User talk:Kai3952/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Dear Kai3952 File:蘆洲機廠DSC 5041.jpg & File:二重疏洪道重要橋梁DSC 5036.JPG 皆由觀音山頂拍攝 ~已經加tag Views from Mount Guanyin (New Taipei)感恩Taiwankengo (talk) 01:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)taiwankengo
![]() |
File:Looking up the exterior of Taoyuan Public Library Lunggang Branch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 04:02, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Flickr2Commons
I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first").--B dash (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Entrance sign at Datun Nature Park in Sanzhi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
B dash (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Reply
Okay, you may get mad after the image was nominated for deletion, I understand. I give you the F2C comment just want to give you one more method of uploading Flickr files to Commons. Before uploading files, you should check the images that are within the FoP (of Taiwan). Thanks for your contribution. --B dash (talk) 15:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Re
The logo on the board is copyrighted. However, the logo occupied only a small space and it is not the subject in the photo. Therefore, it is regarded as de minimis. It is still acceptable in Commons. --B dash (talk) 03:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Please use common sense. It is hard to tell the standard. As long as we won't recognise the copyrighted object as subject, that would be fine. --B dash (talk) 04:07, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- "As long as we won't recognise the copyrighted object as subject, that would be fine." --B dash (talk) 06:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
I noticed that two days ago you moved many pictures into this subcategory. To my perhaps less experienced eye, the majority seem not to be anticrepuscular. Such rays are seldom photographed, unlike crepuscular ones that are often photographed. Could you check to see whether these moves were correct? Jim.henderson (talk) 12:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- My own picture, File:NHP Sunset rays jeh 1909.JPG was made facing west into the Sun. I well remember that evening, bicycling westward towards home. Thus, it's a picture of the usual kind of crepuscular ray; I would have been very pleased to see the rarer anticrepuscular rays. The majority of the pictures that you subcategorized show a Sun disk or other sign of being crepuscular rays, not anticrepuscular, so you should undo all the moves except those for which you have clear evidence that they are anticrepuscular. Jim.henderson (talk) 13:50, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- What is the difficulty? Crepuscular rays are near the Sun. They converge on the Sun. Anticrepuscular rays are on the other side of the sky. They converge on the Antisolar point. The majority of the pictures that you moved are clearly crepuscular; the remaining are uncertain and ought to be returned unless we get evidence that supports the move. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
我回退了您在 File:Meetup.jpg中的標註
我不會在意被標註出來,但我沒有參加2005年的聚會。即使我記憶可能有錯,但另一個證據是我2005年時在服替代役,有當時在單位出版的書籍為證。台灣役男的髮型規範各單位不同,但不可能留著長髮是一定。--Reke (talk) 06:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- 另2005台北夏聚紀錄中也沒有紀錄我的參與。我的首次編輯是2007年。--Reke (talk) 06:57, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Reke: I am replying to you "here". Also, I already know that you can speak English well, so please don't deliberately speak to me in Chinese.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK, the Mr. Wang is not me. As I said, I did not a long hair man in 2015.--Reke (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Reke: I am replying to you "here". Also, I already know that you can speak English well, so please don't deliberately speak to me in Chinese.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
感謝閣下對維基共享資源的圖片分類的巨大貢獻
如題,這是很繁雜的工作,我替維基感謝您。克勞棣 (talk) 00:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: I've replyed on your talk page.--Kai3952 (talk) 01:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
我已經刪除cosplayer左右兩側男遊客的臉,請您撤回刪除請求,謝謝。--Solomon203 (talk) 12:48, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Solomon203: I've replyed on your talk page.--Kai3952 (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded with UploadWizard
Hello.
When you encounter Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard (hist • logs • abuse log) in the recent revision of any page, look at the page history for disruption like Revision of File:夜拍林安泰古厝.jpg or other anomalies. This category shouldn’t be present in any modern revision because was purged with bots. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- I didn’t inform Husky221 because don’t understand his/her Chinese comment and unsure whether can s/he understand my English. Another try with «Uploaded with UploadWizard». Imagine you walk somewhere in Taiwanese countryside and step on a lychee fruit. Would you be astonished? Not much. But if I stepped on it walking in Russian countryside, it would certainly be something unusual. Namely, I’d have to conclude that somebody dropped or threw this fruit by mistake or put it intentionally. The same for comparison of 2013 against modern times – the category in question present in old revisions of File: pages is a commonplace. But if you see it in a current revision, then somebody recently brought it from the past, either mistakenly or doing disruption. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Views from automobiles
Hi Kai3952. Please read first Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/05/Category:Views from vehicles before reverting. Note that this category and its subcategories are only for images where a portion of the automobile is visible. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- For images of roads without any part of the car visible, see Category:Views from roads instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Window reflections are not a part of the car. Use category:Window reflections instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
關於「File:2011年端午節的臺灣新竹南寮舊漁港 20110606.jpg」的分類問題
關於這筆編輯,在下相信自己完全看得懂I did not add Category:Hukou Township, Hsinchu County(我沒有添加"新竹縣湖口鄉"這個分類)這句話,可是在下卻無法理解閣下為何以這句話作為您撤銷在下的編輯的理由。可否解釋一下"I did not add Category:Hukou Township, Hsinchu County"這句話與閣下的撤銷行為的關係?謝謝!克勞棣 (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Female's_objects_in_Taiwan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
E4024 (talk) 01:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c1/Commons_Autopatrolled.svg/50px-Commons_Autopatrolled.svg.png)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. MorganKevinJ(talk) 02:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Warning
Do not reopen closed discussions. Jcb (talk) 14:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
關於Wikimdians in Hsinchu "City"
您好,我是新竹維基媒體社群主持人。Wikimedians in Hsinchu是該社群之英語名稱,服務範圍不僅限於新竹市,之前也有新竹縣人參與我們的活動。本次改動非常不妥,請予以還原。如今日內仍拒不還原,我將會自行修正。祝好。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 18:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Reverting Auschwitz edits
Hi,
There is a reason I deleted the category 'Auschwitz Museum' of some pictures. These pictures were not made in the Auschwitz Museum, but somewhere else in the town of Oświęcim. You could have asked me that, before, without letting me know, reverting all my edits again. Can you correct your mistake, please?
Regards,
Tukka (talk) 12:06, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Gtk-dialog-info.svg/50px-Gtk-dialog-info.svg.png)
Tukka (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
- [1] Practice what you preach! Tukka (talk) 15:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
See also COM:AN/U#Category Problem. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Diagrams of township road signs of Yilan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
TimChen Talk 03:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Re:
Because this power plant is located in South Penghu Marine National Park area.--Encore (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)