User talk:Immanuel Giel/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Datei:Schleswig Braun-Hogenberg Detail1.jpg

Bist du sicher, dass die rechte Kirche (F/G) die Franziskanerkirche St.Paul ist und die linke der Dom? Und nicht umgekehrt? Die linke Kirche hat jedenfalls die typischen Merkmale einer Bettelordenskirche (mit Dachreiter, schlichter Westfassade usw.), wie sie zu der Zeit von den Franziskanern gebaut wurden, etwa die zur selben Zeit entstandene Minoritenkirche in Köln [1]. --Der wahre Jakob (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Da kannst du sehr wohl Recht haben. Ich habe das Bild 2006 hochgeladen und weiß partout nicht mehr, wie ich damals zu dieser Erkenntnis gekommen bin. Wenn du dir sicher bist, ändere doch bitte die Beschreibung. Schöne Grüße. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 14:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Danke für die Reaktion. Ich habe es geändert. LG --Der wahre Jakob (talk) 10:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Neuostheim 151.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

195.88.117.166 11:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

File:IwateUniversitySwallow.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Herz Jesu Ludwigshafen 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Friedenskirche Ludwigshafen 24.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sueddeutsche Zeitung.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sueddeutsche Zeitung.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Sueddeutsche Zeitung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:St John the Baptist, Chipping Barnet (interior) 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Lord Belbury (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, ich habe das URV-Bild des Handys weggeschnitten. Schau mal, ob das verbleibende Bild so noch Sinn macht. --Túrelio (talk) 18:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: I guess it does! Thanks. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Goessweinstein1928b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 18:50, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Adlam acronym.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Adlam acronym.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)

In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

File:KurtBeckJohannesRau.jpg and the date ?

Hello, hope you are doing fine. I'd like to inquire about your picture, Kurt Beck and Johannes Rau. One editor has deleted the piece from ja/Wikipedia (aka jawp) Ostasieninstitut der Hochschule Ludwigshafen, aka OAI, but I wish to revive it on the same page. I have filled contents gap by translating and updating that article.

Now, allow me to present my question, which is very simple but enough to solve the doubt by the erasing editor: which day was this picture photographed? Would you try to recall please? Is it very warm inside meeting rooms in Germany in February, as one person is not wearing his jacket, or the lady standing near window wears an outfit which somehow inspires warmer season, ie May or September. That question is #5 in the following list.

  • one jawp editor says those two politicians are fused/pasted together into one picture. Discussion is in ja language at: user:Y.haruo's notepage;
  • I counter-proposed to those doubts presented by Y.haruo;
  1. both Kurt Beck and Johannes Rau has four person seated behind them;
  2. a lady seated on the second row to Mr.Beck is pictured, with her gray/silver hair almost overwraps with Mr. Beck's head;
  3. Mr.Beck's head is not outproportioned, or his beard shows his chin much wider than his shirt collar;
  4. no, Mr. Rau is facing to the side, but the twisted neck is not that super-unnatural as the erasing editor claims, contrasting with another bust shot of Mr.Rau;
  5. maybe, the photographer noted the date of picture as "Date: February 1999", and I guess central heating system in Germany keeps room temperature comfortable enough to stay without a jacket indoor, but not sure about the date.
Sorry, the date was wrong: 28.03.2000 cf. Bundespraesident Johannes Rau kam im Linienbus zum Ostasieninstitut nach Ludwigshafen

I await for your kind input here on your talkpage, or if you wish, I could translate your answer and post on that user page. Cheers,0-- Omotecho (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

  • It is not much fun to discuss about a photograph scanned more than 20 years ago. Anyway there was no image editing. I am still not very good at it. The picture is low quality. Do with it what you like. By the way I don't get the problem. It is definitely not a fake. Best wishes to you and Mr. Haruo. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Wissower Klinken

Hallo Immanuel Giel, mir scheint, dass File:Klinken.jpg falsch herum abgescannt wurde (ein Dia?) und horizontal gespiegelt werden müsste. Drei andere Bilder vom gleichen Motiv in Category:Wissower Klinken zeigen das gleiche Motiv anders herum. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 12:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Habe es jetzt selbst verlustfrei horizontal gespiegelt und drübergeladen. --Sitacuisses (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Danke. Du hast Recht. Es waren eingescannte Dias. Die Qualität ist aber so schlecht, dass auch Löschen angebracht wäre. Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Statue Strandbad Frankenthal in der Pfalz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sciencia58 (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Image:Schule in Dannstadt.jpg

Hallo Immanuel, mir ist ein Fehler in der deutsche Betitelung aufgefallen. Das Foto zeigt das Rathaus (Sitz der Verbandsgemeindeverwaltung) in Dannstadt, Ansicht von der Nordseite an der Ortsdurchfahrt B 9. Die Description:town hall stimmt dagegen. Bei der Gelegenheit möchte ich dir noch für die zahlreichen Fotos dieser Region danken. Weiter so! Grüsse von einem ehemaligen Dannstädter.

Abbildungen zur Hochschule der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (HdBA

Bitte prüfen Sie die korrekten Bildunterschriften. M. E. haben Sie Abbildungen mehrerer verschiedener Hochschulen falsch zusammengefasst. Danke! - 12.02.2013

Mixed aUI characters

Hello, Immanuel. Thanks for uploading the images for aUI characters used in the aUI (constructed language) wikipedia article, but File:AUI_-_OO_-_9.png and File:AUI_-_UU_-_10.png seem to have been accidentally swapped (at least using auilanguage.org as a reference). -- Anon 2022-05-20 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.93.31.10 (talk) 18:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Molvania Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DS (talk) 03:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Kirchenfenster Scheidental.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

King_David_Zion

Hallo Immanuel, ich wollte dich fragen, ob du die GPS-Daten von dem Bild mir mitteilen könntest? Das wäre sehr nett 🥰

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:King_David_Zion.jpg

Im Jahr 2017 stand die Statue noch hier: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1304379946308892&set=a.114650155281883&notif_id=1673091087420152


Viele Grüße

Peter (epbechthold@gmail.com)

(wenn du möchtest dann schließe wieder diese Seite) Epbechthold (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Es tut mir leid. Meine Kamera speicherte keine GPS-Daten. Das Bild nahm ich im Jahr 2018 auf und es war am Berg Zion.
Könnte das hier helfen?
Mount Zion Walking Tour Map Gruß. --Immanuel Giel (talk) 11:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Category discussion warning

Garden of World Peace has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Secretlondon (talk) 19:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Rinpoche pond has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Secretlondon (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Victory Stupa has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Secretlondon (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)