User talk:Neptun22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Neptun22!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bordelaise AB 21.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bordelaise AB 21.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bordelaise AB 80.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bordelaise AB 80.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

XenonX3 (talk) 08:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte beachte

[edit]

dass sich die 70-Jahre-Regelung auf den Tod des Urhebers bezieht und nicht auf das Alter des Bildes. Um die Bilder von Fritz Hohm hier hochladen zu dürfen, müsstest du nachweisen, dass dieser seit min. 70 Jahren tot ist. Im Übrigen ist die Lizenz {{free screenshot|Copy free={{GPL}} }} falsch, diese bezieht sich auf Screenshots von Software, nicht von Dokumenten und Fotos. Bitte bringe deine hochgeladenen Dateien in Ordnung, ansonsten werden diese in 7 Tagen gelöscht. XenonX3 (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grüß Dich lieber XenonX3! Den Neptun22 kriegt kaum was mit. In de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Neptun22/Puch hab ich zwar drauf hingewiesen, das ich in File:Puch_Blockmotoren.png eine passable Lizenz eingetragen habe. Er scheint allerdings mit diesesen Formalien etwas überfordert. Ach das ist ein Kreuz bis man die Neuautoren so weit ausgebildet hat. pff. Sollte hier nicht zu problematisch sein ... nach dem was ich gesehen habe, zieht er Bilder aus Druckwerken, die vor über 100 Jahren veröffentlicht wurden. LG --Tom (talk) 16:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC) 16:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wo ist denn der Fehler z. B. Bei den Blockmotoren von Puch  ?
Wie sprecht Ihr den Autor an, wenn das Dokument vor 110 Jahren veröffentlicht wurde und der Autor zum Zeitpunkt meinetwegen 40 Jahre alt war. Ob mir der heute 150 Jahre alte Erdenmensch eine sinnvolle Antwort gibt ? Neptun22 (talk) 08:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lieber Neptun22! All dieses Fragen wurden schon oft gestellt und beantwortet. Lies dazu Commons:Lizenzen. Weitere Hiweise für dich ganz oben auf dieser Seite. LG Tom (talk) 08:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Hansa-Brandenburg GNW.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hansa-Brandenburg GNW.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

{{free screenshot|Copy free={{GPL}} }} hatte ich bei diesen drei Dateien entfernt, da es ja offensichtlich keine Software-Screenshots sind (siehe vorstehenden Abschnitt). XenonX3 (talk) 19:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gol Furgao.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.71.220.186 15:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hallo lieber Neptun22! Es ist schon eine tolle Hilfe, wenn du hier Bilder auf Commons hochlädst. Zufällig habe ich jetzt bemerkt, dass du des öfteren Kategoriezuordnungen mit Rotlinks einsetzt. Leider hilft das niemandem ... und noch schlimmer niemand kann mit den Rotlinks die Bilder finden, was doch schade ist. Um das zu beheben, habe ich einige der Bilder nachträglich so zugeordnet, dass man sie finden kann:


   07:47, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen −6‎ K File:Ader Lastwagen 1901.jpg ‎ removed Category:Ader Lastwagen 1901; added Category:Ader vehicles aktuell Markierung: HotCat
   07:47, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen +3‎ K File:Ader 12 CV.jpg ‎ removed Category:Ader 12 CV; added Category:Ader vehicles aktuell Markierung: HotCat
   07:46, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen +4‎ K File:Ader 6 CV.jpg ‎ removed Category:Ader 6 CV; added Category:Ader vehicles aktuell Markierung: HotCat
   07:45, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen +31‎ K File:Delahaye Typ 22 Chassis.jpg ‎ added Category:Delahaye Type 22 aktuell Markierung: HotCat
   07:45, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen +41‎ N Category:Delahaye Type 22 ‎ added Category:Delahaye automobiles by type aktuell Markierung: HotCat
   07:42, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen −3‎ K File:Berliet G.D.S.L..jpg ‎ removed Category:Berliet G.D.S.L.; added Category:Berliet buses aktuell Markierung: HotCat
   07:40, 16. Jun. 2023 Unterschied Versionen −2‎ K File:Berliet P.C.K.jpg ‎ removed Category:Berliet P.C.K; added Category:Berliet PCK

Bitte sei so gut und trage für die Bilder eine blaue Kategorie ein. Wenns keine Kategorie für Modelle gibt dann halt beim Hersteller, wenns den auch nicht gibt dann irgendwie anders als Oldtimer oder ähnlich. Mindestens eine blaue Kategorie ist Untergrenze.

Beste Grüße --Tom (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Tom,
ist das jetzt für Ader schon erledigt ?
Bei der Kategorie stand jetzt Ader Vehicles.
Hast Du das korrigiert ?
Neptun22 Neptun22 (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Moin, ich sags mal direkt: langsam bin ich sauer. Wieso? Du machst einfach weiter mit roten Kategorieeinträgen. Beispiel:

Frage: hab ich zu blöd erklärt oder wieso verstehtst du nicht was zu tun ist? --Tom (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anscheinend nicht kapiert!
Darf man also nur Büssing anwählen ?
Macht das Programm keine Unterkategorien auf ?
Manche Sachen sind nicht so selbsterklärend.
Beim nächsten mal eben nur wie in diesem Beispiel Büssing.
Manche Sachen sind eben nicht so gut programmiert wie bei anderen EDV Programmen.
Neptun22 Neptun22 (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Categories?from=Büssing+DF64
Wie sind denn die anderen Kategorien entstanden wie DF64 usw.
Legt das ein Administrator an ?
Zu einigen Fahrzeugen gibt es Sammler und zu anderen nicht. Das ist schon relativ schlecht gemacht.
Neptun22 Neptun22 (talk) 15:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nee hier geht nix von allein und das ist bewusst so gemacht, eben weil wir in Wikipedia gemeinsam beschlossen haben, das die Arbeit von den Autoren und nicht von Maschinen gemacht wird.
Wenn ich dir jetzt einen Lehrgang zum Kat-System machen sollte/müsste, das wäre einerseits zeitaufwändig und andereseits bist du selbst dafür verantwortlich dich hier zu orientieren. So wie im Straßenverkehr, nur gibt es hier keine Führerscheinprüfung.
Kurzum:
1) Wenn keine oder rote Kategorieeinträge in den Medien sind, dann findet sie niemand.
2) Wenn du nicht dafür sorgst, dann müssen andere hinter dir herarbeiten (war regelmäßig Arger bedeutet).
3) Als Minimaleintrag ist meistens die Basiskategorie zum Thema (Fahrzeughersteller) geeignet.
4) Je besser und feiner Bilder zugeordnet werden, desto besser kann man sie verwerten.
Nun bitte Liste deiner bisherigen Bilder nachkontrollieren und gültige Kategorien eintragen. Ich hab nämlich keine Lust, dir "hinterherzurennen". Es gibt auch schönere Arbeiten hier, ich hab mich nämlich die letzten 2 Tage damit beschäftigt für Berliet die Strukturen einzurichten. Siehe: Category:Berliet vehicles Damit hab ich schon alle Hände voll zu tun und keine Zeit für Katkorrekturen deiner Bilder.
Verstanden? --Tom (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das nächste, wirklich große Problem ist, dass sämtliche Bilder unter einer untauglichen Lizensierung veröffentlicht sind (das ist keine freie Software, die man da sieht) und die Urheberrechtsfrage ungeklärt ist. Darauf wurde oben schon hingewiesen, mitsamt passender Erklärung, es hat sich aber nichts geändert. Es ist halt einfach nicht möglich, hier kistenweise alte Bilder hochzuladen, die man irgendwo findet. Sämtliche Arbeit die man da hineinsteckt ist wertlos, eigentlich braucht es in den meisten Fällen einen Löschantrag. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich hatte im Frühjahr die hochgeladenen Dateien von Neptun22 bis 8.3.2023 kategorisiert. An diesem Wochenende habe ich den Rest gemacht. Hat mich mehr als 2 Tage meiner Freizeit gekostet. Ich habe keine Fortschritte feststellen können. Dazu fielen mir heute einige Dateinamen auf, die zweifelhaft oder falsch sind. So ist das de:NSU Sulmobil ein Dreirad. Dieses Foto eines Vierrads war als Sulmobil bezeichnet, obwohl die Quelle "Kleiner Motorwagen" schreibt. Das kann kein de:Peugeot Typ 18 ein. Ist das ausgedacht? --Buch-t (talk) 08:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Trotz diverser Ansprachen und Hinweise wird der Fehler einfach fortgesetzt. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SVENSK-ENGELSKA_MOTOR-AKTIEBOL%C3%84GET_Fabrik.jpg ist in der nicht vorhandenen Kategorie Category:SVENSK ENGELSKA MOTOR AKTIEBOLÄGET. Es ist zum Verzweifeln. --Buch-t (talk) 10:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Copyright status: File:Wanderer W10.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wanderer W10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brennabor 6-25 Sport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:6-12 PS Motorwagen der Siemens-Schuckert-Werke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:NSU Kleiner Motorwagen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delahaye Type 0A.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thornycroft BT-Type.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thornycroft 20hp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rohrbach-Flugboot "Rodra", mit Lorraine-Dietrich-Motoren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodra Cabines des moteurs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Junkers F 13-L.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hansa-Lloyd CL5 Fischereihafen Geestemünde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hawa IS-10345.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 40.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 275.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 150.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 40 N.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 80 N.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 80.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 50.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing Typ 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brennabor Typ ATZ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brennabor Typ BL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brennabor Typ NL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:56, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brennabor Type N.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austro Fiat Typ SRM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austro Fiat Typ AFL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Playboy A48.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Normag NG 23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Büssing-NAG Trambus 1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aero Minor II 1947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotchkiss Type 686.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darracq 1901.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chevrolet Nr. 20.000.000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mildé-Kriéger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latil H 2 A.I.Y.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SOMUA Typ JL 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gobron-Brillié 1903.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Locomotrice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dolo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Druschba 4 (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]