User talk:Info-farmer/A1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Info-farmer!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please urgently take notice: Your recent uploads (September 20/21, 2009)

[edit]

Hi, please do not categorize your pictures (an example of your 9 uploads regarding this matter):

Category:Culture of Tamil Nadu AND
Category:Tamil words

Please save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:

Category:Cuisine of Tamil Nadu (and for example Category:Cooking of India)

Please avoid to add Category:Tamil words to every single file, unless Tamil words are on the files you contribute. In general (as done before): Please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village (usually regarding Salem T.N.) and, please, do not add - in addition - the categories of the state and country, too.

In addition, please use categories already created, such as Category:Transport in Tamil Nadu and as mentioned before, in avoiding to create (useless) "special" categories as Category:Goods movement in Tamil Nadu for just one only file.

Last but not least: Please check (or better: delete) urgently the files you uploaded in Category:Judiciary of Tamil Nadu, one more "special" category you created. If there's no violation of privacy - i do not think so - use Category:Politics of Tamil Nadu and do no remove the category Category:Politics of India (re. "Politics of Tamil Nadu").

Thank you for your assistance, Roland zh 09:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Your contributions on commons regarding Category:Tamil Nadu - possibly privacy violation

[edit]

Hi, files as -> File:Legal(diverce)notice-side1-Tamil Nadu6.jpg and File:Legal(diverce)notice-side1-Tamil Nadu6.jpg <- should not distributed on commons. Privacy of living personalities imho is not respected as name/address (in Englisch) and propably personal details in Tamil language are mentioned in these at least two sides of a letter dated in 2008 !
As well, you created a topic related Category:Judiciary of Tamil Nadu (what about "Politics of Tamil Nadu" !?!) for these two files - it seems imho not to be serious ... Please avoid such contributions on commons.

As mentionned, therefore these two files have been plaeced for

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Legal(diverce)notice-side1-Tamil Nadu6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--83.78.134.130 13:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Legal(diverce) notice - side 2 -Tamil Nadu 67.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--83.78.134.130 13:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way: Please use - in general - the numberous categories given and do not create "special" categories for just one or two only file(s), i.e. Category:Goods movement in Tamil Nadu on "Tamil Nadu" level -> Category:Transport in Tamil Nadu is fitting much better. 83.78.134.130 13:51, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments "Categories have been checked" i.e. replaced by a less "fitting" category :-(

[edit]

Hi, cou commented this edit as "Categories have been checked" and replaced the more specific Category:Hindu temples in Andhra Pradesh by the too general Category:Hindu temples :-(
-> en:Dwaraka Tirumala (File:Dwaraka Tirumala.jpg) temple is located in West Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh.
Once again, please do not replace better fitting categories by less specific categories and 2) do not remove WP-links respectively bot-generated categories as {Check categories|...|wiki1=wikipedia|article1=Dwaraka_Tirumala|...} unless a specific - for example category "Dwaraka Tirumala temple" is created - usually we do so if there are several files regarding to a specific topic. Thanks for your assistance and best regards, Roland zh 12:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

PS: Regarding that edit -> [Category:Belur] removed as [Category:Chennakesava Temple] is categorized (as part of) [Category:Belur].

PPS: Thank you for removing Category:Tamil words where it was obsolete.

Hi தகவலுழவன், you're welcome, and by avoiding an "overwhelming" of the categories of the Indian states (by using sub-categories), we both will be happy - your pictures of Tamil Nadu i appreciate very much. Best regards, Roland zh 20:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

The pot

[edit]

Hi I found your pot and it was ideal for a little German folksong. I hope you like it.
(You can see the English translation in the description)
Wenn der Pott
Many thanks
David
Dwsolo (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Banana,Tenerife, spain-circa1900.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Banana,Tenerife, spain-circa1900.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Angr 09:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Banana,Tenerife,_spain-circa1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-Nard the Bard 20:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Christian book

[edit]

You have described this as the first christian book printed in Tharangampadi. I read in Ma. Sa. sambandhan's Achchum Padhippum (1980) that printing in Tranqebar started in 1713 and a Tamil bible was the fist to be printed followed by catechism and song books. (I will be uploading the bible's image shortly). Can you confirm this is the first book?--Sodabottle (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • நான் அங்கு குறிப்பிட்டுள்ள புத்தகத்தின் படியே விவரித்தேன். அது குறித்து சிலரிடம் கேட்டுள்ளேன். குழப்பமாக உள்ளது. உங்களையே, ஒரு முடிவெடுக்கக் கேட்டுக்கொள்கிறேன். நன்றி.,(த*உழவன் (talk) 22:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
This is the book i mentioned above. The description in the book says it is a page from the New Testament. But the text says "veda poshagathiran; mudhalam vaguppu" !. I will change the description of "yesu munnigai" into "one of the oldest" instead of the oldest. What is odd is Sambandhan uses Mayilai Seeni Venkatasamy's "krithuvamum Tamilum" as a source in many places. May be he didnt mention Seeniyar's error out of respect.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ouch. I think it is my mistake. You have never mentioned it as the first book. While translating the description into English, i confused this book with Henriques' Doctrina Christam. உங்களை குழப்பியதற்கு மன்னியுங்கள். இப்போது தான் சரியாகப் பார்த்தேன். --Sodabottle (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • சிறு பிழைதானே. மன்னிக்கவும் என்றெல்லாம் சொல்லாதிங்க! உங்கள் பதிவு கண்டு மகிழ்ச்சி. நன்றி வணக்கம்.(த*உழவன் (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Actor sivaji TAMIL NADU 52.JPG

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Actor sivaji TAMIL NADU 52.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Actor sivaji TAMIL NADU 52.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--BarretBonden (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

த.உழவன், இது pd india கீழ் வராது. This becomes public domain in India only on 1 January 2013. Film was released in 1952, so copyright expires 60 years after its release.--Sodabottle (talk) 21:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

அப்ப என்ன பண்றதுTatawhiz எங்க ஊரில் எடுக்குது. --த*உழவன் (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deletion ku naan tag pannirren. My last payment for my whiz connection is on 1 Aug. 2 aug ungalukku anuppirren en email id ku unga address a anuppi vainga.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:15, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hi தகவலுழவன், sorry, but File:Accident, fatal-2,salem(Dt)TamilNadu165.jpg and File:Accident, fatal-3,salem(Dt)TamilNadu166.jpg clearly violate the human dignity of the depicted persons. --Túrelio (talk) 22:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

  • the license added as
Public domain This work has been released into the public domain by its author, JoJan. This applies worldwide.

In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
JoJan grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

--த*உழவன் (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Hyder ali's gold coin(pagoda).jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

. Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ganga_dolphin2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY (TALK) 01:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mooon rotated?!

[edit]

Hallo தகவலுழவன், why https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Moonc.gif&action=history did you rotate the moon image?! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DMK_poster_Tamil_Nadu117.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 09:37, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil Wikipedia workshop

[edit]

டிசம்பர் 11, 2011, தமிழ் விக்கிப் பட்டறை, சேலம்

வணக்கம் Info-farmer,

சேலத்தில் முதல் விக்கிப்பட்டறை டிசம்பர் 11, 2011 அன்று பாவடி பெண்கள் மேல்நிலைப்பள்ளியில் நடைபெற உள்ளது. உங்கள் வருகையை எதிர்பார்க்கிறோம். மேலும், உங்களுக்குத் தெரிந்த விக்கி ஆர்வமுடையவர்களையும் அழைத்து வரவும்.

நீங்கள் தமிழ் விக்கி சமூகத்தின் அங்கத்தினராக இருப்பதால் உங்களையும் இப்பட்டறைக்கு அழைக்கிறோம். உங்களின் பங்களிப்புகளுக்கு நன்றி.

உங்களை 11, டிசம்பர் 2011 இல், சேலம் பட்டறையில் ஆவலுடன் எதிர்பார்க்கிறோம். மேலதிக தகவல்களுக்கு இங்கு சொடுக்கவும்.

--Surya Prakash.S.A. (talk) 15:23, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toy,plastic,_vodafone,Tamil_Nadu353.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phone,_plastic_toy,_Tamil_Nadu-351.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banner_for_monkeys-vandalur_zoo-Tamil_Nadu102.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaur-Indian_bison-vandalur_zoo-Tamil_Nadu85.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dinamalar_24.8.2009Newspaper(red_soil2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dinamalar_24.8.2009Newspaper(red_soil1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dictionary-tam-tam.1940_-_1991,19edition-Tamilnadu31.3India.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dictionary-tam-tam.1940_-_1991,19edition-Tamilnadu31.2India.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dictionary-tam-tam.1991,19edition-Tamilnadu31India.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Advertisement-India-Tamilword19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dictionary_India1986_-PAIRword_(tam-tam)Tamilnadu.2FL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 06:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dictionary-India-2005-creaA(tam-tam-eng)Tamilnadu3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]