User talk:Joydeep/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Joydeep!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 13:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yashica MF-2 super.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Green cast IMO.--Jebulon 15:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC) Green cast removed. --JDP90 16:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Much better, thank you. QI for me.--Jebulon 09:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga, Burdwan, 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charminar Hyderabad 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A winter sunset at Kolkata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments i like it, for me its QI --Ralf Roletschek 12:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worm circled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice colors. --Selbymay 19:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Durga Puja in West Bengal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Image is QI, best in scope imo. - A.Savin 19:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yashica MF-2 super.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope is too broad. It is impossible to choose the best image now. Probably the model of the camera should be added.--MrPanyGoff 06:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Done Scope changed. --Joydeep (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 07:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W530.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The object would be better described if we could see both sides. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. Yann (talk) 03:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W210.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The object would be better described if we could see both sides. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

•  Support OK for me. Yann (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honeycomb 15 03 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice quality, but would recommend a file name change. This is a piece of a beehive, what is termed the Honeycomb --Saffron Blaze 18:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC) File renaming done. File name change to honeycomb. --JDP90 13:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabby cat 26 07 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 04:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of golkonda fort, Hyderabad, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bacterial culture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of golkonda fort a view from top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments So, I think, it will be more interesting... ;) (the file is updated) --Aleks G 21:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks. -- JDP90 17:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dacrymyces palmatus 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mattbuck 10:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dacrymyces palmatus 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panurgus sp. on Glebionis sp..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi there, thank you so much for taking great photos. The quality is really professional. I'm using File:SONY Cyber-shot DSC W530.JPG on the en:Sony and en:Cyber-shot pages. Whoo hoo! CaseyPenk (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for using my photo. And thanks for informing me. Cheers. -- Joydeep (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

QI ?

Hi !

This one

Sorry, i'm french 14 years old, i speak english without translator so, it's not really good.
So, i didn't understood the reason why you refuse my image to QI. You said "less than 2 MP". Bu what is MP ? Is it Mio in french ? For this image, it's 1,46, yeah ?

Thank you. --Orikrin1998 08:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

MP means megapixels. There are certain criteria for image to be QI. You can view the criteria at Commons:Image guidelines. If you have images meeting these criteria you can nominate your other images. Thanks. -- Joydeep (talk) 13:50, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andrew's Church, Darjeeling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The color is not that of reality. Criteria 3. But here seems easy to fix. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done -- Joydeep (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support The very first version is the best(4 octobre 2011 à 11:38). In fact this is the best version of any way that we have currently. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
  •  Done Changed to version October 4, 2011. Thanks. -- Joydeep (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocks Golkonda fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 17:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meghnad Saha Planetarium, Burdwan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Probably VI if you add the geocoding in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Sorry, my mistake. Geocoded now. -- Joydeep (talk) 18:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:47, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burdwan Raj College, Burdwan (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Good picture, but it is recommended to add the scope : (exterior) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 Done Changed. Thank you. -- Joydeep (talk) 05:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaikhali Sundarbans 15-09-2011 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burdwan Church 14 06 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysocoris stollii 30 08 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Burdwan Church (Apse: Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Difficult to get an idea of the building, it would be more accurate to see the facade. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

• Sorry, the place is too congested by buildings and trees, it's not possible to photograph the facade of the church. The side in the photograph is on the road side. -- Joydeep (talk) 06:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
• I understand. For now this is the best picture we have. I would however add to the scope supporter of the term: apse.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
  
  •  Done -- Joydeep (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

PR1-06-2012.jpg and PR2,3,4

I proposed a renaming of this four file. But none of administrteur has done it again, I passiente! Sorry for my bad english. Honestly! Bourgeois.A (talk) 06:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

It's done! Finish ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 06:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

FINISCH, It's OK ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaikhali Sundarbans 15-09-2011 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure about a tilt, but QI.--Jebulon 16:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaikhali Sundarbans 15-09-2011 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Though a bit overexposed, the sky preserves a colour structure. Therefore QI to me. --Cayambe 16:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carica papaya leaf 14072012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 12:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carica papaya leaf 14 07 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 12:38, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stop cock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 14:15, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Standard VGA adapter 14072012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poster colors.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR lens 13 07 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 19:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refreshment stall at Ramoji Film City.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 18:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carica papaya young leaf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Tomer T 12:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa centifolia 21072012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratocumulus clouds 20072012 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cumulus clouds 21072012 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good IMO when a (little) dust is removed. I've tried to add a note at the right place. -- JLPC 17:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC)  Dust removed Thank you. -- JDP90 18:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TITAN watch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:02, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea odorata 12032012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF NIKKOR 50mm f1.8D 28-07-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:26, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR 28-07-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:26, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. The object is fully described. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:28, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stop cock (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The wheel is cut out like with a scissor... nevertheless QI to me. --Cayambe 18:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azolla caroliniana 15-09-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unusually. Good. --Florstein 19:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ant on a pumpkin leaf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 06:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR 28-07-2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR 28-07-2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burdwan Medical College Hospital.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG

Hi, You should try to nominate this as featured picture. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa chinensis 04-08-2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golkonda fort, Hyderabad, 15 03 2012 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF NIKKOR 50mm f1.8D 30-07-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR 30-07-2012 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR 30-07-2012 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 06:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cow 02 01 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and nice! --Iifar 14:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga mandir 18 10 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine with me. --Iifar 14:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Submersible pump 30-07-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good sharpness! --Iifar 14:57, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa chinensis 04-08-2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:53, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An oil lamp 17 10 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me (can you add a geotag, please ? ) --JLPC 20:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)  Done Added geocode. -- JDP90 05:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golkonda fort, Hyderabad, 15 03 2012 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golkonda fort, Hyderabad, 15 03 2012 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 08:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nehru Zoological Park, Hyderabad 16032012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hippopotamus amphibius 16032012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golkonda fort, Hyderabad, 15 03 2012 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much better

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A paddy field 03 09 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Size requirements

Hi JDP,

Please note that none of those images of mine on QIC are below the size requirements of 2 Mpixels. They are pretty close, I agree, but not below. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm just mentioning the sizes of your images respectively (on which I've commented), 1.47 megapixels, 1.97 megapixels, 1.24 megapixels, 1.19 megapixels. Regards. -- JDP90 (talk) 18:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

You are quite right, I was still referring to the old standard of 1.2 Mp and didn't notice it had changed! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:47, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. :)

You can upload the higher resolution images if you have them.-- JDP90 (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratocumulus clouds 20072012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 09:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratocumulus clouds 20072012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Firilacroco 09:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garden Ramoji 17 03 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 20:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture Ramoji 17 03 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 14:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa centifolia 30-07-2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add the locality to the file descr. --Cayambe 14:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)  Done Added geocode. Thank you. -- JDP90 16:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Garden, Darjeeling at mist.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Yes; you can move it another date (and let me know). -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 08:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus 26 10 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Danesman1 13:40, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rock Garden, Darjeeling 15 08 2011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 15:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauhinia acuminata 22 08 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carica papaya 22 08 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice.--Jebulon 13:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffa camelopardalis 16082012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 18:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena 24 08 2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena 24 08 2012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carica papaya young leaf 23 08 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 17:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Flower pictures

Hi, Joydeep ! Just a few words to try to help you. The two pictures you've posted today on the QI page were taken with an aperture of f:2.8. In fact they're not bad but they coud be much better IMO if you used a higher aperture to get more depth of field, if you shot a bit closer to the flower, and if you managed to get only leaves in the background. Basically, as 200 iso is a good choice, f:11 should be the rule. Of course,this choice reduces notably the camera speed and, maybe, you'll have to use a tripod. I don't kow a lot about plants photography and I don't know anything about macro photography... but I've been welcomed on Commons by two very kind people who helped me a lot. So I'm trying to do so with you because I think Commons is a collective work even if it's sometimes fun to compete. -- Last reason : I'm a recent contributer (middle of May) but also an old one (almost 64) and I like sharing my experiences in the domain I'm exploring : it's time to do so ! -- I hope my English is not too bad. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 12:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratocumulus clouds 21072012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 16:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonata wrist watch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Below 2MP, do you have it in higher res? - A.Savin 17:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC) Sorry, didn't notice that. Uploaded the higher res image. --JDP90 17:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC) OK to me now. - A.Savin 19:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of lion outside Victoria Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 16:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus 24 08 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:13, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauhinia acuminata 24 08 2012 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Prenn 12:44, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauhinia acuminata 24 08 2012 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 12:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus24 08 2012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI fot me. --JLPC 17:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocimum tenuiflorum 24 08 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena 26 08 2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus 15 03 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light--Citron 09:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa centifolia flowerbud.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena 26 08 2012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauhinia acuminata 16 08 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tea plantation Darjeeling.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus flower bud 31 08 2012 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 07:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauhinia acuminata 31 08 2012 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 10:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauhinia acuminata 31 08 2012 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 10:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bardhaman Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Impatiens balsamina 28 08 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 18:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus 31 08 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It got better Poco a poco 15:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ocimum tenuiflorum 3 09 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena leaf 03 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 17:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus and Rosa indica, West Bengal, India 20120903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:38, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus white, West Bengal, India 20120903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus24 08 2012 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofhouse Burdwan (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roofhouse Burdwan (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa indica stem, West Bengal, India - 20120903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giraffa camelopardalis 16 08 2012 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelopidas agna, West Bengal, India (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 12:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus Double-flowered cultivars, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosa indica, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 09 03 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 19:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NOKIA 1280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 19:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onychargia atrocyana, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 09 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prodasineura verticalis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musca domestica, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 12 03 2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diplacodes trivialis, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Kreuzschnabel 09:44, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nokia 1280 (Produce for India).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'm not sure the phone is notable enough for a scope. COM:VIS says nothing about products. Could I get a second opinion on this? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:14, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment The keys are specific to India. Should reduce the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
  

 Done -- JDP90 (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

• I would word it as "Nokia 1280 (India version)" to be more idiomatic. Also, since Archaeodontosaurus is asking for the scope to become even narrower, I guess my worries about the scope being too narrow are unfounded, so I  Support. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:33, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agriocnemis pygmaea male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 03 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 10:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diplacodes trivialis, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 13:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elytrigia repens, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 12 09 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Prodasineura verticalis female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diplacodes trivialis, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 11:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agriocnemis pygmaea male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image and good caption; Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelopidas agna, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 18 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 10:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Joydeep:

Congrats for the wonderful and encouraging support you got from the great contributors of Commons from the similar field, like Böhringer, Krisp and Archaeo. Keep shooting! -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 05:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much, their support along with yours (including your help in identification) will surely encourage me in doing even better for days to come. Thanks again. -- JDP90 (talk) 16:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

You Forgotten

You forgotten til sign my picture when you promotion it as QI picture the picture is:

. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, done now. --JDP90 (talk) 05:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agriocnemis pygmaea male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 03 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agriocnemis pygmaea male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 03 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Diplacodes trivialis, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Diplacodes trivialis, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceriagrion coromandelianum, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 23 09 2012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 09:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diplacodes trivialis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 09:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyctanthes arbor-tristis flower bud, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 22 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green Marsh Hawk (Orthetrum sabina), Burdwan, West Bengal, India 22 09 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceriagrion coromandelianum, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 23 09 2012 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 07:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthetrum sabina male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request Please add geocode -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. Gocoded now. -- JDP90 (talk) 10:42, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope now -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:59, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceriagrion coromandelianum male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diplacodes trivialis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 14:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceriagrion coromandelianum, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 23 09 2012 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus flower bud, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 12 09 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 14:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ceriagrion coromandelianum, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 23 09 2012 (1).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceriagrion coromandelianum, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 23 09 2012 (1).JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Prodasineura verticalis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg

Hi Joydeep:

While checking the DragonflyIndia group in FB, I saw a similar picture [1] claiming Onychargia atrocyana female. It is available at [2] too. So I'm confused. What is the size of your dragonfly? Very small? Onychargia atrocyana is very small like your previous one (20mm) whereas Prodasineura verticalis is a medium sized (30mm). Finding correct ID is very difficult sometimes; so I suggest you to post at the DragonflyIndia too for complicated cases. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musa acuminata, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 29 09 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--JLPC 11:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelopidas agna (Dark Branded Swift).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment For the scope: the name should be in italics followed by the common name in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. Thank you for correction. --JDP90 (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catopsilia pomona male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 09 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Iifar 19:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green Marsh Hawk (Orthetrum sabina), Burdwan, West Bengal, India 22 09 2012 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 19:52, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Catopsilia pomona male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 09 2012.jpg

Hi Joydeep:

I doubt whether this is Mottled Emigrant, Catopsilia pyranthe. BTW, do you using a closeup glass with a 50mm generic lens or a 50mm macro? Images are very nice. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

I think that's a female

Hi Joydeep, I think this outstanding picture shows a female, see the clearly identifiable ovipositor. I also missing a secondary genital. Can you please change the picture description.
Nice pictures BTW. Greetings --Loz (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachythemis contaminata female (1), Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 12:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachythemis contaminata (6) , Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prodasineura verticalis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prodasineura verticalis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 13 09 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clitoria ternatea , Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Joydeep,

My name is Zoe Bernard and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Foundation blog [3] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/

Given that your photo is scheduled for 22 October 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. Please let me know if you think you'd be interested! You can reach me on my talkpage or by email at: zbernardwikimedia.org

Thanks,

Zbernard (WMF) (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diplacodes trivialis female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 17:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachythemis contaminata (Ditch Jewel) female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Dorsal view may more suitable for VI (unless a set); please check Archaeo's comment at Commons:Valued image candidates/Sympetrum vulgatum (female) sunbathing on a pine branch.jpg -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Changed. -- JDP90 (talk) 14:14, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

 Support now. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agriocnemis pygmaea female, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 11 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --JLPC 11:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

A final note about image layout

JDP90, I accepted that layout rules in Commons is very loose and non-restrictive. But I think you should also agree that such rules, no matter how non-restrictive, exist. Please see COM:LAYOUT. A Commons description page is not for the pleasure of the uploader only; it is meant to help general audience know about free images. So, although I know you love to put the assessment tags (quality image/valued image) on the top because you are proud of it, it is wrong for the audience; they are interested in summary first. Fleet Command (talk) 06:46, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A final note about image layout

Hi. I don't think "other wrong stuff exist" is a good reason. It gives me more incentive to fix. I fix this wrong stuff and then I go fix the others until none remains. So, since you expect me to honor an agreement but you yourself are not ready to honor one, then we do not have an agreement. Fleet Command (talk) 07:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

I won't touch your private files. But I think you meant "Don't touch my uploaded images' description pages". No promises. Maybe I will, according to Commons policy. 07:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Okay. But I still think a compromise would have been to the benefit of both of us. Fleet Command (talk) 07:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A simple one: I don't touch the description pages of your uploads; instead you modify your template to be more user friendly, according to COM:LAYOUT. This gives you a lot of freedom to do almost whatever you like.

How is that? Fleet Command (talk) 08:18, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Just put the assessment tag below description. (Wherever you like, but below description.) Nothing else. Fleet Command (talk) 08:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Other files? You mean like this? The assessment tag is already at the bottom. No change needed. Fleet Command (talk) 08:36, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Do you mind if I fix them? Fleet Command (talk) 09:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agriocnemis pygmaea female 2, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 11 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality for me --Rjcastillo 13:04, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parotis marginata male (with and without activated Hair-pencil).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very didactic --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:18, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

+1 -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 16:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum melongena flower 12 09 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 14:30, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brachythemis contaminata female (1), Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brachythemis contaminata female (1), Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

POTD profile

Thanks so much for your response. If you could contact me via email at zbernardwikimedia.org, I would very much appreciate it. Cheers, Zbernard (WMF) (talk) 21:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agriocnemis pygmaea female, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 17 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 12:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Catopsilia pyranthe (The Mottled Emigrant), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful(It would be useful to put this picture in Gallery. The label will be automatically established.) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
  

 Done. Thank you. --JDP90 (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:05, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agriocnemis pygmaea (Pigmy Dartlet) female (red form).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Durga Burdwan 03 10 2011.JPG

Congrats. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 04:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. --JDP90 (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Congrats! Nice work, Keep coming 'm :-)-- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 17:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. --JDP90 (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atractomorpha lata female, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 17 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 21 10 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --JLPC 22:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nyctanthes arbor-tristis (Night-flowering Jasmine), fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is recommended to give the English vernacular name if it exists.
•  Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I'll surely remember that. --JDP90 (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:47, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Agriocnemis pygmaea female, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 11 10 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agriocnemis pygmaea female, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 11 10 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachythemis contaminata female, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 27 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ComputerHotline 16:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atractomorpha lata, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 27 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga temple , Burdwan, West Bengal, India 21 10 2012 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 19:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyctanthes arbor-tristis fruit, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 25 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polianthes tuberosa, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 25 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 15:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atractomorpha lata (long-headed grasshopper), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:32, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atractomorpha lata (long-headed grasshopper), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Atractomorpha lata (long-headed grasshopper) copulates.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Atractomorpha lata, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 27 10 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Atractomorpha lata, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 27 10 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caterpiller, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 29 10 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnis nerii, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 29 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. - A.Savin 10:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thanks for the amazingly delicate photo of the pygmy dartlet. Sebastianne13 (talk) 04:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. -- JDP90 (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wood work, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. - A.Savin 10:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catopsilia pyranthe male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 09 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catopsilia pyranthe male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 14 09 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nørre Vorupør Coast 2012-11-18.jpg

Dear JPD90,

Thank you for taking your time to review this FPC. Since your vote on the original an alternative has been proposed. Another reviewer has requested that early voters also consider the alternative. Thanks, --Slaunger (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for also taking your time to review the alternative! --Slaunger (talk) 21:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Blonde d'Aquitaine Vallée Campan 2009.jpg

Voting time ends in 3 hours from now on the FP page : thanks again for the nomination of my photo, even if it's definitely not FP... I've just written a few words under the different votes to thank every voter too. I didn't write a word to comment the picture because I think pictures can't be transformed by words. Maybe I'll try again a nomination with another cow, another landscape and another light the next time I'll go to the FP (French Pyrénées) ! -- I hope I'll see some of your pictures soon on Commons. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 15:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachythemis contaminata female (4)' Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 19:48, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 21 10 2012 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durga idol 2011 Burdwan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Daphnis nerii (Oleander Hawk-moth) caterpillar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peacock Pansy, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 05 12 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Merry Christmas !!!

Thanks for the congratulations. Merry Christmas !!!...Best regards, --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:12, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Christmas

Marry Christmas and always a good light ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear Joydeep, thanks a lot for your wishes! I also hope that you have a Merry Christmas among yours and lots of health, success and more great pictures for the coming year! Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

I join the congratulations! Merry Christmas! --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your wishes. Merry christmas and happy new year! Regards--ArildV (talk) 20:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

I am happy of your Christmas greetings. I hope that you can experience a happy Christmas and that the New Year fulfill your wishes.--Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Hi Joydeep! Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Yours faithfully, George -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind message, have a nice Christmas too !--Jebulon (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

For me too. Happy New Year 2013. You're a photographer. There is not much on Commons. Continues we live a great adventure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your greetings. Nice Chrismas to you too and happy new year ! Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 10:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Best wishes

Thanks for the greetings and Merry Christmas and a happy New Year also to you! --Llez (talk) 11:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

My words are joining with Llez! Greetings! --Ivar (talk) 20:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too, and wish you have a very happy new year! --Kadellar (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Joydeep. Merry Christmas and a very happy new year to you too! I still have limited access to Internet. JKadavoor Jee 03:33, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for the late, but I thank you, as my fellow companions, for your greetings and wish you a year full of discoveries, there and in the real life! --Selbymay (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, too:-)--H. Krisp (talk) 17:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the greetings and Merry Christmas and a happy New Year 2013 Joydeep --Cj.samson (talk) 06:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)