User talk:Martin Falbisoner/Archive 5 2017

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Osaka Castle Outer Moat and Osaka Business Park, November 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Osaka Castle Outer Moat and Osaka Business Park, November 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osaka Castle Outer Moat and Osaka Business Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Either this or File:Osaka Castle Outer Moat and Osaka Business Park, November 2016 (3 to 2 crop).jpg is the best in scope, and if you can tell the difference between this file and the other, hats off to you, because I can't see any difference at the size shown on their pages. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: The files are identical, coincidentally and independently created at the same time, based on the same original upload... ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. lNeverCry 20:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Good evening Martin Falbisoner,

Thanks for the recommendation of my picture. There are some for voters, let's just wait and see.
Sincerely,
--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Die KPMG-Treppe

Hi Diego, das Motiv bietet noch einiges an Potential - ich werde mich selbst sicher auch noch mal daran versuchen. Was die Ecken angeht, nun: schwierig. Das Problem ist zum einen, dass die Treppe nicht mittig auf dem Platz steht, sondern zu einer Seite hin versetzt. Aber vielleicht bekommt man es irgendwie hin, idealerweise mit <16mm. Ich empfehle aber, auf wärmere Temperaturen zu warten. Für diese Perspektive muss man letztlich am Boden rumkriechen bzw. -liegen, was im Dezember natürlich nur eher begrenzt witzig ist. ;-) Aber auch ansonsten wird es einem baulich nicht ganz leicht gemacht, weil - wenigstens in der Nacht - die kleine Plattform, auf der das Stativ stand, zum anderen mit einer Absperrkette abgetrennt war. Somit musste ich das Stativ irgendwie drunterschieben, und zudem hatte ich diese dann dauernd im Bild, wenn ich das Stativ zu niedrig hochgefahren habe, was natürlich aber notwendig ist, um die Ecken gut reinzukriegen... Beste Grüße --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, verstanden, danke für die Insider-Infos. Wenn du nochmals hingehst, sag mir bitte kurz davor Bescheid, vielleicht schaffe ich es, mitzukommen. Auf jeden Fall nicht demnächst, ich freue mich nicht wirklich das Wetter in München ab Montag zu "geniessen". Viele Grüsse, Poco² 22:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Poco²: Bin ja selbst nur noch an max. 2 Wochenenden/Monat in Muc - und komme auch da idR kaum zum Fotografieren. Aber vielleicht bekommen wir wirklich mal einen gemeinsamen Fotoausflug hin, wäre lustig. Grüße --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:08, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Sag einfach Bescheid, vielleicht klappt es ja. Viele Grüsse, Poco² 09:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umschreibung (Olafur Eliasson): Worm's eye view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I find it hard to pick between this and File:Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -03.jpg for VI, but one of them is surely best in scope, so why not this one? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 00:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ninomaru Palace, November 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ninomaru Palace, November 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! No. 2 Folding Autographic Brownie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Umschreibung (Olafur Eliasson): Installation as seen from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Olivier LPB (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umschreibung by Olafur Eliasson, Munich, December 2016 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nara Park, November 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kyoto Station November 2016 -03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ishiyama-dera, November 2016 -3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 18:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance on Sonnenstrasse, Munich, February 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting. --Milseburg 13:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceiling light fixture in Hofstatt Mall, Munich, February 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airborne by Christopher Klein, Munich, February 2017 -1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 16:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Airborne by Christopher Klein, Munich, February 2017 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You may want to use {{FoP-Germany}} for such photos to avoid misunderstandings. --A.Savin 14:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)  Done --Martin Falbisoner 14:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highlight Towers Munich, February 2017 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 16:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highlight Towers Munich, February 2017 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photo, except for the pixellation in the sky. I'm not sure fixing that is essential for QI (someone else can rule on that), but if you fix it, you could nominate either of these photos for FP or both as a set. -- Ikan Kekek 11:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Fixed sky was overly brightened anyway... could you have another look, Ikan Kekek --Martin Falbisoner 20:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Much better. -- Ikan Kekek 00:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highlight Towers Munich, February 2017 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photo, except for the pixellation in the sky. I'm not sure fixing that is essential for QI (someone else can rule on that), but if you fix it, you could nominate either of these photos for FP or both as a set. -- Ikan Kekek 11:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Fixed sky was overly brightened anyway... --Martin Falbisoner 12:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC) Much better. -- Ikan Kekek 00:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceiling light fixture in Hofstatt Mall, Munich, February 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling light fixture in Hofstatt Mall, Munich, February 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Messing with your photo

I just love you photos of the towers! I could not resist seeing if there was any better way of showing of the different lights in the building. I think it works better if you concentrate on just the really colored part of the photos. So I came up with these triptychs. Hope you don't mind... Feel free to tweak them further if you wish or yell at me for playing with your photos. --cart-Talk 21:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

• 

• Thank you very much, cart! I'm wowed - and honored! You've achieved to turn rather banal architectural photographs into little pieces of art. I really appreciate that! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

• Glad you liked it. Maybe they would be better if the individual photos were exact squares or if the black lines were of some different thickness. (Overwrite or make new versions) Anyway, a little idea if you want to try to renom all three of these fantastic photos. Maybe the rest of the bunch will be wowed too. Have a nice weekend now!:D --cart-Talk 10:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

• I do like the triptychs very much - and I don't think I could improve them further. The only reason why I don't nominate them at FPC is that there's already the successfully running nom of the "cyan" towers. Thanks again - and have a nice weekend yourself! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Entrance on Sonnenstrasse, Munich, February 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Entrance on Sonnenstrasse, Munich, February 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building interiors in Munich: Sonnenstraße 15.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
• Comment: How is this the best representative of "Building interiors in Munich". Is no image from Category:Interiors of churches in Munich and its subcats better? For example File:Marianische Männerkongregation Munich.jpg is a FP. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment the actual scope of this FP - as of tomorrow - is "Building interiors in Munich: Sonnenstraße 15". So it's in fact much narrower, otherwise you'd be right, of course. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shopping mall interiors in Germany: light fixture of Hofstatt Mall, Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Highlight Towers: Worm's eye view at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I might prefer File:Highlight Towers Munich, February 2017 -02.jpg by a micron, just because there's ever so slightly less noise in the darker sky, but that's only at full size. As thumbnails, all of your three photos in this scope are equally good, so if you like this one best, that's fine with me. I think you should nominate them as a set for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Thanks Ikan. Yes, it's a very, very tough choice. I like 01 and 02 pretty much equally (the very blue LED illumination of 03 is not as interesting as the cyan and purple LEDs of 01 and 02 imo). Yes, there's a little bit less noise visible in 02's sky, but just because it's darker. Maybe it's too dark? Just a tad? Isn't the sky of 01 more "interesting"? Again just a tad? Questions... As for a set nomination: I've never done one before. I could give it a shot. It's just that I don't want to be make it appear "stairbaiting" ;-) I'll think about it. Thanks again --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

• I was assuming that the sky got darker as the time got later. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, Ikan, that's the only reason. I didn't do much in post. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21st-century sculptures in Munich: Airborne by Christopher Klein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I prefer this one as it concentrates on the sculpture. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support as best in scope. I think this is probably the better picture, as I like the lines of the building better in this one, it opens up more in space, and also for the same reason I think this is best in scope, which is that we see more features of the sculpture more clearly at this angle. So there you have it, a 1-1 split so far. They're both good, interesting photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Highlight Towers Munich, February 2017 -01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Highlight Towers Munich, February 2017 -01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Airborne by Christopher Klein, Munich, February 2017 -2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Airborne by Christopher Klein, Munich, February 2017 -2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rolltreppe Zeche Zollverein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rolltreppe Zeche Zollverein.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rolltreppe Zeche Zollverein.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruhr Museum-Eingangsrolltreppe: Long exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Hi, Martin. I'm wondering whether the reason this nomination hasn't yet been voted on is that people are unsure which other photos of this motif are long-exposure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  * Comment Ikan: if it's the only one in the defined scope, voting should be even easier... ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks.  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 10:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ADAC-Zentrale: worm's eye view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Most useful for VI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo Martin Falbisoner,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünf Höfe - Sphere, Munich, April 2017 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünf Höfe - Sphere, Munich, April 2017 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünf Höfe - Sphere, Munich, April 2017 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 18:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Wings, Siemens HQ Munich, April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 17:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünf Höfe - Hanging Gardens, Munich, April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Munich Subway Station Georg-Brauchle-Ring, April 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:ADAC-Zentrale: View from SE courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 02:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dutch angle: Benches.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful but it could be used in en:Dutch angle. Santamarcanda (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Munich Subway Station Georg-Brauchle-Ring, April 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich Subway Station Georg-Brauchle-Ring, April 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Wings created by Studio Libeskind: Blue hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nokia Networks: Munich Office, worm's eye view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Wings, Siemens HQ Munich, April 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Wings, Siemens HQ Munich, April 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nokia Networks Munich Office, April 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fünf Höfe - Sphere, Munich, April 2017 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fünf Höfe - Sphere, Munich, April 2017 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Question about Natural Phenomena

Hi, Martin - wanted to get your thoughts about categorization of my FP nom as a natural phenomena...the sunset is for sure, as would be a moon, but what about a rock formation like this one? I laughed at the thought the center focus of the image was nature's way of expressing herself for all things troubling. Atsme 📞 14:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

• Atsme, since there's no category "Nature trying to be funny" (yet), I guess this rather dull place has to suffice ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fünf Höfe - Hanging Gardens, Munich, April 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fünf Höfe - Hanging Gardens, Munich, April 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK considering the light conditions. --Peulle 15:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TMA DHC-6 Twin Otter at Velana International Airport, May 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very nice. Lol @ "international airport", I mean it doesn't exactly look like Heathrow ... :D --Peulle 15:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Beautiful rythm. --MirandaAdramin 15:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Please consider adding some cloud categories. --Peulle 15:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

wikidata

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30146136 See this for explain: Creator:Diego Delso — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergkarman (talk • contribs) 01:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC) Generated with tool: Creator:Martin_Falbisoner --Sergkarman (talk) 01:44, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

QIs promoted but not tagged by QICBot

• 
  Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -09.jpg
• 
  Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -08.jpg
• 
  Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -07.jpg
• 
  Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -06.jpg
• 
  Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -05.jpg

--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Rabax63 14:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fünf Höfe: Hanging Gardens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thudufushi: Island and Overwater Restaurant as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thudufushi: stilt houses (called Water Villas).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HVB-Tower Munich, June 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 13:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HVB-Tower and Mae West, Munich, June 2017 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HVB-Tower and Mae West, Munich, June 2017 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 17:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail of Wasserglockenbrunnen, Munich, June 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thudufushi: Whole island including reception area and main restaurant as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:HVB-Tower and Mae West, Munich, June 2017 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HVB-Tower and Mae West, Munich, June 2017 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hypo-Haus as seen from NW with "Mae West" at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose for the moment. Sorry, but a scope that is comprised of four very different elements is overly specific, imho. Remember that the scope is not supposed to be a description of your image, it's more about what people might actually be looking for when searching an image on Commons. Propose to replace the light trails with a simple "at night" or "night view" – that's still pretty complex but much more useful, imho. Great starbursts on the traffic lights, btw. Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 07:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
• Fixed, Ikan Kekek, El Grafo --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support now, thanks! --El Grafo (talk) 14:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I think El Grafo had a good point. My support vote certainly stands. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

QI promoted but not tagged by QICBot

• 
  File:Detail of Wasserglockenbrunnen, Munich, June 2017 -02 (HDR).jpg

--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HVB-Tower: Worm's-eye view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:HVB-Tower Munich, June 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HVB-Tower Munich, June 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations, Martin!!

Well-deserved!! Atsme 📞 12:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks, Atsme! :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
• 100 exzellente Bilder, das ist eine überragende Leistung! Viele Glückwünsche und viel Erfolg für die Zukunft. Ich freue mich jedes Mal, wenn ich wieder einen deiner Kandidaten sehe. Herzliche Grüße nach Deutschland, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Danke Dir, Frank! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Detail of Wasserglockenbrunnen, Munich, June 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Detail of Wasserglockenbrunnen, Munich, June 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wasserglockenbrunnen Frauenplatz (Munich): detail at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

100 FP

Congratulations! I really like Your images. I'm impressed by Your photos. Albertus teolog (talk) 06:46, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Albertus teolog! :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 20:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 20:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Bot wasn't working...

• 
  File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -01.jpg
• 
  File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -02.jpg

--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:33, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diamonds Thudufushi Beach and Water Villas, May 2017 -09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nizwa Fort and Minaret of Friday Mosque.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nizwa Fort and Minaret of Friday Mosque.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wieskirche, August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Generally too much green, but here I like it. --XRay 11:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linderhof Palace, August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ettal Abbey Church, August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:21, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bahrain Fort March 2015.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahrain Fort March 2015.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Thudufushi: Island and stilt houses.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment If we are judging a photo of the island itself wouldn’t this be a better picture -- this one? Viewing something from a seaplane doesn't justify a scope change to me but I'm not stopping someone else to vote for this. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, I'd drop the as seen from the seaplane platform Charles (talk) 19:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Info Charles:  Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Though this image MIGHT be considered as showing off! 07:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC) Charles (talk) 09:24, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

• thanks, Btw, as for showing off - the weather there was rather deplorable for most of my stay... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Ponte di Rialto, Venice, to the North - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very vivid image! --PtrQs 20:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of St. Michael and St. George, Corfu - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AIDAblu in Corfu - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Old Fortress and the Old Town of Corfu - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dubrovnik as seen from Srđ - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dubrovnik as seen from Srđ - Detail - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 15:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of the old city of Dubrovnik - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 15:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Nicola da Tolentino, Venice - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Old Fortress and the Old Town of Corfu 2 - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle and Old Town of Bari - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise's Church, Dubrovnik - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a little too much tightened. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 15:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Ignatius Church, Dubrovnik - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a bit oversharpened, but nevertheless good quality --Llez 16:38, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Donatus, Zadar - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 14:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Papadopoli, Venice - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Canal Grande and Ponte di Rialto, Venice - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama of Dubrovnik as seen from Srđ - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mark's Campanile and Palazzo Ducale, Venice, September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 15:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal Grande and Ponte di Rialto, Venice - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments To me a QI -- Sixflashphoto 07:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good image, useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 09:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stradun, Dubrovnik - September 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Many people and no one is cut or blury. --Milseburg 15:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dubrovnik as seen from Srđ - September 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dubrovnik as seen from Srđ - September 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace of St. Michael and St. George as seen from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I agree it is the best view from the S. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Ignatius Church (Dubrovnik) as seen from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope; useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 14:43, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maryland State House as seen from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maryland State House: cupola as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope It would be nice if the image had more then one category but I don't think it's strictly required per COM:VICR Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Old Fortress and the Old Town of Corfu - September 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Old Fortress and the Old Town of Corfu - September 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museum Brandhorst: whole building as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Absolutely a VI except the description should be expanded a lot, and I would think it should have more then one category. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Fixed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

   Support Very nice, all issues look fixed; Used, and Best in Scope -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 23:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mark's Campanile and Palazzo Ducale, Venice, September 2017 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
James Ewell Brown Stuart: Richmond Monument as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and good. I propose to change the scope to James Ewell Brown Stuart: Richmond Monument as seen from SW (removing color image of) --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Done --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Robert E. Lee statue (Richmond, Virginia) as seen from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saint Donatus, Zadar - September 2017 -2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osaka City Hall Main Building at night during OSAKA Hikari-Renaissance 2016.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The configuration seems to change every year. it would be good to add the year to scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

• Fixed, Archaeodontosaurus --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Church of Saint Donatus, Zadar - September 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of Saint Donatus, Zadar - September 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint Mark's Campanile and Palazzo Ducale, Venice, September 2017 -2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Mark's Campanile and Palazzo Ducale, Venice, September 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convenience Store Shelf, Tokyo 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 17:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Augustusburg, Southern Facade, November 2017 -01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Falkenlust, Western Facade, November 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice symmetric shot, very good. Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Falkenlust, Eastern Facade, November 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The light situation is suboptimal, but it´s ok for QI in my eyes. Eine deutsche Beschreibung wäre nicht schlecht. --Milseburg 23:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Augustusburg, Western Facade, November 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Leaning out a little bit, I think. Should be easy to correct.--Peulle 21:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC) Fixed --Martin Falbisoner 04:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Yep. :) --Peulle 14:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Augustusburg (Brühl) as seen from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Not luck! Charles (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Augustusburg (Brühl) with reflection as seen from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Falkenlust as seen from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used, best in scope, although File:Brühl Germany Schloss-Falkenlust-06.jpg looks quite good, too. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Augustusburg, Southern Facade, November 2017 -02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Augustusburg, Western Facade, November 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Augustusburg, Western Facade, November 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Augustusburg, Southern Facade, November 2017 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Augustusburg, Southern Facade, November 2017 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Falkenlust, Western Facade, November 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Falkenlust, Western Facade, November 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ADAC-Zentrale: blue hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ADAC-Zentrale, Munich, March 2017-05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panorama of Canal Grande and Ponte di Rialto, Venice - September 2017.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama of Canal Grande and Ponte di Rialto, Venice - September 2017.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Martin Falbisoner! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

• Same to you, dear George! :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Champ de Mars (Mauritius) as seen from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umeda Sky Building, Osaka, November 2016 -02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post Tower Bonn, December 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)