User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive29

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul.Krakowska 12 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:44, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul.Krakowska 12 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:44, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul.Krakowska 12 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:44, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 24 w Wapiennikach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:32, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Domy w Wapiennikach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Domy w Wapiennikach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Domy w Wapiennikach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 8 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 8 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 8 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 8 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you narrow the crop to get rid of the rain water pipe? --Poco a poco 13:23, 15 August 2018 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 21:35, 15 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 10 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 6 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 6 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 3 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 3 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 6 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, ul. Sudecka 3 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted CW.--Peulle 10:32, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)OK--Peulle 21:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 15:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:19, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 10 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, pl. Warszawy 4 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rynek w Dusznikach-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, verticals well done. Shadows at left part are not really nice, but unfortunately unavoidable --Michielverbeek 08:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 10 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rynek w Dusznikach-Zdroju 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. A crop on the left might be considered. --Peulle 08:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Rynek w Dusznikach-Zdroju 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 08:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Armenak Margarian 09:40, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Dusznikach-Zdroju 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jarków 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jarków 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 14:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Trójcy w Jeleniowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 E-papieros mod 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), box mod WISMEC Reuleaux RX GEN3 and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Evangelical cemetery in Polanica-Zdrój, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
102 Słone Street in Kudowa-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Warszawy Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Warszawy Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, u. Słowackiego 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Trójcy w Jeleniowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Trójcy w Jeleniowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Jeleniowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Jeleniowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Warszawy Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, oriel windows.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Pending Most valued review candidates

Hi, Jacek

the images must be in "discussion" mode. Do not forget to correct the distortion of the first appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Sudecka Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Sudecka Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Sudecka Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Krakowska Street in Duszniki-Zdrój, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Reklama stacji paliw w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Reklama stacji paliw w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica Czaszek w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kaplica Czaszek w Kudowie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dzwonnica w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 10 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:29, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Lewińskie, Gomoła.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Lewińskie, Lewińska Czuba.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church in Kudowa-Zdrój, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutheran church in Kudowa-Zdrój, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Kudowa-Zdrój, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dzwonnica w Kudowie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dzwonnica w Kudowie-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zespół kościoła św. Bartłomieja w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:11, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zespół kościoła św. Bartłomieja w Kudowie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:24, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zespół kościoła św. Bartłomieja w Kudowie-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Kudowa-Zdrój, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:38, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Kudowa-Zdrój, relief of Jesus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Kudowa-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:27, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace park in Jeleniów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:22, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Lewinie Kłodzkim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Lewinie Kłodzkim 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Lewinie Kłodzkim 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kudowa Słone-Náchod border crossing, border guard buildig.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Słone (Kudowa-Zdrój), monument to friendship scouts and pioneers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Orlickie, Polskie Wrota pass, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I didn't see any other better representation of the mountain pass. It's geocoded and appears to meet all criteria. Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Ercé (talk) 05:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park and palace in Jeleniów, coat of arms of Mutius family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zajęcza Street in Kłodzko, advertisement of petrol stations.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Słone (Kudowa-Zdrój), fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lewin Kłodzki, fire station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przystanek autobusowy w Roszycach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 14:04, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Plebania w Lewinie Kłodzkim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Lewinie Kłodzkim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Lewinie Kłodzkim 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Domy w Roszycach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Roszycach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom przy ul. Słone 102 w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:35, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom przy ul. Słone 102 w Kudowie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom przy ul. Słone 102 w Kudowie-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Pending Most valued review candidates

Hi, Jacek
I closed the first image of the list. I hope it will work because there is a renamed file problem that could block the bot.
These closing procedures are very long, it takes at least 20minutes. I want to vote for the following ones, but maybe it would be useful for you to learn to close these procedures, what do you think? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: I'd prefer not to do this by myself as I'm not very into technical side of Commons. But if that bothers you maybe you should ask a Polish admin to explain it to me.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, coat of arms of former brevery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 8, 02.jpg You already have the label ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Sharper, so better in scope. The other photo isn't letting me edit the nom, so how do I oppose it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Because after receiving VI I changed the name of the file.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:56, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

The resolution is better but there is a big problem of distortion. The object is round, and this point is much better on the first image. It's easy to correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Looks better in review size because the other one has a line on the top.--Peulle (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

1. Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 10, 02.JPG:  
2. 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 8 3.jpg: +3  <--

=>

File:Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 10, 02.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. 

File:2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 8 3.jpg: Promoted<--

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, western frontage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Lewin Kłodzki.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. I also like the contrasting old and new aspects. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Szczytna train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support (with small change) Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Czermna, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Bartholomew in Czermna, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom przy ul. Słone 102 w Kudowie-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality--Lmbuga 10:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality--Lmbuga 10:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality--Lmbuga 10:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:04, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Intresting ligzt/shadow composition --TheRunnerUp 09:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom przy ul. Słone 102 w Kudowie-Zdroju 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Narodzenia NMP w Kudowie-Zdroju 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Remiza OSP w Kudowie-Zdroju.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pomnik przyjaźni harcerzy i pionierów w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pomnik przyjaźni harcerzy i pionierów w Kudowie-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Remiza OSP w Lewinie Kłodzkim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szynobus na wiadukcie w Lewinie Kłodzkim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 10:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szynobus na wiadukcie w Lewinie Kłodzkim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:55, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Szalejowie Górnym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szczytna, ul. Piekielna Góra 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:39, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Plebania w Lewinie Kłodzkim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would crop the person on the right side --TheRunnerUp 09:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Done@TheRunnerUp: --Jacek Halicki 08:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)  Support IMO its ok now --TheRunnerUp 10:02, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Łagów (powiat świebodziński), town hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish Gate in Łagów, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope and Useful. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polish Gate in Łagów, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. ~MOHEEN ^{(keep talking)} 03:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzesniowskie Lake, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used. ~MOHEEN ^{(keep talking)} 03:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Domy w Zielonych Ludowych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 10:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Domy w Zielonych Ludowych 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 10:49, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szczytna, ul. Borowina 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 08:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szczytna, ul. Borowina 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szczytna, ul. Bobrownica 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzesniowskie Lake, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łagów Castle, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łagów Castle, main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łagów Castle, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Łagów Castle, defensive wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:28, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szczytna, ul. Bobrownicka 17 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hmmm not 100% sure, but are the sides leaning out a bit? Please check the perspective.--Peulle 10:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)  Comment Promotion and an issue. Not good. @Jacek Halicki: please check for the issue. --XRay 12:18, 5 September 2018 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Cmentarz ewangelicki w Polanicy-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A large light difference. Contrast is well done, shadows not too strong or too much reduced --Michielverbeek 09:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Cmentarz ewangelicki w Polanicy-Zdroju 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Cmentarz ewangelicki w Polanicy-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Duszniki-Zdrój, Paul Dengler memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The colour and sharpness look better in this one, I think.--Peulle (talk) 10:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

1.  Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 9, 03.JPG:  
2.  2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 4.jpg: +1  <--
=>
1.File:Duszniki Zdrój, Rynek 9, 03.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. 
2.File:2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, Rynek 9 4.jpg: Promoted<--

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Sokola Dąbrowa, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus church in Gościeszyn, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus church in Gościeszyn, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain in Lubniewice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Słowackiego Street in Duszniki-Zdrój.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This one is better, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 10:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Duszniki Zdrój, Słowackiego 1, 01.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. 2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, u. Słowackiego 1.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Duszniki Zdrój, Słowackiego 1, 01.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:2018 Duszniki-Zdrój, u. Słowackiego 1.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 17:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Cmentarz ewangelicki w Polanicy-Zdroju 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Front chłodny w Kotlinie Kłodzkiej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Front chłodny w Kotlinie Kłodzkiej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support That category could use some organization. Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:55, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Lubniewice, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope IMO, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:53, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Lubniewice, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Riding hall in Gościeszyn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope, Useful and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Outbuilding in Gościeszyn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:58, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki, exsposure from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Lewin, kościół, 03.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. 2018 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Lewinie Kłodzkim 2.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Lewin, kościół, 03.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:2018 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Lewinie Kłodzkim 2.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 15:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GrandCelinien 08:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Szczytnej 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Szczytnej 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GrandCelinien 08:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Szczytnej 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GrandCelinien 08:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 31A w Ruszowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Jeleniów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Jeleniów, kościół, 01.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope)
2. 2018 Kościół św. Trójcy w Jeleniowie 2.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Jeleniów, kościół, 01.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:2018 Kościół św. Trójcy w Jeleniowie 2.jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Lewińska Czuba, Wzgórza Lewińskie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Lewińska Czuba, Wzgórza Lewińskie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why two times the same image? --TheRunnerUp 10:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

RGB mode for a greyscale image

You changed the following file from greyscale to RGB, why? File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1969-054-16, Reinhard Heydrich.jpg Hohum (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

You've done it again. Why? Hohum (talk) 21:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

@Hohum: It's difficult to explain and I do not speak English well. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przełęcz Polskie Wrota, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Przełęcz Polskie Wrota, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Chrystusa Pana w Kudowie-Zdroju 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:12, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Chrystusa Pana w Kudowie-Zdroju 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gródek, Wzgórza Lewińskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Ruszowicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Ruszowicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kolumna maryjna w Ruszowicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Budynki przejścia granicznego Kudowa Słone-Náchod 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 08:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ruszowice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you crop a good portion of the road, it is the main subject of the image, but I don't think that it's the intention --Poco a poco 12:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Jacek Halicki 10:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Better --Poco a poco 19:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Nowej Wsi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 11:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Nowej Wsi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Gliśnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Gliśnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 16:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Budynki przejścia granicznego Kudowa Słone-Náchod 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment the fences on the bottom should be cropped. --Carschten 08:20, 10 September 2018 (UTC)@Carschten:  Done--Jacek Halicki 08:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)  Support good! --Carschten 09:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stacja kolejowa w Szczytnej 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit darker would be an improvement --Michielverbeek 08:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)@Michielverbeek: In my opinion the picture is not too bright. I suppose your monitor is calibrated incorrectly, as I see most of your pictures are a little bit too dark.--Jacek Halicki 16:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Sorry, I looked to your photo again and I have changed my mind. I have also looked to my monitor again and I don't see that anything is wrong. Thanks for the advice --Michielverbeek 17:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Gliśnie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Łagowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ratusz w Łagowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 17:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Brama Polska w Łagowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Brama Polska w Łagowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jezioro Trześniowskie (Ciecz) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jezioro Trześniowskie (Ciecz) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jezioro Trześniowskie (Ciecz) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jezioro Trześniowskie (Ciecz) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Milan Bališin 17:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Jezioro Trześniowskie (Ciecz) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Milan Bališin 17:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek joannitów w Łagowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek joannitów w Łagowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Milan Bališin 17:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek joannitów w Łagowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 10:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek joannitów w Łagowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:24, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek joannitów w Łagowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Sokolej Dąbrowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:25, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Sokolej Dąbrowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 10:26, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Szubieniczna, Wzgórza Lewińskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness/details, exposition are OK. QI. Dmitry Ivanov 15:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Sokolej Dąbrowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI imo. --ArildV 21:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:18, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Brama Polska w Łagowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please rotate it little bit to the left (non clockwise) for perspective? The roof and one white building is burnt for my eyes. Bricks in shadow could be darker, too.--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:11, 15 September 2018 (UTC)@Hans-Jürgen Neubert:  Done--Jacek Halicki 20:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC) Better now! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 15:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Gościeszynie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Gościeszynie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As (nearly) allways: Good quality. --Smial 09:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Gościeszynie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Gościeszynie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Najświętszego Serca Pana Jezusa w Gliśnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Tower's a little bright on one side but generally OK --Daniel Case 05:22, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Lovely castle! --Podzemnik 10:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gliśnie 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some CA, see top right --Poco a poco 17:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)@Poco a poco:  Done--Jacek Halicki 08:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Rbrechko 09:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Gościeszynie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Stanisława Biskupa w Gościeszynie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd prefer with the road cropped out (as with one of the church pictures you nominated along) but that's irrelevant, good quality. --Trougnouf 18:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek joannitów w Łagowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Actually works better than I thought it would (you could still damp down those highligts in the center, though) --Daniel Case 19:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gomoła, Wzgórza Lewińskie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House No. 22 in Nowa Łomnica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House No. 9 in Kamieńczyk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nowa Łomnica, statue of John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Gościeszyn, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Description of the image is very short, try to expand the description --Adámoz (talk) 17:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

@Adámoz: IMO description is good enough. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:49, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Left side is leaning right a bit but just a bit :) --Podzemnik 08:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Gościeszynie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 08:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stara Łomnica, statue of John of Nepomuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Florian church in Szklarnia, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Family church in Piotrowice Górne, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stajnia w Gościeszynie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stajnia w Gościeszynie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ujeżdżalnia w Gościeszynie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Ujeżdżalnia w Gościeszynie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Warszawska Street in Międzylesie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Police Station in Międzylesie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kamieńczyk-Mladkov Petrovičky border crossing.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Międzylesie, statue of wolve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  SupportBlessed are those who have the freedom of panorama! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maria Śnieżna sanctuary, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Fontanna w Lubniewicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Fontanna w Lubniewicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Fontanna w Lubniewicach 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Lubniewicach 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Park w Gościeszynie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stable in Gościeszyn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Sędzisz, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Słupiec, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzy Kopki.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Train station in Domaszków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wambierzyce i bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wambierzyce i bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Wambierzyce i bazylika Nawiedzenia NMP 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek w Bolkowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Zamek w Bolkowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Lubniewicach 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the perspective on the right side. Maybe the church is just learning outwards. --ArildV 14:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)@ArildV:  Done--Jacek Halicki 20:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC) Support Thank you.--ArildV 16:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)  Support --ArildV 16:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Park w Gościeszynie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gompa Drophan Ling in Darnków, main building and stupa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gompa Drophan Ling in Darnków, Mani stones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gompa Drophan Ling in Darnków, Mani stone with Om mani padme hum mantra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. I completed the description in English, because it was not esaily understandable fot those not familiar with buddhist culture. Skimel (talk) 07:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gompa Drophan Ling in Darnków, Dharmachakra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Pakoszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Pakoszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Pakoszowie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Pakoszowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 7 w Słoszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Oficyna w Gościeszynie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It would be better without that car's front (looks like the angle could have avoided it, though a crop could improve it) but a QI nonetheless --Trougnouf 23:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Pakoszowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 10:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 7 w Słoszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 10:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 08:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, great clouds --Podzemnik 09:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 09:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gołaczów 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:30, 29 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gołaczów 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Gompa Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Pałac w Pakoszowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Krucza Kopa, Góry Stołowe, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Krucza Kopa, Góry Stołowe, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Granada 08:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 08:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:27, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 10 w Kamieńczyku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 10 w Kamieńczyku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 10 w Kamieńczyku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 112 w Starym Waliszowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 112 w Starym Waliszowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 22 w Nowej Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 22 w Nowej Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Grzegorz Juszczyk.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grzegorz Juszczyk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

~Cybularny ^Speak? 08:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2018 Stupa w Gompie Drophan Ling w Darnkowie 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Kamieńczyku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Kamieńczyku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 5 w Szlarach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Dolniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Dolniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 27 w Dolniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 32 w Marianówce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 32 w Marianówce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 45 w Szklarni 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 45 w Szklarni 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 27 w Dolniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some tilt in ccw direction, see left side --Poco a poco 11:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 12:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Kamieńczyku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Kamieńczyku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Dom nr 9 w Kamieńczyku 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Nowej Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Starej Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Starej Łomnicy 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Mateusz Nocek2017.jpg

Heja. Wskazówka - nie rób takich edycji; tj. nie nadpisuj skadrowaną wersją pełnego pliku. Zawsze ładuj osobno. Pomóc ci w tym może User:Cropbot albo jeszcze wygodniej Commons:CropTool. Masur (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kapliczka domkowa w Szklarce 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kapliczka przydrożna w Nowej Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 12:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kapliczka przydrożna w Nowej Łomnicy 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Floriana w Szklarni 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olivier LPB 09:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Figura św. Jana Nepomucena w Starej Łomnicy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Grodowa, Krowiarki Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kapliczka domkowa w Szklarce 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Floriana w Szklarni 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 13:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Rodziny w Piotrowicach Górnych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:30, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kościół św. Rodziny w Piotrowicach Górnych 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Kapliczka domkowa w Szklarce 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:58, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Leśniczówka Biała Woda w Szklarach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 18:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018 Międzylesie, ul. Wojska Polskiego 2-4 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)