User talk:Kri
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Cats for petrographical files
[edit]Hi Kri, thanks for the revision of cats. Note categories with geoscientific significance, please. best regards --Lysippos (talk) 16:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, what do you mean by note categories with geoscientific significance? —Kri (talk) 17:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry Kri. I mean the following edits by me:
- 18:43, 14. Aug. 2011 (Unterschied | Versionen) Category:Sandstone textures (cat removed (sand is not a stone))
- 18:36, 14. Aug. 2011 (Unterschied | Versionen) K File:Sandstone alveolization - Strasbourg.jpg (added Category:Sandstone using HotCat)
- 18:17, 14. Aug. 2011 (Unterschied | Versionen) K File:Karoo sandstone with bushmen paintings.jpg (added Category:Sandstone using HotCat)
- Not all images are only an artistic picture. Some images of rocks have a special geoscientific message. Adding a category is not a problem. Sometimes the deletion of a category is unfavorable. That was only marginal. A lot of thanks. :-) Best regards --Lysippos (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for telling me. I shouldn't assume categories to be redundant so quickly in the future. —Kri (talk) 19:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Barnsley fern
[edit]Hi. You have added Category:Fractals by type to Category:Barnsley fern. but it is a subcategory of Category:Iterated function systems which is in category Category:Fractals by type. See history. Regards --Adam majewski (talk) 19:44, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, it seems like you know better in this case. Go ahead and change it back if that is better. —Kri (talk) 22:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. I didn't really understand what you meant first (I guess I was tired or something), but now I have changed it back. —Kri (talk) 14:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, I went ahead and moved Category:Iterated function systems from Category:Barnsley fern and added it to Category:Computer generated fractal plants instead. —Kri (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
category
[edit]Hi. You have added category fractals to File:Quadratic Golden Mean Siegel Disc Average Velocity - Gray.png. It is in Siegel disc category which is a subcategory of JUlia sets and Fractals by type. Regards. --Adam majewski (talk) 13:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, sorry for that. It's undone now. —Kri (talk) 14:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Error in file "Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg"
[edit]On my computer and on my web browser (Firefox 14.0.1), the file Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg "cannot be displayed because it contains errors". Please don't remove the template {{Broken file}} I put in it just because it can be displayed on your computer. It doesn't work on my computer so there is clearly something wrong with it or something that prevents it from working properly. It doesn't matter if it is the file that causes the error or if it is my system that is incompatible with it; the two are equally bad and people who want to use the image on any Wikimedia site should be aware of that fact that not all web browsers can display it. I have restored the template again and please let it be there. —Kri (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- The problem is obviously on your computer and you should fix it, not blame a file which by the way is correctly displayed by Firefox 14.0.1. --Coyau (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- It is obviously on my computer? Well can you tell me what the problem is then maybe I can fix it. Look, all I'm saying is that the file can't be displayed in every web browser and on every computer (which is not good), I'm not blaming the picture. Firefox on my computer says that the file contains errors, which users should be aware of. I don't know whether Firefox's error message is correct or not, but perhaps someone who sees this template instance knows why this error occurs and can fix it. —Kri (talk) 22:44, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- I changed back my edit in the picture. See the edit summary. —Kri (talk) 11:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Category:Hanging_cheese_threads has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Category:Cottage_cheese_textures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Blue cheese textures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Category:Provoking_buildings has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Category:Textures_(computer_graphics) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sebari (talk) 17:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Reflections of the Sun in still water
[edit]Hi, you added the category Category:Reflections of the Sun in still water to File:Sunrise at al-Masjid al-Nabawi.jpg, but that's not still water, so I removed the category, and the category is empty right now, and it should be deleted unless you find an image to add to it. --Z 11:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- So the water is moving? —Kri (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Now I see what you mean. That's not water at all; it's polished stone! :P It really looked like water, though. —Kri (talk) 07:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- LoL so far everyone that I've showed the photo to thought that's water. --Z 14:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- I can imagine! :) It's a really nice image by the way. —Kri (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! Sad that didn't have a better camera. --Z 11:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Kri,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Kri,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Kri,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Bird animations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
HDR
[edit]Hi. I have a question. There is a Category:Tone-mapped_HDR_images. It includes : " Images which have been converted from High Dynamic Range (HDR) to Low Dynamic Range using tone mapping". So these are LDR images. It's parent categoryis HDR. Is it mesleading ? Maybe better name should be: LDR crated from HDR using tone mapping" ? I have checked few images from HDR category and it seems that most of these are LDR. What do you think about it ? --Adam majewski (talk) 14:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not an HDR expert so I don't know what the correct thing to do is, and I have no own opinion about it. Maybe "Tone mapped HDR images" is in the "HDR" category because they where created from HDR images (or correspondingly, many LDR/SDR images). Is there any particular reason you are asking me? —Kri (talk) 23:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Category:Market_textures has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |