User talk:Iotatau/Archives/2009
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tower
Thanks you very much for the message.
Now is corrected.
The infringement exists, however I could not recede back - other buildings and trees do not give to make it. This tower is a symbol and heart of Vinnitsa city, and very much is pleasant to me. Inside museum, and outside You can see old hits of guns (near clock).
With best regards,
--George Chernilevsky (talk) 11:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kapernaumkirche (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin Hbf Absenkung Bügelbau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Suurhusen Church, East Frisia, Germany. Pic 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sagittarius serpentarius (Tierpark Berlin, 2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Emden Ratsdelft und Rathaus (2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
Zum Bayer-Panorama
Hallo Iotatau,
ich beziehe mich mal auf deinen Kommentar hier. Erstmal vielen Dank für deine Beteiligung und anerkennende Worte. Panoramafotos sind gewissermaßen mein jüngstes Steckenpferd, daher kann es natürlich bei Bildern noch zu Fehlern kommen. Ich habe Bayer mit Canon PhotoStich erstellt, die Nahtstellen so gut wie möglich mit Photoshop Elements wegretuschiert. In diesem Zusammenhang würde mich in der Tat interessieren, ob ein anderes Programm das besser kann (sowohl „stitchen“ als auch nachträgliches Retuschieren). Da ich mir bei Belichtung und Perspektive diesmal relativ viel Mühe gegeben habe, hätte ich natürlich gerne alles andere möglichst technisch einwandfrei, damit das Bild u.U. sogar Chance hat „featured“ zu werden.
Über ein kurzes Feedback deinerseits würde ich mich freuen. Grüße --S[1] 22:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ich würde mal PTGui probieren. Über die Homepage gibt es eine kostenlose Probeversion: http://www.ptgui.com/ Sie fügt ein Wasserzeichen hinzu, ist ansonsten aber voll funktionsfähig. Wenn die Einzelbilder sauber fotografiert sind (auf Stativ, also geringer oder kein Parallaxenfehler), klappt das automatische Stitchen in PTGui meist hervorragend. In schwierigen Fällen (bewegte Objekte im Bild, insbesondere Menschen oder Fahrzeuge) muss man zusätzlich Arbeit investieren: Dann exportiere ich das Zwischenergebnis als "Layer"-Paket im Photoshop-Format (eine Layer pro Einzelbild) und maskiere in Photoshop störende Elemente. Gerade das Bayer-Bild wäre wirklich einen PTGui-Lauf wert. Bei Flickr habe ich ein Panorama vom Potsdamer Platz, das ich aus 63 Einzelbildern mit je 6 MP mit PTGui erstellte. Toi, toi, toi! Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hallo Jochen, danke für die Erklärung. PTGui schaue ich mir gleich mal an. Gruß --S[1] 09:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Und wie du Recht hast! ;) Bevor ich bestelle würde ich aber gerne wissen, inwiefern es sich lohnt die doppelt so teuere Premiumversion zu kaufen. Benutzst du die, oder erachtest du die Basisversion für ausreichend? Gruß --S[1] 14:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Freut mich. Ich komme bisher mit der Standardversion aus, wobei ich schon zugebe, dass mich HDR-Panos interessieren würden, die nur mit Pro gehen. Vom Preis her verliert man nicht viel, wenn man erst mit Standard einsteigt und später ggf. auf Pro upgradet. --Iotatau (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Hallo Jochen. Nun habe ich mit PTGui eine neue Version von File:Pano-bayer-leverkusen.jpg erstellt. Kannst du dazu vllt. ein kurzes Feedback geben? Gruß --S[1] 22:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Feedback siehe QI-Kandidaten-Seite. Verblüffende Verbesserung. Die unsauberen horizontalen Verläufe und die vertikalen dunklen Bänder im Himmel sind weg. Der Weißabgleich ist besser, die Schärfe ist auch. Ich sehe nur noch ein wenig CA, z. B. ganz rechts am Schornstein, aber das dürfte nicht zur Ablehnung führen. --Iotatau (talk) 23:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Danke. Eine Software wirkt Wunder... --S[1] 07:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin Hauptbahnhof, Ostseite (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blick vom Zürichsee auf Quaibrücke und Grossmünster (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Re:Minor opinion
Thanks, I uploaded your version :). Best regards --Pudelek (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Leishmaniasis
Fixed the Typo thanks for noticing -LadyofHats (talk) 14:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Photography rights at Mining Museum Bochum
.jpg)
For the record here's a discussion on photography rights at the German Mining Museum in Bochum which started in the legend of a Quality Image nomination but has been moved here for better readability with the permission of Mbdortmund. Any local experts please feel free to join.
Begin quote:
- Is it allowed to take pictures there? --Mbdortmund 12:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I showed my equipment incl. tripod at the entrance and asked about taking photographs. The employee told me it is allowed. --Iotatau 12:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I will ask them per Mail, if it is officially OK, when we take pictures for the commons, I would then like to organize a meeting of photographers in the region there, the museum is great. mfg --Mbdortmund 19:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- The museum is fantastic and apparently the biggest one of its kind in the world. Don't forget a tripod, some places are really dark. And get up on the tower, too, the view is excellent. If there's an official permission I have more in my archive to post. --Iotatau 19:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've been there several times and I took pictures, too, but didn't dare to post them on the commons. I will inform you about the answer. --Mbdortmund 19:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Four images of the very machine have been online at Commons for four years, see Category. From this image by Stahlkocher one can derive how I was squeezed between the wall and the machine when I took my nominated image. --Iotatau 21:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
End quote
--Iotatau (talk) 22:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Zitat aus der Antwort des Deutschen Bergbau-Museums: "Sie dürfen Fotos zu nicht kommerziellen Zwecken im DBM machen." Ich will aber nochmal nachhaken und denen unser "Geschäftsmodell" erklären...
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for your comment. Please upload your version. I am still quite a beginner for image modifications. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have the RAW file: File:Massif du Mont-Blanc depuis Vétraz.png. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- I sent you a mail with a link to the RAW file. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlosskirche Buch (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
,_Innenraum_(2006).jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Friedenskirche (Potsdam), Innenraum (2006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bundesministerium des Innern, Berlin (2005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Nikolaus, Bensberg (2004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mercedes W180 II (2004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tunnel boring machine KTF 280 (2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Bergbaumuseum
Habe eine etwas halbherzige Genehmigung zur Publikation von Bergbaumuseumsbildern erhalten, aber eben doch eine Genehmigung. Dabei wird ausdrücklich darum gebeten, "den Namen des Museums korrekt" zu schreiben: "Deutsches Bergbau-Museum" und nicht den Eindruck zu erwecken, dies seien offizielle Bilder.
mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Herzlichen Dank für diese Mitteilung. Ich habe die Namensbezeichnung exakt in der Legende der Tunnelfräsmaschine übernommen (sprich, einen Bindestrich in "Bergbaumuseum" eingefügt). --Iotatau (talk) 22:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Klinikum Prenzlauer Berg (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zeiss-Großplanetarium Berlin (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlin Central Station opening (2006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! West view of Gosaukamm (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Panoramafrage
Hallo Jochen. Da du ja vermutlich viel Erfahrung mit Panoramafotografie hast. Kannst du ein gutes Stativ für diesen Zweck (mit Panoramakopf/Einstellschlitten u.ä.) empfehlen? gruß --S[1] 10:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hallo, danke für die Anfrage. Ein wichtiger Gesichtspunkt für gelungene Panoramen ist das Vermeiden von Parallaxenfehlern. Die treten insbesondere dann auf, wenn sich auffällige Gegenstände wie Pfähle oder Masten im Vordergrund befinden. Sie können schnell dazu führen, dass große Panoramen aus mehreren "Spalten" und "Zeilen" unbrauchbar werden oder viel Nachbearbeiten erfordern. Vermieden werden Parallaxenfehler durch ein Drehen des Aufnahmewerkzeugs im Knotenpunkt. Geeignete Haltevorrichtungen können Geübte selbst basteln, es gibt aber auch kommerzielle Angebote. Einige bespricht Jan Röpenacks Web-Site gut. Ihm gefällt ein Panoramakopf von Novoflex (VR-System PRO II). Mangels Budget habe ich selbst jedoch noch keinen. Jan empfiehlt auch noch weiteres Zubehör wie Stative, Kugelköpfe etc. Bei der Gelegenheit auch gleich ein Hinweis auf ein extremes Projekt, Gigapan. Es wurde von einer Uni und der NASA entwickelt, herausgekommen ist z. B. ein Aufnahmeroboter, der Gigapixel-Panoramen mit Kompaktkameras erstellen kann. Viel Spaß! --Iotatau (talk) 20:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, OK, danke. Aber heißt das denn tatsächlich, dass du auch dieses Flickr-Bild vom Potsdamer Platz freihand gemacht hattest? Oder hattest du dabei doch ein Stativ benutzt, wie ich es eher vermuten würde? --S[1] 21:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ja, das Potsdamer-Platz-Bild machte ich mit einem 30-EUR-Stativ, und mit demselben auch mein neuestes QI-Bild, das Panorama vom Gosaukamm mit 170 MP. Hier musste ich z. B. beim Vordergrund aufpassen, einen Weidezaun nicht mit draufzunehmen. Stativ ist kein Zwang, aber die Parallaxenfehler bei Stativeinsatz sind meist geringer als beim freihändigen Fotografieren, und die Bilder passen beim Stitchen mit weniger Crop-Ausschuss zusammen. --Iotatau (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, OK, das macht natürlich Sinn. Um nun zur Frage bzgl. Panoramakopf zurückzukehren: Dieses Novoflex VR-System Pro II, ich nehme mal an, das hier ist gemeint, müsste also ab ca. 650 € zu haben sein. Passt so ein Panoramakopf zu jedem handelsüblichen Stativ? Und wenn ja, ist dazu eher was namhaftes wie Manfrotto zu empfehlen, oder reicht — wie bei dir — ein 30-Euro-Ding eigentlich aus wenn man schon so einen schicken Panoramakopf hat? --S[1] 22:24, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Achso, und hier gleich noch eine Frage, das ist mir grade beim Anklicken deines Gosaukamm-Bildes aufgefallen: Wie lässt es sich eigentlich einrichten, dass die Kameradaten nach der Bildbearbeitung bzw. dem Stitchen erhalten bleiben? --S[1] 22:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ja, es ist das verlinkte Gerät. Es dürfte auf mein Stativ passen. Allerdings wären die Komponenten nicht so gut aufeinander abgestimmt. Mein Stativ ist etwas in sich wackelig und würde die teuer erkaufte Präzision des Novoflex-Halters untergraben. Wichtig ist ja auch die horizontale Ausrichtung der Aufnahmeebene. Die erziele ich derzeit, indem ich die Teleskopbeine ein- und ausfahre, was ein paar Minuten dauert. Mit einem Kugelkopf dürfte es eine Sache von Sekunden sein: Arretierung lösen, Kugel justieren, festziehen, fertig. Bei meinem Stativ ist der Kopf fest mit dem Stativ verbunden. Bei "Stativ-Systemen" ist eine freie Kombination von Beinen und Kopf Standard. Bei all dem Kritisieren meines Stativs will ich doch noch mal erwähnen, dass sein Preis-/Leistungsverhältnis kaum zu schlagen ist und es mir schon wertvolle Dienste geleistet hat. Ich trug es auch jetzt im Sommer in den Alpen bei allen teils vielstündigen Touren mit. – Erhalten von EXIF-Daten: Ich nutze den EXIF-Editor Opanda PowerExif. Er hat ein paar Bugs und scheint nicht weiterentwickelt zu werden, erfüllt aber seinen Zweck. Ich exportiere die EXIF-Daten eines Einzelbilds des Panoramas und importiere sie, sofern zutreffend, in das zusammengesetzte Bild. --Iotatau (talk) 07:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
OK, danke vielmals. Das muss ich erstmal alles verdauen ;) --S[1] 09:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank
Hi, Iotatau!
Thank You for correct description of my trophies of a mushroom hunt.
Please, visit at free time this my nomination. I respect any Your opinion: (+) or (-).
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kleistgrab Grabsteine (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fiat 500 F Berlina in Berlin (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! A 9 Hermsdorfer Kreuz (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! BVG-Doppeldeckerbus 3333 (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Columbus laboratory replica at ILA (2008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Linden-Center am Prerower Platz (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schwimm- und Sprunghalle SSE Berlin (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! BVG-Straßenbahn-Fahrzeuge (2009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Schönes Bild das, aber ich bekommen einen Fehler, wenn ich versuche, es im Firefox zu öffnen (zu vergrößern). Die Grafik kann nicht angezeigt werden, weil sie Fehler enthält. Liegt das am Foto oder an meiner Umgebung? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- An beidem. Das Foto ist einfach sehr groß. Auch mein Firefox, den ich gerade nutze (auf einem Netbook mit 1 GB RAM) kann die Grafik nicht anzeigen. Es geht nur mit Rechtsklick, "Ziel speichern unter...". Das normale Bildanzeigeprogramm von XP versagt ebenfalls. Nur IrfanView gelingt nach gefühlten Minuten die Anzeige (bei 500 MB RAM-Bedarf). Mir ist bewusst, dass ich an die Grenzen aktueller Hardware stoße, doch ich wollte bewusst mal ein Referenzbild für mich erstellen, und ich hoffe, dass zukünftige Hard- und Software-Generationen weniger Probleme bereiten. --Iotatau (talk) 23:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)