User talk:Moroder/Archives 2012-2

anonymous nomination

bonjour herr Dottore

I'm afraid you forgot to sign your last nomination in QIC, and anonymous nominations are not allowed...

tsssss tsssss !

Have a nice day, anyway ;))--Jebulon (talk) 08:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroque Portal Breno (BS).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baroque portal in Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 20:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johann Dominik Mahlknecht on the Museum Ferdinandeum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Image de qualité -- JLPC 08:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal Santa Maria della Neve Pisogne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice sharpness and resolution.--ArildV 08:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neptune fountain Palazzo Bruni Conter Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 19:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Gering in Waidbruck 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks, started with HDR --Moroder 19:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal in the Stiftskirche in Gries Bozen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfectly sharp but good enough--Jebulon 16:22, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insom Santa Cristina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks tilted, but it seems natural. Good !--Jebulon 16:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks, it's the barn as in the painting--Moroder 16:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC) Yes, I've seen this very interesting comparison (I always have a look on file description pages when I review, one can find -sometimes- surprising treasures and infos). Well done !!--Jebulon 17:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo vecchio e fontana a Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pilasters on the left are not vertical. Maybe they should. --Coyau 13:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)  Done Uploaded a corrected version --Moroder 18:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC) QI now.. --Coyau 15:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Angry ?

Are you angry tonight ?

Anyway... Sorry for your statue in Innsbruck's museum, I like the composition very much (the eyes between the statued women and the painted man), but it has no chance IMO, due to extreme noise and unsharpness I'm afraid...

(And now, you will be a bit more angry, so I go to bed and stop uploading)

Have a good night, my friend !--Jebulon (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes I am angry (not at all at you) because I dont think noise should matter too much and much more then composition. I've seen tons of QI images which are just junk what regards composition and light. I knew that the statue would have been discarded because of the noise of 1000 ISO, but what should i do in a museum with no light and no tripod or flash possible. I think composition light, the content of the picture should matter much more for QI. Sincerely mon ami, do you think your bronze lion and your tour are better then my venus? Don't worry - by happy! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree we could discuss about the bronze lion, but yes, I think my tower (taken from a boat, on the moving river, not a lot of such pictures in the series of the tower...) is better than your Venus. Aber mein Freund, caro amico mio, maybe should you notice that I did not oppose to your Venus, precisely because I (partially) agree with your arguments ??? It is very hard to take pictures in museums, I know this very well. But ISO 1000 is really too much. Do you remember my pictures of the Kaisergruft in Vienna ? Do you really think it was easy to take such pictures at ISO 200, without flash nor tripod ? And what about my recent statues inside of the Louvre ? Have a look to the exif data... No, I agree, it is really not easy. You have no idea how many pictures of mine (of the Habsburg Crypt, for instance) I destroyed with a great disappointment... So I finally think for myself: if impossible, don't take picture. And yes, I'm happy, because I find very extraordinary, funny and interesting to speak at night with a Süd-Tyroler friend !!--Jebulon (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

It is exiting for me too. I fully appreciate your work in the museums and I know how difficult it is. In summary I think sometimes reviewers should pay mor attention to the value of the image rather then subtle technical details. The Tour is impressive regarding the light but I don't like the stuff on the bottom, the lion's head is really too much out of focus imo although the composition is nice, even with the impressive but a bit disturbing background. Btw, thanks for givin to "my" Venus a chance... Still one could discuss for ages on every picture...let's go to bed! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atzwang Oberwirt Fresken 1687 Krönung Mariä hl. Florian 1948 .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The kind of pictures I like very much, because of light and composition.--Jebulon 23:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Das Schmiedhaus in Waidbruck Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 21:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Rottenbuch 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wayside shrine in Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 11:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spielplatz am Brunnen St. Ulrich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Railwaystation in Bolzano Bozen.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railwaystation in Bolzano Bozen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bürgerhaus Bozen Sparkassenstrasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:36, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laion Trostburg Pruca alpini 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sparkassenstraße Bozen westen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice light--Lmbuga 18:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ on the cross Brugger Haus Waidbruck detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Orikrin1998 16:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugger Haus in Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ on the cross Brugger Haus Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österreicher Hof in Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 11:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberfinserhof Lajener Ried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 17:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco SAcun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture of a very interesting document.--Jebulon 10:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Leonhard in Kollmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puez and Crespëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I uploaded an reworked version, now it's a QI for me --Carschten 11:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lietres - Steinerne Stadt - Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:08, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Lietres - Drei Könige Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- JLPC 19:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergkreuz am Sëurasas von Peristi-Walpoth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cansla dla Charità Pic Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val Culea Sas dla Luesa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:12, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Hôtel Gaillard

Hi Moroder,

Thanks for promotting my recent pictures. The three (even the statue of Sarah Bernhardt, see the background at right) are showing elements of the de:Hôtel Gaillard, which is a very strange (and funny, IMO) gothic revival building in Paris, built and owned around the 1870s by a former gouverneur of the Banque de France, and used now as a building of the Banque de France. You may see the relevant Category:Hôtel Gaillard too. Interesting, isn't it ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, mon ami, I still have to answer your mail I havn't fogotten it. Interesting information! :-)) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Peter Lajen J. Arnold d.j. 1845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campill and Sas dla Luesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & useful. --NorbertNagel 19:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chedul y Cir Gherdeina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & useful. --NorbertNagel 19:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of Johann Dominik Mahlknecht on the front of Museum Ferdinandeum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine Picture! --Randy43 15:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria di Nazareth a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Keymeulen 15:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Catherine church in Lajener Ried 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, is the bell tower tilted in reality or just in this picture? otherwise QI Poco a poco 15:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. I checked also with the sacristan, the steeple is not tilted so I uploaded a corrected image --Moroder 21:56, 19 May 2012 (UTC) Good now Poco a poco 20:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Canale di San Pietro di Castello.jpg

I have considered your comments and I loaded a new version. Best Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgruine Wolkenstein Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lajener Ried Kollmann 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stevia Gröden Langental.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a dust spot on the left above the group of birds. --NorbertNagel 19:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks! Removed the spot --Moroder 23:08, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Steger Brücke über den Eisack.jpg

Hello my dear Doktor,

Please have another look on this picture you nominated in QIC, maybe you should withdraw your nomination and rework it a bit. There are many heavy chromatic aberration almost everywhere (along the branches, the wire, the dark beams especially at left for instance...) I like this interesting bridge very much, so I feel I cannot decline, but frankly, it cannot be a QI for the moment.

Best regards, --Jebulon (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you my friend for your help and appreciation. I worked on the CA as suggested by Archeodontosaurus.. and hope it is better now --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Not enough I think, see the top of the roof, and the beams at left... but your bishop is fine (more "decorated" than mine !-I like roman chasubles-. Pentecost is (Holy Spirit) time for confirmations, it was the case for my son two weeks ago...)--Jebulon (talk) 12:59, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for appreciating my évêque. In regard of CA I tryed my best but there is also some on your lamborghini :-))--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

? Yes, maybe, Lycaon/W.S/Biopics etc noticed it already, and so, what ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

You see CA in my pictures but not in yours... hahaha - Take it as a joke please. I still believe the reflexes on the lamborghini are overexposed

Hmmm... Not sure I fully enjoy this kind of jokes I don't understand. Due to my bad english, probably. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 19:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, nothing worst that jokes which are not well understood. I don't believe that your English is bad - (I think it is excellent). What I wanted to say: there is Chromatic Aberration on the lamborgini but I don't mind as there is chromatic aberration on my wooden bridge and you schouldn't mind too much. I feel that somtimes reviewers consider too much small technical faults (we are not on FP) and don't consider the content of the image, the composition. Don't you think so ? Our goal is to illustrate WP with good images, there are too many bad images around. I think that is also the purpose of QIC and that is the spirit in which I participate and "waste" a lot of ou time with great interest in QIC. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Antonius von Padua und Friedhof in Blumau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Paul Ludwig Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Paul det Ludwig Moroder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Taken under moderate lighting, from a considerable distance (so no flash); still QI for me. -- Aisano 19:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Alles gut ?

hi Moroder,

• I worry about you, I hope you are fine, you and family, in your tyroler mountains, with the earthquakes !
• best, --Jebulon (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Mon Ami! Merci beaucoup. I am fine but the earth has shaken a lot, I had only a little carved animal damaged falling from a shelf. But I feel bad for all my cannationals suffering from the great damage.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'm happy you are safe. Trully sorry nevertheless for the great damages and the victims.--Jebulon (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischof Ivo Muser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI--Jebulon 13:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosshotel Blumau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zollstation Schloss Friedburg Kollmann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Blumau Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good Self-portrait in the center ;-)--S. F. B. Morse 10:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Good but the main door is tilted and there is a white stripe at the upper left corner. --Selbymay 16:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your notes, fixed the perspective but cannot see the stripe, could you please put a note on the picture?--Moroder 18:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC) Good job for the perspective. The white line is very thin and visible only in full res. --Selbymay 22:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)  Done Congratulations for your eyesight! --Moroder 06:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC) I think it is OK ~for QI now. Nice subject. --Slaunger 20:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schutzengel Dorigo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 07:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orgun nuef Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 20:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blumau Widum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but there's one imperfection, please see annotation. Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC))  Done Thanks for reviewing. I killed also some clouds on the right although I'd rather had killed the powerlines (English grammar!??)--Moroder 17:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC) It would be better to say removed. Thanks. Mattbuck 19:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dlieja de Sant Antone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Columns at Palais-Royal in QIC

Hello Moroder !

I prefer continue this interesting discussion here, because if not, it should be too long in the QIC page.

I don't understand the problem.

Maybe I could agree about the crop of the windows (horizontal composition), but it means a lost of information. If I cut it "clean", you may think that you see "all" the windows, which is not the case, it is a series. I prefer a "looking random" crop.

As for the column capitals, it is the "suggestion" of the columns. My lens was not able to take horizontally the windows, the roofs etc... and the whole columns (with many disturbing persons and distractive elements below). A "portrait" picture was not my choice, as I wanted to show this typical kind of series of french 17th-century architecture of windows. I could crop out the capitals of the columns, but then, how to understand that it is a second floor in real, with a gallery under ?

That is the explanation I can provide to you about my choices.

Anyway, thanks for careful reviews !--Jebulon (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jebulon, it's always nice to hear from you personally and have a good and fruitful discussion. Well, I will be short, I have a expert witness to write for tomorrow. However you cut an image you will always see that it is a detail, therefor I am of the opinion that you better cut it in a way that the image is aestetically good (I think QI is not only technical). I see horrendous cuts that hurt me in the stomach like this and this. OK this is at least my opinion maybe some scholar would say I am wrong and some other that I am right, I don't know, it is my aesthetical instinct. Have a nice evening my friend --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello Wolfgang Moroder,

It's nice for me too to discuss with you.

Shortly too, I'm afraid we disagree, and we have to live together with that ! ;)

And it is not a drama.

The two examples you shows are not shocking to me. I'm tending to support those kind of pictures (I'll not do so for this time, in order to avoid provocation against you, but I can't promise anything for the future !).

I agree QI might not be "only" technical, but it depends what you mean by "technical". In my opinion, you think the three pictures (including mine) are not good because of "technical" matters: here, the composition. "Composition" is one of the parts of the technical matters, in my opinion, but some are more important to me, like sharpness, light, colors, contrasts, "burned" pixels, bluryness usw... A well composed picture, with a good idea, appealling, and a creative work, (I remember your recent lying statue in the Museum of Innsbruck or Salzburg, looking at the picture on the wall behind) is not a QI by itself, if it is not sharp, or blurry, or noisy etc...

And I know and understand it is not your opinion.

Let's remain good friends however !--Jebulon (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your friendship, sincerely. I will answer later but tell me what you think of this image --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Not my cup of tea... Why ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Breaking news: I've reworked the "Palais-Royal", no more cropped windows, no more columns... Would you please have a new look ?--Jebulon (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwidum Atzwang Eingang.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 07:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bischof Ivo Muser 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--S. F. B. Morse 06:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle in Breno Valcamonica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 17:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Leonhard in Kollmann 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 15:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christis St. Christina Gröden Trebinger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 08:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historicist building in Brescia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

spelling corrections

Thank you for spelling corrections, the Italian is not my native language. Anyway, even in my native language I can not write: I'm dyslexic :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

It's my pleasure! Also to see your beautiful pictures of Venice --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marketenderin in Grödner Tracht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 14:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Felseck Kastelruth detail art nouveau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Felseck Kastelruth detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grödner Bach a Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Why are there "snow towers" in the river bed? --NorbertNagel 09:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Info Thanks for the review. For decoration - Ice towers very appreciated by the tourists--Moroder 09:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrwidum Atzwang.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Catherines Church Corvara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it's a bit bright, it needs the high levels reduced somewhat to allow better contrast. Mattbuck 11:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review and the suggestion --Moroder 23:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC) OK, good enough. Mattbuck 10:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

hi

hi brother! how do your image get camera location after you uploaded them here. i have uploaded some of mine and i don't know why and how to do it. please reply me thank you.--Neogeolegend (talk) 08:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, what image and what location are you talking about? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

• This one for example[1] how do i add camera location?--Neogeolegend (talk) 09:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok, maybe I understood. You are speaking in general about geocoding. Well: go [here] put the cross on the location and read the coordinates (N 46.51315 E 11.47896). On your file use these templates: location dec|46.51315|11.47896 for the location of the camera or Object location|46.51315|11.47896 for the location of the object and it's done. 08:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC). Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot my Brother for the help.--Neogeolegend (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Felseck Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ with Angel Val Gardena 700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Estatua de Kinga, Catedral de Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-05, DD 07.JPG

Hallo Wolfgang, ich habe vor einigen Tagen kurz nach deinem Review "Tilted otherwise QI" das Bild entsprechend korrigiert aber bisher nichts mehr von dir gehört. Verdient es nun den QI Stempel oder ist es noch nicht soweit? Viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Review! VG Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Non c'è di che...it's a pleasure--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Nude by Johann Dominik Mahlknecht - Museum Ferdinandeum.JPG

Hey, ich habe bei dem Bild den Hintergrund noch komplett entfernt. LG, Amada44  ^{talk to me} 10:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Amada, das Bild wurde jedoch nicht wegen dem Hintergrund sondern dem fehlendem Sockelteil nicht als QI akzeptiert. Man könnte den Sockel dazuflicken aber dann kommt schon wieder einer und glaubt die ISOS seien zu viel ;-) Gruss Maria Alessandro--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Es geht doch nicht nur um Qi sondern auch darum, dass das Bild besser aussieht, oder? Naja, hab mal mehr Sockel drangemacht. LG, Amada44  ^{talk to me} 14:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Sehr gut, ich werds jetzt für QI vorschlagen. Natürlich ist QI nicht alles aber ich lege sehr viel Wert darauf, dass meine Bilder auf WM auch einen Qualitätssiegel haben. Soll ich es wieder nominieren oder kannst Du das machen? Mir gefällt jedoch auch das Bild mit dem Hintergrund gerade weil man das Gefühl hat, die Nackte würde sich das Bild anschauen... Gruß und viel Dank für deine Hilfe --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Catherine church in Lajener Ried internal view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with sharpening, but ok. --Mattbuck 18:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review. Sharpened --Moroder 21:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Picture nominated for QI

Hallo Moroder,

thanks for the information, I saw improvements and your picture promoted. Well done and keep going with these great pictures! (for the record, we both appreciate de:Johann Dominik Mahlknecht :)

--Selbymay (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your appreciation and encouragment. I'd like to nominate the Evangelists by Mohlknecht (as you call him) but I'll have to go to my church (300 m. from my home) to take some new images. Regards Wolfgang

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atzwang 2012 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church Atzwang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's some CA on the tower, but I'm not convinced generally: I feel the subject is too dark compared with the background, and unfortunately that's a reality issue, not a photographic one. Mattbuck 10:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review. The church faces north. Do you believe I can do anything besides taking the picture in the late evening and have the western side in the sun? --Moroder 19:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Ah, unfortunate. I'll let someone else review. Mattbuck 10:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Noon light is a bit harsh, and it would have been more optimal later in the day. But acceptable IMO and the DOF, detail level is fine with very low noise. There is a small black thing in the sky above the spire. At first I thought it was some dirt, but maybe a distant bird? --Slaunger 21:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Tipp

Hi Wolfgang, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du deine Zähler per Hand aktualisierst. Mit diesem kleinen Fix ist diese Aufgabe überflüssig und damit auch immer aktuell. Ich hoffe, du betrachstest es nicht als Einmischung, du kannst natürlich gerne meine Edition rückgängig machen. Das gleiche kannst du natürlich bei VI und FPs machen. Tanti saluti alla bella Italia, Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo - keine Einmischung - bin dir fuer den Tipp sehr dankbar --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Waidbruck Wasserstation Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhof Waidbruck Wasserstation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--ArildV 14:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosshotel Blumau Südansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Ivo Muser in VI

Hi ! I'm a newby (I began to download photos one month ago) and I'm mot really sure, but I think you made a slight mistake in the presentation of your photo. IMO, there's a problem about the scope : your link points to the Wikipedia page about Ivo Muser, instead of pointing to "Category:Ivo Muser", where, in fact, it's the best and, of course, VI. Just change this detail and I think it'll be OK. (I don't write this on the page itself, because I'm not used to Wikipedia habits, and I'm too old to talk to other people -- even if they're younger than me -- in a short and harsh way, like some users sometimes do and like bad teachers always do). Sorry for my English. Regards. JLPC (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I think that your English is much better then mine! Thanks , you are right, but it's a while since I have have posted my last pictures at VI. Best regards!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I have just added a french translation of the caption. Alleluia !--Jebulon (talk) 16:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Le ciel est garanti. I'd love it if you'd ad French captures to the images of J.D. Mahlknecht --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done, not for each picture, but for the whole category, with links to the french WP relevant articles, gratis for you just because you are a good friend .--Jebulon (talk) 23:46, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Gratis et puor la gloire ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Great! Mahlknecht was born in de:Überwasser which belongs to the municipality Kastelruth but to the parochial community of Urtijëi. When he was born he was therefor recorded in the registers of Urtijëi. Have a nice photographic Sunday, mon ami! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done the precision.--Jebulon (talk) 13:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

A little other mistake in the caption of : File:Stations Ferdinand Demetz Urtijei.jpg. I wasn't there but I'm sure JKesus is 33 on your photo(!). Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

thank you soo mutch, you are damn right!! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Schgaguler Hof

Hi, zu deinem Bild mit dem Schgaguler Hof File:Schgaguler-Hof Kastelruth.jpg unter QIC:
die vertikalen Linien ganz rechts sind ok, links am Haus lehnen sie ein wenig nach rechts. Du könntest die linke Linie des Hauses in die Vertikale bringen. PhotoShop: select all>edit>distort: links oben ein klein wenig nach links ziehen. Ich hab's versucht, es funktioniert. (Aber wahrscheinlich weisst du das alles).
Noch etwas zu deinen Bildern: unter dem hellen Himmel leuchten sie manchmal zu wenig. Probier mal: Himmel auswählen, die Selektion umkehren, dann Tonemapping (Levels, oder auch Autotone, wenn notwendig Autotone abschwächen) auf den zu dunklen unteren Teil. Das wirkt Wunder (aber aufgepasst wenn Baumkronen in den Himmel ragen). Ich habe auch das bei dem Bild des Schgaguler Haus ausprobiert: sieht gut aus. Bitte verstehe dies als gutgemeinte Hilfe :-). Ich selbst habe hier viel durch Kritik und Ratschläge gelernt. Übrigens, wir haben dieselbe Kamera (D800). Herzliche Grüße aus Luxemburg. --Cayambe (talk) 19:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Moroder, ich komme noch einmal zu dem Schgaguler Hof zurück: das Bild ist unten GUT ausgeleuchtet. Hatte es mir gestern nur auf meinem zweiten, dunkel eingestellten Schirm, angesehen... und war etwas müde. Sorry, --Cayambe (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)--Cayambe (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, vielen vielen Dank für deine Tipps, dieselben Gedanken hatte ich schon immer aber bin mit PS night besonders gut - ich werde auf jedem Fall noch die korrektur der Perspektive versuchen. schönen Sonntag! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Leonhard in Kollmann Süd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments the crosses in front are not so good, but nevertheless QI for me --Taxiarchos228 09:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I agree but could not lift up in the air and behind me was a wall ;-) --Moroder 10:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neptun fountain in Bozen South Tyrol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steger Brücke über den Eisack A22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beggar Saint Elisabeth Group.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Gering in Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucifix in the Saint Catharine church in Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lafay-Hof Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral Brixen front detail bishops.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral Brixen front detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Villa Felseck Kastelruth North.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villa Felseck Kastelruth North.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienaltar Sankt Oswald Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --JLPC 08:56, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schgaguler-Hof Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for QI. --Cayambe 18:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Porträt Schauspielerin Anna Unterberger

Vorab: Ich finde es schade (aber auch verständlich), dass sie das Porträt wegen unsachlicher Kommentare als Kandidat für exzellente Bilder zurückgezogen haben.
Bezüglich der Kandidatur bei QI würde mich interessieren, woher der deutliche Grünton im Gesicht der Schauspielerin kommt. Wenn es vom Make-up und / oder dem Umgebungslicht kommt, wäre ein entsprechender Hinweis bei QI und in der Bildbeschreibung meiner Meinung nach hilfreich. Gruß --J. Lunau (talk) 14:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Lunau, herzlichen Dank für dein Interesse. Der Grünton stammt sicher von einer "falschen Beleuchtung": zuviel grünes Licht in der Umgebung, und nicht von einer falschen Kameraeinstellung sonst könnte ich es doch ausbessern. Take it as it is. Ich und andere haben das Bild reichlich mit notes versorgt. Ciao --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of bishop Ivo Muser.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgo detail Josef Moroder Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stations Ferdinand Demetz Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality! I like it. Good. --Steinsplitter 08:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Felseck Kastelruth North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 22:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historical building 5 at the cathedral in Brixen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality, meets all Qi criteria for me. --J. Lunau 15:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance Saint Nikolaus church in Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. I like the composition. A detailed picture of the door (the engravings of angels etc...) should be interesting too, in another occasion...--Jebulon 09:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ansitz Lafay in Kastelruth Eingang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spitzëch Bula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.now. --Cayambe 07:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Actress Anna Unterberger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would like some indication of the location for the photo in the file description. As a minimum the country cf. COM:PEOPLE and also whether it was taken in a public or private place. Maybe some variant of the {{Consent}} template is relevant in the file page. Besides that all criteria met. A very good and naturally looking portrait. Congratz. --Slaunger (talk) 09:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose File:Actress Anna Unterberger2.jpg has better colors, and geocoding is needed. Yann (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I disagree about the colors -- I think this one is better -- but either way, geocoding is needed. cmadler (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose - no geocoding. --Claritas (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Info: Sorry, I do not understand why geocoding. I specified the town Bozen, where the picture was taken, in the description, I do not want and I believe I don't need, same as the actress, to be more specific about the location which is private. Thanks for the suggestion to add the consent template. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
  •  Support Fair enough, I do now see that the city is given in the description. I now support this image. cmadler (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
    • OK about the geocoding, but the colors are still wrong. See Berthold Werner's notes. Yann (talk) 11:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
      • That's as may be, but the overall color is still better in this image than in the other. That might be (OK, it probably would be) a problem for QI, but this is VI, and we have but to choose the best suitable image. This one is at least adequate, and is better, so I support this one. cmadler (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support With the added information that it is taken at a private place (I have added this detail to the file page) in Italy and that the creator had consent from Anna, I find all criteria are met. Due to the private nature no need for geocoding, Bozen is fine. --Slaunger (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church - Sacred Heart chapel Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marguerite Marie Alacoque Pfarrkirche St. Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Jebulon 08:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Devotion of the Tyrolean people to Sacred Heart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You pay very respectful tributes to the Moroder artists family !--Jebulon 08:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Regensburger Hütte in Südtirol Cisles Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 21:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Flösser (Kastelruth).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. Verry Good quality. DE: Super Bild, Super Qualität und gute Position. --Steinsplitter 13:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Nikolaus in Tisens (Kastelruth) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 12:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LampelehofSankt Michael Kastelruth Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nikolaus church Kastelruth main door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I find these details very nice. It is a QI. Thank you.--Jebulon 15:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Nikolaus in Tisens (Kastelruth).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it much better now. The extreme upper part is slightly out of focus but what do you expect at 35 MPx. -- Aisano 18:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Verwendung des Bildes "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rosary-Madonna-Mersa.jpg"

Sehr geehrter Herr Moroder,

herzlichen Dank für die Bereitstellung Ihres Fotos "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rosary-Madonna-Mersa.jpg".

Wensleydale Press, ein Selbstverlag für die Musik-Publikationen von Gerard Carter (Australien) und mir (Deutschland), verwendet Ihr hervorragendes Foto für die anstehende Notenausgabe "The Rosary, Music of César Franck, freely arranged for organ by Gerard Carter Op. 4".

Sie wird demnächst im Buchhandel und auf unserer Website www.lisztsonata.com (bzw. www.wensleydalepress.com.au) zu finden sein.

Wir erwähnen auf der Copyright-Seite Ihren Namen und würden Ihnen gerne ein Exemplar der gedruckten Ausgabe zuschicken, wenn sie verfügbar ist (in 1-2 Monaten). An welche Adresse soll ich Ihnen die Partitur schicken?

Nochmals herzlichen Dank und viele Grüße

Martin Adler

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taufbecken Jesus und Tühfer in Holz vergoldet Pfarrkirche St. Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:42, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Ulrich Fresco Kirchebner Pfarrkirche St Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 17:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco Pfarrkirche St Ulrich in Gröden Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 17:15, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altar St. Nikolaus Kirche in Tisens Kastelruth.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altar St. Nikolaus Kirche in Tisens Kastelruth.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

XenonX3 (talk) 14:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacrifice-of-Isaac-detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Giorgio Moroder.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful... a parent can be?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

• Parent? you mean my dad? I'm too old or he is too young - he is a relative.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Parent: such as brother or cousin ... cousin probably ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Sankt Vigil Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 20:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ritsch-Hof Kastelruth Südtirol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI for me --Haneburger 14:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Nikolaus Statue in Tisens Kastelruth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would have tried a bit of perspective correction, but ok --Poco a poco 10:54, 30 June 2012 Tks for the review. I'v tried a selective correction but this looks more natural (UTC)

Bildnutzung

Ich verwende Dein Foto in stark modifizierter Form (http://www.skischule.it/images/10.jpg) als Banner, um auf einen Blog hinzuweisen. Das Projekt ist noch in Entwicklung. Ich weise nach Fertigstellung im Impressum auf die Bildrechte hin. Wäre das ok? --Msuess (talk) 20:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Freut mich sehr, schick mir bitte die entgültige Version. Viel Erfolg! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühle beim Malenger St. Vigil Kastelruth west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühle beim Malenger, Kastelruth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baptismal font Parish Church of Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Flash light maybe a bit strong, but QI nevertheless--Jebulon 17:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review, mon ami. You should look at exifdata: flash did not fire :-)) --Moroder 19:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Oh, indeed... So definitely QI !--Jebulon 21:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Magdalena Kirche in Tagusens Kastelruth Decke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Oswald Kirche Kastelruth Innenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 19:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kampedeller-Hof St. Vigil (Kastelruth).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 17:03, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bartholomäus Apostel St. Magdalena Kirche Tagusens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:22, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ritsch-Hof St. Michael Kastelruth westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagusens Tschefas Tanürz St. Peter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice view! Minor overexposed areas on the clouds, but nevertheless QI to me. I like especially the foreground colors. --Iifar 15:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Magdalena Kirche Tagusens Kastelruth Innenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 19:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ritsch-Hof in St. Michael in Kastelruth Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 17:34, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mort de Sant Ujep de Albino Pitscheider Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Sculptures byJosef Konrad Wieser

Good evening. I've just written the support formula above your set on VI page. I just modified the title of the scope. I thought it needed a slight modification because the first link only pointed to two pictures of the set. I hope I've done well. If nor, you can have a look at it and modify. In any case, your set is VI for me. -- Best regards. -- JLPC (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi JLPC, thanks for reviewing my nomination and appreciating my photographic work. My intention was to nominate the two sculptures as a set to promote the sculptor and I actually created a category with his name. The pictures of the altar and the exterior view of the church where intendet only to create the (magic) frame where these sculptures are "hidden". An other jewel of the little church is the altarpiece by F.S. Unterberger which deserves an other VI nomination. It is the second time i've tryed to take a picture of it but it would need some harder work (lighting etc) to give it the right professional quality. Anyhow, I'm glad that the set is appreciated and I'd like to do some more research and mybe write an article on this baroque sculptor which I find great and worth to be presented to a wider public.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tisens innen 017 018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijëi dal pas de Pinëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 20:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Nitpicking in QIC

Hallo my favourite Süd-Tyroler friend ! (well, I have no other in this part of the world, but you are my favourite anyway...)

I was to support your recent nomination in QIC, because I find it very nice.

But I've noticed a thin white line all around the building, especially near the sky, and I'm afraid some of our "friends" in the page will quibble about that...

Do you think you could improve this ?

Cheers from (rainy) Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Mon cher ami!It is always a pleasure to hear from you and from Paris (one of my favorite). Now I have been working to fix the leaves (a propos I liked your sympa appreciation of the flag) with the same stitching problem as with the leaves (using HDR it happpens on moving objects). Well, I cut off the nasty breech and now everything is fixed. I understand you with the white line, but I refuse to work on a white line which is exactly 2 pixels large, out of 4400 which is 0,5 per thousend. So if they like my image it`s OK otherwise... fuck them. I work on a project on WP (monuments, which I like and don't want to waste my time with stupid peoply fuzzing around for a couple of pixels. Here we have a nice summer, come and visit me! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Oswald Kirche Kastelruth Nordseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One step left, and more space above are maybe needed, but QI. Motion blur of the flag is interesting.--Jebulon 23:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Oswald Kastelruth Innenansicht Chor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 11:06, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Oswald Kirche Kastelruth südost Seite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, still I would crop the right side a bit --Poco a poco 17:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laurentius und die Armen Arnold d. Ä..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. -- JLPC 17:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Der Schlern aus Kastelruth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal St. Oswald Kirche Kastelruth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good but crop can be improved, can you get rid of the lamp and of a bit of floor? Poco a poco 09:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)  Done Your wish is my command ;-) --Moroder 21:28, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holzstatue St. Magdalena Kirche Tagusens Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saslonch Pic Pieralongia Cisles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portal St. Vigil Kirche Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I feel it's a too tight crop on the right side AzaToth 17:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)  Done Uploaded a version with larger crop --Moroder 10:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)The light is not very pleasant, but QI--Jebulon 09:27, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Saint Leonard Church in Kollmann, South Tyrol.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Saint Leonard Church in Kollmann, South Tyrol.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 19:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stevia Cir Sella.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 22:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mastlé, Pic, Saslonch.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments really nice --AzaToth 17:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fetal spine 19 weeks Dr Wolfgang Moroder.theora.ogv, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fetal spine 19 weeks Dr Wolfgang Moroder.theora.ogv has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Fetus pissing

 Done.

Hello dear Freund,

I'm still here, but I'm a bit...pissed of () by QIC for the moment. I feel the air is heavy, and I need to breethe. The "AzaToth" drama was the trigger for me to stop temporarily.

I'm stunned by the daily series of trains under rain by M., the flooding, "run-for-label" and agressiveness of T., the tunnels by C., the stupid and "make-a-point" votes by R., the lessons and patronizing tone by D. etc... Every question, every "decline" vote becames now a circus, so I feel no more good to nominate my own pictures there. I know myself, and I know I'm not able to stay "mellow" enough. A little rest will be a good way.

I continue to upload (I've a lot of good pictures to work with), and I'll be back, don't worry. Now, I'm waiting for my vacations I need really, because I'm tired, the year I spend at job was really difficult.--Jebulon (talk) 08:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

You did not mention the search for CA and other little "peli nell'uovo" by l so far ;-). Have a good holiday and I am looking forward for your new production. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Do you like this one  ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

WOOOW, how did you manage that and on the jour de la Bastille? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, have a look on the caption. But no need to translate "Bastille day" in french, we never use these words ! For us, the usual name is just the date: the "quatorze juillet".--Jebulon (talk) 10:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitschberg Gröden Osthang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 10:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Vigil Kastelruth Südansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment First impression was pretty good, but what happened to the leafs? Retouched sky? Also notable blue CA on leafs. --Iifar 07:09, 13 July 2012 (UTC)  DoneFixed stitching and CA issues due to HDR --Moroder 10:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC). It's definitely better now, but some blue CA is still there. --Iifar 12:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC) At 100% pixel size you cant see it and at greater magnification it is really irrelevant; I believe we are at QI here and not at FP --Moroder 13:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC).  Support Good quality. --Danrok 19:04, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar Sankta Magdalena in Tagusens detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 18:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagusens oswald anna unterberger 032 029.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:31, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Use Of Your Photography

Hello Mr Moroder

Thank you for allowing the public to use you images at no cost. I will be using Aspen Mountain.jpg on my website. I will be sure to make sure to give you (Wolfgang Moroder) the credit on the photo.

The website address will be www.RebeccaRohman.com

Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions at RebeccaRohman@hotmail.com.

Hope you have a great day!

Kind regards

Rebecca Rohman

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fetal yawning 4D ultrasound ecografia 4D Dr. Wolfgang Moroder.theora.ogv, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fetal yawning 4D ultrasound ecografia 4D Dr. Wolfgang Moroder.theora.ogv has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Sculptures by Josef Konrad Wieser in Mary Magdalene church, Tagusens.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Sculptures by Josef Konrad Wieser in Mary Magdalene church, Tagusens.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tisens und St. Nikolaus Kirche in Kastelruth .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop out the bush on the left, but anyhow QI --Poco a poco 16:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)  Info Thanks for the review. IMO a crop on the left would take away also the mountain in the bottom and reduce the depth of the landscape --Moroder 06:52, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kirche Sankt Vigil Kastelruth.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirche Sankt Vigil Kastelruth.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Blackfriars Bridge MMB 01.jpg

I have altered this image, is the new version better? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Insam Prinoth Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 18:57, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa martiner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 16:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val-Mezdi-freeride.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val-Mezdi-input.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 17:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runcata-y-tubla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:54, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! School-Tempsicore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 12:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pertan Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 16:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Peza in Urtijei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Viel besser geworden --Poco a poco 21:02, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela de Resciesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 06:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda Gherdeina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtijei Seceda and Pic.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela de Resciesa interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela de Resciesa interior crucifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Backscatter on Resciesa Val Gardena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strangely, boldly, perfectly. --Florstein 16:25, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

QI

Hi, I moved the discussion here because it would take too much space on QIC. The image has improved, but I still have the feeling that the building is falling. Maybe the best thing to do is to ad an other picture under the heading |other_versions= depicting the whole building in order to let the reviewer see which are the strait falling lines and be able to judge the vertical perspective. Regarding the horizontal perspective it looks fine on the bottom but how about the top? That still looks weird in your picture. I am not an expert in architectural photography but these are my suggestions, I hope they can help. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (d) 06:28, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't have any full-frontal views of the house, but Commons has some here. Is it enough for you ? If not, don't worry, I'm not going to enter into depression for this :-)

Thanks anyway for your review ! -Gzzz (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela de Resciesa north face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting. --ArildV 15:52, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exner and Bruneck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough although brigthenss/sharpness could be still improved Poco a poco 16:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

God beware us from depression... I can see that this is not easy to fix, maybe you can let the picture fall a little bit more to the left. Regards!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cesa-Insam-Prinoth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 15:56, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fussgangerzon St. Ulrich.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Danke dass Du Commons mit Südtirol Bilder bebilderst. Danke für die vielen QL-Bilder. Steinsplitter (talk) 19:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks, I appreciate your encouragement a lot.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brenn Tal Kastelruth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 08:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagusens oswald anna unterberger 152.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lafogler-Hof Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark areas could be a bit brigther but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 16:53, 3 August 2012 (UTC) Thabks for the review, uploaded brighter image with perspective correction --Moroder 22:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago garda MG 044.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Oswald Kirche in Kastelruth Südseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verry Good quality. --Steinsplitter 21:02, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grohmann-portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Oswald Kirche in Kastelruth Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Letztes Abendmahl Peter Nocker Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lechsant Stevia Sella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grialëces cuecenes .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costamula de sëura Urtijëi.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:31, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagusens oswald anna unterberger 154 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Nikolaus Tisens Kastelruth innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altar St. Nikolaus Kirche in Tisens Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 09:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienkapelle Seiser Alm innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freskos in St. Oswald Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frescos in St. Oswald Kastelruth apsis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruf de cuecenes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Front parish church Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tubla de Puent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Mauta Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Antony in Urtijei front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Bruel Muradeures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kranebitter Sankt Vigil Kastelruth.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 12:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresken Altarraum Pfarrkirche St. Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now, although I wouldn't have changed the curves Poco a poco 05:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing. Well, you asked for a perspective correction ;-). In fact it's a round arch --Moroder 08:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC) I meant that I wouldn't have changed the contrast, brigthness, and so on curves! :) Poco a poco 10:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tubla de Puent sopert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Haneburger 08:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Da Rusina ju a Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Adler and Hotel Cavallino in Urtijei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Iifar 14:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schützenkompanie in Grödner Tracht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grialeces cuecenes egon 071.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruf de cuecenes y Grialeces.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Iifar 18:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenfahne und Herz Jesu St. Ulrich in Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 06:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Nikolaus Kirche in Tisens Hauptaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grialëces cuecenes mo plu in su tl bosch .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saslonch da Mastle Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 12:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lec de Mastlé Gherdëina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 16:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gherlanda spiza in Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Kirchenfane St. Ulrich in Gröden.jpg

Hallo Wolfgang, meines Erachtens ist das Rauschniveau von diesem Bild zu hoch, es kann aber auch sein, dass ich mit diesem Thema etwas überempfindlich geworden bin (deswegen weil am Anfang grundsätzlich deswegen meine Bilder bei QIC abgelehnt wurden). Ich reduziere immer das Rauschniveau von all meinen Bildern bevor ich sie in JPEG umwandle. Das kann ich nur empfehlen. Das Argument, dass das Bild einfach so geworden ist, ist etwas wacklig. Bei deiner Kamera sollte schon der Anspruch sein, dass der Himmel sanft aussieht. Viele Grüße, Poco a poco (talk) 22:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Diego, vom Bild habe ich leider kein RAW file. Ich habs mir jetzt mit meinem Eizo Monitor angeschaut aber ich finde di JPG Artefakte sind bei 100% schon wirklich minimal. Ich lass mich aber gerne belehren, da ich nicht verstehe wie und warum ich das Rauschniveau reduzieren soll, sogar bei allen Bildern? Macht das nicht mein Fotoapparat? Bei hoheren ISO Werten? Meistens fotografiere ich ja mit 100 ISO? Bin gespannt auf deine Antwort. Lieben Gruss --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Meine Antwort ging über Email! VG Poco a poco (talk) 22:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pass Padon Dolomites.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sky! --Iifar 18:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grialëces cuecenes mo tl bosch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlüsselübergabe an Petrus J.Arnold d.Ä detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JLPC 22:02, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco a San Piere Laion Josef Arnold der Ältere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco by Josef Arnold der Ältere in St. Peter bei Lajen life of St Peter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:02, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schmiedhaus Waidbruck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musikkapelle St. Ulrich Prozession.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

picture of Melkhitsedek

Hi, With a group of friends we will publish a book about the future of humanity during the aquarius time.Among the chapters is one about Melkhitsedek. I would like to have an authorisation from you to use the picture taken at santa maria del rosario in Venice. My e mail is dorado375@live.com I am claude Brun from Canada. Thank you very much

I'm very delighted for your choice. E-mail will follow - Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühle bei Malenger St. Vigil Kastelruth Westansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle Drocker-Hof Kastelruth Innenansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rescion in Sureghes Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmhouse Col de Flam in Urtijëi from west .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farmhouse Col de Flam in Urtijëi .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raschötzer Wald.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 07:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenfane St. Ulrich in Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Don't see the artefacts in the sky, if any, they are not a problem. QI and useful for me --Herzi Pinki 09:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Claraia clarai Werfen formation Val Gardena.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Óðinn 00:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cir and Sellagroup Juac.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice view, but some of the clouds are strongly overexposed. --Iifar 18:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, I retouched the overexposed clouds --Moroder 09:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Firilacroco 19:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Kandidat

Hallo Wolfgang, was hälst du von dieser Nominierung? Morgen ist es mit dem Stimmen vorbei und, ehrlich gesagt, Kommentare wie dieses hatten mich bewegt, das Bild zu nominieren, viele Grüsse, Poco a poco (talk) 08:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC) PS: Übrigens, dein FP Kandidaten von den Dolomiten ist Wahnsinn!

Lieber Diego, danke für dein Kompliment!! Mir gefällt das Bild gut (wie bereits besagt, und da gab es noch keine Korrektur der Perspektive. Für FP fürchte ich jedoch sind die Artefakte wegen der hohen Iso einfach zu stark. Nichts für ungut --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Das ist schade, aber ich respektiere es. Bis bald, Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchenfahne Fronleichnam St. Ulrich in Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frescos on the north face of the parish church St. Peter bei Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco on Parish Church Saint Peter Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture and good quality--Llorenzi 13:47, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ on the Mount of Olives St Peter Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a little crop below, IMO. Otherwise QI.--Jebulon 13:57, 21 August 2012 (UTC)  Cropped below--Moroder 15:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Thank you. No doubt for QI.--Jebulon 16:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco on Parish Church Saint Peter Lajen outside north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture and good quality--Llorenzi 13:47, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aaron by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fresco Sankt Peter Lajen 18 Jahrhundert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seiser-Alm mit Sella und Langkofel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments minor stitching error at the little hut in the middle, otherwise very nice --Taxiarchos228 14:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC).  Comment I can't see any stitching errors, please add a note. Very nice and sharp to me. I would remove some (perhaps birds) spots on the sky. --Iifar 14:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)  Fixed stitching and dots --Moroder 17:15, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Resciesa de DIte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition --Haneburger 13:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela da Poz a Urtijei pert levasuredl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capela da Poz Urtijei da pert dl suredl che sen va.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cris sun Seceda da per dl suredl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda pieralongia sacun 2012 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tubla de Pieralongia te Ncisles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seceda pieralongia sacun 2012 026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 18:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieralongia te Ncisles Gröden.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Florstein 18:30, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grödner Dolomiten Seiser-Alm Hi res.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grödner Dolomiten Seiser-Alm Hi res.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Skjern Enge

Hallo,

muss mich schon sehr über deine hier benutzte Sprache wundern. Ich weiß auch nicht, was so schwierig daran sein soll, das unsauber hergestellte Schild als solches zu erkennen und stattdessen CA oder sonstige Dinge dem Bild anzudichten. Auf diesem Niveau habe ich auch keine Lust, mich überhaupt mit Dir weiter zu unterhalten. Ich verkaufe niemanden für blöd und finde Deinen Tonfall absolut daneben und unangemessen. --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw, nimm das bitte nicht so übel. Ich habe auch versucht, meinen Tonfall mit "I don't want to be mean" " never mind" und "sei mir nicht böse" zu mildern. Es tut mir leid, dass es mir nicht gelungen ist und möchte mich dafür entschuldigen. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

About FP

Hi! I'm sorry I didn't answer on time. I said the image was a bit blurry because of some of the trees and because of some parts of the mountains. I asked about the aperture of your lens because if sharpness is as good as with f8, you could have used smaller aperture to increase depth of field and get the trees more focused. Have I explained myself? I hope so ;) It's just that I felt you could have done even better, because it is a nice panorama. Regards, --Kadellar (talk) 21:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kadellar, thanks for reviewing my pictures. I use f8 as sort of a compromise but you are right I could have used f11 but over 11 everybody tells me the you are going to have artifacts. But listen, with a focal lengh of 42 mm and f8 everything beyond 2-3 meters is in focus. Therefore if you believe to see some blurry parts its not the aperture. On the other side, I use a tripod and 2 seconds delay for the mirror and autorelease after 5 seconds, so its not the shaking of the camera. Do you think you can find a serious explanation? The only explanation is that with 36 MP you are tempted to look far beyond the 100% of the sceen size and than you believe something is wrong - you ask too much from my pictures :-)) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieralongia tubla te Ncisles.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some blur at the sides, but forgiveable with this resolution, I think. - A.Savin 16:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crist de Piza Ciaulong.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Station of the cross Sacun Val Gardena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dantersasc Langkofelhütte Speisesaal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odles as seen from Seceda.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Stu Phillips 16:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Ramitzler Ciani Resciesa 2012 143.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality imo. --JLPC 09:39, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Magdalena Fresko Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 08:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of St. Petel Lajen crucifix on chapel .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:17, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crucifix on wall parish church S Peter Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a QI--Jebulon 09:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grödner Dolomiten Seiser-Alm Hi res.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Maria del Carmelo St. Peter bei Lajen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Piere Ramitzler Ciani Resciesa 2012 062.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Peter bei Lajen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church Saint Peter Lajen western facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 12:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trebe-front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice photo. --Florstein 20:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)