User talk:Merker Berlin
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
SieBot 16:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello!
Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. Siebrand 17:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Do you have a better version of Image:Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 Seite 93.jpg?
[edit]
Thank you for your submission of Image:Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 Seite 93.jpg. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)
If you can supply the same exact image as Image:Reichsgesetzblatt 1893 Seite 93.jpg at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.
Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated. Siebrand 17:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Deppenapostrophe 1
[edit]Hallo Merker Berlin, warum hast du denn die Kategorie Deppenapostrophe umbenannt? Es ging dort eben nicht um Apostrophe, sondern um die fälschliche Verwendung von Apostrophen im deutschen Sprachraum. Dieser Aspekt ist nun völlig verlorengegangen. --X-Weinzar (talk) 10:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hallo X-Weinzar, es ist nett, dass du mir die Möglichkeit gibst, es zu erklären. Es ist die Galerie Apostroph eingerichtet worden, um dort genauer darlegen zu können, worum es sich handelt. Das ganze Phänomen soll also regelrecht erklärt werden. Nicht so ausführlich wie im Artikel, aber auch nicht so kommentarlos wie in der Kategorie. Ich will mich da an der Galerie Leerzeichen in Komposita orientieren, die sich auf den gleichnamigen Artikel bezieht, der bis vor einer Woche Deppenleerzeichen hieß. Das Lemma wurde seit Jahren als Schandfleck empfunden, nun ist es endlich geändert worden. Die Galerie gibt die Möglichkeit, die Art der Fehler noch zu untergliedern und überhaupt übersichtlicher zu gestalten, denn in der Kategorie liegen die Bilder ja nur einfach so. Wenn besonderer Wert darauf gelegt wird, kann natürlich noch die Unterkategorie Deppenapostroph (im Singular) eingerichtet werden, aber der Begriff ist verunglimpfend und beleidigend, die Verbreitung ist in den letzten Jahren (bedauerlicherweise) hauptsächlich durch WP erfolgt. Wenn du Vorschläge und insbesondere noch Bilder zur Galerie beitragen möchtest, würde ich mich freuen. Wenn du danach nicht zufrieden sein solltest, können wir ja immer noch sehen, wie wir das mit den Deppen regeln. Weißt du zufällig, wie ich in den Bildunterschriften einen Zeilenumbruch erzwingen kann? -- Merker Berlin (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ach so, noch etwas: Ich habe den Galerielink in Apostroph und in Apostrophitis eingefügt, damit die Bilder überhaupt erst einmal vom Artikel aus gefunden werden können. -- Merker Berlin (talk) 13:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- OKay, keine Einwände. Eine Frage habe ich aber noch: Woher nimmst du denn die Ansicht, die Verbreitung sei hauptsächlich durch WP erfolgt? Wegen der Zeilenumbrüche: Im normalen Text kann man das mit "</br>" machen. Ob das auch innerhalb der Gallerys funktioniert, bin ich mir nicht ganz sicher, aber ich nehme, dass das dort auch geht. Eine Antwort hier hätte mir übrigens gereicht. Gruß --X-Weinzar (talk) 19:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Herzlichen Dank, die Zeilenumbrüche funktionieren wunderbar. – Mit einer wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung kann ich leider (noch) nicht aufwarten, aber meine Tests mit Deppenleerzeichen lassen Schlimmes ahnen: Von Philologiestudenten gaben 25% an, dies sei der korrekte (!) Begriff. Bei den über 50-jährigen Befragten (30 Personen, also zu wenig) war niemand dabei, der diesen Begriff erklären konnte. Mit Verbreitung meine ich allerdings nicht Erwähnung, sondern die nachhaltige Begriffsbildung (!) und Verlinkung in ungefähr 20 harmlosen Artikeln wie Substantiv oder Deutsche Rechtschreibung. Jedenfalls habe ich die Galerie Apostroph im Portal:Deutsche Rechtschreibung eingetragen, damit man deine Bilder auch findet. -- Merker Berlin (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Deppenapostrophe 2
[edit]Hallo Merker Berlin,
das Bild File:Trauring Aktion.jpg wird aus deiner hübschen Sammlung wohl wieder verschwinden müssen, weil der Inhalt doch über reinen Text hinausgeht und COM:FOP auch nicht greifen würde, da es nicht permanent installiert ist. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, welchen Fehler habe ich denn da gemacht, ich hielt das für vollkommen unverfänglich, kein Name, keine Adresse... Soll ich die Ringe wegmachen, nur den Schriftzug lassen? -- Merker Berlin (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nun, die Ringe haben m.E. doch eine gewisse Schöpfungshöhe. Du kannst sie natürlich wegschneiden, aber dann verliert das ganze natürlich viel. Andererseits hast du ja schon reichlich Beispiele für dieses merkwürdige Phänomen zusammengetragen, so dass wir vielleicht auf eines mehr verzichten könnten. Ich werde jetzt nicht sofort eine rfd aufmachen, aber irgendwann wird das jemand tun.--Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ja, das hatte ich nicht bedacht. Warten wir also – da du so nett bist – auf den, der es rausschmeißt. Dann arbeite ich es um. Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis, ich werde in Zukunft besser aufpassen. -- Merker Berlin (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nun, die Ringe haben m.E. doch eine gewisse Schöpfungshöhe. Du kannst sie natürlich wegschneiden, aber dann verliert das ganze natürlich viel. Andererseits hast du ja schon reichlich Beispiele für dieses merkwürdige Phänomen zusammengetragen, so dass wir vielleicht auf eines mehr verzichten könnten. Ich werde jetzt nicht sofort eine rfd aufmachen, aber irgendwann wird das jemand tun.--Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
File:DIE DRAUSSEN WERBER Litfaßsäule 1000.jpg brauchen wir das 2x? --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nein, da habe ich mich geirrt. Ich brauche nur das 1000.jpg (1000px breit). Das andere ist so ein riesiger Lappen und kann gelöscht werden. Soll nicht wieder vorkommen. -- Merker Berlin (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kaiser-Wilhelm-Brücke.jpg is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Kronprinzenpalais.jpg is uncategorized since 13 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ussukuma 1921.jpg is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Fördermittelübersicht Umweltprämie 20090312.jpg is uncategorized since 12 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but File:Trauring Aktion.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Tryphon (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kaiser Wilhelm Brücke Kaiser-Wilhelm-Brücke Berlin.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-Tryphon (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kaiser Friedrich Museum Kaiser-Friedrich-Museum Berlin.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-Tryphon (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kronprinzen Palais Kronprinzenpalais Berlin.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-Tryphon (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bismarck Denkmal Bismarckdenkmal Berlin.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
-Tryphon (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
- Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
- State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
- If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
- Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
- Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.
If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.
It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.
You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.
Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.
Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Baumstumpf_frauenau_Q_400.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Baumstumpf_frauenau_Q_400.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Baumstumpf_frauenau_Q_400.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
\mu/ 11:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Spontandemo_14_5_08_Q_400.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Spontandemo_14_5_08_Q_400.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Spontandemo_14_5_08_Q_400.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
\mu/ 11:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
No permission tags
[edit]Please do not remove "no permission" tags from files uploaded by other users like you did at [1], especially when you're not able to solve the problem at all. Also, please do not add misleading "{{own}}" if the uploader is obviously not the author, and don't add meaningless upload dates to the respective field ("date" means the date when a file was created). -- \mu/ 11:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Logo_areal_Q_600.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logo_areal_Q_600.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo_areal_Q_600.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
\mu/ 21:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Erläuterung als Ergänzung -- \mu/ 21:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Duden Scann
[edit]Hallo Merker Berlin
die von Dir eingestellten Bilder [2] und [3] sind ziemlich dunkel, bzw. kaum zu erkennen. Kannst Du sie mit einem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm aufhellen, die Gammakorrektur und / oder den Kontrast ändern und die Bilder in neuer Version hochladen? Wenn Du möchtest könnte ich das machen. Sind aber eigentlich deine Bilder. --Knochen (talk) 11:21, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Nimm mich mit.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Nimm mich mit.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Akzent has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |