User talk:Ngsharif

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ngsharif!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Open insult other user and support of a vandal

[edit]

User:Taivo, You have to explain based on which document and which reason you attributed me to this person?!! Supporting an obvious sabotage and a psychological war and an editorial war based on which law?!!. You supported a specific user that should have been blocked. Where is this written in Wikipedia's rules?!! The named user edited a page of his own accord and by insisting on an editing war, which was accompanied by insults with my warning and request from this user, and now instead of answering my request and doing justice to the user, who fought for three hours. He made a false claim and Do you support?! Based on which reason?!! This is a clear insult to Wikipedia users and unwarranted support for a saboteur, which is why you issued a verdict without a document. Ngsharif (talk) 07:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help to enforce fair law and prevent vandalism

[edit]

Dear Administers Ahonc, Cybularny, Ciell, Ezarate, Dharmadhyaksha Christian Ferrer, Leyo, Raymond, Racconish, Shizhao, A.Savin, Cookie, Anthere, 1Veertje, -revi, Davepape, Emha, Blackcat and Ellian Belz. Hello. I have respectfully called you to address a matter. At first, I transferred the page that was mistakenly insert with the wrong name to its correct name. In the first few minutes, a user who had mistakenly transferred several pages to the wrong name objected to my editing. I asked him what is the reason for your work and do you have a source and reason for your work?! But this user not only did not answer, but also insulted me. In the following, he started an editing war and attacked me for three hours continuously, he edited my page and told me the reason for his work as much as I wanted. In the end, without any evidence, he attributed me to a user whom I do not know. After that, on the admin page and some users, I asked to deal with vandalism, insults and tagging this user. He not only edited my page but also attacked me and other users and deleted other people's text. I asked to prevent this person's vandalism by presenting reasons and proofs, but instead of examining my request, an admin, that is, your colleague, supported this hacking person without any documents and proofs, and deleted all my messages and blocked me. Now my question is, where in Wikipedia is there a law for a person to edit pages and insult users based on his personal desire without providing any reason and evidence and the management supports it?!! Is wikipedia a family group that the admin supports a person away from the law?!! It is not known that several other users were blocked based on this person's false claim and their useful activities were prevented. Ngsharif (talk) 07:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Taivo, He obviously deleted all my posts and requests.!! In which law, people are allowed access to suppress other users?!! I defend my honor, dignity and time. Wikipedia should not be governed by the personal wishes of individuals and behind the scenes camaraderie. Isn't everyone equal here?!! Why is a person's false request executed, but even my messages are deleted for no reason?!!. I request to refrain from insulting the users and prevent the oppression of the users. Ngsharif (talk) 07:51, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one can help you. You're globally blocked for more than 10 years and your behavior did not change in meanwhile: always making socks, forcing your POV and engaging in edit warring. Therefore you're not welcome here.

You could simply ask question on my user talk or street's talk page: "Why is this street named Imam Khomeini Street, not Haraz Street, where are the sources?"

I would answer you: "Dear Ngsharif, the street is named as such because all Iranian streets on Commons have contemporary official names, and you can find such name on Wikimedia maps, scholarly articles and official city website". That's it.

But no, with the very first your edit you redirected page, then you removed my warning and immediately engaged in edit warring. You're doing the same for a decade, expecting different results. It did not work today, it never worked in past, and it will never work in future. Goodbye. --Orijentolog (talk) 12:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ngshari or whatever your name is, I cannot help you. I don't even know Teheran, never been there, thus I am not entitled to solve a controversy about names. The only thing I can suggest is always to seek consensus for your proposals. Either here on Commons than generlly everywhere. -- Blackcat 21:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Yann (talk) 19:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]