User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive16

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 055.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 059.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 081.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 083.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 084.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 047.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 045.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 048.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 052.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 053.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 085.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 086.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 087.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 088.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 089.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 097.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 099.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 100.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 091.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 092.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 093.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 095.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 094.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Radmor 5412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumna głośnikowa Altus 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumny głośnikowe Altus 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 103.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 104.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 105.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 106.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół Zwiastowania NMP 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your request

Hi Haliki

I don't really understand on which Wikipedia Facebook fanpage I should post your information in Italian. Can you send me the link and the exact text you want me to post? I surely will do it with great pleasure. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Wolfgang

P.S. I tried to answer your emai but I got this reponse:"These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:posta-certificata@sicurezzapostale.it; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system status"

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół kościóła św. Jakuba Starszego, witraż 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół ewangelicki 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hi-Fi loudspeakers, ZgB 70-8-61 "Altus 110".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół ewangelicki 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół ewangelicki 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół ewangelicki 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hi-Fi stereo receivers, Radmor 5412.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Useful--Pierre André (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kolegium 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, Franciszka Werner reliquary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, Maria Merkert reliquary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 14:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, pałac biskupi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, pałac biskupi 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:30, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 24 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Komendanta 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Komendanta 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Komendanta 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół dworu biskupiego, ul. Lompy 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kolegium św. Anny.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kolegium św. Anny 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka, fontanna Trytona 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zgromadzenie Sióstr św. Elżbiety w Nysie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 39.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka, fontanna Trytona 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka, fontanna Trytona 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your Mail

Hallo Jacek, I just sent you a mail regarding your request. Greetings --Llez (talk) 07:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 50.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:46, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:44, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 10:40, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:16, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:17, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Dominikańska 6 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 58.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:20, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but slightly too dark IMO. --Ermell 08:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kapliczka św. Barbary 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Sandomierska 25, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Dominikańska 6 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ratusz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:58, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zamek w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity the dark foreground, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zamek w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:46, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:05, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -Llez 09:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jakuba Apostoła w Woliborzu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:49, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Dziennikarze TVP3 Wrocław przy pracy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Operator kamery w czasie pracy.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Browar Tarnowskich 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 05:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, wozownia, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, wozownia, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfortunately in the shadow but good --Ermell 13:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A difficult photo to make because main object is shadowed, it might have ben a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 13:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kapliczka przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, then QI for me! --Hubertl 22:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, park, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:39, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite slim but ok --Ermell 13:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 09:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steschke 09:53, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 FED 5C 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 FED 5C 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 FED 5C 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:08, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 FED 5C 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 FED 5C 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Yamaha XV1600 Wild Star.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kolumny głośnikowe ZG 40-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dllu 23:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:48, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 35.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halavar 09:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, cmentarz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, cmentarz 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, lodownia, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Ram-Man 01:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zameczek w Opolnicy 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zameczek w Opolnicy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zameczek w Opolnicy 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation towers in Poland, tower on Wapniarka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:30, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FED 5C, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FED 5C, top view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support, it is the only top-view picture of the FED 5C, but regardless, it is a very useful image. ~Mable (chat) 15:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops Palace in Nysa, pilasters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops Palace in Nysa, arcade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, cmentarz 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, cmentarz 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, cmentarz 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, cmentarz 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, kaplica 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:22, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Part of the chimney is missing; too bad, but it isn't disturbing too much. Ok for QIC. --Cccefalon 03:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, ogrodzenie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, kaplica 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, kaplica 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, kaplica 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. S. Orła, kaplica 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, Zamek Tarnowskich, kordegarda 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It´s ok now for me --Hubertl 19:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Mickiewicza 19 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The antenna is piercing the image border. Could you please clone it out? --Cccefalon 03:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 12:27, 4 April 2016 (UTC) Much better!  Support --Cccefalon 16:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main object is at the shadow sight while other parts are lightened by sun. This problem might be avoided on a bit more cloudy moment (like photo 4). However I think quality is high enough to become a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 12:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please reduce magenta fringing at the cross. Elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 09:41, 6 April 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 15:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Katarzyny w Ożarach, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. very fine! --Hubertl 08:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Bibelot.JPG

File:2016 Bibelot.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Photographer (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola, John of Nepomuk sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Bartholomew's Church in Topola, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Łomo ŁK-A 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Łomo ŁK-A 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Catherine in Ożary, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:40, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Bibelot.JPG

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bibelot.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Busola.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Topoli, 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 35.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 35.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Świetlica wiejska w Topoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halavar 08:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Halavar 08:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

FPC Killed

Hi Jacked,

I only want tell you sorry because I am killing your nomination, however, IMHO is necessary solve license problems before to nominate. Thanks for underestand --The Photographer (talk) 11:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zameczek w Opolnicy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps the perspective correction is a bit overdone at the right? --A.Savin 14:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 15:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cenzura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Much better than 2014 version. --Cccefalon 08:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. However, a 16:9 crop with less tree on top would be great. --Cccefalon 08:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The half cut car is quiet disturbing. Perhaps try another crop? --Cccefalon 08:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Nice improvement.--Cccefalon 09:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Jerzykowice Wielkie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Jerzykowice Wielkie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia II, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia II, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia II, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia II, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 7, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 7, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 7, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Data w aparacie

Cześć!

Zauważyłem, że masz nowy aparat, czego Ci gratuluję, ale przy okazji zauważyłem, że wrzucasz nowe fotki nim robione, w nazwie plików mające rok 2016, ale w danych EXIF występuje data 2015. Czyżbyś miał złą datę ustawioną w aparacie? --Halavar (talk) 12:26, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny, spichrz, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 07:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny, spichrz, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 07:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 2, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, pomnik Bartosza Głowackiego 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, ul. Kuźnicza 35 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, ul. Kuźnicza 35 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, ul. Kuźnicza 35 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, ul. Kuźnicza 35 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 41 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 41 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 41 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 41 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 41 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek-Ratusz 7 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek-Ratusz 7 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek-Ratusz 7 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:17, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia II, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 44 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 44 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 44 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:45, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Uliczny artysta we Wrocławiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:48, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny, spichrz, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done --Jacek Halicki 20:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality now. --Archi38 10:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plastic models, Yamaha XV1600.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
49 Market Square in Wrocław, gable.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Kuźnicza Street in Wrocław, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:54, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Kuźnicza Street in Wrocław, window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
35 Kuźnicza Street in Wrocław, capitals of the pilasters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, ul. Świętego Józefa 2-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka I 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Selfie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The image itself is OK, and definitely relevant for Wikimedia since it illustrates the "selfie" phenomenon, but I'm worried about this personality rights warning. Can we get some info on that? --Peulle 11:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC) @Peulle: All three girls agreed to the publication of photos, and besides, under Polish law, such consent is not required. In Poland, the only public figures as n.e. politicians have reserved the rights to the image. --Jacek Halicki 11:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC) * Support OK, good enough for me. Supported. --Peulle 19:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC) (could not figure out how to remove the error message)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House of the Golden Dog in Wrocław, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rochowska, kaplica Boguszów, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka I 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 2, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The contrast at the left side is pretty faded. Can yopu apply gruaduated filter with minus exposure and plus contrast/dehaze? --Cccefalon 04:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)@Cccefalon:  Done --Jacek Halicki 20:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Sorry for delayed re-assessment. --Cccefalon 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, plebania 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka III 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mielec, ul. Rzochowska, kapliczka III 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Wrocław, Rynek 44 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
42 Market Square in Wrocław, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
44 Market Square in Wrocław, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Market Square Town Hall in Wrocław, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 20:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former novitiate building of Sisters of Saint Elizabeth Convent in Wrocław, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)