User talk:Jklamo/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1

TUSC token 3e8e73a5ec5eadaa5d4ed0164ea3c4eb

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

FP promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Inde bondo8658a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inde bondo8658a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


Votre participation à Wiki Loves Monuments

Bonjour, (for an english translation, scroll down)

Merci pour votre participation au concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 sur Wikimedia Commons. Je me permets de vous laisser ce message pour vous informer, au cas où vous ne l'auriez pas vu, que la participation au concours n'est pas limitée à une seule contribution. Si vous souhaitez soumettre d'autres images dans le cadre de WLM 2013, il vous reste donc jusqu'au 30 septembre.

Si vous avez besoin de précisions sur ce concours n'hésitez pas à revenir vers moi.


English translation : Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 on Wikimedia Commons. I send you this email to inform you, in case you didn't notice, that the contest is not limited to a single contribution. If you have other images of historical monuments then you have until September 30 to contribute to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. If you need information on this contest feel free to contact me. Sincerely.


Symac, WLM2013 - France.

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. --Yuval Y § Chat § 23:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:P1130275.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:P1130275.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. odder 11:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Zvažte, prosím, jestli kategorie Gothic architecture in the Czech Republic a Renaissance architecture in the Czech Republic jsou vhodné. Fasáda je barokní a nic renesančního a gotického na ní není vidět. To, že palác obsahuje také gotické a renesanční konstrukce je pravda, ale přesto považuji tyto kategorie u této fotky za matoucí. --Šandík 21:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Klidne je smazte, netrvam na nich. Ale alespon jedna kategorie stavebniho slohu by tam zustat mela. Na fotce je sice videt hlavne ta klasicistni cast (asi), ale ta goticko-renesanci je v pozadi (snad). Navic zadna lepsi fotka k tematu tu jeste neni. Jinak jsem rad, ze se do tech kategorii aspon obcas nekdo podiva. --Jklamo 21:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

ahoj, jsi upravil tento obrazek. nechces zaroven odebrat ten osklivy podpis na horu na levo? Neni to zakazano podle licence : "I agree to the terms that my images may be freely redistributed and used, that they may be freely modified" - dekuji predem. --Diligent 09:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Ani ne, vim ze je to podle licence mozne, ale neprijde mi to slusne. Ten podpis beru jako oceneni autora snimku, ze sve stovky fotografii z toho fora uvolnil pod GFDL. Aspon jsem ten podpis narovnal, aby nevypadal tak desive. --Jklamo 10:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

SVG Skycrapper comparison

Could you please reupload your SVG with Shanghai tower as for example Skyscrapercompare-2008.svg please, there was a revert on your change, but it could be interesting to more recent comparison. Regards Popolon (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Image is available in archive (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/6/60/20081223202126%21Skyscrapercompare.svg). Problem is, that image is not showing correctly in commons, although looks ok in Inkscape (and i presume that is main reason of revert). --Jklamo (talk) 02:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


POTY voting setup

It would appear we have just met in the middle. Well, crashed, given the number of edit conflicts =) Adam Cuerden (talk)

In any case, thanks a lot - that made a long, boring job only half as painful as it would otherwise have been =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it was boring, but i am happy to help with POTY. I am still disappointed from email voting failure, but it still better to organize it other way now, than nothing. Anyway, i can help with monitoring some voting pages (i can see that some users started already voting, although start of voting is on ferbruary 12). --Jklamo (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Your deletion request

Kolego, když dáváte návrh na smazání, tak si důkladně všímejte nápovědy, jak se to dělá. Ze čtyř potřebných kroků jste dva vynechal. Nevložil jste příslušnou šablonu na stránku obrázku a nevložil jste hlasovací stránku na přehledovou stránku (Deletion request log).

Chápu, že jste si chtěl také vyzkoušet dát návrh na smazání, když je to s tímhle odůvodněním teď v módě, ale ušetřil byste práci sobě i ostatním, kdybyste si nejprve přečetl pravidla pro mazání souborů. --ŠJů (talk) 04:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Na založení návrhu na smazání je tu pěkný javascriptový skriptík, který jsem použil. Bohužel jsem právě nebyl přihlášen, tedy se neprovedl úplně. Za vzniklé komplikace se omlouvám. --Jklamo (talk) 07:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Naštěstí jsme si toho s kolegou všimli a chybějící kroky doplnili – jinak nevím, jak se řeší, když někde zůstane dlouho viset neúplný návrh na smazání: například když byste navrhl na smazání fotku od někoho, kdo již na Commons není aktivní a nevšiml by si toho. Ale tím přečtením pravidel pro mazání jsem myslel i to, že není postačujícím ani vhodným důvodem pro smazání fotky, že už existují jiné fotky téhož objektu. Pokud je fotek nějakého objektu více e je potřebné "vypíchnout" ty superkvalitní anebo nejlépe cílené, tak se to dělá vytvořením stránky s výběrovou galerií, kde navíc je možné fotky i lépe seřadit, popsat atd. Nikoliv tak, že se smažou fotky, které sice kvalitou jsou "dvojkové" či "trojkové", a nehodí se zrovna na výstavu nebo do článku, ale nějaký informační obsah přece jen nesou – což je ostatně i důvod, proč občas do Commons nahrávám i technicky méně kvalitní fotku (doteď jsem považoval za slušné na nedostatky v kvalitě fotky viditelně upozornit, aby se někdo nespletl, ale asi budu muset tuto praxi změnit). A samozřejmě také občas fotku něčeho hledám a vždycky jsem rád, když něco najdu aspoň na nějaké "slabší" fotce, než když nenajdu vůbec. Přitom často můžu hledat věc, kterou fotografující ani neměl na mysli a v záběru se mu octla mimochodem: může jít třeba o různé prvky uličního mobiliáře, vozidla, oblečení, architektonické prvky, stromy atd. Nikdy nevíte předem, co na vaší fotce může jednou někdo hledat či najít. Zbrklé mazání opravdu není dobrou cestou, a kromě jisté skupinky Čechů, kteří sem teď naběhli hlasovat, není ani na Commons podporované. Účelem projektu je spíš obrázky shromažďovat a efektivně je organizovat. Vybírání nejreprezentativnějších fotek je záležitostí článků a výběrových galerií, nikoliv mazání "nadbytečných" fotek. --ŠJů (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

I copied your list...

Hi,

I would say you that I copied your eligible/inelegible list of POTY to Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Voting/Voting register, as suggested by Miya here (so everyone can edit and sign for his edits). Sorry if I didn't ask you before I had done this, however I quoted you for your edits (like here: by Jklamo).

Thanks, --sNappy 20:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


Hi, I am just curious, but how many votes did my picture Image:ChampagnePool-Wai-O-Tapu_rotated_MC.jpg get in the POTY competition? It should be in this gallery User:Jklamo/Nature_views but somehow it is missing there...
Thanks, Christian --Chmehl (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for message, i forgot to add your picture. I corrected it (and checked all other lists). --Jklamo (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Have a barnstar

Hi, Jklamo. As you see, POTY2008 Round 2 is finally open.

Here is the Working Man's Barnstar for your valuable collaboration in POTY2008. Thank you!--miya (talk) 07:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for barnstar, despite i retired from the core part of project after March 18 due to insufficient time. I will try at least translate voting page for second round to my home language and announce running second round on my language wiki. --Jklamo (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Julia Roberts (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Martin H. (talk) 19:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Politická korektnost

Buď prosím politicky korektní a nenech svými názory ovlivňovat svou práci zde na projektu. Wikimedia je založená na principech objektivity a nezávislého úhlu pohledu, proto, prosím, nepoužívej pro pojmenování obrázků pojmenování s negativním nádechem, jako je např. Parouback. Děkuji za pochopení, věřím, že pochopíš, že to míním dobře vzhledem ke kvalitě projektu. 85.132.158.238 00:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Viz Commons:Project scope#Censorship a nasledujici. Nazev souboru File:Parouback.jpg nepovazuji za urazlivy. Duvodem vytvoreni meho cropu bylo to, ze v prislusne kategorii byl dostupny pouze tento snimek, podle meho nazoru ne prilis zdarily. --Jklamo (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
File:071018ImresoltBurjDubai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ZooFari 06:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

POTY2009

Hello. Finally we are going to open POTY2009. Will you help its translations? Thank you!--miya (talk) 07:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

I am happy to hear that! Unfortunately as i am extremly busy now, i will not have help as much as last year. But i will at least make some translations and advertisement on my mother language wiki. --Jklamo (talk) 06:53, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Supranational European Bodies diagram

Hi. I moved your request to Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Supranational European Bodies diagram. I thought I'd let you know just in case you might wonder what happened to it. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

ok thanks. I did not notice table on top with link to Ilustration workshop and in the box "Requesting work" is link "Images to improve": For improvement of images, creation of graphics, etc. --Jklamo (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jklamo,
could you then request undeletion of File:Egon-Schiele-Anton-Josef-Trcka-1914.jpg on January 1st, 2011? The original uploader seems to be no longer active here. --Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Europe Rail Electrification Map

Hi, nice map, requesting a couple of touchups. The Isle of Mann railways are 550v not 25kv (they use ex London Underground stock), Also the way Liverpool is done with two seperate blobs presumably on either side of the Mersey is unclear and makes it look like two sytems, might be worth making one solid orange blob since the outlines cover the river anyway. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Europe_rail_electrification_en.svg --83.104.138.141 02:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

I am author of File:Europe rail electrification.png wich was inteded to be as much as possible general and thus not respect single system expections. Unfortunately user creating SVG version did not respect my intentions. --Jklamo (talk) 01:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Request to use your image

Hey there - nice image of Turners painting (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rain_Steam_and_Speed_the_Great_Western_Railway.jpg) you've uploaded there! Do you mind me asking how did you got the image? Is it a photo that you took? Can I please use the image in a forthcoming book I'm working on? many thanks --86.72.247.121 23:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

As stated in file summary, i found that image on reffered website and upload it with respect to Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. For use image in book you must ensure that linked concept verified in US law is also valid in your jurisdiction copyright law. In case of problem you can use File:Joseph Mallord William Turner 072.jpg wich have more solid copyright status (but lower resolution and strange colour rendering). --Jklamo (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Marina101210907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.131.141 09:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Lego minifigurines

Bonjour Jklamo il y a eu ce message là ; COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Cordialement. --FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

OECD

Estonia is now a full member of the OECD. This map should reflect that. Just letting you know in case you feel like updating it. Cheers. Cantus (talk) 02:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Done. I added Israel as well. It is not so hard with those countries shortcuts. --Jklamo (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I don't know what you mean by countries' shortcuts. Anyway, I haven't found a decent SVG editor for Mac, that's why I don't edit these files. Cantus (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
File:NabC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Name of map

Hello Jklamo: Thanks for your translation of the diagram of supranational European Bodies (File:Supranational European Bodies-en cs.svg). Can you move the file to "Supranational European Bodies-cs.svg"? It would be easyer to find (see list). Cheers --Kolja21 (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I requested move. Anyway, diagram is now outdated (because of Estonia in Eurozone), is there any updated version? --Jklamo (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanx! File:Supranational_European_Bodies-ru.svg ist updated. I made a list: Translations. --Kolja21 (talk) 06:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

File:NabC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.186.139 20:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Good work

Beautiful retouching on the Lewis Hine photograph of the child laborer in South Carolina. It's a wonderful shot. MarmadukePercy (talk) 00:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

překlad POTY 2010

Ahoj, v překladu úvodu Poty 2010 je chyba, ale nemůžu ji opravit, protože je stránka zamčená. Je tam napsáno, že "vybírají uživatelé všech projektů nadace Wikimedia z nejlepších obrázků roku 2009 ten, který se stane Obrázkem roku 2010." To ale není pravda. Všechny obrázky v POTY 2010 jsou nejlepšími obrázky roku 2010. Správný text by měl být "vybírají uživatelé všech projektů nadace Wikimedia z nejlepších obrázků uplynulého roku ten, který se stane Obrázkem roku 2010. S pozdravem --Slfi (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Diky za upozorneni, upsal jsem se. Zamcene to neni (spravce nejsem a editovat to muzu), akorat se clovek musi prokousat tim systemem prekladaciho frameworku, je to na Commons:Picture of the Year/2010/cs. A stejne se mi zda, ze ty preklady nefunguji jak maji :-( --Jklamo (talk) 23:00, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Agama

I removed your edit in the file:AgamaSinaita01 ST 10.jpg picture description as it somehow messed up all other languages but English. Please make sure that other languages are not omitted if you edit it back in. Thanks, ST (talk) 17:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

It did not. It is a feature, not a bug. If there is enough number of languages in description, language selector is activated and only description in your default langage is there, but other langages are still accesible through language selector. See Meta:Language select for details. --Jklamo (talk) 22:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation, I wasn't aware of it, sorry for the re-edits. ST (talk) 09:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Mauro David image

Regarding this, if you give me a ticket number, I'll message them in Italian. Or we can ask Trixt or another native speaker.--Chaser (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

There is no ticket number, i just sent request from my e-mail address (and noted that declaration must be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). I used text from Commons:OTRS with a few explanatory sentences (and noting achievements of the pictures on Commons). --Jklamo (talk) 16:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Odkdy je fotka výkladní skříně "copyright violation" ? To je špatný vtip. Laskavě to znovu zpřístupněte !

Vyfoceni obalky knihy je celkem typicke odvozene dilo (Commons:Derivative works), vyloha zadnou roli nehraje. --Jklamo (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Poděkování z článku Více účtů

Díky, ale poradil byste mi, jak na to, já to neumím

S čím konkrétně? --Jklamo (talk) 13:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Myslím to přesměrování účtů, také nevím (ale myslím že to nejde) změnit uživatele u obrázků.--Harken (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Presmerovani uctu - prilogujete se na ucet, date domovskou stranku uctu, potom editovat a pak vlozite:
#REDIRECT [[User:Harken]]
.
Zmena autora v popisku (to jde), to uz vam koukam celkem jde, se spravnym linkem je to:
[[User:Harken|Harken]]
--Jklamo (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Zoomify update

I just wanted to tell you that I updated my dezoomify script, because I know you have a mirror of this script on your server. This is a minor update, that adds support for the new zoomify HTML5 player. --Lovasoa (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know. It takes me a bit longer time to update script on my mirror. Seems that now works partially also with Chrome. --Jklamo (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Dear POTY-voter, some helpful people made us aware of a mistake in our candidate list. We regret the inconvenience.

Therefore we will add your vote to Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/R1/Into the Jaws of Death 23-0455M edit.jpg after voting is over, if you do not disagree and it is not yet there. If you don't want to have your vote transferred, visit Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/R1/1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg and remove your vote, either by editing the page and removing exactly the line containing your username or clicking the button.

Yours sincerely -- RE rillke questions? 10:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Ahoj! Obávám se, že tato změna problém neřeší. Císařské otisky jsou copyrightovány Českým úřadem zeměměřickým a katastrálním. Tento soubor zjevně vznikl printscreenem ze stránek ČÚZK. Autorská práva sice již pominula, jsou tu ale práva předmětná (sbírková? prvního uveřejnění?). To se nám může nebo nemusí líbit, nicméně tato mapa Josefova je celá pokryta vodoznakem "(c) ČUZK, http://archivnimapy.cuzk.cz", což pravidla Commons nedovolují. Zdraví --Gampe (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Jklamo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:37, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments at the decrat

Hi Jklamo, you stated:

I am not so concerned about his role in "portrait of Jimbo Wales affair", but I am afraid that is not first (or second) time, when he was involved in some controversial matter. Simply loss of confidence for bureaucrat role (as I can see also confidence from co-bureaucrats).

I am curious as to what is the controversial matters I have been involved in which obviously is of concern to you? Just trying to understand your comments. russavia (talk) 06:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 00:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 06:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Jklamo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Jklamo,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo


Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Jklamo, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User reviewer}} or {{User trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 05:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jklamo,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Rain Steam and Speed the Great Western Railway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JimmyGuano (talk) 08:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hrad Švihov od východu.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hrad Švihov od východu.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Jklamo. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:41, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Úřední dílo

Ahoj, rád bych se zeptal, jestli je soukromý dopis spolkové ministryně úředním dílem, jak prezentuje kolega Rosičák (samozřejmě chápu i možnost rozdílné legislativy), resp. je daná licence u souboru v pořádku? Díky.--Kacir (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Dovolím si přispět, když jsem byl zmíněn. Soukromý dopis by to byl v případě, pokud by ho odesilatelka odesílala jako soukromá osoba. Tady byl ovšem použit úřední aparát ministryně. Tedy úřední odpověď je úřední dílo nikoliv soukromý dopis.--Rosičák (talk) 14:13, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Přece vše, co kancelář ministryně zpracuje a vyřídí v soukromé korespondenci, ještě podle mého názoru automaticky není úředním dílem, neboli nevím, pod jakou skupinu by měl být zařazen z hlediska vymezení úředního díla; ničemu takovému neodpovídá (a ani mi není jasné, jak může sama asistentka signovat a vydávat úřední díla např. bez plné moci oprávněné osoby).--Kacir (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Co na to říct... Snad jen to, že Autorský zákon v § 3 odst. a) (Výjimky z ochrany podle práva autorského ve veřejném zájmu nehovoří docela jasně) a výčet úředních děl na stránce českojazyčné Wikipedie není (a nemůže tak být úplný). Ten dopis naplňuje ustanovení § 3 odst. a)... a jiná taková díla, u nichž je veřejný zájem na vyloučení z ochrany... Zveřejnění dopisu v zájmu zpřesnění údajů na Wikipedii veřejným zájmem je a naplňuje zmiňované ustanovení. Neopominutelný je i fakt, že byla odpověď za tímto účelem vyžádána.--Rosičák (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Nemyslím si ani to, že přechýlení jmen na cs Wikipedii je veřejným zájmem, ale nebudu zde dále "spamovat". Zdraví--Kacir (talk) 16:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kdyby si o nepotřebnosti odpovědi myslela paní ministryně totéž co Vy, odpověď by nikdy nepřišla. A ano, konec diskusí na cizí stránce.--Rosičák (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Zdravím, němčinou nevládnu a tedy si na interpretaci § 5 německého autorského zákona (viz Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany) netroufnu. Analogicky to dovozovat z českého autorského zákona není vhodné. Zkuste německou nebo copyrightovou "lípu". --Jklamo (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Díky. Dané stanovisko by snad i bylo možné vykládat v souladu s odkazovaným: "By German law, documents are in the public domain (gemeinfrei) ... if they have been released as an official announcement or for public information," i když se zde nejedná o oficiální stanovisko ministerstva v soukromé záležitosti.
Přesto vidím jeden zásadní problém — neověřitelnost soukromého dopisu v důsledku absence zveřejnění. Neboli, takových dopisů s jakýmkoli obsahem si mohu vyrobit kolik chci, a pak je zde vydávat třeba za oficiální stanoviska.--Kacir (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kolego, pokud mně nevěříš, měls to napsat hned. Mimochodem o neověřitelnosti nemůže být řeč. Ověřit to lze. Stačí napsat odesilateli, odkázat na ten dotyčný dokument a ověřit, zda obsah pochází od nich.--Rosičák (talk) 20:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Omlouvám se ještě za reakci ke spojení "pokud mně nevěříš". Já ti věřím, ale Wiki přece není založená na víře, ale na ověřitelnosti jako základním kameni věrohodnosti. Proto jsem vkládal danou šablonu požadující potvrzení věrohodnosti autorem via OTRS, jinak vlastně ani nemá smysl vést debatu o PD-GermanGov. Pokud píšeš: "Ověřit to lze. Stačí napsat odesilateli," tak to jsi právě ty měl udělat před nahráním, aby se u souboru objevila šablona OTRS, nikoli, že si to každý může ověřit sám dopisem autorovi.--Kacir (talk) 20:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Your mirror of dezoomify

Hello!

You host a mirror of a script I wrote (dezoomify). You created this mirror some time ago, and it isn't up to date anymore. Can you please update it? You can find the source code on github. I'm asking that because your mirror comes first for the query "dezoomify" on Google.

Thanks,

--Lovasoa (talk) 09:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for letting me know. I will try to update it to the newest version. I tried some updates in past, but still the one of the oldest versions worked the best for me.
Anyway I had no idea that my mirror come first for Google search and have no idea why, as I mention it only once at Help:Zoomable images#Dezoomify V2. --Jklamo (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I have updated the script (and left the older version as well). Anyway none of these works currently for my "home archive" :-( --Jklamo (talk) 19:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
They seem to insert the dezoomify viewer with a piece of javascript. You can still download the image by looking up what the url of the tiles are, and removing TileGroupn/x-y-y.jpg at the end. Then you enter this url in dezoomify. (for instance http://amp.bach.cz/mrimage/pragapublica/zoomify/cz/archives/CZ-321100010/NAD-3/dao/images/0023/7df85e98e52bcf0c8a248e7dbd957aa0.jpg/). If you want to report other sites that don't work well with dezoomify, don't hesitate to open issues on github. And can you please give an example of a site that works with the old version and not with the newest?
--Lovasoa (talk) 09:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your Dezoomify mirror

Hello Jklamo: I have problem with your dezoomify mirror dezoomify, it's not workable except for national gallery images, but it worked well some time in the past, and even I use the older version of the sciprt, it does not load images at all, can you pls check what is wrong with the script?

Dancorpse--Dancorpse (talk) 02:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:ShelleyDuvall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Queryzo (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jklamo,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

SJM-VRFEATURE-0608 (30129871643).jpg

Why did you tag File:SJM-VRFEATURE-0608 (30129871643).jpg as not being found, after the bot had already found the image? If you were meaning to mark it for deletion because of Flickr washing, that requires nominating the file, like I did. Elisfkc (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Abebe Bikila

Abebe Bikila is in 1964 Summer Olympics athletes which is in Athletics at the 1964 Summer Olympics therefore having the file in both Abebe Bikila and Athletics at the 1964 Summer Olympics is redundant. Please stop reverting. Janweh64 (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Nope. Having the photo in category of athlete does is not making the category identifying the event redundant. Having athlete category in event category does not change that. --Jklamo (talk) 19:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Thank you very much for your kind help, really appreciated. Moyanbrenn (talk) 18:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Thanks again for your support of yesterday Moyanbrenn (talk) 09:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Inkscape

Hello Jklamo, just for your information, while editing the File:High Speed Railroad Map of Europe.svg, I noticed that you are using Inkscape 0.48.5. For your information this is now an old version and the latest stable version, 0.92.1, includes a lot of improvements (points can glue to shapes, usage of the css-recommended 96 dpi instead of 90 dpi, etc.). Best regards, Carfois (talk) 01:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bo Derek on the Academy Awards Red Carpet.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Descriptions in File:High Speed Railroad Map of Europe.svg

It seems the descriptions in File:High Speed Railroad Map of Europe.svg differ between languages, at least for Finnish vs English. The Finnish says the theoretical speeds are depicted, while the English (and es, fr, it) says it is the operational ones. Which one is correct? And is the error also in other languages (I do not know all of them). --LPfi (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Kontrola licence

Ahoj, našel jsem, že můžeš kontrolovat licence, tak tě chci poprosit o schválení File:Accessreel.com Interviews - Amy Acker.webm. Nahráno z Vimea, licence je tam trochu schovaná - pod názvem videa se musí kliknout na "More" a piktogramy jsou takové šedé a ne moc dobře viditelné. Díky. --Harold (talk) 19:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Hotovo.--Jklamo (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 en Perú
Hola Jklamo, queremos agradecerte especialmente por ser el octavo contribuidor más generoso en esta edición de Wiki Loves Monuments en Perú, gracias a tu trabajo muchas personas podrán acceder libremente al conocimiento sobre el Patrimonio Cultural del Perú alojado en Wikipedia y otros proyectos de Wikimedia. Te invitamos a seguir colaborando y compartiendo conocimento libre para todas y todos. Con cariño y un profundo agradecimiento del equipo de Wikimedistas de Perú y de WLM 2017 en Perú

--Ovruni (talk) 07:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Request: File:Rail density map.svg needs to be corrected.

Hello.

The File:Rail density map.svg needs to be corrected because Myanmar (5,403 km), Laos (4 km) and Afghanistan (25 km) have railways which are operational, but erroneously appear in the map as having no railways. Please see the sources.

Please see the sources.

31.200.19.48 08:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for suggestions, I have updated the map. But next time it will be better to report it at map talk page.--Jklamo (talk) 22:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your contribution and thank you very much for your advice.
Hello. This IP-User has asked me previously and has not listed any source for this change request. Do you have a source for the changes? Whithout any source link, I don't want to accept this update, only by request from an IP-User. Please tell me here, where in the web to find the information about existing railways in this states. Antonsusi (talk) 12:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Rail density map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A2D2 (talk) 21:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

File:World Metro Systems.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A2D2 (talk) 22:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Request

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Czech?

 
Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Jklamo, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Strakhov (talk) 20:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

WSC2019 meeting

FYI this meeting is planned at the WikiSummit in Berlin at the end of March. All organizers and representatives of national chapters are invited or should take a look at the end with the summary of the event.

This message is left to everyone who was involved in the 2017 edition. please spread the news to whom might be interested.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Kategorie Villages

Zdravím, kolego.

Šablonu {{Villages-municipalities}} jsem před 11 lety (v dubnu 2008) nevytvořil svévolně, ale na základě konsensu, který vznikl v diskusi o tom, jak kategorie českých obcí a vesnic uspořádat. S kolegy, kteří se kategorizací českých obcí a sídel zabývali, jsme se tehdy dohodli, že kategorie s názvem "villages" budeme v rámci České republiky používat nikoliv přímo pro všechny vesnice, ale pro tzv. venkovské obce - tj. obce, které nejsou městysem ani městem. Tehdy jsem měl podobný názor jako Vy, ale kolega Miaow Miaow, který na kategorizaci odvedl spoustu práce a kterého si velmi vážím jako inteligentního a nekonfliktního, mě tehdy víceméně přesvědčil pro toto řešení. Respektive šlo hlavně spíš o to mít vůbec v kategorizaci nějaký jednotný systém, ne o to, prosadit něčí vizi proti nějaké jiné. (Nyní jsem na problém narazil v souvislosti s tím, že tři z vesnic patřících k městu Blatná nebyly vůbec zařazeny v jeho kategorii, což je právě důsledek toho, když kategorizace není důsledně skladebná a tedy přehledná a co nejjednodušší.

Právě proto, že toto pojetí je odlišné než jaké je dnes na české Wikipedii, jsem toto upozornění už před 11 lety vložil prostřednictvím šablony do záhlaví všech stránek, kterých se týká, aby to bylo jasné všem a aby si toho nikdo nemohl nevšimnout. Už tehdy bylo jasné, že je to jistý kompromis, který má i své nevýhody, ale dosud většina kolegů tento systém respektovala – snad tedy právě s výjimkou několika okresů v jižních Čechách, kde nebyl uplatňován důsledně a někteří kolegové ho možná ještě nestačili buď zaregistrovat, nebo se s ním smířit.

Pokud bychom nyní chtěli od tohoto systému ustoupit, pak bychom se museli domluvit na celkové změně pro všechny obce v celé republice. Nejsem proti, ale bude to spousta práce. Nejprve bude potřeba v mnoha tisících případů odlišit kategorii pro obce od kategorie pro stejnojmennou vesnici atd.: tento problém jsme ještě nevyřešili ani v případě článků na Wikipedii. Budete-li tomu chtít věnovat čas a energii, můžeme začít přemýšlet a diskutovat o tom, jestli se do té celkové změny pustíme systematicky. Do té doby bych spíše doporučoval respektovat tu šablonu.

Chápu, že z urbanistického hlediska je zejména v jižních Čechách zřetelněji zachován rozdíl mezi sídly vesnického typu a městskými jádry, a že když člověk chce hledat obrázky vesnic, rád by je měl pohromadě v nějakých specifických kategoriích. V jiných regionech je to složitější: mnohá sídla mají smíšený charakter, původní vesnice vrůstají do měst nebo se proměňují v města, developerské satelity už nejsou vesnicemi v pravém smyslu slova, těžko se hledá hranice mezi "osadou" ("částí vesnice") a "vesnicí" atd. To jsou také důvody, proč za základ kategorizace bylo vzato administrativní členění území na obce, části obcí, případně katastry, a formální status obcí, nikoliv jejich urbanistický charakter, jehož hodnocení může být v mnoha případech subjektivní a sporné.

Díky za pochopení. --ŠJů (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jklamo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

File:COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Europe.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:6C7C:EE1C:7C27:CC2D 12:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:NabC.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NabC.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sourced to file since deleted as copyvio or missing Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Supranational European Bodies-cs.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AndrejSalkovic (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

Czech Wiki Photo
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jklamo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Purfleet and the Essex Shore as seen from Long Reach.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Purfleet and the Essex Shore as seen from Long Reach.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Update request

Hello.

Can you update the maps File:High Speed Rail Turkey.PNG, File:Rail transport map of Turkey.png, File:Rail transport map of Turkey-m.png, File:YHT Service (2021).png, File:YHT Turkey 1741x733.png, File:Networks of Major High Speed Rail Operators in Europe.gif, File:High Speed Railroad Map of Europe.svg and File:Western Asia HSR.svg? The Konya-Karaman high speed rail line was opened on 8 January 2022. (The average speed for high speed rails in Turkey is 250 km/h.)

Here is a source: https://www.raillynews.com/2022/01/konya-karaman-high-speed-train-line-will-save-63-million-TL-annually/

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello.
I retract the request, because all the other related maps I listed in the top paragraph, have been updated by another user, to whom I also sent an update request.
Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 21:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jklamo,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Supranational European Bodies-cs.svg is out of date. Russia is no longer a member of Council of Europe Could you update it? Thanks again. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Jklamo/Archive 1,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)