User talk:Kallerna/2012

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porin ravirata 6.8.-11 - 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nummenpakan koulu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Kadellar 20:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luotsimäen silta 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porin ravirata 6.8.-11 - 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porin ravirata 6.8.-11 - 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porin Yliopistokeskus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. Well-done panorama. --Selbymay 17:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novascotiannoutaja Karhuluodossa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Welcome back ! Looking for the ball again ?--Jebulon 00:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Love it. There's a possible dust spot, but it's probably just a bit of dark cloud. Mattbuck 16:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kokemäenjoen suistoa Meri-Porissa 3 - White balance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 11:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficient quality for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poda Island panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --NorbertNagel 20:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nopparat Thara Beach panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 11:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onni Yyterissä 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 08:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luotsimäen silta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the colour (very green?)--ArildV 16:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment Better now? --kallerna 17:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment It should seems to me to be somewhere so ;). (The file is updated) --Aleks G 00:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC) New version is fine IMO.--ArildV 20:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tub Island panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tub Island from Chicken Island panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think such balance white there will be more correct (the file is updated) ;) --Aleks G 21:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poda Island panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nopparat Thara Beach panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Mattbuck 12:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --NorbertNagel 22:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poda island beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 18:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phai Plong Bay pontoon pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koirarannan levää 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, interesting, and good DOF -- MJJR 20:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Krista Kiuru

Kuvan Kiurusta WPK on ensin väittänyt tallentaneensa Wikipediaan omana työnään vuonna 2011, mutta sitten muuttanut tietoihin sinut tekijäksi ja lähteeksi Commonsin. Mitä se äijä nyt on meinannut tällä? Onko kuva sinun ottamasi vuodelta 2009? Toinen kysymys on, miksi ihmeessä kuvasta näkyvät eri versiot kun sen kokoa muuttaa? Weepeekoo on jotenkin loputtomilla päälletalletuksillaan sotkenut asioita joka puolella.

Ps. Voit poistaa kuvat kun olet ne nähnyt, en osannut laittaa niitä siistimmin sivulle :)

--Pxos (talk) 14:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Vain tämä on minun ottamani (huono) kuva. Muista en tiedä, pitää WPK:lta kysyä. Tarkoitus on varmaankin Krista Kiuru -artikkelin kuvituksen vaihto, joka on tietenkin tehty väärällä tavalla. Kuvien vaihtuminen kokoa muuttamalla on jännä ominaisuus, liittynee useisiin tallennettuihin versiohin, mutta siitä pitää kysyä joltain minua enemmän wikin tekniikkaan perehtyneeltä käyttäjältä. —kallerna™ 20:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Huu, en aio kyllä mennä sylttytehtaaseen (Ab WPK Oy) kysymään yhtään mitään. Käyttäjä on jo ikuisesti/toistaiseksi estetty täällä Commonsissa ja olen viime kesänä kuluttanut keskustelukiintiöni loppuun Wikipediassa. Ties kuinka monta kuvaa ja vaakunaa on samalla tavalla pilattu tallentamalla samalla nimellä useita versioita, ja jos tuota Kiurun kuvaa katsoo erikielisissä Wikipedioissa, sama tiedosto on erinäköinen aina riippuen siitä, mihin kokoon se on asetettu näkymään. Minullakaan ei ole aavistusta, miten asia voitaisiin korjata. --Pxos (talk) 12:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Itse en ole (onneksi) tapaukseen törmännyt, jos ja kun tapauksia on useampi pitäisi ne kyllä selvittää. Yksi vaihtoehto voisi olla vanhempien versioiden poisto. —kallerna™ 17:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Pariwat waterfall 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ao Nang beach panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:25, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I use some of your photos

Hi Kallerna!

I have some photos of Gulo gulo from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directy in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") one and one again ;-):

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33117

If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Kallerna

This is my "contributor card", for example: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

Cheers! —kallerna™ 07:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jätkäjätkät @ Pori Jazz 2010 - Erno Haukkala 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Singha beer 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruger Hauer @ Bar Kino 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Carschten 14:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phai Plong bay 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:47, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Vcarceler 13:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock climber Phra Nang 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long-tail boat in Railay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, Good quality --Thesurvived99 18:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --S nova 17:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support as in FIC. --Jkadavoor 08:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 13:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Helsingin City hall

I replaced "Helsingin City Hall" in the right place to VI. The set must contain multiple images. The scope for a building must contain, if possible (exterior or interior). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, haven't done those for a while. Thanks for help! —kallerna™ 09:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ao Nang beach panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. best of the 3 versions. Nice composition. --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sphinx and the Great Pyramid of Giza panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, good quality. Maybe even FP. --Tomer T 12:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Great photographs! I'm very impressed with your pictures of Macaca fascicularis. InverseHypercube 20:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you InverseHypercube! —kallerna™ 06:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 09:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Dani Sordo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great. --Kadellar 09:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some minor distortion: slightly curved horizon. But otherwise good quality, interesting subject and very nice composition. -- MJJR 10:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long-tail boat 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Horizon slightly curved. --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)...but a bit greenish !--Jebulon 16:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long-tail boat driver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.‬ A bit CA on top (maybe can be fixed?), but really neglectable for preventing it Qi. --Tomer T 12:46, 18 April 2012 (UTC)  Comment CA fixed. --kallerna 13:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Great. Tomer T 16:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taavisilta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. --Kadellar 09:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helsinki City Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria; best in scope. cmadler (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Phra Nang beach panorama edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phra Nang beach 33.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is defitely great in composition. --Telemaque MySon 09:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yyterin rantaheinää.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though I'm not sure whether the white balance is correct. The sky semms a bit greenish. . --NorbertNagel 21:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but maybe a little green cast.--Jebulon 16:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)  Comment Any better now? --kallerna 13:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Yes, even if only the face is really in focus, but good for QI, IMO.--Jebulon 13:47, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railay Beach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 00:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novascotiannoutaja Karhuluodossa 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 19:56, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 12:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 02:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 04:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tsunami warning signs Ao Nang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:20, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Cayambe 18:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onni Yyterissä 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't there too much green? --Berthold Werner 11:12, 26 April 2012 (UTC). Imo many Kallernas photos have too much green. --Iifar 14:28, 26 April 2012 (UTC)  Comment Made small adjustments. Better now? --kallerna 11:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)  Support (the file is updated) --Aleks G 23:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)  Support --Berthold Werner 10:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me (the file is updated) --Aleks G 23:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Adorable! --Jkadavoor 06:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO but 1 (or 2) small problem. To mutch green, and maybe a small anticlockwise tilt?--ArildV 07:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment I made some corrections, but IMO the rock seems bit red now. What do you think? --kallerna 08:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC) The new version is fine IMO.--ArildV 08:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ao Nang beach 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ao Nang beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuk-tuk fastfood grill 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Dark situation, correct settings, composition and focus. --Kadellar 18:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

File:P-bychkov-ya-7950.jpg

What do you mean by «bad expression»? I thought this image cannot be compared to others because it's a face portrait, not a head portrait.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

The guy isn't looking nowhere near the camera and the face expression isn't flattering. —kallerna™ 07:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

I thought, face expression is a term for VI or FI, and QI is about technology.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 15:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muay Thai Ao Nang 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Sai beach panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice ( but there was a spot in the sky that I removed).--Vassil 21:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment Cheers! --kallerna 07:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yyteri BeachFutis 2010 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition.--ArildV 14:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 21:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 12:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hat Noppharat Thara beach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well executed. --Saffron Blaze 12:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Aurinkolahden puistotietä kohti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 23:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ko Kai & Ko Tub 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ko Kai & Ko Tub 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsingin kaupungintalo satamasta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks pretty good to me, just one spot on the sky. --Iifar 14:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment Dustspot fixed. --kallerna 07:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC).  Support QI to me now. --Iifar 09:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 16:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lae Lay Grill restaurant - view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not bad, but please remove that big dust spot in the upper right area. - A.Savin 23:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment Couldn't find it, could you point it out with notes? --kallerna 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)  Done Dustspot fixed. --kallerna 09:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC) OK now. - A.Savin 09:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unibet Dream Team saa takkiin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 20:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monkey warning sign Ao Nang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Morray 19:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muay Thai Ao Nang 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good for indoor action shot --Carschten 13:34, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hat Noppharat Thara beach 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 14:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks for the explanation. Ok to me. --Cayambe 18:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luotsinmäki Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Erno Haukkala.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. cmadler (talk) 19:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
University Consortium of Pori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pormestarinsilta Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question I agree that this is the best image of this bridge, but why is the bridge "of more than local interest" as needed to justify a scope? cmadler (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Info It's the main pedestrian bridge to Kirjurinluoto. —kallerna™ 13:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 19:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 10:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kim Herold maalissa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krabi town 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 18:49, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tsunami Hasard Zone -sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wat Tham Sua 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. He/she suffers from cataract! --Cayambe 14:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bivalvia Ko Kai 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kauppakeskus BePOP 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:56, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ton Pariwat waterfall 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd prefer it sharpened, but ok. --Mattbuck 16:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hat Noppharat Thara beach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 11:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hat Noppharat Thara beach 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for QI.--S. F. B. Morse 10:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juseliuksen mausoleumi 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:19, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koh Poda 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good composition, perhaps little noise in the sky, unsharp on back ground (summit of the rock), unlucky catamaran on back ground. Condition of light not easy otherwise QI for me - Siren-Com 21:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC). • I have removed the catamaran; not sure about sharpness, however. -- Aisano 07:32, 26 May 2012 (UTC) A ew erroes associated with removal should themselves be removed, but good enough. Mattbuck 18:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC) Improved that, thanks. -- Aisano 16:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalevanpuisto 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--S. F. B. Morse 06:08, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käppärän pieni kappeli 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Only a slight perspective correction is needed IMO. -- JLPC 11:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment I already did a bit, do it need it more or less? --kallerna 05:58, 30 May 2012 (UTC) Seems good now! Keymeulen -- 08:08, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ko Kai & Ko Tub 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pixelated sky, especially in the left corner. Blurring should fix it. Óðinn 16:43, 21 May 2012 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I don't quite understand what's the problem. Could you add a note? --kallerna 07:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Sure; added. Óðinn 14:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC) Looks fine to me. Mattbuck 14:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krabi town 8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 16:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cute. --Mattbuck 15:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juseliuksen mausoleumi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 23:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juselius Mausoleum (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good. I suggest to reduce the scope (exterior); like that we could promote a view of the interior later. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Comment Photographing is forbidden inside the building, although I could manage to take some photos inside with my contacts. Made the change anyways. —kallerna™ 08:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Used your photo

Great shot!! Your photo has been selected to appear on http://www.tripbucket.com, a website dedicated to helping our members achieve their bucket list dreams. We have credited you with a link to your photo on Wikipedia.

You can see the dream with your photo at:

http://www.tripbucket.com/dreams/dream/attend-the-winter-x-games/?ppc=PhotoSource

If you have any questions, contact us at photos@tripbucket.com.

Thanks you for sharing your photo!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiikartorni 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --JLPC 08:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus padus Rauma.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality: --Vassil 09:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanha Rauma vesitornista.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful --ArildV 12:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Menkaure's pyramid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 10:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vuojoen kartano 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Like that. --Herzi Pinki 11:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauman vesitorni 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irjanteen kirkko 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, but some dustspot in the sky.--ArildV 12:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)  Comment Dustspots fixed. --kallerna 10:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Thank you.--ArildV 10:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lapin kirkko 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok to me. --Iifar 18:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rauman vesitorni 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit noisy sky, but ok. --Mattbuck 21:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Alex Raschi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:42, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sammallahdenmäki panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Useful and QI to me. -- JLPC 22:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lapin kirkko 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 19:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Innsbruck_-_Bergiselschanze6.jpg

Hi,

I have uploaded a new version. Please check if this meets your perception of QI. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pursilahdenranta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turisteja Kustaanmiekassa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giza pyramids and Khufu boat pit 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and well done. --Selbymay 16:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - EK 1 - Nicholai Georgiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit more of brightness would make it QI to me Poco a poco 20:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Meet the criteria of QI. --Makele-90 15:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lapin kirkko 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --JLPC 08:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vuojoen kartano 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phra Nang beach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now. --Cayambe 08:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen SkyView.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful --Moroder 11:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ursus arctos Ähtäri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veljekset Keskinen panorama 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veljekset Keskinen panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veljekset Keskinen panorama 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villisiat Ähtäri 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:40, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäyrä Ähtäri 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect shot. --Kreuzschnabel 13:44, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

regarding: fuel management

hi,

this is kishore from india.i did my masters in chemical engineering and did a certified course in nuclear technology. i want to know more about spent fuel management. Is it safe to bury waste inside the earth crust , as it(earth crust) is changing time to time.  

thanks, k.kishore.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lynx lynx Ähtäri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Holleday 15:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Globe Arena 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turun linna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality, but the upper side crop is too tight and the leaves right of the tower are disturbing. Nevertheless: QI for me. -- MJJR 19:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valkohäntäkauris Ähtäri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen SkyView 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:23, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen SkyView 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good & interesting! -- MJJR 21:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Considerable motion blur, but a good shot anyway. I would crop it on the lower and right side so the foreground does not distract from the bears. --Kreuzschnabel 13:49, 28 July 2012 (UTC)  Comment Made much tighter crop, better now? --Kallerna 08:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valtatie 8 Raumalla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:51, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen SkyView 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaca fascicularis Ao Nang 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice scene. --Óðinn 19:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villisiat Ähtäri 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irjanteen kirkko 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena Globen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 12:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irjanteen kirkko 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better --Moroder 17:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rådmansgatan metro station 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poron vasa Ähtäri 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mäyrä Ähtäri 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veljekset Keskinen shopping carts 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 15:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Globe Arena 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 22:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turun linna 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I guess. --Florstein 18:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaanaan vesitorni 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Waterfront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergels Torg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok to me. --Iifar 16:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaknästornet 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Amorella Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaknästornet 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skeppsholmen panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kustaa II Aadolfin maapäivien obeliski 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good--Jebulon 10:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matinkaari Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taideteollinen korkeakoulu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömbron Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 21:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacka Strand 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 19:16, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanhankaupunginkoski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm unsure - no real reason to decline, but doesn't feel quite right. Maybe a little too much blue? Unsure. Mattbuck 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)  SupportQI for me.--Danesman1 21:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viru Gate 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hietaniemen uimaranta 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kallion kirkko 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo, nice composition.--ArildV 15:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raekoja plats 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Sibelius-monumentti

Moi, Sibelius-monumentin tekijän kuolemasta pitää olla kulunut 70 vuotta, kuollut 2003. File:Sibelius-monumentti 6.jpg ja File:Sibelius-monumentti 9.jpg. Toi ensimmäinen kuva olisi parempi kuin nyt fiwiki artikkelissa oleva. –Makele-90 (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Joo, tajusin heti upattuani, ja poistinkin kuvat. Epähuomiossa taisi jäädä noi kaksi poistamatta. —kallerna™ 13:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölönlahti 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness not the best, but ok --Poco a poco 11:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view from Laukkaluoto 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice, good quality --Rjcastillo 15:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Tallinn old town 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:02, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaivopuisto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View from Seurasaari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Steinsplitter 21:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Töölönlahti 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could you use if possible, the Panorama templete? --Moonik 16:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)