User talk:Maurice Marcellin~commonswiki
Image Tagging Image:PICT0070_3.JPG
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:PICT0070_3.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hola Maurice. Si quieres que esta imagen permanezca en los servidores de Wikimedia, por favor, proporciona los siguientes datos:
- Prueba que la muchacha retratada desnuda en la foto es mayor de 18 años.
- Muestra que esta foto es útil de alguna manera para algún proyecto Wikimedia.
- Por ahora, para evitar problemas legales para la Fundación, borraré esta imagen.--Orgullomoore 17:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gracias por tu respuesta. Espero que entiendas que no he borrado este fichero por ningún sesgo personal ni nada así. Sucede que por IRC, varios de los administradores de Commons discutimos la imagen y decidimos que, debido a la falta de información segura que se nos daba, era demasiado riesgoso mantener la foto en Commons, por el momento. A nosotros nos pareció muy joven y ése sí que sería un problema muy grande para Wikimedia. No es necesario que vuelvas a subir la foto, todavía la "tenemos", pero yo, por mi parte, prefiero esperar la opinión de otros administradores al respecto. Puedes iniciar una discusión en el Commons:Village pump. Yo voy a estar dialogando con unos por IRC mientras tanto.--Orgullomoore 08:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Orgullomoore 05:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --- ^^Este mensaje fue dejado automáticamente por un bot que yo programé[1]. Coincidencia.--Orgullomoore 04:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Image:Louise a vattetot1.jpg
[edit]I suppose she#s french? Changed Category. Regards TomAlt 14:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:La_domination_masculine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
__ ABF __ ϑ 20:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:NACHO_MÉNDEZ_2.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:NACHO_MÉNDEZ_2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 01:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Nacho_mÉndez_c-guitarra_1.jpg
[edit]
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:Nacho_mÉndez_c-guitarra_1.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 01:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded a derivative work | We're sorry, but Image:Los sueños de la razón... vacas.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Photographs of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this photo must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a derivative work, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-dave pape (talk) 01:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Los_sueños_de_la_razón..._vacas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
dave pape (talk) 02:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- The problem is that Freedom of Panorama only exists in certain countries. France, in particular, has none - so you cannot take a picture of a copyrighted work and release it under a free license, except with the explicit permission of the work's creator. --dave pape (talk) 02:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Las Pozas
[edit]Hola, te escribo en español porque esa parece ser tu lengua materna. He escrito un libro sobre arquitectura singular y me gustaría utilizar una de las fotos de Xitlitla para el bloque de ilustraciones que vamos a adjuntar en el interior. Lo va a publicar una editorial modesta en España, así que el presupuesto es pequeño. No obstante, si nos das el permiso para usar una, además de incluirte en los créditos, te enviaríamos un ejemplar del libro cuando se publique (dentro de unos meses y si nos facilitas una dirección donde hacerlo). Espero tu respuesta. Gracias y saludos, Natalia
![]() |
File:Sir_Edward_James_scratched_poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mike Peel (talk) 05:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jafeluv (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Instalación Spencer Tunick Mexico City 009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Badzil (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:People_living_in_the_street,_Canal_Saint_Martin,_Paris.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:People_living_in_the_street,_Canal_Saint_Martin,_Paris.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
– Adrignola talk 17:44, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:IMGP1591.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
– Adrignola talk 21:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Maurice Marcellin. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Maurice Marcellin~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
21:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
04:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)