User talk:Ltalc

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ltalc!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

[edit]

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tok Pisin  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float 
You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Do not create deletion requests without a valid rationale. Thanks, --Yann (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Yann, can you please tell me why do you think my edits are vandalism? I agree some of them were in contrary to the policy, namely COM:INUSE and I understand it now. (I learned about it only after a few of the deletion requests, but I let the ones made in my error be there, to see what would other users think.) But I don't mean them, I mean, for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frost Deep Dark.jpg. I know Commons is meant for educational files, Commons is even introduced in Commons:Welcome with this purpose and this purpose is elaborated at Commons:Project Scope. I think Commons is littered with noneducational nude pictures, so I requested deletion of some of them. Was I unclear in the named deletion request? Or did I miss some exception, again? I am very sorry if I made some serious mistakes, and I won't make a large number of controversial deletion requests in a very short time again. Many thanks for understanding. Ltalc (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Creating deletion requests without a valid rationale disrupts the project. Call it whatever you want, but it is not OK. Yann (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize. I have just browsed the policy pages, and found Commons:Deletion policy#Not educationally useful. This policy seeming describes what I had in mind when requesting deletions. I am confused – what makes my rationales invalid? The policy says "The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose". When I was making the requests, I wrote: "Not educational". Where is the difference? I have not read the whole policy (I have found it just a moment ago), so I may have missed something. Or do you mean the photos actually were educational? Thank you for your patience. Ltalc (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]