User talk:LC-de

Archives:

• User talk:LC-de/Archive1

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leccinum variicolor LC0365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Owsome seperation by DOF --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 01:15, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leccinum versipelle LC0366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum LC0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 18:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cervus elaphus LC0367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:15, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laccaria amethystina LC0370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Craterellus tubaeformis LC0374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 04:49, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tricholoma fulvum LC0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 15:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lepista nuda LC0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clavulina rugosa LC0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lepista nuda LC0372.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lepista nuda LC0372.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Austerdalen LC0364.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Austerdalen LC0364.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 16:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haematopus ostralegus LC0378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and QI -- Spurzem 22:52, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chroicocephalus scopulinus LC0381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and cute. --Thibaut120094 23:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celmisia semicordata LC0379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 15:29, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

IP troll

Those comments were very likely made by a IP troll who pops up occasionally to take pot shots at reviewers. We don't permit IP to vote and nor should they have any say in how others vote or criticise voting. Before restoring his remarks, you might want to consider whether you are improving Commons or just permitting a coward to be nasty. -- Colin (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

You can take contribution to the FPC discussion as an answer here. Additionally Kelvin also made an important point: IPs don't write comments, users do. But in most cases you cannot just simply infer from an IP that the comment came from the same user... --LC-de (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Replied there. Both of you are lacking the facts and your comments have nothing to do with FPC. Now, if you want to discuss how we review images and assess them as "among our finest" then I'll happily talk to you. If you want to encourage IP trolls... -- 20:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leccinum variicolor LC0365.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leccinum variicolor LC0365.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/KTC (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

FPC

Hi, Derogatory comment like this does not bring anything useful, and Colin was right to revert it. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

The starter was adressing some problems with his critics (which are often enough hard on the edge of being derogatory themselves) and then deleting the comment criticizing himself. This looks at least a bit odd to me. If someone is fond of giving harsh critics he should also be able to stand harsh responses. The further reaction then brings me to the conclusion, that the IP might made some valid points here. But I partially agree with you: It was a completely useless comment to a completely useless starter. I won't follow up this discussion anymore. Too much fecal words flying around... but interesting enough: not from the IP... --LC-de (talk) 10:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't have reverted it if made by a logged-in user prepared to stick his user name against it, but it's a familiar IP troll. I'm fine with harsh responses by users who sign their posts with a name, what I'm not so happy about is the "please respect my opinions" response which is falsely trying to use some invented etiquette to say "don't critise my review". Equally phony is the "all opinions are equal" viewpoint, when used for the same purpose. Many people at FPC forum are interested in improving both their photographic and their review skills (myself included) and welcome rational criticism of both. Those who can't handle and learn from criticism need to do some growing up. Since I'm not actually editing votes or deleting candidates, the "playing God" idea is just a random insult of no use. For all my concerns expressed, they are just words, nothing more, and people can respond with intelligent discussion or ignore as they see fit. But insults from IPs, we can do without: by definition they are not part of this community and have no vote and no voice. Logging in isn't that hard. -- Colin (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

So is it a familiar IP troll? What makes you confident that it is always the same user behind a given IP if they are dynamically assigned? And where is the difference to a logged-in user? It could give you more confidence, that this is really the same user. So on one side you delete comments because you think its from a certain user, but you cannot be sure, but if you can be sure, you wouldn't do it? Sounds a bit odd to me from a logical point of view.

I also would strongly oppose the opinion, that IPs are not part of the community. Of course they are. The whole Wiki philosophy is based on the principle that everyone can take part who wants to. This also includes users who don't want to create accounts, log in, forgot it, whatever. The fact, that the configuration used for this project doesn't prevent IP comments can be seen as a manifestation of this principle.

So I would oppose any comment deletion as long as it wasn't offensive, out of topic or in other ways against agreed rules. It might be impolite to bring up controversal accusations without logging in. It is impolite to just delete those comments as well. --LC-de (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia anyone can edit. Commons is not. You can't upload files without an account and you can't vote at FP without an account. By and large, IPs don't edit here and don't participate at FP. There's no such "wiki philosophy". You know quite well why someone might post trolling comments as an IP. There are no reasons for such behaviour that improve Commons. -- Colin (talk) 12:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae LC0383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veronica subalpina LC0382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celmisia plants LC0380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Aid

Sorry, I can't understand your words. Can you say your words in simple English, please?

You say: "Please don't apply this ominous rule before there is a real consensus about it which isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote."

I can not understand the end of the sentence (...isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote). Thanks--Lmbuga (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Just wanted to express that this vote was a farce. And this 4MP rule is not in place so far. Just take a look at Commons:QIC --LC-de (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus cerasifera LC0385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Touzrimounir 23:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goura victoria LC0384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Lewis Hulbert 02:55, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Leccinum versipelle LC0366.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leccinum versipelle LC0366.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamiops swinhoei LC0386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:35, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygonia c-album LC0390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 02:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fragaria vesca LC0389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacerta agilis LC0388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo LC-de,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium glandulosum LC0391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium glandulosum LC0392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:25, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeonium glandulosum LC0393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga cotyledon LC0395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. The back of the wing is a little OOF, but it works okay. --Crisco 1492 01:07, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good. Charlesjsharp 09:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta sandvicensis LC399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 13:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo LC-de,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Boloria selene LC0293.jpg

Guten tag, this picture actually shows Boloria euphrosyne. Would you please make the correction here and in the wikipedia pages that use it ?--LamBoet (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Never mind, I did the corrections--LamBoet (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dictamnus albus LC0401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone sylvestris LC0403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dictamnus albus LC0402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gentiana nivalis LC0404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Jkadavoor 03:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orobanche lutea LC0405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austerdalsbreen LC0406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 14:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Austerdalsbreen LC0406.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Austerdalsbreen LC0406.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium pininana LC0407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:49, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genista benehoavensis LC409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium wildpretii LC0408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola palmensis LC0412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A geotag would be appreciated. --Cayambe 06:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium brevirame LC0411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This image seems tilted, doesn't it? Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 15:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Wouldn't say it's tilted. This plant was growing at the slopes of the San Antonio volcano. --LC-de 22:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Explaination accepted :-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)