User talk:Der wahre Jakob
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Piéta Ersdorf, Foto Christoph Hüber.jpg is uncategorized since 13 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:St. Jakobus vom Waldweg, Foto Christoph Hüber.JPG is uncategorized since 13 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Johanneskirche (freie ev. Gemeinde) Bielefeld-Sennestadt.jpg was uncategorized on 30 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:St. Kunigunde Sennestadt (Bielefeld).jpg was uncategorized on 30 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Psalm 1-IV. Ton.jpg was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dorkirche Schönwalde-Glien 006.JPG was uncategorized on 16 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Lauretanische Litanei
[edit]Wegen deiner Anfrage über das "Virgo prudentissima"-Bild kann ich dir leider auch nicht mehr sagen, als das Bild hergibt: Das Spruchband "Du allerweiseste Jungfrau" ist durch die Umrahmung eindeutig dem Engel mit dem Spiegel zugeordnet. Ohne dieses Spruchband würde man natürlich sofort auf "Spiegel der Gerechtigkeit" tippen. Allerdings bin ich kein Fachmann für katholische Liturgie; gibt es vielleicht irgendeine Beziehung/Querverbindung zwischen beiden Anrufungen ?
Tut mir leid, dass ich nicht mehr dazu sagen kann. Xenophon (talk) 22:14, 1 Februar 2011 (UTC)
- Ich habe gerade auf der Disku zu Lauretanische Litanei erfahren, dass der Spiegel ein uraltes Symbol/Attribut der Weisheit ist. Danke! --Der wahre Jakob (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Weihnachtsmann - Fassadenkletterer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:59, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Radelandkirche Berlin Hakenfelde2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Code (talk) 08:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Wolfgang Rosenbaum.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Rosenbaum.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wolfgang Rosenbaum.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Beda Kleinschmidt OFM.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Beda Kleinschmidt OFM.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Beda Kleinschmidt OFM.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Autbert Stroick OFM.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Autbert Stroick OFM.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Autbert Stroick OFM.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Lothar Hardick.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lothar Hardick.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Peter Nettekoven.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Peter Nettekoven.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Peter Nettekoven.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:St. Joseph-Bielefeld 1933.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:St. Joseph-Bielefeld 1933.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:St. Joseph-Bielefeld 1933.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:St. Joseph Bielefeld 1944.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:St. Joseph Bielefeld 1944.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:St. Joseph Bielefeld 1944.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Wegekreuze in Falkemich und Breitenstein
[edit]Hallo, wahrer Jacob, ich nehme an, du hast die Wegekreuze umkategorisiert, weil sie neu sind und vielleicht auch nicht deinem (unserem) Geschmack entsprechen. richtig? Ich finde aber, jeweils eine Totale der Kreuze könnte durchaus unter Wayside Crosses in Rheinisch-Bergischer Kreis stehen, dazu gehören sie schließlich — Einwand? Gruß MoSchle (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ich habe etwas anderes gemacht: Ich habe die Breitensteiner und die Falkemicher Kreuze jeweils zu einer Kategorie zusammengefasst (Category:Breitenstein Hofkreuz und Category:Crosses in Falkemich), und diese Kats sind genau da eingehängt, wo die einzelnen Bilder waren. Du findest alles jetzt als Unterkategorien von Category:Wayside crosses in Rheinisch-Bergischer Kreis.
- Eine Änderung aus "geschmacklichen" Gründen liegt mir fern. Wir machen hier eine Enzyklopädie iiiiiund keinen Meinungsblog. Und da ist es üblich, sinnvolle Unterkategorien zu bilden, um die Oberkategorie übersichtlicher zu machen.--Der wahre Jakob (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank fuer dir Erklaerung und die sinnvolle Einordnung. (Es soll aber schon Meinungsblogs bei WP gegeben haben...) MoSchle (talk) 19:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kirche Gemeinwesenzentrum Staaken 004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kirche Gemeinwesenzentrum Staaken 005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kirche Gemeinwesenzentrum Staaken 003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EWK Spandau 2013 - 04.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Deutscher Seniorentag 2021 Logo.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Deutscher Seniorentag 2021 Logo.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Deutscher Seniorentag 2021 Logo.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Randykitty (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Heribert Holzapfel OFM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 10:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Schott Messbuch 1963.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Schott Messbuch 1963.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Schott Messbuch 1963.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:St. Canisius Berlin - Inneres 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Christian Herwartz 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Emmauskirche Bad Griesbach 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 09:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)