User talk:Manoillon

TUSC token 7de49f10adcfb02de6eb2df5912845fc

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Cointrin ?

Hello,
J'ai modifié la catégorie de cette image car ce n'est pas Cointrin. Ou alors notre cher Goldorak a changé de look sans que je le sache ? Moumou82 (talk) 19:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

M.... t'as raison ! Faut jamais croire ce qu'ils racontent sur Internet, on m'avait bien dit ! Manoillon (talk) 19:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 16417d402d8978c90eb9a8fbab51541d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Image:Swiss-demo.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 08:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neuchâtel

Voila, c'est tout bon. J'ai fait une ou deux corrections (des liens qui concernaient encore parlament.ch) et une ou deux additions (les infos au début pour clarifier tout de suite quelles images sont concernées, car ce n'était pas clair avec {{Parlament.ch}}, qu'il faudra que je mette à jour aussi). Dans les détails mineurs, j'ai changé le blason pour en prendre un qui est transparent. Parfait ! Schutz (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Auguetbruecke.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Auguetbruecke.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Auguetbruecke.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Suhadi Sadono (talk) 19:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Manoillon!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Höchi Flue.jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2009.

Schweizer Wappen

Da auf Commons kein Hinweis auf Schweizer Recht vorhanden ist – deutsches Recht gilt für die Schweiz nicht – wäre es angebracht, den Transfer von Schweizer Wappen einzustellen, bis die rechtlichen Voraussetzungen dafür vorhanden sind. Mit freundlichem Gruß --Enzian44 (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Reval initiative 1941.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Reval initiative 1941.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

78.55.194.228 06:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

anmelden, wenn du die nowCommons-Vorlage setzt

Hallo Manoilloon, kannst du dich bitte anmelden, wenn du die nowCommons-Vorlage setzt? Ich nehme an, dass du das warst (Bearbeitung war von einer IP: de:Spezial:Beiträge/193.222.161.6). Eigentlich solltest du ja durch SUL eh angemeldet sein.

Beispiele:

Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Guzgen

Category discussion notification

Category:Guzgen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Tobyc75 (talk) 14:57, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neue Subkategorien

Wenn du neue Subkategorien erstellst wie etwa hier, bitte nicht nur ein Bild umkategorisieren, sondern die ganze Arbeit machen! -- Хрюша ^?? 09:15, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bremgarten-AG-Vogelperspektive.jpg

File:Bremgarten-AG-Vogelperspektive.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 19:56, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mauvaise Catégorie sur WLM

Bonjour Manoillon,

La page http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch/detail.php?id=662&canton=BE devrait être associée à la catégorie "Wasserschloss (Bern)" et non pas à la catégorie "Wasserschloss". Krol:k (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C'est corrigé. Merci de ton aide (et bravo pour toutes tes photos !) Manoillon (talk) 19:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upload Link

Hi Manoillon, the Commons page is not intended to link to all the websites, but to be the central starting point for Wikimedians who want to upload pictures from foreign countries and don't know which campaign to use. Please don't put in your website!--Cirdan (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cirdan. The Swiss contest doesn't use "campaign" (whatever this is). Therefore, wither redirect users on the web site or remove Switzerland for your list. Manoillon (talk) 08:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But as far as I can see, you have a campaign!? I will set back the changes, but I would recommend you set up an UploadWizard-Campaign (seems to be prepared, wlm-ch exists) since it's much easier for new contributors to use.--Cirdan (talk) 08:34, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No clue what a campaign is, but I promised the WLM contest in Switzerland doesn't use this. Could you maybe clarify a bit what "wlm-ch" is ? Thanks in advance, Manoillon (talk) 08:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you follow the mailing list!? A campaign is a special pre-set for the Special:UploadWizard, have a look at this campaign and you'll get an idea. If you want to, you can play it through and remove the WLM stuff afterwards.--Cirdan (talk) 08:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info (and, to answer your question, no I'm not following this ML anymore since months). Next question is : how could I remove this "wlm-ch" campain ? It's not used and may only confuse people. Thanks for your help. Manoillon (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if an admin can remove it, but since it's not linked anywhere, nobody will find it, I guess. By the way, could you have your national prizes added to de:Wikipedia:Wiki loves monuments 2011/Preise, please? We added your jury already and it would be great if we could inform all german speaking swiss people about the prizes as well.--Cirdan (talk) 14:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask an admin to remove it : it's totally wrong, very confusing and cannot be used for our contest. I'll update your page, but please already excuse my poor german... Manoillon (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try to fork Switzerland. Restored the templates and the wizard. Multichill (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Men, it doesn't work at all.. I uploaded 2 pictures and got some error messages saying that ID is unknown ! Manoillon (talk) 15:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WLM - Schwarzenburg, Speicher Henzischwand 298a: Géolocation erronée

Bonjour Manoillon,

Les coordonnées indiquées dans la liste officielle de la Confédération ne sont pas très précises pour l'objet cité. Comme il y a un deuxième "Speicher" pas loin du "bon" (Henzischwand 297a), j'ai rajouté la bonne géolocation dans la catégorie Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Speicher,_Henzischwand_298a

Peut-être pourrais-tu en faire part à tes interlocuteurs "officiels"...

Krol:k (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WLM - Schwarzenburg, Bauernhof Aeckenmatt, Aeckenmatt 6

Voilà encore un problème concernant la géolocation d'un objet du catalogue A: La ferme Aeckenmatt 7 (selon Google maps) est la plus proche des coordonnées indiquées par la Confédération; tandis que la ferme Aeckenmatt 6 soit un peu plus éloignée de la route. J'ai de nouveau indiqué les géolocations des deux objets; je te laisse voir avec tes interlocuteurs quel est l'objet recherché (je n'ai pas encore mis la catégorie des "Cultural properties"...

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aeckenmatt

Krol:k (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je t'ai répondu sur ma talk page. --Krol:k (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WLM - Bundeskunstsammlung

Catalogue A: Bundeskunstsammlung, Monbijoustrasse 51 A 599.807 198.966

L'annuaire de la Confédération donne une autre adresse (Monbijoustrasse 45). En fait, c'est l'immeuble à côté (Monbijoustrasse 45-51), relié au 51A. Peut-être, le site c'est Monbijoustrasse 45-51A.

Krol:k (talk) 06:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bad name

Gday. At Category:Oskar Reinhart Collection 'Am Römerholz' you requested a {{bad name}}, though that is not the appropriate way to rename a category. Please read Commons:Rename a category and to note that there should both be a valid reason. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WLM Temple de Morges

Bonjour,

Pourquoi avoir retiré la mention de catégorie pour le concours WLM 2011 ??? Comment faire pour participer à ce concours?, les liens sont éronnés depuis le site suisse, j'ai déjà du passé par un autre site pour y arriver.

Merci d'avance, meilleures salutations

Stedewa

bonjour également.

j'ai retiré le lien sinplement parce que le temple de Morges ne fait pas partie des biens culturels suisses d'importance nationale. Vous trouverez la liste exhaustive de cex biens pour le canton de Vaud sur http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch/canton.php?canton=VD

salutations, Manoillon (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re,

Et ce lien, qu'est-ce que c'est alors???

edit : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.ch/detail.php?id=2474&canton=VD

J'habite Morges et je sais ce qu'est le temple de Morges... et il est sur la liste WLM...

Alors?? -- Stedewa

Voila, c'est fait .desole. Manoillon (talk) 20:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem, thanks! --Stedewa

Pictures before July in WLM

Hi Manoillon,

Why did you add pictures uploaded before July 2011 to the Swiss WLM? See this for example. A picture taken in 2006!

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 15:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi,

I only added the template to indicate that this file had been declared on our website as part of the contest. Right now, i m checking all files, but it may take some times to validate. Please don't remove or change anything so far on the picturesof the swiss contest. Thanks. Manoillon (talk) 09:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Löschantrag für Kategorie Betlis-Strahlegg (doppelt)

Category:Betlis-Strahlegg

Category:Betlis-Strahlegg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Schofför (talk) 01:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Eisensteg Zweibruggen

Die Kategorie Eisensteg Zweibruggen ist gemäss folgender Informationen ([1]) auf den Liste der Kulturgüter von Nationaler Bedeutung. Gruss -- Schofför (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ganz genau. Sorry für den Fehler, ich habe zwei Brücken gemischt (und vielen Dank für all die tollen Fotos!) Manoillon (talk) 07:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johannis_Kappelle.jpg

File:Johannis_Kappelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

WhiteWriter ^speaks 12:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lachen_-_church.jpg

File:Lachen_-_church.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

WhiteWriter ^speaks 12:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justice_militaire_1921.jpg

File:Justice_militaire_1921.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo TPG

Hello,

Please note that the logo of TPG is de minimis is the maps, and it is too simple to be copyrighted anyway. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

I fully disagree with this statement. Manoillon (talk) 07:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Löschantrag für Kategorie Wildkirchli, Schwende (doppelt)

Category:Wildkirchli, Schwende

Category:Wildkirchli, Schwende has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Coat of Arms - Gemeinde Tafers/Sensebezirk

Hallo Manoillon. Ich habe gesehen, dass Du die Wappen verschiedener Sensler Gemeinden überabeitet hast (Bösingen, Brünisried, Düdingen, Giffers, Oberschrot, Plaffeien, Plasselb, St. Antoni, St. Silvester, Schmitten, Tentlingen, Ueberstorf, Wünnewil-Flamatt, Zumholz). Könntest Du das letzte fehlende Wappen der Gemeinde Tafers/Sensebezirk ebenfalls erstellen? Vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe.--Wuyuay (talk) 09:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Et voilà ! Nichts zu Danken. Manoillon (talk) 13:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms: Wünnewil-Flamatt

Hallo Manoillon. Ich habe noch einmal eine Bitte mit der Überarbeitung des Wappens von Wünnewil-Flamtt. Gemäss dem Kantonsarchiv des Kantons Freiburg ist folgendes [Wappen] gültig und nicht [dieses]. Kannst Du dieses Wappen eventuell auch in ein sgv konvertieren, damit es den restlichen Bezirkswappen entspricht. Vielen Dank und liebe Grüsse aus dem Sensebezirk, --Wuyuay (talk) 09:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Wuyuay. Ich habe doch das Wappen korrigiere, aber das Ergebnis ist nicht die beste ... Grüsse zurück aus Nyon bezirk ! Manoillon (talk) 13:46, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Manoillon. Merci bien pour ton travail. Si je trouve le vrai blasson de Wünnewil-Flamatt dans une plus grande resolution je vais t'envoyer. A+ --Wuyuay (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Turm_Grinau

Category:Turm_Grinau has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Schofför (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections sur Marianne Streiff

Hello,

Merci de ton aide sur la photo de Marianne Streiff, mon premier upload sur commons n'est pas un franc succès ;)... Je vais regarder tes edits sur ces photos pour mes prochaines tentatives... Merci beaucoup ! Cordialement --Oursdesmontagnes (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut et de rien. En fait, quand tu charges les photos du parlement, il vaut mieux prendre la grande version (qui se trouve liée depuis la page du parlementaire) que la petite vignette. Mais rien de grave, c'est vite corrigé ! Manoillon (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Alt Sankt Johann coats of arms.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Alt Sankt Johann coats of arms.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 20:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Armoirie de la commune de Murist

Bonjour, L'armoirie de la commune de Murist que vous avez publiée n'est pas la bonne! Veuillez svp remplacer celle que vous avez mise par celle qui se trouve sur le site officiel de la commune de Murist, à savoir sur www.murist.ch. D'avance merci pour votre feedback et bonne journée. Mitch1970

File tagging File:Choisi1.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Choisi1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Choisi1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rathaus,_Schwytz

Category:Rathaus,_Schwytz has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Schofför (talk) 10:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeuss-coat of arms.svg

File:Jeuss-coat of arms.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

77.56.152.71 10:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Building in Chur

Hi, how are you? I have seen here, but I am putting all buildings of the cultural property in its own category and I have put this category as subcategory of the buildings in Chur, so it should be redundant. --Ilario (talk) 08:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ilario, thanks for the explanation. However, as far as I can see, the specific category for this building doesn't exists yet and, therefore, it's probably better to let the global category till done. What do you think ? Manoillon (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

le fichier présenté pour la commune le Flon n'est pas correct. voice l'original :

File:Ecusson de la commune Le Flon.JPG

Ecusson de la commune Le Flon

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ecusson_de_la_commune_Le_Flon.JPG

File:Le Flon-coat of arms.svg

File:Le Flon-coat of arms.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Commune Le Flon Bouloz (talk) 14:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belles-filles, Geneva, Switzerland.jpg

Bonjour, Il n'y a pas de "rue des Belles-filles" à Genève. Une idée sur le nom correct ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Initiative de crise 1935 6 fr.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Initiative de crise 1935 6 fr.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 10:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Manoillon (talk) 11:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Schwyz_(Dorf)

Schwyz (Dorf) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- User: Perhelion 15:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ehemaliges_Grand_Hotel_Belvédère,_Davos

Category:Ehemaliges_Grand_Hotel_Belvédère,_Davos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blason de la commune de La Chaux-du-Milieu

Hello,

La commune m'a contacté pour m'indiquer que le corbeau était dans le mauvais sens sur : File:La Chaux-du-Milieu-coat of arms.svg

On peut voir le blason original en haut du site : http://www.chaux-du-milieu.ch/

Bonne journée

--AntonierCH ^(d) 08:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blason de Rueyres-St-Laurent

Hello Manoillon,

Comment ça va? J'ai eu une demande d'aide sur ma page de discussion pour afficher le blason de Rueyres-St-Laurent de la page du wiki allemand vers le wiki francophone. J'ai vu que tu avais géré l'ajout de plusieurs blasons. Est-ce que qu'il te serait possible d'ajouter ou de déplacer celui-ci? Je ne connais pas bien la procédure sur commons...

Merci beaucoup, à bientôt!

Quadrien (talk) 20:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bons-templiers 1979 2.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bons-templiers 1979 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bons-templiers 1979 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 22:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OpenStreetMap

Bonjour Manoillon ! J'ai vu que tu avais téléchargé des cartes provenant d'OpenStreetMap : pourrais-tu m'expliquer comment faire ? Lorsque j'exporte ma sélection, j'obtiens un fichier XML dont je ne sais pas quoi faire... Merci pour ton aide ! Gzzz ^zz 13:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fondation_Jean_Monnet_pour_l'Europe

Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Gzzz ^zz 20:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murist-coat of arms.svg

File:Murist-coat of arms.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pillonel.christophe (talk) 06:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blason Murist

Bonjour,

Pour info, votre blason de Murist n'est pas correct, merci de le retirer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pillonel.christophe (talk • contribs) 15:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Murist-coat of arms.svg

File:Murist-coat of arms.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pillonel.christophe (talk) 16:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Manoillon

TUSC token 7de49f10adcfb02de6eb2df5912845fc

Cointrin ?

TUSC token 16417d402d8978c90eb9a8fbab51541d

Neuchâtel

File tagging File:Auguetbruecke.jpg

Tip: Categorizing images

Schweizer Wappen

Copyright status: File:Reval initiative 1941.jpg

anmelden, wenn du die nowCommons-Vorlage setzt

Neue Subkategorien

Mauvaise Catégorie sur WLM

Upload Link

WLM - Schwarzenburg, Speicher Henzischwand 298a: Géolocation erronée

WLM - Schwarzenburg, Bauernhof Aeckenmatt, Aeckenmatt 6

WLM - Bundeskunstsammlung

Pictures before July in WLM

Löschantrag für Kategorie Betlis-Strahlegg (doppelt)

Category: Eisensteg Zweibruggen

Logo TPG

Löschantrag für Kategorie Wildkirchli, Schwende (doppelt)

Coat of Arms - Gemeinde Tafers/Sensebezirk

Coat of arms: Wünnewil-Flamatt

Corrections sur Marianne Streiff

Copyright status: File:Alt Sankt Johann coats of arms.png

Armoirie de la commune de Murist

File tagging File:Choisi1.jpg

Building in Chur

Copyright status: File:Initiative de crise 1935 6 fr.jpg

Tagging copyvios

Blason de la commune de La Chaux-du-Milieu

Blason de Rueyres-St-Laurent

File tagging File:Bons-templiers 1979 2.jpg

OpenStreetMap

Blason Murist

Navigation menu

Search