c'est mon voisin !)entre Wiki Commons et Wkipedia. La page sur Babette de rozières est une page sur un cuisinier et non sur un auteur ou écrivain. Si l'on veut respecter la NEUTRALITE chez wikipedia, nous devons le faire intégralement et pour tous. Wikimedia commons n'est pas obligé d'être neutre d'après certains, par contre le fait d'utiliser cette photo dans une page Wikipedia rend wikipedia non neutre. Renseignez-vous auprès d'avocats spécialistes en droit publicitaire ! Il suffisait de recadrer la photo pour ne plus voir le titre de ses livres (faisable par tous actuellement, même par un enfant). Babette de rozieres n'est pas une écrivaine (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89crivain) mais simplement la conceptrice de recettes de cuisine mises sur papier. Je suis très déçu par le manque de sérieux de Wikipedia ... qui n'applique pas l'intégralité des règles et principes fondamentaux à tous : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aide:R%C3%A8gles https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Principes_fondateurs Cordialement
suppression : Babette-de-Rozières-2011.JPG (suite 2)
courrier envoyé à votre collègue Mirgolth
Bonjour,
J'ai suivi votre conseil de modifier le cadrage de la photo de Babette de Rozières afin d'effacer seulement la partie publicitaire (titres de ses livres).
Mais sans changement puisque l'on a remis aussitôt l'originale.
La bibliographie de la cuisinière suffisait pourtant à faire connaître ses livres.
Je n'ai peut-être pas utilisé la bonne façon de la remplacer et m'en excuse si pour certain cela tient du vandalisme mais ce n'était pas mon intention
La photo respecte celle de T.Caro et n'est pas un vandalisme comme "OAlexander" le dit.
Wikimedia commons et wikipedia ne risque pas de perdurer ... Nous en reparlerons dans quelques temps.
Malgré une initiative intelligente et utile pour tous dans le sens que chacun contribue, dans ses connaissances, compétences et aptitudes, cela reste un peu l'anarchie ... et reste le monopole de quelques contributeurs plus ou moins compétent dans leur organisation et responsabilité d'administrateur.
Ancien responsable technique en électronique et en cabling system, je voulais, maintenant que je suis à la retraite, apporter de mes compétences, connaissances et de mon temps. J'ai commencé à contribuer mais je crois que cela me suffit comme expérience.
Je vais continuer à faire l'un de mes loisirs, en dehors de celui de la danse de salon, faire des sites internet gratuitement pour des personnes ayant peu de moyen, plus sérieuses et respectueuses des règles du net.
Cordialement et bonne continuation
P.danseur6.2 (talk) 08:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EG-3272-19820622.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fma12 (talk) 02:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sol de america logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Rio de Janeiro - Rocinha - UPP - 01 - P de Oliveira.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Asclepias (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Olá
Olá, OAlexander.
Desculpe mas só hoje é que vi a mensagem que deixou na minha página de discussão. Não sei bem o que significado do que escreveu ("CV") mas imagino que foi um alerta para uma imagem retirada daqui, minha, com licença para ser usada à vontade desde que mencionado o nome do autor, neste caso autora. Na minha cabeça, só associo "CV" a Curriculum Vitae. Ossos do ofício. De qualquer maneira, obrigada por ter reparado e passado na minha página. Cumprimentos e resto de bom fim-de-semana. Trebaruna (talk) 12:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Olá Trebaruna.
- Desculpa me para não falo o português muito bem. Aqui, "cv" e curto para "violação do copyright," neste caso por o sitio web indicado, usando a sua imagem sem referencia a você, como deseja na pagina do imagem. Abraço, OAlexander (talk) 03:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Simple geometric shapes and/or text
bsd. hi, i saw you have been uploading quite a few logos to commons. First, thanks for the hard work. I would like to bring to your attention that "simple geometric shapes and/or text" means something along the lines of this logo: File:'Iron Man'.svg. Otherwise it should be considered non-free. This is very important, because when you replace a non-free logo on wikipedia, with one from commons, which will eventually be deleted because it's not really free, all those articles will have no logo. Regards --Benstown (talk) 01:38, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 11:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 23:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Please have a read of this, in summary {{PD-textlogo}} is not available for Australian logos. LGA talkedits 00:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Federation University Australia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
LGA talkedits 00:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Vector version of LFM logo
At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo LFM.jpg you stated you have a vector version of the LFM logo. Since it closed as a keep, is it okay if it's uploaded? WhisperToMe (talk) 09:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Seems to be a very reasonable decision, thanks for letting me know. Please give me a day or two, and I will up the vector. I shall ping you. Ok? Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 10:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Ok! I have a category for the image: Category:Liceo Franco Mexicano WhisperToMe (talk) 10:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Seems to be a very reasonable decision, thanks for letting me know. Please give me a day or two, and I will up the vector. I shall ping you. Ok? Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 10:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
@WhisperToMe: : Uploaded three variants - revert to your favourite one, the choice is yours. You may wish to apply the logo also to the WP:FR and WP:ES articles (the one on WP:ES is not of good quality). Cheers, have fun! OAlexander (talk) 11:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup! ¡Muchas gracias! Color is always better than black and white so I'll use color logos. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- BTW which specific file on http://www.lfm.edu.mx/ uses the tricolor? WhisperToMe (talk) 13:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- "Olympiades Lycée Franco-Mexicain", (PDF, 2013-02-14). Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Got the files, and now all articles use the tricolor. Anyway, is it okay if the blue and black and white variants at File:LFM-M.svg have separate files? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Be my guest and do as you see fit, those files are apparently all in the public domain. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 05:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! Now they're in: Category:Liceo Franco Mexicano logos WhisperToMe (talk) 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:IFK Norrkoping.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
// Gikü said done Thursday, 12 June 2014 16:53 (UTC) 16:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Logo BRQ.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yanguas (talk) 18:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cruzeiro - Campeao1966 - Diploma.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cruzeiro - Campeao1966 - Diploma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cruzeiro - Campeao1966 - Diploma.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 19:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Brasao nsrita.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Votuporanga (SP) - Áerea - Centro da Cidade.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Votuporanga (SP) - Áerea - Centro da Cidade.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Gunnex (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Source indicating to the cc-by-2.0 licensing indicated by you was missing. I corrected the file. Gunnex (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Joinville EC (2014) - SC.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estádio Monumental do Sesi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Derivated by you from File:Estádio Monumental do Sesi.png (copyvio). Gunnex (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called OAlexander. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name OAlexander~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)