User talk:Missvain/Archives 5

Don Young media tour files

Methinks you may have transposed details on a couple of files. On the one you claimed was of KINY, a plaque on the wall clearly shows the KCAM logo. On the one you claimed was of KCAM, the view out the window is more consistent of the type of scene you would find in Juneau than in Glennallen (for one, density of trees, for another, Glennallen has gently rolling hills or level terrain, whereas Juneau has steep hills rising not far from the coast). I don't have a Twitter account and Twitter is evidently no longer allowing access to media files on its site without logging in.RadioKAOS (talk) 09:10, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I hope you can help fix those - I trust that what you're saying is true. I copy the text from his Tweets to the upload, so it's even possible his staffer (it's unlikely he himself tweets) might have miswrote it, or it was my fault. I hope you can help fix it! Thank you and sorry about that. Missvain (talk) 16:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbara Lee and her mother, Mildred Massey, at the unveiling of the Shirley Chisholm stamp.jpg

File:Barbara Lee and her mother, Mildred Massey, at the unveiling of the Shirley Chisholm stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cafe La Haye - 2019 August - Stierch 03.jpg

Thanks for the above. Nice enough to eat, and very clearly described. I'm using it at la:Risotto, and maybe on a page about the shrimps as well. Andrew Dalby (talk)

Category:Steve_Womack_wearing_cloth_masks_during_the_COVID-19_pandemic

Category:Steve_Womack_wearing_cloth_masks_during_the_COVID-19_pandemic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Leonel Небојша Sohns 08:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Pluto - 29428003716.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Death and state funeral of John Lewis - John Garamendi.jpg

File:Death and state funeral of John Lewis - John Garamendi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 16:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:VMFA 2009-261a v1 KW x-1024x895.jpg

File:VMFA 2009-261a v1 KW x-1024x895.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Goesseln (talk) 12:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Christmas Goofy.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hello, can you please help me to delete some files that I have uploaded. I have requested the files for deletion, but they were marked "kept". The files I want to delete are mostly pictures of children, and the reason I want to delete is that the people who are in pictures have seen them and want them deleted. Since I do not have any admin privilege to do that now, I beg you to help me, so I don't get in trouble. Thank you. Zeke (talk) 07:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Zeke. Can you post the list of photos? Thanks! Missvain (talk) 14:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the list of photos that I want to delete. Thank you very much for everything you do. Zeke (talk) 08:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Albita.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diana.shqip.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rina.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Albion.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andi.JPG

I am still waiting for an answer here. Thank you Zeke (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Funeral of George Floyd - Minneapolis - Joyce Beatty 02.jpg

File:Funeral of George Floyd - Minneapolis - Joyce Beatty 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joyce Beatty at 35th Annual Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Breakfast.jpg

File:Joyce Beatty at 35th Annual Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Breakfast.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Phil Guest - 10885441883.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kamala Harris talks about wildfire preparedness.ogg

Copyright status: File:Kamala Harris talks about wildfire preparedness.ogg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kamala Harris talks about wildfire preparedness.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Kamala Harris - 2020-08-16.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Thompson at Hamilton - Feb 2020 02.jpg

File:Mike Thompson at Hamilton - Feb 2020 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gnom (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Category:The ascertainment of Joe Biden as President-Elect

Thank you for creating Category:The ascertainment of Joe Biden as President-Elect!

I'm just wondering if it doesn't need the "The" in the front of the category name? Right cite (talk) 03:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not needed, I realized I screwed it up and just kept organizing the files. I'm just too lazy right now to fix it. It needs just to be moved and the files relocated. I hate doing it, but, I eventually get to it... LOL. Have at it if you feel inclined! Missvain (talk) 03:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay no problem thanks for your help! Right cite (talk) 15:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg

Copyright status: File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:05, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg

Copyright status: File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi there. You closed many DRs today, thanks for your hard work. Please see: File talk:Armenia Jan 2020 12 44 08 004000.jpeg. --E4024 (talk) 00:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, thanks!!

I feel like the last admin left on Commons today. I'm shocked by the backlog. I deleted that talk page! Thanks for bringing it to my attention and for your contributions to Commons! Missvain (talk) 00:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:KeldyshGalperinStaros.jpg

Hello Missvain, thanks for your message on my page. I contacted Mark Galperin (ru:Гальперин, Марк Петрович), who is the owner of the photo, and received permission from him to use this photo. Mark Galperin also sent the request to OTRS Ticket 2020090910000358, but it was rejected as he relocated to Australia and they couldn't confirm that an email belongs to Mark Galperin. I am stuck here, so please advise on the next step. Thanks. Jacob0790 (talk) 03:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Jacob0790, it sounds like this is a situation to reach out to OTRS again. I assume Mr. Galperin can send a new OTRS message since he's moved? That's what I would ask. Regardless, I'm not really able to help with that (I can't even view your ticket, as only certain volunteers can due to privacy reasons). I would ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. That is where OTRS volunteers hang out and can hopefully provide some advice. I'm sorry that's not very helpful! Missvain (talk) 03:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missvain, thank you for your prompt response. I will try to contact OTRS. Jacob0790 (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:New Democratic Party Campaign Sign, Old South London, Ontario (21834490891).jpg

Hello. Is this DR - Commons:Deletion requests/File:New Democratic Party Campaign Sign, Old South London, Ontario (21834490891).jpg - meant to be kept or deleted? Thanks JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Deleted! Sorry about that. I think I processed over 1,000 deletions yesterday. Oy. Missvain (talk) 16:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:STM Kargu.jpg

What am I supposed to do? Thanks. Beshogur (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Beshogur! Please see the notification on your talk page and proceed here with the process for claiming ownership and releasing the image under a free license. I do not volunteer for OTRS, so I can't help you any further at this time. You can learn more about the process Commons:OTRS and ask questions there, too. Missvain (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joyce Echaquan

Bonjour Missvain, long time no see! I hope you are doing good.

I'm currently in an OTRS process with a picture about the death of Joyce Echaquan. You erase the picture this morning: File:Joyce echaquan1.jpg. Would it be possible to restore it, until I finish the OTRS process with the husband of Joyce? Thank you in advance for your comprehension. Best regards, Benoit Rochon (talk) 14:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Benoit Rochon! Nice to "see" you. I have un-deleted it. Please add the OTRS received template when possible. Thank you! Happy Holidays. Missvain (talk) 16:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're the best madame! Merci. (BTW, the template "OTRS pending" was already there!) Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Library membership cards

Hi Missvain. Thank you for closing this DR. As this file File:市政局公共圖書館借書證.jpg is also part of this DR and remains undeleted, could you delete it as well? Thanks. --Wcam (talk) 15:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Missvain (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:A hybrid, large-scale wireless sensor network for real-time acquisition and tracking (IA ahybridlargescal109453425).pdf

You deleted this but retained Commons:Deletion_requests/File:A_framework_for_collaborative_Quadrotor_-_ground_robot_missions_(IA_aframeworkforcol1094510654).pdf which had the same deletion rationale provided.

Can you explain what the difference was? as some consistency of guideline to apply would be appreciated. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. These are both public domain, federally created documents. No point in deleting them. I was just outside the military school these are from a few weeks ago! Missvain (talk) 22:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of the views expressed in the Undeletion request Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:A_3D_spatial_channel_model_for_cellular_radio._(IA_3dspatialchannel00sasi).pdf was that there was some doubt as to the status. Consistency of closure decisions would be good, as well as having a documented guideline. @Elcobbola: @Fæ: . ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If folks want it undeleted that's totally fine after it goes through the undeletion process. I have closed somewhere between 500-1,000 deletion requests in the past 24 hours. Screwing one up (actually I screwed up another one above, too) out of that many isn't so bad. If someone else wants to sit around and close out the backlog, they are welcome to do so, but clearly no one else is. Happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 22:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic (1919).svg

Why did you delete both File:Flag of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic (1919).svg AND File:Flag of the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic (1919-1927).svg? The other on is still in use [1]. --WTM (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for stopping by. I see what happened. No big deal. I'll undelete.

Missvain (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing the DR backlog...

If you are interested in clearing backlogs, first read [[2]]. and then carefully apply the rationale there to:

Category:IA mirror related deletion requests Category:FEDLINK_items_for_license_review Category:Documents from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library for license review‎ Category:Documents from the US Bureau of Land Management Library for review‎ Category:Documents from the US National Institutes of Health Library for license review‎

PD-US-Gov doesn't necessarily always apply to contractor produced materials, third party submissions (by non Federal employees) to Federal agencies, or work produced by a non-federal entity that was funded by a grant. It also doesn't apply to materials that would be subject to ordinary copyrights merely because those materials have ended up in the Library or Archive of a Federal Agency. (However in respect of a small number of these items, a "no notice" situation may exist provided the items predate 1977.)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Memorybank2019-萬安國小振興分校.jpg

Hi, I notice that you deleted the photo per nomination. However the nomination is wrong, I've gave a clear reference but it seem not be considered. The photo is a copy from a photography competition hold by WMTW and Ministry of Culture of Taiwan. That means department of Taiwan government has already checked the copyright problem when they award the price. Before I asked the photo to be restored, I'd want to know why you did not use the evidence I mentioned.--Reke (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reviewed over 3,000 deletion requests yesterday and I misread yours. I apologize. Screwing up four out of 3,000 isn't so bad. I have restored your photo. My apologies. Have a good day and thanks for your contributions! Missvain (talk) 16:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I just want to know if there was any misunderstanding of my opinion. Thanks for the restoring so much.--Reke (talk) 05:28, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

La gestion de l'eau à Pétra.

Bonjour Missvain. Comme je l'ai signalé avant hier à Zunkir, concernant l'Étude volumétrique des Thermes de Sabrah, pour chacune des photos utilisées, j'ai demandé par courrier l'autorisation à l'auteur de l'article ou de la photo ( ou dessin). Les réponses ont toujours été favorables, mais certains ne me répondent pas. En ce cas je fais comme il est d'usage : j'inscris le nom de l'auteur de la photo sur ma légende, avec certaines autres informations que je juge utiles. C'est le cas pour Monsieur Fournet et ses photos que j'ai utilisées, et pour lesquelles il m'a donné l'autorisation de les publier, et même il m'a donné d'autre infos pour d'autres photos. Je vous joins un passage de son courrier. Le problème, et vous devez le savoir, reste lorsque l'on ne retrouve pas, pour diverses raisons, les coordonnées de l'auteur, alors comme pour ceux qui ne répondent pas je mets leur coordonnées sur ma légende de la photo. Je fais comme cela sur tous mes autres articles et je n'ai jamais eu de reproche. Je ne vois pas comment faire autrement pour permettre une meilleure compréhension de l'article et satisfaire à la fois le lecteur et les impératifs de Wikipédia. Mais peut-être le savez-vous? Cordialement. Jean-Pierre Pelon.--Le Médocain (talk) 09:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Courrier de Monsieur Founet.

Le 27 03 2019 à 12 h 04

Bonjour, et merci de votre message. Vous pouvez bien entendu utiliser ces images, en indiquant comme crédits "Th. Fournet / Ifpo-CNRS". N'hésitez pas à explorer les autres documents qui pourraient vous être utiles sur ma page Academia (https://ifporient.academia.edu/FournetThibaud). Je peux également vous envoyer des images à meilleure résolution que ce que vous avez déjà pu récupérer en ligne, si nécessaire. Voilà par ailleurs un petit article de synthèse sur le bain à Pétra, qui peut vous être utile si vous ne l'avez pas déjà. Très cordialement, Thibaud Fournet

Hello, I cannot speak French and I can read very small amounts. Please contact Commons:OTRS to provide permissions for the photo. I cannot assist with that. If OTRS receives and approves the permission received then I can help restore the photo. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 16:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:James C. Swan (UN official) .jpg

Hi, please give the reason why you delete the photo, I uploaded this for the purpose of editing James C. Swan's page. The photo's copyright belongs to UNSOM, and here's the official Flickr link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unsom/48297886367/in/album-72157716863872558/

I have changed the license to CC0, please help to restore it. --Zoeyyy99 (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zoeyyy99 - Hi! It's because the licensing did not match what was on Flickr and we can't risk issues around that. Now that it's all the same, I have restored your photo. You're welcome and have a good day! Missvain (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files related to Jiny Lan

Unless I misunderstand something, you intended to delete everything listed here, but overlooked one of them. -- Hoary (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks Hoary! Missvain (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DRs

Hey Missvain, Not sure if you're aware but you didn't close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту сигнала, со счетом на 10.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Функциональная блок - схема счета по фронту и спаду сигнала, со счетом на 12 (три точки отсчета), и фильтром на выходе.jpg,
Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 12:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware. :) Missvain (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympic record icon.svg

Please restore. File is widely used: [3]. --WTM (talk) 04:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC) Also applies to file:CR_icon2.PNG: [4]. I am saddened; how can you delete a correct, used file? --WTM (talk) 05:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:WTM. Don't be sad! This is an easy fix. Here is what I suggest though - that you participate in the deletion discussion. One of these files has been nominated and no one contributed to the discussion. Please check it out and review the image being suggested as a replacement for these SVGs. I apologize for the inconvenience this has caused. Please find the deletion discussion, which I reopened, here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Olympic record icon.svg. Have a great day and thanks for contributing to Commons! Missvain (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png

Hello Missvain ! Why have you deleted this file [[File:Karte-Haus-Burgund 4-FR.png]] ? I asked to delete File:Karte Haus Burgund 4 FR.png and it was done, but I don't understand why both are deleted ?

It was probably an accident. No big deal, it can be fixed. I'll restore it. I worked on over 1,000 nominations this past week so I'm not surprised I messed up a few. Missvain (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buste GUITTET.jpg

Hello, you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buste GUITTET.jpg as Keep, but there is no license on File:Buste GUITTET.jpg and I can't find one indicated on the source website. The source page says reproduction soumise à autorisation du titulaire des droits d'exploitation, which is the exact opposite of a free license. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AntiCompositeNumber - Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I apologize for not investigating further and appreciate your due diligence. I will be deleting the file shortly. Thank you again. Happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of it. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete

Per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:E-mushaf,_page_604_of_604.png, please delete the other 603 pages which all have same situation (C) as the one you deleted. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank goodness for the batch tool.

Missvain (talk) 04:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edmund Li SHENG Associate Dean (Academic Affairs) of Faculty of Social Sciences.jpg

Hi. I see that you have given the uploader a week to sort OTRS. But I don't see any note on the file about this - how are you going to keep track? Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I don't have to track anything. We have a category for each day of oTRS requested and in one week, if nothing comes from it, we delete the file. Missvain (talk) 16:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Василий Георгиевич Гунин 01.png

Dear Sir, Please take the trouble to explain the reason for deleting this file. I personally took this photo 50 years ago. Konstantine Gunin (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Konstantine Gunin - It was because people did not think you took it or owned the copyright of the photo. We can reinstate the photo and make sure you have proper credit if you can please submit the appropriate information through Commons:OTRS. Thank you! Missvain (talk) 22:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain: Hi, do these people have evidence that the photo of Mr. Vasiliy Gunin was taken not by Mr. Konstantine Gunin, but by someone else? No, they have no proof. Then why are these people turning volunteer work into a monkey business? I already wrote on November 24: “What copyright issues do you have regarding my file? This is an image I took when I was a teenager and I was into photography. I had a simple Soviet camera “Smena-8”, so the photo is not of very good quality. Sorry”. Thank you. Konstantine Gunin (talk) 18:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Arts in Early England (1903))?

I was in Paris in 1987, and I have a photo of the construction of the Louvre Pyramid. In 2015 someone try to delete it, but everything was fine. Now it's "The Arts in Early England (1903))". Maybe my English it's not to good, but I have no idea of what is this, why the Louvre Pyramid is in this subject or why someone delete the file. Thanks. Joseolgon (talk) 20:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying User:ShakespeareFan00 - I think this has to do with a category you've engaged with or nominated for deletion. I know the Louvre Pyramid is not able to be published here on Commons because of copyright ("freedom of panorama" - I will not bore you with the details). But, unclear on the nomination of that category. Missvain (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, someone else asked about it below. I'll reinstate it. I didn't know what file it was, as I couldn't find it in my history. Missvain (talk) 02:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseolgon: and MissVain. Perhaps this? File:Louvre Pyramid construction 1987.jpg? I looked at your (Joseolgon) talk page, then browsed the whole DR about Louvre Pyramid, and then looked at the public log of your file. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:21, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request was made at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2015-10#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Louvre Pyramid. The eight files (including the file in question) appears to have been deleted despite the fact that they were supposed to be restored per the discussion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louvre pyramid - blackout.jpg

Hello. Why is File:Louvre pyramid - blackout.jpg deleted, on the reason at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Arts in Early England (1903)? The file is not included at the deletion request, and it was used on articles relating to freedom of panorama (including Tagalog Wiki's tl:Kalayaan sa panorama, at the section of France). It was also used in various user pages and Commons pages here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what happened. Someone asked about it above, too. I really have no idea. Seriously. I'll fix it. I have no freaking clue. Missvain (talk) 02:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please see the deletion log from 16:44 UTC. There seems to be about 40 Louvre-related files and their associated talk pages deleted with the rationale mentioning "Category:The Arts in Early England (1903)". That would be a total of about 80 pages. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone clearly had those Louvre images in that category or something. I would have never intentionally deleted them without them going through the AFD process. Missvain (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick undeletion of most files. I see that the pages listed below were not undeleted. I'm not sure if that was intentional for some reason or if you just missed them. (?)

("File:P1030568 (5015328803).jpg" and "File talk:P1030568 (5015328803).jpg" were also not undeleted, but they were redirections, so I'm guessing it's ok and the non-undeletion was intentional for those two.)

-- Asclepias (talk) 13:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you Asclepias for linking me to these. I did not intentionally mean to ignore them. My eyes started crossing at some point in undeleting so I am not surprised I missed a few. Thank you so much for your help and assuming good faith. Happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 16:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles l'Eplattenier, Autoportrait, 1942, Huile sur toile, .jpg

Hello, I am contacting you as I am unable to find why the file in the title of this message was nominated for deletion. It is a self-portrait by Charles L'Éplattenier, a painter that died in 1946, and which has a category devoted to his work on Commons. Is it possible to go ahead and fill in an undeletion request? I am pinging @MBA La Chaux-de-Fonds: from the Museum of Fine arts which carried out the upload, as they should also know what happened. Thanks for your help! --Flor WMCH (talk) 13:16, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flor WMCH, it was deleted at the request of the museum. You can find the deletion request here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles l'Eplattenier, Autoportrait, 1942, Huile sur toile, .jpg. Missvain (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also that painting would not fall under US public domain laws. So, I'm not surprised it was deleted. It is more suitable for Wikipedia as fair use. Missvain (talk) 15:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mask promotional video from Biden-Harris health care leaders in 2020.ogv

File:Mask promotional video from Biden-Harris health care leaders in 2020.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rochelle Walensky screenshot from COVID education video in 2020.png

File:Rochelle Walensky screenshot from COVID education video in 2020.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden meeting with solar workers during his presidential campaign.jpg

File:Joe Biden meeting with solar workers during his presidential campaign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden speaks about Anthony Fauci during presidential transition in 2020.ogv

File:Joe Biden speaks about Anthony Fauci during presidential transition in 2020.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden during his 2020 presidential campaign.jpg

File:Joe Biden during his 2020 presidential campaign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Introduction video from Biden-Harris transition about cabinet and administration picks 12-11-20.ogv

File:Introduction video from Biden-Harris transition about cabinet and administration picks 12-11-20.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Build Back Better image promoting national security.jpg

File:Build Back Better image promoting national security.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lloyd Austin speaking upon his nomination as Secretary of Defense in 2020.ogv

File:Lloyd Austin speaking upon his nomination as Secretary of Defense in 2020.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Amini - Picture Deletion

Hi Missvain, I recently discussed a picture with you on the Mohsen Amini wikipedia page. Since then I have gotten written permission to use the picture that was deleted. Can you please put the picture back. Also if there is anything else I need to do just let me know!

Thanks, Mohsen

File attached here:

File:MA Wikipedia letter.pdf

Hello - You actually can't go through me to make this happen. You have to go through WP:OTRS. I'm sorry I can't be of assistance at this point, I don't have permissions to approve things like this. OTRS will help you. Missvain (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:20180521 064315 - New York-New York.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kurdish languages.png

Hi. Sorry for taking your time. Is there any way I can view this file? It was being used on ku.wiki and apparently you deleted per "being unsourced". I want to check if that is actually the case. Thank you. --Balyozxane (talk) 04:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Balyozxane! I am unable to provide you viewing of the file, since only admins can do that on Commons. Here is a copy of the wikitext so perhaps that will help you. Also the nominator was User:Beshogur, so they know that this discussion is taking place and their rationale was "Fan fiction, the source doesn't show any map like this." I did not delete it because of it "being unsourced." I trusted the nominator, assuming good faith regarding their concerns. The file was also categorized as "Files manipulated by sockpuppets of WorldCreaterFighter." Perhaps best to take this up with User:Beshogur to learn more.

DescriptionMissvain/Archives 5	English: This map shows the distribution of the Kurdish languages (in 2019)
Date	6 September 2019
Source	Own work, based on Kurdish Institute of Paris<ref>http://www.institutkurde.org/en/info/the-kurdish-population-1232551004</ref>
Author	LenguaMapa

Hope that helps! Missvain (talk) 05:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply. Something I wonder both Taivo and Elcobbola have disregarded deletion requests citing wide use of the file. The File:Kurdish languages.png was being used on ku.wiki and several other wikis. Just google search you will see those using the file, as well. It was being displayed on ku.wiktionary on the Main Page. Well what I'm trying to say is is there no standard when it comes to "Wide use policy"?--Balyozxane (talk) 04:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to suggest you talk to User:Beshogur about this and perhaps you can also consider taking it to Commons:DR. Honestly, in the thousands of DRs I have reviewed, there are plenty that get deleted with "wide use" because of copyright violations, mapping issues, things like that. I didn't see that the file had been nominated before for those reasons. Again, I'm indifferent on what happens to the file in the end - if it goes to deletion review and folks decide it's fine, has no errors in the mapping and it should be reinstated then that's fine with me. Sorry, I don't really know what else to say. Missvain (talk) 05:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Painting_studio

Painting studio has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 00:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

deletion requests from User:194.8.192.162

Hi Missvain, you deleted several logos and icons after deletion requests from this IP. The IP wrote "The SVG version which should substitute this one also looks much more modern." I guess these are similar cases like this one? But then these are different logos. "similar" is not "same". So please restore these files. Chaddy (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you can please link me to the deleted files or pages I'll help you out. Missvain (talk) 17:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Missvain (talk) 03:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you -- Chaddy (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of files

Hello Missvain, I have found two unsolved deletion requests and I was wondering if you could take a look at them:

I think the reasons to delete those files are clear. Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chem Sim 2001: Looks like User:Leyo beat me to it!

Missvain (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, thanks anyway! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Missvain, I have found this deletion request which should be closed by deleting the file. Can you take a look? Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-standing deletion requests

Would you be willing to look at the deletion requests for files in these two categories:

Category:Superseded coats of arms of counties of Norway

Category:Superseded locator maps of counties of Norway

I have spent a lot of time on categorizing old maps and coats of arms of Norwegian counties. All the files in the above categories are applicable for deletion. Thanks :) --Worldlydev (talk) 21:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Biden Documents

Sorry about the reversals. I missed the fact that you had a better category in terms of Joe Biden documents. My bad.--Achim Hering (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate that.

Missvain (talk) 02:37, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So now what happens to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Biden_silicone_foam_letter_to_USNRC?--Achim Hering (talk) 02:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I knew I was missing something. My computer froze (long day on the laptop!) and I had to restart and my browser didn't reload my tabs! Thank you. I'll redirect. Missvain (talk) 02:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the categories from the defunct one but it still shows up. Nice catch on the Shirley Jackson category. I did not know it existed. I am not exactly a fan, of her deflections on PFP, but this was done right.----Achim Hering (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads

Hi, please don't use {{category:Random Politician}} as creator of files you upload. It just transcludes all the personal categories of this politician on every file, and put some mess in the information box. Thanks. Rhadamante (talk) 06:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I did, it was a mere accident. I know better. I was involved in helping to create the creator template. Ha! Sincerest apologies. Missvain (talk) 16:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Follow Salty - Stierch.jpg

File:Follow Salty - Stierch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

File:President Biden and Vice President Harris Receive an Economic Briefing.webm. See from my uploads that I am actively working on these--they aren't just empty pages where I won't upload. They just take awhile because they are hundreds of MB. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I remade it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Missvain

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Missvain,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jennifer Rubin - journalist.jpg

File:Jennifer Rubin - journalist.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BeŻet (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kaiser_Permanente_announces_$32_million_for_housing_and_homelessness_in_Sacramento,_California_(February_20,_2020)

Category:Kaiser_Permanente_announces_$32_million_for_housing_and_homelessness_in_Sacramento,_California_(February_20,_2020) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Cristiano Tomás (talk) 01:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:HiggyvHertz.jpg

Hello. I noticed that the Commons:Deletion requests/File:HiggyvHertz.jpg is still open, even though you closed it in December 2020 as delete. Is there a reason why this DR is still open? Also, did File:HiggyvHearts.jpg also have black bands in the picture per the nomination? If not, I think File:HiggyvHertz.jpg should have been deleted as it has black bands and File:HiggyvHearts.jpg should have been kept if it didnt have black bands. However, as I'm not an admin, I can't confirm what the deleted photo looked like. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrLinkinPark333 - Hi. I undeleted the one without black bars. I deleted the one with black bars. However, this file might be a copyright violation, so, it probably won't last long! Missvain (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! Thanks for looking into it :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cbf brazilian championship trophy 02.svg

Hi how are you? I hope well. You were responsible for ending the deletion discussion, but the file remains in the project. I could give an answer so that I can file a new discussion, mainly because they have reloaded more copyvio trojan files.

Greetings! Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 23:59, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[User:Conde Edmond Dantès|Conde Edmond Dantès]] - That was unintentional! It's been deleted. Thanks for letting me know! Missvain (talk) 19:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Result

Hello. Please RESULT the discussion of this file. Arguments were given. I would not like to arrange conflicts with other participants.--NikolayLukas (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Bennet with Chuck Todd.jpg

File:Michael Bennet with Chuck Todd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:廖城兰（大马美食家食公子）造型照.jpg

Hi, for the photo File:廖城兰（大马美食家食公子）造型照.jpg that you said this media is missing permission information. I would like to explain to you that the photo was reviews and approved by King of Hearts and I am the author of the photo. Please view the licensing below the photo page, that have been written the media is proven...

The external site https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1D8t9nZbqs8UJl9fG1OY_oDh6ED_WLekR was reviewed on 26 June 2020 by reviewer King of Hearts, who confirmed that there is photographic evidence of the uploader setting up the Phase One medium format camera on a tripod in order to take this portrait.

Patricialiew (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golif - Der Beobachter - Foto Ingo Karnicnik.jpg

The file has a permission template, so I do not understand your message. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

Please undelete File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.jpg. The nomination is clearly wrong, because it is not a duplicate: It has no watermark, while File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.png has a watermark. Please explain in more detail, if you do not want to undelete it. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lodestar (127438799).jpg

Hi there. You tagged this file as missing evidence of permission, but the source file Lodestar at Flickr is licenced as CC-BY-2.0, which was confirmed by the FlickreviewR 2 bot. It depicts a concert by Sarah Harmer at the Victoria Conservatory of Music. What other evidence is needed here? Are concert photos no longer acceptable at Commons? Mind matrix 12:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was an accident. It appears that tag was removed by someone. Missvain (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Mind matrix 17:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

Please undelete File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.png, as it is not identical to File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.jpg, which clearly has no watermark. Please keep both versions, as it is usual at least on de:Wikipedia:Fotowerkstatt. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, indeed, for the very quick action. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alonso Räikkönen 2005 British Grand Prix.jpg

According to the Google Cache, this file was reviewd by Andre Engels. Therefore the copyright status is not unknown but instead it is correctly confirmed. Or do I miss something? -- Chaddy (talk) 21:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-- Chaddy - The file has been up for deletion, with no contest for over a month. I took a look at the account for which these came from - yes, they were approved as having appropriate licensing, but, all of the images were deleted from the Flickr users account which magically has no racing photographs and if the Flickr user did take these photographs, he's pretty terrible at taking other pictures. Seemed strange to me. Missvain (talk) 22:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I now found this file. The metadata are interesting: Obviously this image was taken by Rainer W. Schlegelmilch, a very famous motorsports photographer. Therefore it is actually very likely that also the other photos of this flickr user were stolen. So your deletions are correct. -- Chaddy (talk) 23:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:План-схема Национального парка "Межигорье".jpg

Your decision is „Deleted: per nomination” but you have kept the file. — Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:14, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coach Daniel Gimenez.jpg

Hi, I don't understand what the issue with the image is. The uploader, who is the person who owns the camera (Canon EOS 80D), uploaded the image to Commons. Therefore, it is correctly marked as own work. He has uploaded it under CC-by-SA-4.0, so he is giving permission to re-use (and adapt/crop) the image. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's great you assume good faith! I try to that. Perhaps you can ask the original editor who tagged it for deletion what their concerns were with it, they thought it was promotional. You have participated in that discussion before, actually. Also, other photos of that subject were deleted due to concerns around their copyright and ownership. Anyone can tag something as CCBY - just like a decent file you get online or a friend sends you can have EXIF data - but that doesn't mean you own the copyright or are the photographer. It's always better to be safe than sorry. If the photographer is really the person who owns the copyright they will provide permissions. Missvain (talk) 15:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The camera holder, who is the subject of File:Coach Daniel Gimenez.jpg, is also the person who uploaded it to Wikipedia. I have explicitly told them to do so, as I obviously can't upload picture on other people's behalf. That image was uploaded by him after I told him the correct procedure, and what type of images are permitted and which aren't (he initially just uploaded pictures found online). The only legitimate image is the one I linked, the others were (correctly) deleted by you. (PS. can you please ping me?) Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 23:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nehme1499 - I'm copying the original nominator of these images - User:Indrajitdas - so they can weigh in. I really do think that having OTRS is super ideal for notable subjects on Commons. I really don't know what is wrong with that suggestion. It's commonplace, when you ask a subject to contribute a photograph to Wikimedia Commons, that you request Commons:OTRS. If you have been in touch with the photographer or the subject in the recent past, and it seems like you have, then it should not be too tough to have them send in a simple letter stating that they are the copyright holder of all the appropriate photographs. We would not be in this situation if that would have happened, frankly. Missvain (talk) 23:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should OTRS be requested for each individual image? Or can the person send OTRS also on behalf of other potential future images? Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 23:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nehme1499 - The copyright holder can send one OTRS in (just follow directions on Commons:OTRS) for all of the images they own - including anything deleted. They would have to contact OTRS every time they upload new images, however, because OTRS teams oversee the placement and approval of OTRS templates. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 23:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He should have just sent the OTRS email now. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 12:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shoes on feet

Is COM:SCOPE not a valid reason for deletion? Anarchyte (talk • work) 12:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One can argue that shoes and feed are educational in value, like User:Tm did. I think these photos are ok to host. If there are concerns about copyright or ownership, perhaps request permissions and if we don't get them, then the image will be deleted. Missvain (talk) 15:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bloukrans Bridge-001.jpg

I don't think Liuxinyu970226 has proved enough that simple bridge design is artistic work per SA Copyright Act. Jklamo (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jklamo: Seems a bit controversy due to the understanding of South African FOP status, I suggest to discuss this matter via COM:UNDEL. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Video shot by Congressman Dan Kildee D-Flint - via Michael Moore on Facebook Watch.webm

I'm wondering if you reviewed the comments I made, including an official government FAQ on the applicability of the "official duty" criteria. It's not an official duty of a congressperson or their staffers to film inside the chamber - and it cannot be construed as such in any way because they're explicitly prohibited from filming inside the chambers (the only people permitted to do so are the official recorders for networks such as CSPAN). Further, it doesn't matter if he was performing an official duty - it matters whether it was his official duty to film the events - which it can't be considered to be at all. Put simply, it's not "in official duty" that matters, it's "as official duty" - and the FAQ I presented from a government agency explicitly states that it doesn't matter if someone was performing an official duty at the time, it matters whether the work was created as an official duty. I encourage you to re-consider this closure as it seems to ignore the actual rule and based solely on the fact that many people voted to keep it. Berchanhimez (talk) 03:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Berchanhimez - I'm happy to reopen it so another admin can close it. I knew it would cause a kerfuffle and I really don't have the capacity to accommodate that. I worked on Capitol Hill for years as Wikipedian in Residence at the Library of Congress and two other federal institutions and I have worked with Commonists to better understanding "official duty" content with the federal government. I am viewing this differently then you are, but, I don't want to beat a stick about it. Even up to a week ago discussing it with another editor who requested to delete content that was created under official duty and published to a federal employee's federal social media account. I'll just reopen it and let someone else analyze it. Missvain (talk) 03:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think it may be best to start a discussion on this in general, as it seems to be a common misconception not just on commons but other projects and in the real world - the small but meaningful difference between “while in official duty” and “as official duty”. Berchanhimez (talk) 04:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosa DeLauro Twitter header.png

File:Rosa DeLauro Twitter header.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Assumed to be a US Government work, but actually a work of a member of the press.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/rep-rosa-delauro-d-conn-greets-dalia-elfassi-of-silver-news-photo/488751820

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 07:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden Twitter Jan 2021 profile pic.jpg

File:Joe Biden Twitter Jan 2021 profile pic.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This image predates his inauguration, so it is inconceivable that it could be an official photograph or anything like that. The earliest use I can find is here (at the end), but it is possible that it is older. Likely taken as a campaign photo and is therefore not PD. Precautionary principle mandates deletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 08:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biden administration video about immigration - 2021-02-02.ogv

File:Biden administration video about immigration - 2021-02-02.ogv has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: While this derivative U.S. government work may be in the public domain, the underlying intellectual property - the webcam videos taken by each of these individuals (who we have no reason to believe are federal government employees) - is almost certainly not. Additionally, we have no reason to believe that the old home videos interspersed throughout the work are freely usable. Should be deleted under the precautionary principle.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 08:07, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Moldova (Project Lobachev).svg

You deleted my file File:Flag of Moldova (Project Lobachev).svg. Can you explain which rule my file is breaking? Is it forbidden to upload your own files and projects? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Лобачев Владимир - The file you linked to was not deleted. Missvain (talk) 14:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Moldavian Democratic Republic 1918.png

You deleted file File:Coat of arms of Moldavian Democratic Republic 1918.png. Resource moldova1359.md has collected one of the largest libraries of historical depictions of the symbols of the Principality of Moldova and the Moldavian Democratic Republic. The image of the coat of arms of the Moldavian Democratic Republic is a rather rare high-quality image. Explain the reason for deleting this file. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Лобачев Владимир! Please see the discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Moldavian Democratic Republic 1918.png. I will ping User:Accipiter Gentilis Q., the original nominator of the deletion, who had concerns about the use of the image. We often run into folks using historical imagery without context and it misrepresents history, etc - it's a legit concern and one you see repeated if you review deletions. I understand the concern - even the link you provided shows no context. It claims to be 1918 and a Coat of Arms of the Moldavian Democratic Republic. We see a lot of people making up their own coats of arms, flags, and maps on a regular basis here on Commons and I can see how this image can look questionable. I'm happy to revert my deletion for the time being and let you two discuss this further. I also suggest you perhaps invite other interested editors to review your concerns and further discuss this item for deletion. Thanks for your contributions. Missvain (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:COA of the Moldova digital (Project Lobachev).svg, File:COA of the Moldova digital max (Project Lobachev).svg

Please explain the reason for deleting my files, which I myself created and myself uploaded to Commons. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:COA of the Moldova digital (Project Lobachev).svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:COA of the Moldova digital max (Project Lobachev).svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not undelete these. Like I said earlier, we run into a lot of instances of users uploading their own versions of historical imagery (maps, coats of arms, logos, flags). Content like that can be seen as out of scope as it is "fake history" or just using Commons to host personal artwork. You are welcome to request these be undeleted via Commons:Undeletion_requests. I'm also copying User:Accipiter_Gentilis_Q. here. Missvain (talk) 14:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a fake story. The name of the file and the description clearly say that this is my draft of the new coat of arms of the Republic of Moldova. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biden administration video about immigration - 2021-02-02.ogv

File:Biden administration video about immigration - 2021-02-02.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethnicities and religions in Iran-ar.png

Hello, this map is a translated version of a map recently deleted, shouldn't this be deleted too?
I want to add that I'm an enwiki editor and don't have any experience related to commons. Kevo327 (talk) 23:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DR

What do you mean by "no valid reason for deletion"? see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas and Friends Logo USA.png & Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas and Friends Logo USA.svg. --Minorax^talk 12:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[User:Minorax]] - Ah....I see what I did here. Let me fix that. Reverting and deleting. Sorry for the confusion. Missvain (talk) 19:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Престанете да триете мои файлове!

Извършвате вандалство! Аз работя в училището и снимките, които съм дарил на Уикипедия го представляват - с позволение и с мои авторски права. Не сте имали никакво основание да ги триете. Илиев2010 (talk)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Val Valentino.jpg

Hello. Should the File:Val Valentino (cropped).jpg be also deleted? It is a derivative of File:Val Valentino.jpg, and I included it on the DR page, and pinged/mentioned the derivative uploader there (who fortunately responded by sending thanks to my ping/mention). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JWilz12345 -

Done Thanks for bringing it to my attention! I do my best to pay attention to every detail but with so many DRs that haven't been touched sometimes I miss a few things. Appreciate it! Missvain (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Missvain/Archives 5

Don Young media tour files

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Deletion request

Notification about possible deletion

Copyright status: File:Kamala Harris talks about wildfire preparedness.ogg

Thank you for creating Category:The ascertainment of Joe Biden as President-Elect

Copyright status: File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg

Copyright status: File:Expedition 46 Return At Ellington 02.jpg

Hi

File:KeldyshGalperinStaros.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:New Democratic Party Campaign Sign, Old South London, Ontario (21834490891).jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:STM Kargu.jpg

Joyce Echaquan

Clearing the DR backlog...

La gestion de l'eau à Pétra.

File:James C. Swan (UN official) .jpg

Files related to Jiny Lan

DRs

File:Olympic record icon.svg

More problems with U.S. Congress uploads

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buste GUITTET.jpg

Please delete

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edmund Li SHENG Associate Dean (Academic Affairs) of Faculty of Social Sciences.jpg

File:Василий Георгиевич Гунин 01.png

Category:The Arts in Early England (1903))?

File:Louvre pyramid - blackout.jpg

File:Charles l'Eplattenier, Autoportrait, 1942, Huile sur toile, .jpg

Mohsen Amini - Picture Deletion

Notification about possible deletion

deletion requests from User:194.8.192.162

Deletion of files

Long-standing deletion requests

Joe Biden Documents

Uploads

Please undelete

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

File:HiggyvHertz.jpg

Result

Please undelete

Please undelete

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bloukrans Bridge-001.jpg

File:COA of the Moldova digital (Project Lobachev).svg, File:COA of the Moldova digital max (Project Lobachev).svg

DR

Престанете да триете мои файлове!

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Val Valentino.jpg

Navigation menu

Search