User talk:MGA73/Archive 50
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Reply to your permission request (Bram Luyten / Denis-Chris Luyten De Hauwere)
Denis, my uncle and the photographer, has passed away: http://www.luytendenis.be/ I was entrusted with his photography by his widow, my aunt Chris. She's a senior citizen - how can I help her to issue this permission? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluyten (talk • contribs) 16:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
File:HansonBearcat1200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FASTILY 08:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Lao shan coke.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Larryasou (talk) 09:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 06:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
File:CosmoCaixa 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Siprage-panorama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Conbo (talk) 23:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Filed a CU at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Howhontanozaz. Would’ve made more a in-depth look at both users but I do think both are related. Also 4am in the morning ATM, only hoped on the Commons after being woken up by a disturbance in my street and couldn’t get back to sleep. Bidgee (talk) 18:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Abbotsfordbc.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ponderosapine210 (talk) 07:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Task
Hello MGA73, I did a detailed research on some of my few uploads which doesn't comply with Commons policy i.e low quality, no education purpose, out of scope or fishy exif data. Have a look at the link. Thanks, stay safe. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- @C1K98V: I deleted most of them. Some are in categories where we have very few images so I kept some. You can nominate them for deletion if you still think they are of no use. --MGA73 (talk) 06:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Is it only me, or...
Do you see double too?
Acagastya (talk) 04:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- No I see double too. And it's not because I had too many beers. I tested a few files and there is no double there. --MGA73 (talk) 05:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, did you notice if any of them had {{LicenseReview}}? My first guess is that is causing the double bug.
Acagastya (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)- They had. For a long time I had double then it went away. --MGA73 (talk) 07:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- I used an old version of LR script, and made this change, and it seems to have been fixed. Was a global
<div class="LR"></div>
hack added some time back?
Acagastya (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- I used an old version of LR script, and made this change, and it seems to have been fixed. Was a global
- They had. For a long time I had double then it went away. --MGA73 (talk) 07:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, did you notice if any of them had {{LicenseReview}}? My first guess is that is causing the double bug.
File:Bazoches - 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Borvan53 (talk) 14:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi MGA73. I just uploaded the above file from viwiki. The first version is own work, but the second and the fourth (reverted to the second) seem to be taken from the following link (given the dates: 25 january 2017 and 7 august 2017): https://voyageintemporel.wordpress.com/2017/01/25/destinee-dune-jeunesse-saigon-72-75-par-nguyen-nguyen-ky-au-pays-reve-2016/. Would you mind taking a look? Sincerely. Buiquangtu (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Buiquangtu! I have split up the file so now the historic photo is located at File:Trường THPT Lê Hồng Phong, TP Hồ Chí Minh 4.jpg. I'm not sure we can keep it. I think we need to verify that it is PD. It seems that {{PD-Vietnam}} is not correct so not sure we can just use that. --MGA73 (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's all I would have asked. I have nothing for the historic photo except the link, and expect the file to be deleted. Buiquangtu (talk) 11:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Okay I made this Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trường THPT Lê Hồng Phong, TP Hồ Chí Minh 4.jpg so we can have a discussion. Problem is that it is not clear if a photo is PD after 50, 75 or 100 years. --MGA73 (talk) 11:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's all I would have asked. I have nothing for the historic photo except the link, and expect the file to be deleted. Buiquangtu (talk) 11:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, sorry to bother you again. I've just bumped into this file and it seems to be a copyvio (flickr's all rights reserved. I guess the reviewing bot was malfunctioning) (or the flickr user has changed the license). Buiquangtu (talk) 04:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Buiquangtu: It's the flickr user that changed the license. The bot is tested and it works. The only review errors we have only seen it make is that sometimes it can't read the license or whatever and then it will just say that it could not review the file. It never reviews files that does not have a free license. I added {{Flickr-change-of-license}} to the file. --MGA73 (talk) 06:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
LR?
Hi MGA73, Can you look into this one? Thank you! Lymantria (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Lymantria: Done! --MGA73 (talk) 05:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Lymantria (talk) 09:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
--A1Cafel (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
I completed the matching for what we have now (used more than 200 times) and it only needs to be sorted. I wonder if we should add more from this list? Maybe go down to 40? That would be about 300 more matches (we have about 500 now). What do you think? Multichill (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Multichill: Good question... The first 457 tags gave 988k matches (if all are done). If we do from 200-150 it is about 60 tags and 11k matches. If we do 150-100 it is about 80 tags and 9k matches. If we do 100-40 it is about 163 tags and 10,5k matches. Below 40 there are 364 tags and 5k matches. I would say take the 60 tags above 150 and forget the rest. --MGA73 (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- Agree, that seems a good number. Thanks for adding them, I'll see if I can match them. Quite a fun puzzle every once in a while.
- I'll add some checking code to see if we might have skipped any of the concepts.
- Wales has been completed by the way. I have to check if that leaves any other open points. Multichill (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Multichill: I started checking but was busy doing something else... But you know how it is... Always something to work on... It is relly cool to restart the project. Batch uploads is a good way to get good photos. --MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
File:NOR-Aust-Agder.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Worldlydev (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
File:NOR-nord-trendelag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Worldlydev (talk) 16:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
File:NOR-sor-trendelag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Worldlydev (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
File:NOR-Vest-Agder.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Worldlydev (talk) 16:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
License review
Hello MGA73, I hope you're doing good. You can license review these files, done with all research work. Thanks for you consideration. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 16:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- @C1K98V: Done except the last one. Are we sure they are the copyright holder? It looks like a collage of videos. --MGA73 (talk) 08:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @MGA73: , Good day, all file were reviewed. Have a look at these too. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi C1K98V "Paste expired or not found." --MGA73 (talk) 08:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hello MGA73, Good day, Have a look at these files. I'm done with my research work. Thanks for your consideration. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 04:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
返信
私の会話ページに返信しましたのでご確認おねがします。(talk) 18:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Wappen Euskirchen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
194.8.192.162 09:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
File importer trick Template:GFDL-sr
Can you update the file importer configuration so that Template:ГЛСД-са одрицањем gets replaced by Template:GFDL-sr? See File:Кула са сатом 01.jpg for an example upload where that should have been done. Thanks, Multichill (talk)
- @Multichill: Hi! FileImporter have problems changing licenses that is in a self-template. Also it changed to Template:GFDL-en instead of Template:GFDL-sr. I changed it so IF it changes then it changes to GFDL-sr. I will see if I can find a way to fix self-templates. --MGA73 (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
MGA73 A barnstar for you (Structured data) great work *(how to thank a bot)*
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
For your tireless contributions ........................MGA73 ................... Great job............ & .....'a'm'a'z'i'n'g 'bot !! |
how many edits does this bot make a minute....???? just wondering...?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.155.14.60 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi! Thank you. But Multichill does most the work on structured data. I do other tasks with my bots. Mostly related to preparing files for transfer to Commons and cleaning up on Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Swiggy logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
CptViraj (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
how to say thanks in wikiland.,again.. :MGA73 keep up with it.......
The da Vinci Barnstar | ||
great work* :MGA73 |
- Thank you! --MGA73 (talk) 06:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Files for Review
Hello @MGA73: I hope you're doing well. Please have a look at the files. My research work done, files okay for review. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done --MGA73 (talk) 13:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @MGA73: Thanks for a quick response. Have a look at these for review. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 11:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done --MGA73 (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi MGA73. This user is uploading many photos from the internet without evidence of cc-by-sa-4.0. I tagged some with the {{Copyvio}} template. Perhaps you might have a more efficient way? Sorry for the inconvenience and have a nice day! Buiquangtu (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Buiquangtu: Yes, thank you. I mass deleted the files and left a note about sending permission to OTRS. --MGA73 (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
How are you doing?
Hi MGA73! I was looking at some images of persons and then I found out that Commons:Country specific consent requirements/table and Commons:Photographs of identifiable people do not contain information of the laws in Vietnam. I wanted to update the info but had some difficulties. If you're interested, you're welcome to take a look at article 32 in this link and perhaps enlighten me eventually. :)
. Buiquangtu (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:W siran4041.jpg
Copyright status: File:W siran4041.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:W siran4041.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Request for delete this file
Hi Michael, can you delete this photo?. The reason is I don't use it anymore and thinking that this cropped version (you can see the original source at the description) resulted in bad composition of image (I'm thinking to upload the full photo). Thanks.
Astronom5109 (talk) 03:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Astronom5109: Deleted. But you could also just have uploaded the original file on top of the old one :-) --MGA73 (talk) 06:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I don't know how this image will be atleast useful in Wikipedia. Astronom5109 (talk) 07:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hello @Astronom5109: . Great! If you mean how to upload a new version just go to a file (for example File:Sheila on 7.jpg) and below the table in "File history" there is a line "Upload a new version of this file" (just read COM:OW first). --MGA73 (talk) 08:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Officers Submarine Warfare insignia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ich (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Navpscibadge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ich (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Ostaci rimske naseobine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Home 07-03-~2 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Taivo (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
--A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Export file to Commons
Would you help me to export this file from id.wp to Wikimedia Commons? Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- I've found this file on Wikimedia Commons with different file name. Thank you. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Somaliland regions
Hei,
Could you update the Somaliland regions map. it's incorrect as it doesn't show the Sahil region.
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Somaliland_regions_map.png
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saaxil.svg#mw-jump-to-license
Thank you Lakmi00 (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Lakmi00: Hi! I just moved the file to Commons from somewhere. I did not create it. --MGA73 (talk) 18:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
OK.
Thanks you🙏🏽 Lakmi00 (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Ethyl3.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WIKImaniac 12:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Amarsanaa Statue in Secret park.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
rubin16 (talk) 10:56, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!
Dear MGA73,
Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.
After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a draft policy (available in many languages). We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so.
The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am perfectly aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.
As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.
Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!
Dear MGA73
Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.
After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.
The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.
As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.
Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Re:
I barely use IRC. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 14:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: Okay. I'm working on the permission now. --MGA73 (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- All yours. I've released the ticket :) Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: I did not mean to take over the ticket (I've been writing with creator so it would be nice to have a second pair of eyes). I meant I was preparing a list of files for him to link to. --MGA73 (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: Hello again. I know the permission is not perfect. He is 85 years old so I hope you do not give up yet but help him if you have further questions. If the permission is accepted the files on wa.wiki needs to be fixed and moved to Commons. I can do that. Let me know what you think. --MGA73 (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- You can follow up the ticket, no problem. --Ganímedes (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Of course! Be my guest. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- You can follow up the ticket, no problem. --Ganímedes (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: Hello again. I know the permission is not perfect. He is 85 years old so I hope you do not give up yet but help him if you have further questions. If the permission is accepted the files on wa.wiki needs to be fixed and moved to Commons. I can do that. Let me know what you think. --MGA73 (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: I did not mean to take over the ticket (I've been writing with creator so it would be nice to have a second pair of eyes). I meant I was preparing a list of files for him to link to. --MGA73 (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- All yours. I've released the ticket :) Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Please take a short survey regarding UCoC
Hello MGA73,
I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.
As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.
You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.
Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)