User talk:Logan/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
![]() |
File:Mostlybogus1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Reinhardhauke (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:O'neill clanaboy.png, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 03:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:O'Neill.png, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 03:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Andrew_Selkirk.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Andrew_Selkirk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Batista_as_WWE_Champion_in_2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:FHM-sketch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:T-AKE-1LewisAndClark.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-AKE-1LewisAndClark.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:T-AKE-1LewisAndClark.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nuala_Ni_Chonchuir_2010_001.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nuala_Ni_Chonchuir_2010_001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nuala_Ni_Chonchuir_2010_001.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
File:Kid Koala.jpg
Good day. Thanks for your note on my talk page regarding File:Kid Koala.jpg. However note that this was not my photo. You should ask the original uploader, which as indicated is en:User:Alkivar. I am also undure what sort of "permission" you think is "missing", since it states it released under GFDL. Thanks for your attention. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Coa_Hungary_Town_Budapest_4th.svg
Hi Logan,
You renamed this picture http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coa_Hungary_Town_Budapest_4th.svg, to Coa Hungary Town Budapest 6th.svg. Please delete the Coa_Hungary_Town_Budapest_4th.svg link, because I want to upload the correct image, but on this name wants to overwrite the Coa Hungary Town Budapest 6th.svg. Sorry for my english!
Bye, Madboy74 (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you!
For the move.TCO (talk) 02:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Logan Talk Contributions 17:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Forvo Logo
You wrote on my talk page about this file: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/wiki/File:Forvo.gif I don't know how to add it to the file description, but the info can be found here: http://www.forvo.com/license/ which links to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en_GB
What should I do, or would you do it?
Cheers - °~ TheSun (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC) ~°
- Unfortunately, the license linked to on that page is CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0, which is not a free license by Commons's standards. Furthermore, I doubt that that license applies to the Forvo logo and just to the content. This logo should be a non-free file on en.wiki, not a file on Commons. Logan Talk Contributions 13:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Deprecated License
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Bishzilla blink.gif, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 02:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the move!
Thanks for moving those files! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 14:40, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Logan Talk Contributions 15:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- I wish to second that sentiment, thank you for helping me with that unexpected conflict. Kyteto (talk) 01:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) Glad I could help. Logan Talk Contributions 03:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I wish to second that sentiment, thank you for helping me with that unexpected conflict. Kyteto (talk) 01:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations, Dear Reviewer
Hi Logan, thanks for your application to be a image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. Backlogs include Category:Flickr images needing human review, Category:Picasa Web Albums files needing human review, and Category:Panoramio review needed. You can use the following scripts by adding them to your vector.js:
- importScript('User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js'); -- for Flickr reviewing only
- importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); for reviewing Panoramio and Picasa images as well.
You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 13:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, Tanvir! Logan Talk Contributions 22:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Litang, China.jpg was uncategorized on 19 January 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Quality of article.png was uncategorized on 12 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Logan, I seem to have made a mistake on the renaming request for that file, can you please move it to File:Better with You sitcom logo.png, which is what it was supposed to be? Thanks, -- Darwin Ahoy! 10:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Done Partially my fault for not checking the extension more carefully. :) Logan Talk Contributions 01:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd already read the policy: COM:MOVE#5. 'Minature' isn't valid in English, or French to the best of my knowledge, and is considered a typographical error. 'No valid reason stated', isn't sufficiently specific. Best, Mephtalk 00:44, 16 June 2011 (UTC).
- COM:RENAME states the following: "As a matter of principle it's best to leave all files with generally valid names at their locations, even if slightly better names may exist." Since this is just a minor typographical error that does not correspond to a proper noun or false historical date (as reason 5 gives as examples), moving this file is unnecessary according to policy. Hope this explains it. Logan Talk Contributions 00:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. Best, Mephtalk 00:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC).
- You're welcome. :) Logan Talk Contributions 00:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. Best, Mephtalk 00:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC).
Thanks Logan!
I see that you were lumbered with a number of my pictures that needed renaming. Sorry about that! I wanted them to be useful and the original names I gave were not conducive to that. I think I am beginning to crack the system and hope not to bother you again, not in that way anyway! Cheers, Jon JonRichfield (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- No worries. Logan Talk Contributions 18:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
your tag is better?
Hallo Logan, why is your tag better (File:LAVinaRock.jpg)? ;-) If you really want to add another tag it is okay - but why removing the old? Just curious. I will try to tell the quickdelete script to remove flickrreview request tags so you will not be bothered in future - or I will do it myself. Another solution: do not be faster than the copyvio admins in working on the flickr backlog. ;) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, about that. ;P My speedy tag was specific for Flickr, since it was automatically added by ZooFari's Flickr review script. Next time, I'll leave the original tag, though. Logan Talk Contributions 03:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for marking the flickr images. Just a brief note. If you tag an image with a nsd tag, try to notify the uploader of this fact. (I did this here) If not, they won't know of the problem. Here, the uploader found the right link after receiving the notification. Cheers and please continue flickrmarking images. Commons needs people like you as I don't have the time to mark them all myself. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:10, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Anna_Ancher_in_a_studio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:100120haiti13 lg.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:100120haiti13 lg.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
– Adrignola talk 14:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree; a basic source is provided for the file, and you used the template claiming that it has no source. I transferred this from the English Wikipedia, and I thought that there was enough sourcing for it to be kept, at the least. I do agree that it needs a better, more specific source, though. Logan Talk Contributions 02:19, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
- It is not adequate. I can grab any photo I want and claim it's from www.ice.gov. The photographer must be shown to be a US government employee and not someone who simply took a photo of ICE agents. If you disagree with this tag I will do a full nomination for deletion because doing a Google Image Search with this image to try to determine an original web page for it, all the uses state that they pulled the image from Wikipedia. – Adrignola talk 13:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
check please
hi logan can you check again this the owner has change the license today.can you check please? thank you --Augusto664 (talk) 04:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the file is still licensed under a license that is not compatible with the Creative Commons. According to the current description page on Panoramio, the author has has changed the license to {{Cc-by-nd-3.0}}, which, as you can see, does not permit derivative works, and thus it is not accepted on Commons, which requires licenses to allow for derivative works. Logan Talk Contributions 04:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
ok can i use this license on the picture?--Augusto664 (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- You can only do that if the photo is licensed as such on Panoramio. After all, the photographer holds the rights to the licensing of the photo. Logan Talk Contributions 05:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- ) when i say ``i`` really means the original owner jeje.i contact with you when the picture is ready ok? thank you--Augusto664 (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. I would make note of this in the deletion discussion as well so that the file isn't deleted before you have discussed this with the photographer. Logan Talk Contributions 05:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
i will appreciate to much! thanks--Augusto664 (talk) 06:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC) pd:do you speak spanish? is really hard to write in english!:)
- Sí, hablo español. :) Puedes hablar conmigo en español. Logan Talk Contributions 19:24, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- hola logan ,checa otra vez la imagen ya cambiaron ahora si la licencia,so please tell me if the license is correct please! gracias!--Augusto664 (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Rename guidelines
Hi there, I suggested to have File:CemetaryAuckland.JPG renamed because of rule 5 of the rename guidelines ("correct obvious errors in file names"). It should be 'cemetery' and not 'cemetary'. But if that's the only thing that gets mended, the resulting file name "CemeteryAuckland.jpg" would be somewhat presumptuous, as it's of course by no means the only cemetery that there is in Auckland. Hence I've come up with "Symonds Street Cemetery Auckland 01.jpg". If you don't agree with the second part, would you not concur that the first part, at least, is valid? Schwede66 03:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Although it is only a minor typo ("cemetary"), I have decided to perform the rename, as it could be considered part of the proper name of the cemetery. Sorry about the confusion. Logan Talk Contributions 15:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help, and thanks for reconsidering it. Schwede66 18:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. :) Logan Talk Contributions 18:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help, and thanks for reconsidering it. Schwede66 18:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thanks
Greetings!
I saw you left a nice note on the flickr page of an image I recently uploaded here. Since November 2009 I have tried to inform and thank the flickr uploader. Someone (maybe you?) suggested I start explicitly thanking people for using a CC liscense.
I used to leave the note when I uploaded the image. But, now I wait until after the flickrreview.
About eight months ago I thanked a flickr uploader, who went ballistic. One might think he would have understood the CC liscense, as he had personally uploaded four or five dozen images here himself. But apparently my thank you triggered him to check to see if any other commons contributors had uploaded any other images.
One surprising thing is that other contributors had uploaded well over 200 of his images over the years, and I was the very first person to thank him.
So I welcome someone else recognizes the thank you is a good idea. Geo Swan (talk) 02:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- This is the standard message I use now... Geo Swan (talk) 02:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- This image was uploaded here --
- Thanks for using a CC liscense that allows re-use!
- Yep, I have found the thank you comments on Flickr photos to be very effective; they both make the creators of the photos feel appreciated, and they also allow for, as you said, the verification by them that they actually wanted to license their photos under the Creative Commons licenses. Glad you appreciated it. :) Logan Talk Contributions 02:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Logan, the uploader of this image claims it to be permission-reviewed by you, which is likely untrue. Take a look, please. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
"Bot move checked"
Hi. Re File:Valentines.day.blizzard.mansfield.ohio.jpg -- you edited the file with the remark "This bot move has been checked" [1]. The file was clearly labeled as being in Ohio, but was categorized as being in New Orleans. Note that the transfer bots are by nature stupid, and sometimes generate text or categories that to humans are obviously absurd and inappropriate. That's a reason why we need people to check on them. I fixed this file, changing to more appropriate categories. For future reference, this is the type of bot garbage that one should keep your eye out for, and fixing this is part of the process of "checking". Thanks for your work. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 01:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Duly noted. That diff was from April, and I have had significantly better category checking since then. ;) Logan Talk Contributions 16:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:In_memory_of_Bouazizi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ALE! ¿…? 12:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Template:User page image
Unfortunately, the spelling "userpage" is also quite common, and your move created double redirects which broke the functioning of some aliases (i.e. Template:Userpage image)... AnonMoos (talk) 07:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, used to the double redirect-fixing bots over at enwiki. I performed the move based on the spelling of WP:USER and just to make the template name more legible. Logan Talk Contributions 20:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama
I noticed you have tagged a couple of pictures I have uploaded here on common for deletion, I understand that the links for the sources give a 404 message, just wanted to let you know that it is because when the host site "bollywood Hungama" changed their layout recently, something went wrong with their archives and all old links are dead. Now I understand that pictures uploaded preferably need to be reviewed when uploaded so to avoid such problems. Cheers. --Meryam90 (talk) 23:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes; unfortunately, the files were not reviewed soon after uploading, which is due to a general license review backlog. Do you have updated links for these photos so that they can be verified, or did Bollywood Hungama remove them from their site on purpose? Logan Talk Contributions 23:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have noticed that they have changed the format of their links, some pictures still exist on the site, but with new links. The problem is there are above 300 pictures in the archive of SRK alone, and I can't go through all of that to find them again. So, I guess I am just gonna let them go and find some new ones to replace them with--Meryam90 (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry if I am bothering you, but Bollywood Hungama freak me out these days. So I would like to request you to review a picture I uploaded today. :D Thanks. Team_Don2.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meryam90 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have noticed that they have changed the format of their links, some pictures still exist on the site, but with new links. The problem is there are above 300 pictures in the archive of SRK alone, and I can't go through all of that to find them again. So, I guess I am just gonna let them go and find some new ones to replace them with--Meryam90 (talk) 00:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
MediaWiki will support basic XCF-rendering in 1.19
Hi Logan, good news: Bugzilla: 17959 is done now.
BTW, do you want me nominating you for adminship? Or do you want to do it yourself? Best regards and a happy new year -- RE rillke questions? 12:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, awesome! XCF rendering will be very beneficial to the project. If you would like to nominate me for adminship, go right ahead. :) Happy New Year to you too! Logan Talk Contributions 23:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Done. It is now your decision whether and when you transclude the page to Commons:Administrators/Requests using
Listing [[Commons:Administrators/Requests/Logan]]
as edit-summary. You can also delete my text and replace it with your own one, add your own text or just type that you accept. -- RE rillke questions? 22:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello Logan, sorry for bothering you with this but I decided to contact you as an administrator. Can you please take a look at these two files: File:DC-10 of Air New Zealand at Heathrow - 1977.jpg and File:Air New Zealand DC-10-30 ZK-NZP LHR Jul 1977.png. Is this user's behaviour acceptable? I have uploaded a newer version of the image, placed a tag to merge the old one into mine's, and the user that originally uploaded the older version opposed. I uploaded my version to replace their image, and the user refuses that change too. I just don't know how to proceed on cases like this one, so I decided to contact you for help. I guess it is not the first time this user behaves this way, according to their talk page. There has to be a single image depicting the same topic the way I see things. I believe s(he) is not aware of the fact that another user is able to change any of their former contributions. Thanks in advance for your help.--Jetstreamer (talk) 03:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Tm may not have liked your contrast change, which is why he recommended that you upload the new version with a new file name rather than replacing or uploading a new version over his original version of the photo. There is nothing wrong with having two versions of the same photo on Commons; it happens very often, whether they be coloring differences or cropping. I'd respect his opinion about the contrast change and leave your new version in a separate file. You can then use the version with more contrast wherever you want to use it, and Tm's version can be used as well. Hope that makes sense. Logan Talk Contributions 03:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your response.--Jetstreamer (talk) 03:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are very welcome. Feel free to poke me if you have any questions in the future. Logan Talk Contributions 03:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your response.--Jetstreamer (talk) 03:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy
I believe this picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SRK_jumps.jpg should be deleted since it doesn't provide a valid license, plus the source provided is not the actual picture that has been uploaded. Thanks --Meryam90 (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- The file appears to have been deleted by Denniss. For the future, I am not an administrator on Commons, so you should ask one of these people if you need a file deleted. :) Logan Talk Contributions 23:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- Oh! o_O, well Now you are :D Means I can bug U with all the oddly licensed pictures I find on wiki :D I found another one:
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Koffee_with_Karan_Season_3.jpg It's filed under CC 3.0 however, it's a promotional still from a TV show. --Meryam90 (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have added a "no permission" template to the photo. If OTRS permission is not received within seven days or so, the file will be deleted. Logan Talk Contributions 02:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Administrator
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/Quatre-quarts_aux_pommes.jpg/200px-Quatre-quarts_aux_pommes.jpg)
Logan, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.
Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators:#wikimedia-commons-admin.
You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.
Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Welcome to the team. You may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful -- feel free to edit or add to it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Just a word of caution: If you delete an image here, CommonsDelinker will pick-up this from a log/recent changes and will remove it from all usages. So one should be careful...
- Welcome to the team. -- RE rillke questions? 16:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks everyone! I will be sure to use my tools wisely. :) Logan Talk Contributions 18:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Good luck! =) Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Reaper. :) Logan Talk Contributions 02:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Good luck! =) Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks everyone! I will be sure to use my tools wisely. :) Logan Talk Contributions 18:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you Logan --Portales (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- Logan can you review the article Entronque de Herradura...? Those photo that Matt delete are my, I took then on one of my trip to my hometown Entronque de Herradura, I have proof. Thank you.
- Are you referring to en:Entronque de Herradura? If so, it already seems to be in the main article space. Logan Talk Contributions 02:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
File replacements with enWP in no-edit mode
Just wondering whether it is worthwhile holding off on further file replacements until enWP is back into edit mode. I am holding off on the replacements on CDL talk page until that time. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing earlier. I think CommonsDelinker just gives up if the database is locked, so it might be a good idea to wait on all replacements for enwiki until the blackout is over. Logan Talk Contributions 00:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'd nominated the above files for renaming to SeshadriinBengaluru2010.JPG and NarasimhaninBengaluru2010.jpg resp., as the numbers "182" and "214" don't signify anything meaningful here. It might perhaps be from the way the uploader's instrument stores the images. Does it not warrant for reason #2 mentioned at Commons:FR to be invoked. Please guide. Regards, Lovysinghal (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Lovysinghal; I believe that you are reading the policy a bit incorrectly. COM:FR reason 2 states that files can be renamed to "change from completely meaningless names into suitable names, according to what the image displays." Note the bolded "meaningless;" this does not apply to extra numbers at the end of a meaningful file name. Such file moves put unnecessary stress on CommonsDelinker and are wholly unnecessary. Please let me know if you have any further questions! Logan Talk Contributions 12:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in resolving this doubt but moving these two particular files won't put much stress on CommonsDelinker IMO as they are not much linked to at this stage. Is it not? Eitherways, I'll keep your point in mind while doing future tagging/edits. Thanks, Lovysinghal (talk) 12:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Italdesign Maserati BOOMERANG (2712036234).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Problem: two photos deleted
Hello, I've seen that you deleted the two photos File:2011-12-13 Ludwig Erhard Mycologist.jpg and File:2011-12-13 Frieder Gröger Mycologist.jpg because you haven't received an OTRS permission. Yesterday I sent Erhard Ludwig (he has sent me a photo of hinself and a photo of his collegue Frieder Gröger) with e-mail for uploading at Wikimedia Commons. After that I wrote him to send a OTRS permission. And he answered me, that he has already sent such an e-mail. What should I do now - all again? I would be glad to read from you. --Ak ccm (talk) 06:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry about the late response (I completely forgot about this message). Can you ask him to confirm the ticket number that was given to him for his OTRS request? Thanks. Logan Talk Contributions 15:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Masarinae to Scoliidae
Many thanks for the prompt rename. Apologies for the nuisance. JonRichfield (talk) 06:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. :-) Logan Talk Contributions 13:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Fcpune-chem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hindustanilanguage (talk) 10:39, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Feedingfingers-promo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hindustanilanguage (talk) 10:41, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Felix45.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hindustanilanguage (talk) 10:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:A Panda Show.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hindustanilanguage (talk) 08:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Discussion on your recent deletions
Hi Logan, you can probably supplement the comments on this noticeboard pertaining to some of your recent deletions. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC).
![]() |
File:I140279871 25824 7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hindustanilanguage (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:ValenciaPitom.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chesdovi (talk) 16:04, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Logan, sorry that I somehow reverted your revert, but nfu.jpg was really not an optimal filename and with rename-requests filed on the day of upload we surely can be more generous. --Túrelio (talk) 12:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree with the basis for the rename (based on policy), but that's quite alright. :) Logan Talk Contributions 12:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Renaming file Fiat Panda
Hallo Logan, warum muss die Datei Fiat_Palio_Weekend_front_20120519 in Fiat_Palio_front umbenannt werden. Ich sehe keinen Sinn hierin, im Gegenteil: Wenn ich nun ein weiteres Foto eines Fiat Palio hochlade, ergibt sich ein Namenskonflikt, der mit meiner Version nicht entstanden wäre. War die Umbenennung wirklich nötig, und warum? Wenn ja, müssen alle meine tausende Dateien jetzt umbenannt werden? Laut den hier vorliegenden Richtlinien, nach denen eine Datei umbenannt werden muss, finde ich nichts mein Problem hier betreffend. Insofern betrachte ich die Umbenennung als reine Willkür, zumal ich darüber nicht auf meiner Diskussionsseite benachrichtigt wurde (was eigentlich selbstverständlich sein sollte). Ich wäre froh um Antworten, vielen Dank und Gruß, --Randy43 (talk) 19:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- P.S. here is my list of any thousands of files, there is much to do to redefine them all without date! --Randy43 (talk) 19:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)--Randy43 (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- As you can see from this diff, it was Abigor, not I, who renamed the file; I simply approved the renaming command, as the file had already been renamed. I will reply to the discussion that you already started on Abigor's talk page. Logan Talk Contributions 19:51, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help! --Randy43 (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, any time. :-) Logan Talk Contributions 20:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Can you help me rename the files to their old names. User Abigor does not want to revert, he is mad at me. Thanks. --Randy43 (talk) 21:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, any time. :-) Logan Talk Contributions 20:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Done, thanks! --Randy43 (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
UTC hue4maps
Can you move the handful at Category talk:UTC hue4maps, like you moved File:UTC hue4map ATA.png? Thanks a lot! Royaume du Maroc (talk) 02:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could you move Republic of China too, as described at Category talk:UTC hue4maps? The X stands for areas that don't have an ISO code. Royaume du Maroc (talk) 17:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I found one more: File:UTC TZ hue4map USA-IN.svg -> File:UTC hue4map USA-IN.svg. Reason all these maps named "UTC hue4map" are time zone maps, no need for "TZ". Royaume du Maroc (talk) 02:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Done as well. Logan Talk Contributions 03:08, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
flicker
How to make oggy files, and how they are uploaded. reply on my talk page if possible 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS (talk) 11:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:473W0619 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ytoyoda (talk) 03:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:I Protest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vibhijain (talk) 06:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:I Protest.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vibhijain (talk) 09:29, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
OTRS has been sent to commons for file:AMA_van_Gool.jpg on 8 march 2012. Can you try to find it, please ? Or may I send it again ? Thank you for your answer ... and sory for my very poor english. Good afternoon.--Claude PIARD (talk) 09:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- I sent again yersterday OTRS to commons. Can you try to find it and undelete the file, please ? Thank you very much. --Claude PIARD (talk) 16:51, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have undeleted the file and updated the pending tag with the new date. Thanks! Logan Talk Contributions 19:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
I didn't know it. I just copied that description from File:Spilosoma canescens caterpillar.jpg. Thanks for fixing it. Regards. --Dodo (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Image query
Hello. I am almost exclusively an editor at the English Wikipedia, though I do upload and visit here time to time. Recently, a Wikipedia article on which I have been working for quite some time got a new map, which I requested at the Map Workshop. One of the source images for that map was this one. During the featured article candidacy of the article, it was noted that the said image shows a 404 access error for the first listed source (named Indian Railways). Since the image is protected, only administrators can edit it; could you solve this dilemma for me? It would be really helpful in the FAC too. Thanks! Ankitbhatt (talk) 18:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- I have tagged the source as a dead link. I looked in the Internet Archive, and none of the snapshots of the page had all of the images, so an archive link wouldn't help too much. Hope this helps! Logan Talk Contributions 19:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! However, is it not possible to remove the source entirely? The presence of a dead link is affecting the FAC process actually, so I'm rather more concerned about this one. Ankitbhatt (talk) 03:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Well, just because a source is a dead link doesn't mean that it wasn't a source for the original image - it's always good to provide attribution. What specific issue is this causing? Logan Talk Contributions 05:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- As with every FAC, each image has to be perfect - and I mean perfect. That means that none of the images should have incomplete or lacking rationales if non-free, and that free images must have spotless sources and attribution. So if this problem isn't fixed, the FAC can get failed on the basis of the image problem. Ankitbhatt (talk) 06:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Are you still there? Ankitbhatt (talk) 12:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry, yes. I doubt that anyone at FAC will give you any trouble for that file, since people on en.wiki recognize that a source is still a source, even if it is dead. It is tagged properly. If they give you any issues about it, then please let me know and I will jump in the discussion. Logan Talk Contributions 17:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- The link provided doesn't include full source information, which makes potentially updating or archiving it more difficult. I wonder whether there is a possible replacement source somewhere? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry, yes. I doubt that anyone at FAC will give you any trouble for that file, since people on en.wiki recognize that a source is still a source, even if it is dead. It is tagged properly. If they give you any issues about it, then please let me know and I will jump in the discussion. Logan Talk Contributions 17:28, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Well, just because a source is a dead link doesn't mean that it wasn't a source for the original image - it's always good to provide attribution. What specific issue is this causing? Logan Talk Contributions 05:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! However, is it not possible to remove the source entirely? The presence of a dead link is affecting the FAC process actually, so I'm rather more concerned about this one. Ankitbhatt (talk) 03:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Image Vandalism
Hello Logan, Delta Quad referred me here in reference to the "Photo Vandal" who leaves little dirty notes (and sometimes big ones) in the summary section of hundreds of photos a week. Delta said: "It's no big deal" after speaking with you about it. Rather than get into a long debate about it being a big deal or not, let me vent a short concise opinion: "NO ONE belongs in, or should have editing privileges to a Photo file except the "Uploader" (artist or submitter) and Admins needing to clean up an improper upload". A photo file is nobodies business, and should not be Editable by anyone other than the aforementioned. Thank You. Pocketthis (talk) 14:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 09:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
Can you please check your bot uploads from other Wikipedia projects, please? Can you please add proper categories and source information? Do you think that this image is inside the Commons project scope? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for poking me about this. I was actually just demonstrating a bug in CommonsHelper, and I forgot to delete the file (which I have just done). Logan Talk Contributions 07:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:A street in Eurodisney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:IGoogle logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Cloudbound (talk) 20:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:X.Trikoupis bridge.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Veggies (talk) 12:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:Valerie jodoin keaton.jpg
File:Valerie jodoin keaton.jpg is nominated for speedy deletion for copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:X.Trikoupis bridge.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Help needed
Hello! I want to ask you for an advice. I want to ask a question about one users uploads, as i highly doubt their license...
Atdheu (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)
But i dont know where to raise that question, and how? I mean, do we have some board specially for this kind of reviews, or should i use admin board? Also, what do you think about this? --WhiteWriter speaks 13:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- A good place to inquire about this is Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Please let me know when you do so that I can participate. Logan Talk Contributions 19:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:1989yellowsunniesonboat.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sinnamon (talk) 10:07, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Niteshift36 (talk) 19:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:ATP (1).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yikrazuul (talk) 10:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:T-1 Jayhawk.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-1 Jayhawk.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:T-1 Jayhawk.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:T-41 Mescalero.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:T-41 Mescalero.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:T-41 Mescalero.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EasyJetlogo.SVG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Scott • talk 20:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Editor @ ar.wiki
Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:OAS.Logo&HQ.02.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Felviper (talk) 23:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Pineapple cans.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 20:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:User Sadads.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BaseSat (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:N110-1925.jpg
![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:N110-1925.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:N110-1925.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
-- Gazebo (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
De-adminship warning
Dear Logan/Archive 1, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 19:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Young Gavin McInnes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:ORBCOMM integrated.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tommy boy in 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 12:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:J and T.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Buxtehude (talk) 20:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Erie Crossing - Crescent Bridge - East Side.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Erie Crossing - Crescent Bridge - East Side.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Leyo 20:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:02 Taiko2.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
I JethroBT (talk) 16:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Brassinolid.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 01:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:J I Thornycroft.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Clavis Cordis (talk) 22:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Is the message about non-working redirects still actual? I think that deletion shouldn't break anything now... rubin16 (talk) 11:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Anniehaslam-july2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hawkins-100.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
37.5.5.119 11:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tenth Street - Promenade (Metromover station - Miami, Florida).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tenth Street - Promenade (Metromover station - Miami, Florida).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Dream out loud (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kamran Latif.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saqib (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EpicIndiaCities.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kenfyre (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:2003-2005 Hyundai Grandeur XG250.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 03:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:02c1349.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:02c1349.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Watson the Cavachon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Inkiw (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Convite
![]() |
CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO
Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Histórico |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Olá Logan,
Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014.
Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.
O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!
Acesse o site do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 - Patrimônio Histórico confira nossa lista de monumentos a serem fotografados e submeta suas imagens para concorrer a premiação de R$6.000 em dinheiro.
Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.
Atenciosamente,
Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015
![]() |
File:026 la times.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:2003-2005 Hyundai Grandeur XG250.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) (talk) 07:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Watson the Cavachon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
-- Geagea (talk) 03:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:02-jones-jim ji.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelly (talk) 11:22, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
#invoke:Autotranslate Kelly (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning) ([[User talk:Kevin Foo (Foo Zhen Ning)|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ilya ([[User talk:Ilya|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ilya ([[User talk:Ilya|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Kwasura ([[User talk:Kwasura|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Leyo 13:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate -mattbuck (Talk) 21:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
De-adminship warning
Dear Logan, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate —LX (talk, contribs) 10:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)