User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief18

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijchen, kasteel Wijchen RM39629 foto7 2016-04-20 10.08a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Waalbrug RM523067 vanaf het Valkhof foto6 2016-06-08 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brinkheurne, schuur bij bakkerij Huiskamp foto6 2016-07-19 10.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Barbarossa ruïne RM31192 foto10 2016-06-08 14.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rheden, de Dorpskerk RM42087 foto3 2016-05-08 16.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, gietijzeren lantaarnpaal met vijf gaslantaarns van het type ritter-lantaarn RM519511 IMG 9537 2016-04-30 18.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem, kantoorgebouw van de Rabobank in Dudokstijl RM516839 foto7 2016-01-17 10.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:42, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarschot, parochiekerk Onze-Lieve-Vrouw oeg41424 foto4 205-06-08 14.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --EoRdE6 06:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buren, vestingwerken met toren van de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM11329 foto4 2016-10-05 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elst, autotunnel onder het spoor foto8 2016-08-31 19.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, straatzicht de Randweg met de sneeuw foto5 2017-01-15 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Elden, de Bonifatiuskerk RM8385 met sneeuw foto3 2017-01-15 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deil, de Hervormde kerk RM16496 tm RM16498 foto2 2016-10-05 11.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buren, het koninklijk weeshuis RM11388 achter de vestingwerken foto8 2016-10-05 11.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Please check your image. It's tilted CCW (or needs perspective correction). --XRay 09:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done and I hope it is good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it is OK now. --XRay 11:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lent, treinstation Nijmegen-Lent foto12 2016-08-24 20.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, de OHRA-tunnel (voor fietsers) met sneeuw foto14 2017-01-15 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Fietsmaten?--Famberhorst 06:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ik zat in de sneeuw te wachten en wachten tot er een fietser langs zou komen. Uiteindelijk zag ik dan twee fietsers die voor mijn camera wilden poseren. Dat werd tijd ook want ik begon intussen wel een kouwe reet te krijgen, haha --Michielverbeek 06:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Elden, monumentaal woonhuis GM022WN0440 met sneeuw foto1 2017-01-15 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Er zit ook nog een ekster in de boom links.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deze vogel is dan zonder dat ik het in de gaten had op de gevoelige plaat vastgelegd --Michielverbeek 06:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glanerbrug, de Hervormde kerk 0153WN034 foto5 2016-04-03 17.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IJsselmuiden, toren van de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM39907 en kerkgebouw van de voormalige Gereformeerde Gemeente Buitenverband foto3 2016-02-17 14.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:36, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, de Lutherse kerk RM23024 foto5 2016-02-17 13.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kampen, toren van de Bovenkerk RM23053 vanaf Vloeddijk-Muntsteeg foto5 2016-02-17 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:18, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, de Peperbus RM41765 vanaf de Eekwal foto8 2016-06-05 12.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:35, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, schip de Josefien, de Wijndragerstoren RM41712 en ophaalbrug foto10 2016-06-05 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Scotch Mist 15:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, fontein bij het Van Nahuysplein RM41594 met de Sassenpoort RM41788 op de achtergrond foto6 2016-06-05 10.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwolle, de Sassenpoort RM41788 foto5 2016-06-05 10.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for QI! --Milseburg 12:45, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denekamp, kanaal Almelo-Nordhorn foto6 2016-09-25 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Denekamp en Oldenzaal, weg voor landbouwvoertuigen foto11 2016-09-25 09.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note. Maybe a tiny bit more beautiful right cut.--Famberhorst 06:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note. Maybe a tiny bit more beautiful right cut.--Famberhorst 06:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks --Michielverbeek 07:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC) You are right, a better right crop Done --Michielverbeek 22:01, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion and vote...

I thank you for your encouragement and I understand that the same thing is expected of me ... if I have sometimes given my appreciation, I am unable to express myself with sufficient precision in a language That I do not practice; So I actually leave my pictures to the appreciation of the participants and can not really argue or defend validly my point of view on the exposed photos that generally are promoted when they meet the quality criteria. Excuse this language too dependent on google ... and rest assured of my interest for this contest for which I try to provide interesting images among those that I realize at the Museum of Toulouse. Best regards. --Ercé (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Fortuin, Zakkendragershuisje aan de Zuiddijk foto4 2017-02-01 14.37.jpg

File:Henk Fortuin, Zakkendragershuisje aan de Zuiddijk foto4 2017-02-01 14.37.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Fortuin, de Buiswoning foto4 2017-02-01 15.01.jpg

File:Henk Fortuin, de Buiswoning foto4 2017-02-01 15.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Fortuin, Schanseiland foto4 2017-02-01 15.16.jpg

File:Henk Fortuin, Schanseiland foto4 2017-02-01 15.16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Fortuin, de Witte Villa aan de Govert van Wijnkade foto3 2017-02-01 15.28.jpg

File:Henk Fortuin, de Witte Villa aan de Govert van Wijnkade foto3 2017-02-01 15.28.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Fortuin, het Lage Licht foto5 2017-02-01 15.44.jpg

File:Henk Fortuin, het Lage Licht foto5 2017-02-01 15.44.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henk Fortuin, de Burgemeester van der Lelykade foto7 2017-02-01 15.51.jpg

File:Henk Fortuin, de Burgemeester van der Lelykade foto7 2017-02-01 15.51.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 06:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality image

Regarding this photo. What an honor having it approved as a quality image. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henk Fortuin, de Buiswoning foto4 2017-02-01 15.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henk Fortuin, de Burgemeester van der Lelykade foto7 2017-02-01 15.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henk Fortuin, het Lage Licht foto5 2017-02-01 15.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henk Fortuin, de Witte Villa aan de Govert van Wijnkade foto3 2017-02-01 15.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henk Fortuin, Zakkendragershuisje aan de Zuiddijk foto4 2017-02-01 14.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijchen, sculptuur de Tafel foto7 2017-02-15 16.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nederasselt, de Rooms Katholieke kerk GM0252-013 foto6 2017-02-15 16.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malden, straatzicht de Rijksweg foto5 2017-02-15 12.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nijmegen, de Sint Annamolen RM31199 foto6 2017-02-15 12.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, houten brug bij Baakhovenstraat-kinderboerderij in de winter foto6 2017-02-12 09.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henk Fortuin, Schanseiland foto4 2017-02-01 15.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave, het stadhuis foto2 2017-02-15 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gassel, de Sint Janskerk RM526041 foto5 2017-02-15 14.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mill, de stenen schoorsteen op het voormalig terrein van houtfabriek Van Hout GM0815-WN001 in straatzicht foto4 2017-02-15 13.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utrecht, de Domtoren (RM36075) vanaf de Oudegracht 230 ongeveer foto5 2015-11-01 08.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieuwegein, fietspad langs het Sint Antonius-ziekenhuis foto3 2016-10-05 16.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern_windmills

Category:Modern_windmills has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 23:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraaijenbergse Plassen, ophaalbrug foto10 2017-02-15 13.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haren, de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM28515 foto5 2016-04-20 12.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dieden, stellingmolen Stella Polaris RM32387 foto8 2016-04-20 12.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demen, de Sint Willibrorduskerk RM32378 foto8 2016-04-20 11.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ravenstein, windmolen de Nijverheid RM32362 foto4 2016-04-20 11.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veen, molen de Hoop RM6823 foto6 2016-01-23 11.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Henk Fortuin, het Lage Licht

Hi, I like this painting very much, so I made an edit trying to correct the colors: File:Henk Fortuin, het Lage Licht, edit.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lith, de Sint Lambertuskerk RM516542 positie2 foto2 2016-06-19 17.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Giessen, de Hervormde kerk RM39609 foto6 2016-06-19 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 23:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oss, de kerk van de Onze Lieve Vrouw Onbevlekt Ontvangen RM31870 foto3 2016-04-20 13.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments some halos and artifacts, but ok for me --Carschten 00:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Megen, de Gevangentoren RM28527 foto5 2016-04-20 12.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beek en Donk, ophaalbrug over de Zuid-Willemsvaart foto10 2016-10-16 12.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beek en Donk, de Sint Michaëlkerk in straatzicht RM520153 foto5 2016-10-16 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lieshout, windmolen de Leest RM25888 foto6 2016-10-16 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuenen, de Sint Clemenskerk RM30822 foto6 2016-10-16 10.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 22:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lith, molen de Zeldenrust RM25913 foto5 2016-06-19 17.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 22:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarle-Rixtel, Klokkengieterij Petit & Fritsen RM46886 foto7 2016-10-16 12.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helvoirt, de Sint-Nicolaaskerk RM21465 foto5 2016-04-20 17.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eindhoven, roeiers op het Eindhovens Kanaal foto11 2016-10-16 17.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geldrop, molen 't Nupke RM16032 foto13 2016-10-16 17.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Great motive and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heeze, beeld van het NCRV radio spel 'heer en meester' foto9 2016-10-16 16.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Someren, standerdmolen Den Evert RM34114 foto6 2016-10-16 15.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, de Dommel vanaf Mariënburg foto6 2016-12-04 12.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, de Dommel vanaf de brug-Stationsweg foto5 2016-12-04 12.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, de Dommel vanaf de Molenberg foto18 2016-12-04 11.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, straatzicht vanaf het Wilhelminaplein foto4 2016-12-04 11.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, het Drakenfontein foto3 2016-12-04 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, straatzicht Statenlaan positie2 foto10 2016-12-04 13.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, straatzicht Statenlaan positie1 foto4 2016-12-04 13.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 's-Hertogenbosch, straatzicht Brede en Smalle Haven foto13 2016-12-04 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:48, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gennep, de Sint Martinustoren RM525602 foto6 2015-11-02 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broekhuizen, de Sint Nicolaaskerk RM11091 foto7 2015-11-02 12.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sint-Odiliënberg, de Sint Wiro, Plechelmus en Otgerusbasiliek RM33643 foto5 2016-09-08 17.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vlodrop, de Sint-Martinuskerk RM37866 foto7 2016-08-31 16.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Posterholt, wegpanorama foto10 2016-08-31 16.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noorbeek, de Sint-Brigidakerk RM34794 foto3 2016-07-10 11.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eckelrade, de Sint-Bartholomeuskerk RM34676 foto4 2016-07-10 10.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016-04-20 14.37 Geffen, standerdmolen Zeldenrust RM16028 foto6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Three dust spots on the right that should be removed (see the note) --Halavar 23:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Done, thanks! Sorry, but the note is gone --Michielverbeek 22:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Image is good but please add proper categories (by place and by subject) --Halavar 14:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Uhh, I forgot something Done --Michielverbeek 16:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok, good now. QI for me --Halavar 20:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, sculptuur voor het centrale treinstation foto7 2016-08-24 10.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect! --Ermell 07:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helmond, zicht op kanaal door Helmond vanaf de Kasteeltraverse foto8 2016-10-16 13.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helmond, kubuswoningen foto4 2016-10-16 13.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croy, kasteel Croy positie2 foto6 2016-10-16 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maastricht, de Torenmolen van Gronsveld, RM28086 foto8 2017-03-11 10.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Limbourg, chapelle Saint-Anne oeg63046-CLT-0001-01 foto5 2017-03-12 13.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bévercé, la chapelle Saint-Antoine foto6 2017-03-12 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malmedy, straatzicht la Rue Outrelepont foto3 2017-03-12 10.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupen, l'église de la Paix oeg63023-CLT-0022-01 foto4 2017-03-11 14.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Great motive, nice composition and very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupen, sculptuur op plein Malmedyer Strasse naar Frankendelle foto4 2017-03-11 15.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Limbourg, de Vesder in de stad foto9 2017-03-12 14.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bévercé, panorama foto9 2017-03-12 11.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Henri Chapelle en Bilstain, panorama naar het dorp foto7 2017-03-12 15.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe not the most interesting composition but the image is OK. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Belle Croix en Jalhay, panorama foto9 2017-03-12 12.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Mont Rigi en Mont, panorama vanaf La Route de la Baraque Michel foto4 2017-03-12 11.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Kralingen, de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM506428 foto5 2016-02-28 13.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 03:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Coolsingel met het stadhuis RM513763 foto4 2016-02-28 10.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nicely done. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Groothandelsgebouw RM530940 foto10 2016-02-28 09.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, de voormalige Rotterdamsche Bank aan de Coolsingel RM530919 - nu ABN Amrobank foto72016-02-28 10.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, de Nieuwe Kerk foto1 RM11872 foto4 2016-03-13 12.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, de Lutherse kerk in straatzicht RM11951 foto6 2016-03-13 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delft, de watertoren aan het Kalverbos RM525246 foto6 2016-03-13 11.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 23:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benthuizen, de witte zijde van molen de Haas RM8993 foto3 2016-05-01 15.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hazerswoude- Dorp, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM21046 foto5 2016-05-01 15.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hazerswoude-Dorp, de Gere Molen RM21065 foto5 2016-05-01 14.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leimuiden, de Johannes de Doperkerk RM509921 foto7 2016-05-01 13.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, de Wippersmolen RM26626 foto14 2016-06-06 15.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maassluis, straatzicht de Wip met de Sluis GM055627-34, het voormalig stadhuis RM26604 en beeld van Fredie Kloen met boei foto6 2016-06-06 11.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zevenhuizen, de Tweemanspolder Molen No. 4 RM40456 foto4 2016-05-01 17.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zevenhuizen, de Tweemanspolder Molen No. 3 RM40459 foto5 2016-05-01 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zevenhuizen, de Tweemanspolder Molen No. 2 RM40458 en No.1 RM40457 foto3 2016-05-01 17.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 06:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ameide, de toren van de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM7571 foto4 2016-10-05 15.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Ameide en Meerkerk, sloot in polderlandschap foto5 2016-10-05 14.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Meerkerk en Ameide, sloot in polderlandschap foto6 2016-10-05 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arkel, achtkante korenstellingmolen Jan van Arkel RM8285 foto6 2016-10-05 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijnsaterwoude, de Woudse Dom RM33006 foto9 2016-05-01 13.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den Haag, beeld op de Kalvermarkt - The Observer van Berry Holslag foto10 2016-10-01 18.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks better now --Poco a poco 17:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Comment[reply]
Upload problem has been solved --Michielverbeek 05:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wat Mae Chon ruins 2 -Sukhothai.JPG

Thank you for reviewing File:Wat Mae Chon ruins 2 -Sukhothai.JPG. I didn't even notice the insects. Please bear with me, my eyes aren't so good for such small items and I don't have a lot of image editing experience. But within the image note you made, I tried to remove the insects. I can no longer see the ones I spotted after you made your note. Please look at it again and advise. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 10:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC) The insects were not removed so I have removed them by using the Photoshop-brush. I hope you like my new version, --Michielverbeek (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

response on my talk page. PumpkinSky talk 12:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lisse, tulpenveld in verschillende kleuren positie2 foto5 2017-04-09 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:08, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noordwijkerhout, veld met tulpen foto2 2017-04-09 14.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voorhout, veld met hyacinthen bij de Bergamolaan foto4 positie2 2017-04-09 13.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voorhout, veld met hyacinthen bij de Bergamolaan foto4 positie1 2017-04-09 13.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lisse, tulpenveld in verschillende kleuren positie1 foto10 2017-04-09 15.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Straatzicht Place du commissaire Maigret

Hi Michiel, I just wanted to know how to correct the image, so I've checked it in my Lightroom. I've uploaded a new version, please feel free to renominate it. Best regards, --Basotxerri (talk) 20:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, straatzicht Point Chaud foto6 2017-03-26 10.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Montagne de Bueren foto16 2017-03-26 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goos quality --Llez 14:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Hôtel des Postes oeg62063-CLT-0181-01 vanaf de Passerelle Saucy foto4 2017-03-26 09.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Tilted 0.3 degrees to the right. --Halavar 10:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done and I hope this version is good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, but the problem still exist. Please do, what I said before, just rotate image 0.3 degrees to the left. Do that with original version. --Halavar 18:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Done rotation in Lr -0,4 --Michielverbeek 21:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 22:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Hôtel des Postes oeg62063-CLT-0181-01 met de Passerelle Saucy foto6 2017-03-26 09.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Tilted 0.3 degrees to the right --Halavar 12:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done and I hope this version is good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, but the problem still exist. Please do, what I said before, just rotate image 0.3 degrees to the left. Do that with original version. --Halavar 18:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC) )[reply]
Thanks Done rotation in Lr -0,4 --Michielverbeek 21:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 22:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, straatzicht Point Chaud foto6 2017-03-26 09.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eijsden, de Martinuskerk RM15487 foto4 2017-03-25 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Before promotion, image needs perspective correction, vertical lines are not straight (see the notes) --Halavar 11:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks Halavar I was not accurate and made a small rotation --Michielverbeek 21:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect, but it's much better. Thanks for the new version:) QI for me --Halavar 23:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, zicht over de Maas naar Palais des Congrès vanaf de nieuwe brug foto5 2017-03-26 13.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, La Tour Paradis met de brug tussen Outremeuse en Guillemins foto10 2017-03-26 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Collégiale Saint-Denis oeg62063-CLT-0003-01 foto5 2017-03-26 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, straatzicht Place de Verte foto6 2017-03-26 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems to be oblique, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 18:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It goes up and down everywhere in Liège --Michielverbeek 20:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Port des Yachts met Pont Kennedy foto4 2017-03-26 14.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, kruizen op Pont Albert 1er foto11 2017-03-26 14.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, le pont Albert 1er Guillemins foto9 2017-03-26 14.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, La Tour Paradis foto7 2017-03-26 13.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liege, huisje achter het glas in Parc de la Boverie bij de nieuwe brug foto2 2017-03-26 13.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ninane, kerk foto9 2017-03-27 10.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaux sous Chevremont, spoorviaduct over het plein bij de Haute Folie foto9 2017-03-27 10.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, sculptuur op l'Avenue Maurice Destenay foto14 2017-03-26 16.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, zicht vanaf le Pont des Arches foto3 2017-03-26 15.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sougne-Remouchamps, spoorbrug over de Rue de Trois Ponts foto7 2017-03-27 12.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dieupart, l'église des Saints-Anges oeg62009-CLT-0005-01 foto6 2017-03-27 12.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aywaille, zicht op de Amblève foto4 2017-03-27 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Florzé, l'église Saint-Pierre foto5 2017-03-27 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO a bit of the foreground could be cropped but the image is OK of course! Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC) Done You are right; I forgot it. --Michielverbeek 07:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sprimont, l'église Saint Martin foto5 2017-03-27 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, Port des Yachts foto9 2017-03-26 14.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The whites are blown, can you reduce it? --A.Savin 09:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks, you are right. I have made whites less strong and the marina a bit darker --Michielverbeek 07:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 11:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, straatzicht Place du commissaire Maigret foto4 2017-03-26 10.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The left side is slightly leaning in, maybe you could try to get this better? --Basotxerri 15:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately not --Michielverbeek 17:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks Done by Basotxerri, a third opinion please --Michielverbeek 20:45, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --W.carter 09:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoumont, l'église Saint-Hubert foto6 2017-03-27 14.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen La Gleize en Coo, spoorviaduct foto5 2017-03-27 15.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bévercé, la Warche foto5 2017-03-27 16.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sourbrodt, l'église Saint-Wendelin foto7 2017-03-28 11.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stoumont, château de Froidcourt oeg63075-CLT-0022-01 foto7 2017-03-27 14.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Stavelot en Trois Ponts, de Amblève foto5 2017-03-27 15.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castle of Dalmayrac 06.jpg

Ok, thank you very much! Dank u wel! Tournasol7 (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Belle Croix en Baraque Michel, hoogveenpanorama foto5 2017-03-28 12.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Robertville, zicht op het meer vanaf de brug foto7 2017-03-28 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-centrum, promotievlaggen bekerfinale bij Volkshuisvesting-Pluryn foto6 2017-04-26 10.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Comment[reply]
Thanks --Michielverbeek 16:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-centrum, koe in Vitesseshirt en promotievlaggen voor bekerfinale bij Volkshuisvesting-Pluryn foto5 2017-04-26 10.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Your photos are very fine. Good quality. And I like the cow. -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-centrum, No Lie Can Live Forever bij het Openbaar Ministerie foto5 2017-04-26 10.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-De Laar, houten brug bij Baakhovenstraat-kinderboerderij op Koningsdag poging2 foto4 2017-04-27 09.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walhorn, die Walhorner Pfarrkirche foto2 2017-03-28 14.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 19:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden-Merenwijk, waarschijnlijk straatzicht de Broekweg foto8 2017-04-09 10.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 18:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warmond, de Broekdijkmolen foto7 2017-04-09 10.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice atmosphere. A little disturbing are the building materials at the mill.--Famberhorst 18:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks, it was a very difficult photo to make because I was facing the sun. --Michielverbeek 20:41, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Oud Ade en Warmond, polderpanorama bij Huize Brugzicht foto7 2017-04-09 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Ade, de Rooms Katholieke kerk en de pastorie RM386998 foto15 2017-04-09 11.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:37, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Belle Croix en Baraque Michel, hoogveen-panorama foto8 2017-03-28 12.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A piece of cut may be more beautiful, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 05:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Comment Thanks for advice; you have got experience with those kind of compositions --Michielverbeek 21:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupen, die Sankt Joseph Kirche oeg63023-CLT-0026-01 foto6 2017-03-28 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robertville, l'église Saint-Joseph foto9 2017-03-28 10.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hillegom, ophaalbrug met de toren van de Maartenskerk RM22136 foto5 2017-04-09 16.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Perfect weather to make nice photos. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hillegom, de voormalige watertoren GM0534WN008 foto3 2017-04-09 15.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:33, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arnhem-Zuid, Heel Arnhem naar de Kuip promotiebord voor de bekerfinale foto6 2017-04-29 16.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 21:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijpwetering, ophaalbrug foto8 2017-04-09 11.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Beautiful weather in NL for making gorgeous photos. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rijpwetering, de Lijkermolen no.2 RM7129 foto5 2017-04-09 11.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sassenheim, de Sint Pancratiuskerk GM1525WN046 foto4 2017-04-09 12.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sassenheim, de Dorpskerk-de Pancratiuskerk RM33032 foto6 2017-04-09 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What seems to lean to the right, but good quality for me.--Famberhorst 05:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, het Bevrijdingsmonument foto3 2017-04-09 09.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Tilted antiCW --A.Savin 10:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Done I did not check the verticals correctly --Michielverbeek 21:24, 2 May 2017 (UTC) I'm still not quite sold with the right-hand side, but OK4QI IMO. --A.Savin 09:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liège, uitzicht vanaf Montagne de Bueren foto11 2017-03-26 19.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I realize that this is an evening photo, but could you brighten is just a little bit, at least the highlights in it. --W.carter 07:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for comment. Done (partly). I have made foreground indeed brighter. However I think it's not an improvement to make the main part (the town) brighter, a bit darker is even better. --Michielverbeek 20:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good call! It just needed some details that stood out a bit to make it easier on the eye. Good quality. --W.carter 08:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, if I return to Liège I would use my flash --Michielverbeek 05:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, bedrijf aan de Schielands Hoge Zeedijk foto6 2017-04-30 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, het voormalige stadhuis RM16843 positie3 foto2 2017-04-30 13.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 04:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Lac de Robertville, straatzicht met het meer foto2 2017-03-28 10.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The houses are tilt CCW, could you fix that, please? Maybe a better crop would improve the image but that's for tastes. --Basotxerri 14:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you were right Done --Michielverbeek 21:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, toren van de Grote of Sint Janskerk RM16722 positie2 foto7 2017-04-30 10.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, toren van de Grote of Sint Janskerk RM16722 positie3 foto7 2017-04-30 11.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice view of the tower! Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, sculptuur bij het Potterplein foto9 2017-04-30 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda,de EB68 aan de Kattensingel foto6 2017-04-30 08.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, het voormalige stadhuis RM16843 positie2 foto5 2017-04-30 09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But please add the geo location. --XRay 05:42, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gouda, Huis van de stad (nieuwe gemeentehuis) foto8 2017-04-30 08.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, Feyenoord lichtbak bij de Weena 200 vlak voor Excelsior-Feyenoord IMG 6425 2017-05-07 13.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, Welkom in Rotterdam bij de Weena 200 IMG 6425 2017-05-07 13.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dull lighting, but good quality. --DXR 06:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the light conditions were very poor that day --Michielverbeek 17:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, café Beurs aan de Kruiskade - Feyenoord scoort 2-0 IMG 6759 2017-05-14 14.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Hofpleinfontein - Feyenoord is kampioen IMG 6790 2017-05-14 16.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Hofpleinfontein - Feyenoord is kampioen IMG 6799 2017-05-14 16.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Hofpleinfontein - Feyenoord is kampioen IMG 6805 2017-05-14 16.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Hofpleinfontein - Feyenoord is kampioen IMG 6824 2017-05-14 16.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 08:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam de Binnenrotte, lichtbak Feyenoord is landskampioen met voertuigen van de mobiele eenheid IMG 6831 2017-05-14 16.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Shellgebouw met banner voor de kampioenswedstrijd IMG 6738 2017-05-14 13.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dominant. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Lijnbaan, Feyenoord-supporters met vlag in de pauze van de kampioenwedstrijd IMG 6770 2017-05-14 15.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add an image note

I'm not sure what these are called: notes/tags/captions/annotations or whatever. Recall my photo File:Wat Mae Chon ruins 2 -Sukhothai.JPG? You added a yellow box with a note to remove the insects, which I had trouble doing and you did it for me? Just what are these yellow boxes called and how do I add one? Thank you. PS: When I was 11-12 years old we lived in Utrecht. PumpkinSky talk 22:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You left a note by clicking on the link just left under the photo (in Nederlands: notitie toevoegen with as question mark). I don't know the name of the yellow box; I have a Dutch version and this might be the problem. --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:55, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MTF curves

Hallo, I come here after reading your comment in QIC. Each optical equipment has an optimal setting, focal distance and f-number do play a role. Each lens does have MTF curves for the different f-number. You should find out what are the best settings in your camera to optimize your lenses. Regards, Poc o² 18:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks for your answer --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maasbracht, sculptuur met chinees restaurant bij de rotonde op de Hoofdstraat foto6 2017-05-10 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linne, de Sint-Martinuskerk RM522193 foto6 2017-05-10 12.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Merum en Ool, de Oolderplas foto4 2017-05-10 11.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roermond, de Maria Theresiabrug RM32609 met de Sint-Christoffelkathedraal RM32552 foto6 2017-05-10 11.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thorn, lantaarnpaal met de Abdijkerk RM35490 op de achtergrond foto6 2017-05-10 16.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevensweert, de Sint Stephanuskerk RM34890 en de pastorie RM34891 foto4 2017-05-10 14.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:47, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Stevenswert, de Oude Maas foto12 2017-05-10 13.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maasbracht, het Julianakanaal foto8 2017-05-10 13.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice view. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevenum, de Fabianus en Sebastianuskerk Gm1507SEV-022 foto4 2017-05-17 15.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roggel, de Roggelse waterbol foto10 2017-05-17 12.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 07:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heel, de Sint-Stephanuskerk RM21076 foto12 2017-05-10 17.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wessem, de Medarduskerk RM38678 foto6 2017-05-10 17.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thorn, toren van de Abdijkerk RM35490 foto9 2017-05-10 16.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venray, Onze Lieve Vrouw van Zeven Smarten of Paterskerk RM524009 foto11 2017-05-17 17.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! America, de Rooms-Katholieke parochiekerk Sint Jozef RM523267 foto4 2017-05-17 16.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kronenberg, de Rooms Katholieke Sint Theresia kerk RM526557 foto9 2017-05-17 15.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Sint Lodewijkskerk RM25593 met de Groenebrug foto7 2017-06-11 11.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, zicht op Kort Galgewater vanaf Prinsessekade foto13 2017-06-11 10.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 06:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, zicht vanaf Blauwpoortsbrug naar Beestenmarkt, Rederij Rembrandt en Molen de Valk RM25655 foto7 2017-06-11 10.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful scenario. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, fontein op de Beestenmarkt foto8 2017-06-11 10.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, straatzicht Beestenmarkt-Steenstraat foto7 2017-06-11 10.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 06:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiden, de Marekerk RM25069 met terras op boot in de gracht foto5 2017-06-11 09.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great photo. I suggest you consider nominating at FPC. PumpkinSky 23:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks for your comment, but IMO lightfall is not good enough for FP. --Michielverbeek 06:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]