User talk:Nicoli Maege/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
talk page link addition
Hallo Nicoli Maege, I have reverted your change at File:Birgit26.jpg, File:Naked.jpg and File:Birgit009.jpg. Please keep the authors attribution as he made it - that is part of the license. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Saibo, thanks for that, do you think you could point me to the policy where it says that? I'd like to become more familiar with it so I don't violate it again. thanks! Nicoli Maege (talk) 13:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Nicoli Maege, see for example at File:Birgit26.jpg: "Under the following conditions: * attribution ......" The attribution consists usually of the author field - and it was specified without "(talk)" by the author.
- Apart from the possible license infringement - what should be the use to make an edit for this minor thing? Clicking the username and selecting talk" then also brings you to the talk page. Another option is to click the talk link in the upload log on the bottom of the file's page.
- Just reply here - no need for a talk back message. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- I understand that you don't think it is a good idea, I had seen it done before and simply thought it would be a helpful addition. I'm not sure however, that I quite understand how amending the username to include a link to their talk page could constitute license infringement, which is one reason I ask for the specific policy, so that I could familiarize myself with it. Nicoli Maege (talk) 15:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- When I edit a file description page anyway, I tend to remove links to the user take page in the Author field. Most of them where probably just generated as a by-product of the standard signature (~~~). --Leyo 16:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Leyo, so are you saying that the Author is not part of the license? And it is acceptable to change it? because it would seem to contradict what was earlier stated by Saibo, "possible license infringement." Please do not mistake my questioning for disrespect towards yourself or Saibo, I'm simply very new to editing Wikimedia and want to be sure I make a habit out of proper practices. Thanks. Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Author is part of the license inside templates such as Template:GFDL-user. What I was saying is that your edits were the opposite of what is “cleaning up” for me. :-) --Leyo 19:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- @Nicoli: I cannot tell you a specific policy - there is none. It is roughly COM:L and the licenses themselves.
- @Leyo: For CC-by licenses the author field could serve as the attribution required for reuse by the author. If the author has intentionally written User:Saibo (talk) it could mean that you (Leyo) are infringing (kind of) the license by removing the "talk". The same as if it was added. Therefore I would like to preserve the author field as good as possible (also if the author has written "selbst" in there). ;-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Author is part of the license inside templates such as Template:GFDL-user. What I was saying is that your edits were the opposite of what is “cleaning up” for me. :-) --Leyo 19:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Leyo, so are you saying that the Author is not part of the license? And it is acceptable to change it? because it would seem to contradict what was earlier stated by Saibo, "possible license infringement." Please do not mistake my questioning for disrespect towards yourself or Saibo, I'm simply very new to editing Wikimedia and want to be sure I make a habit out of proper practices. Thanks. Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- When I edit a file description page anyway, I tend to remove links to the user take page in the Author field. Most of them where probably just generated as a by-product of the standard signature (~~~). --Leyo 16:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
- I understand that you don't think it is a good idea, I had seen it done before and simply thought it would be a helpful addition. I'm not sure however, that I quite understand how amending the username to include a link to their talk page could constitute license infringement, which is one reason I ask for the specific policy, so that I could familiarize myself with it. Nicoli Maege (talk) 15:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Chibi wikipetan wikiproyecto 1 .png
Hallo Nicoli Maege, could you please re-license your derivative File:Chibi wikipetan wikiproyecto 1 .png according to the original? Just copy the license template. Your background removal is probably not sufficiently creative to be eligible for copyright as you claim to have by adding the FAL license.
It would be best to use http://toolserver.org/~luxo/derivativeFX for uploading derivative works in the future. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Human Sexuality Barnstar |
Great uploads! Handcuffed (talk) 21:17, 25 August 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you!! Nicoli Maege (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ebony at Beach.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pete F (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Comment at deletion request
I've responded to your comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:White bikini2353.jpg, where your vote seems to be in error. A reply would be much appreciated. --Conti|✉ 20:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) --Conti|✉ 21:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! Nicoli Maege (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Re: Quick question
Thanks or pointing it out - I can see no reference to OTRS in the system, so it is a rather obvious copyvio. One cannot be present in the Recent Changes all the time... Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:한국의_명승지_이미지 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
–moogsi (blah) 13:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Double cat
Double categories are sometimes pertinent. See my comment here. Thanks for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Ah! my sincere apologies, I didn't realize the subject was also the photographer. Thanks for pointing that out TwoWings, much appreciated. Nicoli Maege (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Stoya after signing banner at Exxxotica NJ-NY 2010.jpg
- File:Stoya signing banner at Exxxotica NJNY 2010.jpg
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 06:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, sir. Nicoli Maege (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jesse jane 9 bikini miamis south beach may8 2009 6 VubL9YO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 21:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jesse Jane at Pirates premier.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ww2censor (talk) 06:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nude model Alexa in black and white.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 00:30, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nasty Canasta.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 01:56, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:An ejaculation explosion...semen out of a penis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 03:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nudes-A-Poppin' 2009-783.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 10:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Blanks
Hi Nicoli. Please do not remove such blanks. --Leyo 23:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Leyo, I just replaced the outdated with the current version, see the Guide to layout #File description pages, in the edittool shortcuts it's =={{int:license-header}}== Nicoli Maege (talk) 19:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was only referring to the blanks. The rest of your edit was fine. If bots do this replacement, they rather add a blank between the equality signs and the title. I am not aware of a guideline specific to Commons, but the reasoning on de.wikipedia applies globally IMO. --Leyo 21:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- I respect your opinion, and I do agree the wikimarkup syntax should be accessible to all, but as I said I only used the edittools, if you have an issue with how that's set up then you should take it up with WMF Labs (or whoever is in charge of its development), for me it would be an extra step to 1. remove the old license heading, 2. add the new license heading, then 3.go back in and re-add spaces to the code. It sort of defeats the whole purpose of having the edittools in the first place if I have to go back and change what it adds, don't you think? And I'm not entirely convinced that spaces really have a huge effect on the readability of the code. Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- I then suggest to either use User:Magog the Ogre/cleanup.js or (better) leave such tasks to the bots (also to be able to hide them in the watchlist). There are several bots doing such tasks around. --Leyo 19:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- I respect your opinion, and I do agree the wikimarkup syntax should be accessible to all, but as I said I only used the edittools, if you have an issue with how that's set up then you should take it up with WMF Labs (or whoever is in charge of its development), for me it would be an extra step to 1. remove the old license heading, 2. add the new license heading, then 3.go back in and re-add spaces to the code. It sort of defeats the whole purpose of having the edittools in the first place if I have to go back and change what it adds, don't you think? And I'm not entirely convinced that spaces really have a huge effect on the readability of the code. Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- I was only referring to the blanks. The rest of your edit was fine. If bots do this replacement, they rather add a blank between the equality signs and the title. I am not aware of a guideline specific to Commons, but the reasoning on de.wikipedia applies globally IMO. --Leyo 21:48, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
YW
You're welcome Nicoli - - btw do you have interests in BDSM? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- I do indeed, actually I'd call it an interest in human sexuality as a whole. I think BDSM subjects are slightly less covered than more mainstream aspects. If you contribute to the En wiki I'm building a list of BDSM articles that are in need of images, here, using this list by User:Handcuffed – Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- I come from it.wiki though I am administrator here. I too have a certain interest into that too :-) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 02:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica AC 2013 (8673172994).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Smily (talk) 18:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
LOL it's you in the photo? :) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- Which one? lol no it's not me. Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica AC 2013 (8673996590).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Merops_apiaster_04.jpg/220px-Merops_apiaster_04.jpg)
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Picture of the Year 2013 Results
- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg/170px-Gl%C3%BChwendel_brennt_durch.jpg)
Dear Nicoli Maege,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Pure Rebel and Ariel Summers at NAP 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 12:54, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Categories
The massive number of files you are uploading to individual categories is overwhelming the main category. I have therefore created the Category:All-Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 to contain the hundreds of related files. I notice that you are currently uploading numerous files for the Asbury Park Zombie Walk and they should also be placed in a subcategory for that event. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- and now Mud Fest. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Secondarywaltz, thanks for the help, most of my system is occupied with the automated flickr stream import. I appreciate the help.Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- OK, but you are still overloading many other categories except for Lifeguard. What has File:All Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 (7647173190).jpg got to do with nipples? Or File:All Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 (7647249716).jpg this guy? These pictures have nothing to do with nipples in general! The tournament is not an ocean either. If you feel the tournament is related to fitness then you can add that category to Category:All-Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 and remove it from individual entries. It did take place in Sandy Hook, New Jersey, and not all of them do. They only need one category unless there is something remarkable about the photograph. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- As I said before the transfer is automated, Flickr2Commons automatically suggests categories, so I dunno. But I agree nipples isn't a proper category for the files you mentioned. And I appreciate you trying to explain that individual files shouldn't go in overarching parent categories, but I understand how categorization works. Thanks again for the help. Nicoli Maege (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- OK, but you are still overloading many other categories except for Lifeguard. What has File:All Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 (7647173190).jpg got to do with nipples? Or File:All Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 (7647249716).jpg this guy? These pictures have nothing to do with nipples in general! The tournament is not an ocean either. If you feel the tournament is related to fitness then you can add that category to Category:All-Women Lifeguard Tournament 2012 and remove it from individual entries. It did take place in Sandy Hook, New Jersey, and not all of them do. They only need one category unless there is something remarkable about the photograph. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Secondarywaltz, thanks for the help, most of my system is occupied with the automated flickr stream import. I appreciate the help.Nicoli Maege (talk) 17:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:The Boardwalk (8724770140).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 06:17, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Restore The Shore (8635191383).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Critical Tits party (2007).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
188.29.164.116 17:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tracy Fruit Loops.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Essie 167 (talk) 08:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica NJ 2013-059.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FredWalsh (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EXXXOTICA 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FredWalsh (talk) 01:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted content
File:Amia Miley at Exxxotica Miami 2010 (19) (crop).jpg
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188709).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188795).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635189445).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8636294542).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8636294850).jpg
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188709).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635188795).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8635189445).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8636294542).jpg
- File:Sheppard Fairy (8636294850).jpg
Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 13:33, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Anny by atlantean6-d6wxuv7.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 13:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:3D model fluid simulation (1848638233) (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 13:38, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 13:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
"X-shaped pasties"
Think most of the time they're just two crossed strips of strategically-applied tape... AnonMoos (talk) 10:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
What human being biggest desire or selfishness
I think from birth to death every human being just want every moment of life pass with full of happiness joyfulness peaceful laughing and making laugh others Tarun81278 (talk) 04:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
TUSC token a95964465bfc9c54acae0f4a40d159de
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Hello MatlatsaKonichiwa (talk) 02:13, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slave kicked in the balls during demonstration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
49.197.107.232 12:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Fountainheads has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Themightyquill (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tracy Fruit Loops.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TonyBallioni (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica AC 2013 (8673429826).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Where is my Bra? 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
File:Rosie (14489441995).jpg
Hi.
I was wondering, are there more photos of Rosie available on internet? Kindly ping while replying. Best, —usernamekiran(talk) 13:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi usernamekiran, did you mean other than the ones in Category:Rosie Robinson? Nicoli Maege (talk) 11:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Carla - Art Nude.jpg
- File:Nude model Alexa in black and white.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white 01.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white 03.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white 04.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white half-length 02.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white half-length.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white silhouette.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha black and white.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha color 01.jpg
- File:Nude model Natasha color 02.jpg
- File:Nude model-Natasha.jpg
- File:Nude model-Oona.jpg
- File:Rosie (14489441995).jpg
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica NJ 2012-Chaturbate 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Temyfa (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica NJ 2012-Chaturbate 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Temyfa (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica NJ 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Temyfa (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Vader at Dragoncon 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Shiizhang (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Circle jerk 3D illustration.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
TZYX (talk) 07:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:1988 Evante.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Yann (talk) 14:59, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- Necessary deletion, not entirely sure why this was uploaded, probably part of a batch? Thanks to User:Yann for catching it. Nicoli Maege (talk) 20:25, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Niki Belucci 28.07.2013 @ YOLO Brač - Bol.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Roy17 (talk) 18:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Bondage endurance challenge at BoundCon 2013.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
"All images and sound material recorded at the event may only be published with the written consent of the organizer." Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, but I'm not the uploader, nor is it my work. Did you notify the original uploader? I simply adjusted the image, and have nothing to do with its creation or the permission to distribute, nor do I have any knowledge of such. Nicoli Maege (talk) 19:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- I used the perform batch task tool. While I do not know, if the uploader was informed about this file, them was informed about a number of other files in the category and all of them come with the same rationale. --C.Suthorn (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Gotcha, thanks for your vigilance friend. Nicoli Maege (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- I used the perform batch task tool. While I do not know, if the uploader was informed about this file, them was informed about a number of other files in the category and all of them come with the same rationale. --C.Suthorn (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, but I'm not the uploader, nor is it my work. Did you notify the original uploader? I simply adjusted the image, and have nothing to do with its creation or the permission to distribute, nor do I have any knowledge of such. Nicoli Maege (talk) 19:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Alektra Blue in 2010 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
FredWalsh (talk) 18:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Melissa Jacobs in 2008 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
FredWalsh (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Sasha Grey in 2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
FredWalsh (talk) 21:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Roxi D'Lite onstage at Burlesque Hall of Fame 2010-01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ankry (talk) 08:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nude model-Oona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 00:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Topless female at Ayia Napa resort-Cyprus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
E4024 (talk) 04:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Sideboob has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 14:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Underboob has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Slave kicked in the balls during demonstration.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
LinguisticsGirl.Librarian (talk) 22:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Exxxotica Miami 2011-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.225.69.21 06:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nude tatooed girl on greece beach by.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
E4024 (talk) 11:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nude tatooed girl on greece beach by.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
POTY 2013
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/Nude_recumbent_woman_by_Jean-Christophe_Destailleur.jpg/500px-Nude_recumbent_woman_by_Jean-Christophe_Destailleur.jpg)
Don't forget to cast your Vote for Commons POTY 2013