User talk:KarleHorn
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
--Saibo (Δ) 19:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Your contributions to FPC
[edit]![]() |
Welcome to the FPC project, KarleHorn. Thank you for contributing; however, new users must have made 50 edits to Commons and have accounts at least 10 days old. This is because we do not want sockpuppets, disruptive editors who create multiple accounts to add more votes. You have not done anything wrong, and we hope you will come back after you meet the requirements. Thank you. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:39, 1 October 2011 (UTC) |
![]() |
File:LP Label Queen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
![]() |
File:All-in-one-PC-2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Asterix Briefmarke 2015.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Correlatio (talk) 19:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Briefmarkenbogen Asterix.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Correlatio (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Briefmarke BMW 507.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:MB W111 Briefmarke.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yann (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
![]() |
Hello KarleHorn.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Yann (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Hello Yann, I do not understand, why you don't even give me a chance to reply, but delete all files immidiatly at one day and even "attack" my account. Would it be correct, to load them up (only) to the german Wiki ? There are no problems with stamps; have e. g. a look here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Briefmarkenblock
Thank you --KarleHorn (talk) 18:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
Copyright status: File:Spargelschaelautomat.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Spargelschaelautomat.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello Magog the Ogre, thanks for the hint, I added the licence. Greetz --KarleHorn (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
Wenn Du Bilder hochlädst: ...
[edit]... kategorisiere sie bitte, und überlass nicht anderen die Arbeit. Z. B. Category:Multicar Dieselameise M 21. Danke & Gruß --Frze > talk 04:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Frze, in der Tat tue ich mich damit schwer, weil mir die Vorgehensweise nicht klar ist. Wie ist - ausgehend von einem Bild, welches man hochladen möchte - die geschickteste Vorgehensweise ? Danke und beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 17:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Hallo KHorn - Wenn Du Deine Bilder nicht in mindestens eine Kategorie einordnest, schwirren sie wie hunderttausende andere (fast) unauffindbar und nutzlos in den weiten des Commonsuniversums. Schaust Du bitte hier:
Dort findest Du alle Hinweise. Am besten ohne Kategorie hochladen, Warnung ignorieren.
Wie geht's praktisch weiter nach dem Hochladen? Beispiel: File:Ford Futura Heck.JPG.
- Klickst Du ganz unten neben Media needing categories as of 1 June 2017 auf das (+).
- Trägst Du Ford ein, bietet er Dir ein paar Kategorien zur Auswahl an.
- Ford automobiles in dem Fall erst mal ok.
Bist Du Dir unsicher, wähle eine Oberkategorie.
Am besten Du schaust in die Wikipedia auf den Artikel. In diesem Beispiel de:Ford Futura. Schaust Du im Artikelabschnitt Weblinks:
- Klickst Du Commons: Ford Futura – Sammlung von Bildern, Videos und Audiodateien.
- Landest Du in der Category:Ford Futura. Umso besser.
- Auf der Bilddatei unten in Category/Kategorie das (+-) Zeichen anklicken, aus Ford automobiles machst Du Ford Futura.
- Fertig.
- Viel Erfolg.
- Bitte bei allen Deinen Bildern selber durchführen!
- Danke & Gruß --Frze > talk 19:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Frze, vielen Dank für die für mich wertvollen, guten Hinweise ! Da haste mir ja eine schöne Hausaufgabe gegeben :-) Ich werde mich sukzessive dranmachen. Schöne Pfingsten --KarleHorn (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo KHorn - ist ja in Deinem ureigensten Interesse, dass Deine tw. guten Bilder auch Beachtung finden, und nicht für immer z. B. eines der 736.443 ungenutzen unkategorisierten Bilder des Jahres 2016 bleiben ... > Category:Media needing categories. Viel Spaß & Gruß --Frze > talk 14:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Frze, guck bitte mal, so richtig ? Gruß --KarleHorn (talk) 15:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sieht schon ganz gut aus. Bitte beachte:
- Frze, guck bitte mal, so richtig ? Gruß --KarleHorn (talk) 15:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Categories sind hier meist in englisch >>> Category:Motorroller wird also Category:Scooters
- Category:Rondelli gibt es nicht, entweder anlegen (das ist schon Lektion 4) oder in übergeordnete Kategorie Category:Scooters
- aus Category:Weizenbier wird ?
- vermutlich erstmal Beers, Kategorien hier meist in der englischen Mehrzahl.
- Du siehst schon, vorher, ob es die Kategorie gibt (es erscheint statt des X ein Häkchen v).
- Im nachhinein prüfen: wenn die Kategorie rot erscheint, bitte noch mal ändern.
Weiter frohes Schaffen. Gruß --Frze > talk 15:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/Freiberger_Bier.jpg/220px-Freiberger_Bier.jpg)
Klick mal an > Category:Biers Klasse. --Frze > talk 15:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Da kann man ja Abitur drauf machen ... das mit dem Englisch hab' nun auch gerafft (logisch:commons = englisch-sprachig - Herrgott, gib mir Hirn :-) ) ... aber jetzt habe ich es wohl halbwegs raus. Vielen Dank nochmal für die Hilfestellung ! Gruß --KarleHorn (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:06, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:ELO Out of the blu Inlay.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:ELO Out of the blu Inlay.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ELO Out of the blu Inlay.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
JuTa 00:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Hallo, diese Darstellung hat keinerlei "Schöpfungshöhe" oder dergl., insbesondere, weil die Teile des "E.L.O.-Raumschiffes" nicht dargestellt sind. Insofern verstehe ich das grad nicht. Bitte um nähere Erläuterung, besten Dank --KarleHorn (talk) 17:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ersttag 900 Koethen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
DaB. (talk) 13:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:20Euro Bauhaus100.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:20Euro Bauhaus100.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:20Euro Bauhaus100.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Quedel (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo, das verstehe ich nicht, denn alle anderen Münzen sind offenbar legitim, warum diese und (wie ich gerade feststelle) auch einigee 2-Euro-Münzen nicht ? Was habe ich falsch gemacht bzw. muß ich nachholen ? Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tauchschiff JAGO.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Clivar av (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
![]() |
File:White Pearl A Seite.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
VLu (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
OTRS-permission received. --KarleHorn (talk) 17:31, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
![]() |
File:Peugeot 508 Mittelkonsole.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2003:EF:5BC7:7A00:9037:D3B8:D6C9:8D18 10:39, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
0-Euro banknote
[edit]I saw that you recently uploaded a 0-Euro banknote, is the original design in the public domain or free to use? If not, then it's best to nominate it for deletion here and then upload it locally to the German-language Wikipedia. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Donald, I've the permission of the producer in Berlin (given to e. g. 0-Euro "Gorch Fock") to show them on Wiki. Should I copy it here ? THX --KarleHorn (talk) 12:20, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Storyville Single rot.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Nominated for deletion by User:Tomskyhaha. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Muenze 2Ct Oesterreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Lego LKW Serie 1968.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lego LKW Serie 1968.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lego LKW Serie 1968.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, bitte konkretisieren. Geht es um den Begriff "Lego" ? Die Abbildung eines Legomodells aus den 1960er Jahren nebst selbiger auf der Bauanleitung hat keinen künstlerischen Wert, damit Löschantrag mE unberechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Logo PRIMAX.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Logo PRIMAX.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo PRIMAX.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0Euro 125 NOK.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0Euro 125 NOK.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[1]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0Euro 125 KiWo.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0Euro 125 KiWo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[2]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:AppStore Karte 15Euro.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:AppStore Karte 15Euro.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AppStore Karte 15Euro.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, falls es um den Apfel geht: Er ist zwischenzeitlich Allgemeingut, keine Schöpfungshöhe (mehr). Der Löschantrag daher mE unberechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Quality Street Blechdose.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Quality Street Blechdose.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Quality Street Blechdose.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, eine Blechbüchse, die ich zuhaus knipse, ist also ein Problem ? Hätte ich sie auf die Straße stellen sollen ? Ich bitte generell darum, Löschanträge zu begründen (nicht nur Baustein, und dann noch inflationär), besser noch Kontaktaufnahme im Vorwege. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Christophorus Titel diverse.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Christophorus Titel diverse.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Christophorus Titel diverse.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, keine Schöpfungshöhe, lediglich historische Darstellung einer Schriftentwicklung. ME Löschantrag nicht berechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:BC2015 Business50 Vorderseite.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:BC2015 Business50 Vorderseite.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:BC2015 Business50 Vorderseite.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, keine Schöpfungshöhe, lediglich Darstellung eines öffentlichen Dokuments, keine Person abgebildet. ME Löschantrag nicht berechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0Euro Herkules2.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0Euro Herkules2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[3]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Opel Magazin start.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Opel Magazin start.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Opel Magazin start.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, keine Schöpfungshöhe, lediglich historische Darstellung einer Schriftentwicklung. ME Löschantrag nicht berechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0 EURO Kassel.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0 EURO Kassel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[4]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0 EURO Koelner Dom.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0 EURO Koelner Dom.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[5]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0 EURO Luebeck.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0 EURO Luebeck.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[6]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0 EURO Berliner Schloss.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0 EURO Berliner Schloss.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[7]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:0 Euro Schein Kiel 2017.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:0 Euro Schein Kiel 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Didym (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, sh. hier: [[8]]; ich habe nach Kontaktaufnahme permission zur Abbildung der 0-Euro-Scheine. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ravensburger groesstes Puzzle1.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ravensburger groesstes Puzzle1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ravensburger groesstes Puzzle1.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, Foto im öffentlichen Raum, keine Personen erkennbar, Löschantrag mE nicht berechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ravensburger groesstes Puzzle2.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ravensburger groesstes Puzzle2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ravensburger groesstes Puzzle2.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, Foto im öffentlichen Raum, keine Personen erkennbar, Löschantrag mE nicht berechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autogramm Heidi Hetzer.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autogramm Heidi Hetzer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Autogramm Heidi Hetzer.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, ein Autogramm (ohne Abbildung der Person) hat keine Schöpfungshöhe, es ist nur eine Handschrift. Löschantrag mE nicht berechtigt. Zudem lebt die Person nicht mehr. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Getraenkekarte Spiralbindung.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Getraenkekarte Spiralbindung.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Getraenkekarte Spiralbindung.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Didym (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Moin, keine Schöpfungshöhe, es geht um die Art einer Speise-/Getränkekarte, mE Löschantrag nicht berechtigt. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 15:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Datei wurde wiederhergestellt. --KarleHorn (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Dodge new General Lee.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Dodge new General Lee.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Dodge new General Lee.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:VW Golf VII GTi CS Seite.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:VW Golf VII GTi CS Seite.JPG
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:VW Golf VII GTi CS Seite.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:10Kronen DK 2.jpg
- File:1Krone DK 1.jpg
- File:1Krone DK 2.jpg
- File:25 Oere DK 1.jpg
- File:25 Oere DK 2.jpg
- File:2Kronen DK 1.jpg
- File:2Kronen DK 2.jpg
- File:50 Oere DK 1.jpg
- File:50 Oere DK 2.jpg
- File:5Kronen DK 1.jpg
- File:5Kronen DK 2.jpg
- File:DK 5 Oere 1973 2.jpg
- File:DK 5 Oere 1973.jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ersttag 350 CAU.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Discostu (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Label Pink Floyd Dark.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
George Ho (talk) 05:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Muenze 10Ct Oesterreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Muenze 20Ct Oesterreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Muenze 50Ct Oesterreich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Modell Berliner Hauptbahnhof.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lukas Beck (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Modell Berliner HBhf ICE.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lukas Beck (talk) 14:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)