User talk:Jaymyang
Image Tagging Image:DSC00647.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00647.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ ϑ 14:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:CRW 0037.JPG was uncategorized on 8 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:慶誠宮 孟母三遷.JPG was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:大士爺廟 十八羅漢.JPG was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:慶誠宮 廟門.JPG was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:大士爺廟.JPG was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:DR2700 97kph.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:東勢隧道.jpg was uncategorized on 14 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:東勢站-S.jpg was uncategorized on 14 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:梅子 s.jpg was uncategorized on 14 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:West Towson Elementary School "Go West!".JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Wifi Connected Caledonian Sleeper.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
廣九直通車 (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
請問
[edit]您好,請你看我發現你寫的「光華號」條目被合併,而提出合併討論的時間是4月20日,那一天正好是提名人在維基共享資源這裡對DR2700展開編輯戰。然而,我翻查光華號的編輯歷史,其實那條目早在2014年就建立了,你看:[1]。2014年至現在,算起來也將近十年,十年期間是無人疑問,但提名人的行事作風卻是無視維基百科光華號所寫,反而他自己宣稱說:「DR2700就是給光華號使用的車型」。
我不確定他是否因為編輯戰才跑去維基百科提出合併討論,但我知道我建立Kuanghwa_Express分類就是根據「光華號」條目。當時發生編輯戰的原因,就是那位提名人相信他自己查到的資料,可是維基百科「光華號」條目所寫的,其實並不是像他這麼說。因為光華號是載客服務時期 (1966年至1979年) 才出現,而且條目也有強調,光華號於1979年停駛後,只有在特定活動才會重新掛牌,這些在維基共享資源是有照片可以佐證的。遺憾的是,提名人始終堅持「DR2700等於是光華號」想法,所以我想找你指教。
我想請教的問題是:
- 如果按照提名人的想法來看,不管DR2700是否只在1966年至1979年期間營運使用,只要是該車的車款自1966年購買來台,即使是1979年停駛,在還沒被報廢之前,它的一生都是屬於光華號,這是對的嗎?
- 維基共享資源建立的DR2700分類是網羅所有以DR2700為編號的各種鐵路車廂與列車,當然也包含工程維修車 ( 例如這種 ),那麼請問光華號是否有僅限於客車?換個問題,DR2700被挪為工程車使用,這也能算光華號嗎?
以上二個問題,其實是與維基共享資源有關,因為它的答案牽動著DR2700與Kuanghwa_Express之間的歸類問題。
儘管對方引用台灣後山鐵道風華一書,但憑他信口說他看過書中是怎麼寫,實際上全文是寫怎麼樣,其實我們並不知道,有沒有可能被他斷章取義,我們也不確定,所以我不敢貿然迎合他。因此我只能選擇維基百科,至少它是攤在陽光下,大家都能看得到,隨時可以接受檢驗,有問題也能在陽光下提出,只不過維基百科沒人反映,除了提名人他一個人跑來維基共享資源質疑,也不知道他是不是來找碴的。--125.230.68.104 11:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- 我有後山鐵道風華。但我在半夜兩點翻遍了我家書庫還是間找不到,先說說個人意見。
- 光華號是車種名,DR2700是車輛型式,這兩個是不一樣的。就像自強號這個category,我覺得只要是與自強號有關的媒體資料都可放入,例如EMUs100,200,300,3000;TEMUs1000,2000;DRs2800,2900,3000,3100,這些車輛用於行駛自強號的時候,都可以放進去。但是今天如果出現一張DR3000型在屏東線行駛區間車時的相片,我覺得不是很適合;反過來說,這張照片就很適合放在DR2900/3000 的category,或是「台鐵柴聯車」。坦白說我實在看不懂那個爭執的邏輯。
- 我認為「光華號」的category,可以把1966-1979年的DR2700相片放進去,但1979年7月15日以後的DR2700不再以光華號之名行駛,除非是特別列車有headmark的相片,否則不應歸入「光華號」。另一方面,「光華號」的category,也可以放進LDR2300/2400行駛的光華號照片。
- 基本上是很簡單的邏輯集合問題。我是認為這問題不是在鄭仁崇怎麼寫。有諸多資料顯示台鐵的光華號包括西幹線DR2700行駛的班車,以及台東線由LDRs2300/2400行駛的班車。DR2700不等於光華號,光華號也不等於DR2700。
- 再說條目。關於台東線光華號與西幹線光華號合併的問題,我也沒多少意見;因為台東線當年也有行駛柴對快跟普通車,這兩個車種都沒獨立出來,所以把台東線光華號跟西幹線的光華號合併成一個條目,我覺得也是合理的。
- 但是DR2700那邊我就有不少意見,其實文筆我覺得並不好(這見仁見智;我是老人,不喜歡那些拖泥帶水的文字,也不喜歡那些跟題目無關的東西。我在討論有提到,希望將關於第一段柴油客車的簡史,移到其他條目)。查歷史可以看到,DR2700跟光華號條目雖然都不是我創的,但是在黎明期我參與很多。不過呢,舊的研究也不一定都是正確的,新的研究也許可以發現以前的不明之處並加以改正,這點我倒是沒有意見;不過把相片幾乎都換成現在靜態保存時的相片,有點像是把條目寫成個人著作,也不尊重以前曾經為這個題目出過不少力的人(DR2700條歷史中目的第位個編輯者Encino,如果我沒記錯的話,1990年代就是各BBS鐵道版的著名車輛研究專家)。不過既然已經變成了優良條目,現在又有不知道打哪來的在搞編輯戰,我就算了。我的青春跟時間不應該浪費在維基百科上。
Jaymyang (talk) 18:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- 發現這裡有「後山鐵道風華」的全文。
- 1. 如果按照提名人的想法來看,不管DR2700是否只在1966年至1979年期間營運使用,只要是該車的車款自1966年購買來台,即使是1979年停駛,在還沒被報廢之前,它的一生都是屬於光華號,這是對的嗎?
- 我認為DR2700不等於光華號。光華號早就被台鐵取消了,但是車子還在,聽到很多人都叫他白鐵仔。不過的確在1980年代初期還有一些記者將北部區間柴對快發生的事故,直接用「光華號」代稱DR2700。
- 2.維基共享資源建立的DR2700分類是網羅所有以DR2700為編號的各種鐵路車廂與列車,當然也包含工程維修車 ( 例如這種 ),那麼請問光華號是否有僅限於客車?換個問題,DR2700被挪為工程車使用,這也能算光華號嗎?
- 改為工程車的車輛,應視為DR2700的改型或是衍生車種(個人傾向於歸為改型),不算光華號。
- 以上Jaymyang (talk) 04:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)