User talk:Hgrobe/archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Grundig_audiotapeTK1_hg.jpg

[edit]

This tape recorder was not built before 1960. See Tonbandmuseum, Radiomuseum or Radiomuseum Rottenburg. It would be nice if you would update the picture data. Thanx Hihiman 00:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done - thank you for the hint Hannes Grobe 07:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ernst wilhelm nay stamp.jpg

[edit]

Ravenala madagascariensis Picture

[edit]

Hello, I believe that the plants in teh picture you have uploaded as Ravenala madagascariensis are in fact Strelitzia nicholai, which, up close are very similar. Do you have any objection to my altering their name and placing in the relevant article in Wikipedia? Many thanks HelloMojo 10:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for uploading photos to WikiCommons. Please not that German stamps are not released by Deutsche Bundespost under any Creative Commons license. German stamps are public domain. Regards, Thuresson 21:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A question -- Your ice sheet map indicates that Los Angeles faced winter sea ice offshore, yet the fauna and flora from the La Brea tar pits indicate a more moderate temperature. Can you explain your reasoning? 68.5.64.178 08:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC) (Scott Adler)[reply]

  • this graf is not a scientific publication - it is just a very principle and raw scetch about maximum glaciation - as an imaginated result from what paleoclimatologists have found and discussed. LA is given just for geographic orientation.

Ice Sheet Map

[edit]

Thanks for the ice sheet map. Two areas for improvement: doesn't note the year (is it the last glacial maximum?), and doesn't show the altered coastlines.

  • see coment above. description says Northern hemisphere glaciation during the last ice ages. This is a principle scetch, not a scientifc reconstruction of the last glacial maximum or altered coastlines. (i would appreciate comments from identified users, not from IP-No)

Image:Amanda kvakland.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Amanda kvakland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tskoge 21:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC) .[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Rhodes colossos.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhodes colossos.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool.

There are similar issues with these images:

Thank you. Wikipeder 07:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikipeder, i tried to reconstruct the date and source of the fotos, but i failed. i am afraid you are right and the fotos have to be deleted. in the future i will be more carefull and precise with source and copyright notifications. sorry for wasting your time. Hannes Grobe 20:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sea salt-d hg.png

[edit]

I just saw this nice grafic in the article Speisesalz from the German wikipedia but found a small mistake...
All descriptions are translated into German - except "salt" which remained in English... ;->
Perhaps it would be possible to correct it? --Anna reg 11:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

queen anna - thank you for pointing this out - corrected. glückauf Hannes Grobe 21:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Great!!
(diese fiesen kleinen Fehler ;->) --Anna reg 22:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iomega jaz 2gb hg.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright Image:Iomega jaz 2gb hg.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Anna 23:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

anna, even though this product does no longer exist, i am afraid you are right. Hannes Grobe 21:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Druckwasser-Drehkran hg.jpg

[edit]

I'm very curious to read the pic descr. on "Image:Druckwasser-Drehkran hg.jpg"! greetz! --Bukk 14:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

description added in german first; Hannes Grobe 21:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antarktis: Schwerefeld der Erde im Südpolarmeer

[edit]

Man versteht das Bild "Schwerefeld der Erde im Südpolarmeer" nicht. Siehe Diskussion im deutschen Antarktis-Artikel. Was genau zeigt das Bild? Was bedeuten die Farben? --84.73.209.218 08:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, bild entnommen - ist für das antarktis lemma zu speziell. besser auf de:Gravimetrie aufgehoben. Hannes Grobe 10:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antarktis Grafik

[edit]

Hallo, was bedeuten denn die Farben in der Grafik 'Antarktis im Interglazial'? --Buckiboy 06:14, 14. Jan. 2007 (CET)

eine erklärung findet sich auf der bildbeschreibungsseite in commons Hannes Grobe 22:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi HGrobe! Ich möchte oE Grafik größer und mit Legende in den Artikel Antarktis stellen und hab zur Erklärung der Farben zwei Fragen: wie übersetzt man korrekt "ice divide" - Eis-Scheide? oder doch Wasserscheide? detto bei "ice flow lines" - sind das Eisströme? Vielen Dank für deine Beiträge, auch wenn ich einen davon nicht vertanden hab ; )
Grüsse --Uwaga Budowa 00:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
deutsche Erklärungen in commens eingefügt Hannes Grobe 19:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


QI promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hundertwasser nz 1998 hg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Jnpet 12:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Koldewey_awi.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Koldewey_awi.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 19:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Variable_scale-gerber_hg.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Variable_scale-gerber_hg.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 16:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CO2 pump hg.png

[edit]

Thanks for this excellent image...I made a few suggestions for improvement at Image talk:CO2 pump hg.png and was wondering if a copy could be uploaded in SVG or other vector-graphic format, for easier modification? -- Beland 21:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot - will do when back from cruise. Hannes Grobe 08:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Ski jumps torino.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright Image:Ski jumps torino.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

IKONOS is a commercial satellite, not operated by NASA. As the source page states, the Torino image is copyrighted by GeoEye/European Space Imaging. See also http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/masthead.html, where they note that not all of the images there are PD NASA work. --Davepape 15:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! i should be able to read, when contributing to wikipedia ... ! Hannes Grobe 14:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unterwassermikrofon

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, Danke für Dein Foto, es füllt eine Lücke im Bildarchiv. Ich war mal so frei, es ein wenig zu säubern und die Bildgrösse an Monitorverhältnisse anzupassen. Nicht böse sein. --Galak76 12:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prima - vielen dank. das mikro wird verwendet für PALAOA - http://www.awi.de/en/research/new_technologies/marine_observing_systems/ocean_acoustics/palaoa/

Hannes Grobe 12:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder zur Zusammensetzung von Meersalz

[edit]

Hallo, Hannes. Ich habe deine Grafiken Image:Sea_salt-d_hg.png und Image:Sea_salt-e_hg.png vektorisiert und unter Image:Sea_salt-d_hg.svg und Image:Sea_salt-e_hg.svg hochgeladen. Melde dich bei mir, wenn du was an den Bildern auszusetzen hast. -- Stefan Majewsky 14:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan - ich bin begeistert! sehr herzlichen dank und gruss Hannes Grobe 19:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fluorescent minerals hg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Past, present and future of CO2 variations

[edit]

Is there any svg-Version of this graph? I'd like to translate it to german. --130.75.17.50 08:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

german version in png and svg:
png format
Hannes Grobe 18:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]





Image:Vulcano bransfield-strait hg.png

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hallo!

Vielen Dank für das Hochladen von Dateien auf Wikimedia Commons. Bitte denke daran, dass die Bilder und Mediendateien auf Commons für Nutzer von allen Wikimedia-Projekten nützlich sein sollen. Dies ist nur möglich, wenn die Bilder auch von anderen gefunden werden können.

Um dies zu ermöglichen, sollen Bilder sollten in das Kategoriesystem eingeordnet sein. Deshalb sollten die Bilder in eine passende Kategorie eingeordnet sein, zusätzlich ist es möglich, die Bilder auf Galerieseiten einzubinden. Um gute Kategorien zu finden, bietet das Tool CommonSense Hilfe.

Eine Übersicht über alle von dir hochgeladenen Dateien findest du hier.

Wichtig ist, dass Bilder an irgendeiner Stelle eingeordnet werden. Es gibt eine große Anzahl von Bildern, die noch unsortiert sind. Hilf mit, diese Anzahl nicht weiter wachsen zu lassen!

Vielen Dank. GeorgHH 06:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lieber GeorgHH, vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. Ich weiß, welche Bilder ich hochgeladen habe und welche verdrahtet sind. Nahezu alle meine Bilder werden mit Artikeln verbunden. Dem workflow entsprechend lade ich einen Satz von Bildern mit dem Java-tool, versehe diese dann mit Titeln und verbinde sie mit den Artikeln, ggf kategorisiere ich sie auch (wenn auch mir die Kategorisierung in Wikipedia noch nicht so ganz geheuer ist). Das braucht alles seine Zeit (manchmal Monate, wenn ich auf Expedition bin), daher bitte etwas Geduld mit mir. Gruss Hannes Grobe 08:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Hans, es scheint, wir haben uns falsch verstanden. In dieser Liste siehst du deine auf die Commons geladenen Dateien. Die in der rechten Spalte rot markierten sind hier auf Commons weder in eine Galerie noch eine Kategorie einsortiert, unabhängig davon ob sie in einem Wiki-Artikel eingebunden sind (was natürlich schonmal sehr gut ist). Und darum ging es mir: deine Dateien sollen natürlich in möglichst vielen verschiedenen Wikipedias verwendet werden können, dazu sollten sie aber hier auf den Commons kategorisiert sein, damit andere Benutzer sie leicht finden und dann in ihrem Wiki verwenden können.
Ich werde mal sehen ob ich dir zwischendurch beim kategorisieren behilflich sein kann, soweit meine Seemännischen- und Englischkenntnisse das zulassen. --GeorgHH 23:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
hervorragend! vielen dank für den hinweis georg. ich verstehe jetzt besser die bedeutung der kategorisierung und werde deinen hinweis beherzigen. eine unterstützung seitens eines kategorisier-fachmannes ist natürlich sehr willkommen. grüsse Hannes Grobe 09:22, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Riessbeck_eistage_2005-03-16.jpg

[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Riessbeck_eistage_2005-03-16.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. GeorgHH 10:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dieses bild ist mit dem source text versehen: ...with the permission of the artist reproduced and uploaded by .... ich habe es auf wunsch des künstlers nach commons geladen. es ist nicht so einfach einem künstler klar zu machen, wie die rechte zu definieren sind. artikel zu rießbeck und bildrechte sind in arbeit. bitte NICHT! löschen. Hannes Grobe 15:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS added Hannes Grobe 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eugen seibold dfg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, das Bild von http://www.dfg.de/dfg_im_profil/geschichte/praesidenten_der_dfg/eugen_seibold.html steht nicht unter einer freien Lizenz, da kommerzielle Nutzung nur mit Genehmigung der DFG erlaubt ist, siehe [1]. Daher muß es leider gelöscht werden. --GeorgHH 10:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dieses bild wurde mir von prof. seibold (dem rechte-inhaber) zur freien verfügung gestellt. wie soll ich das dokumentieren? Hannes Grobe 15:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, um auf Commons das Bild einstellen zu können muß Professor Seibold eine Einverständniserklärung abgegeben, aus der hervorgeht unter welcher konkreten Lizenz (die auch gewerbliche Nutzung erlaubt) das Bild steht, also z. B. {{Cc-by-sa-2.0-de}}.

Hier mal ein Muster (auch einzusehen unter Einverständniserklärung für alle Anfragen): 

Hiermit erkläre ich in Bezug auf [ hier Beschreibung der Bilder oder, besser, die Dateinamen 
aufführen ], dass ich der Fotograf/Autor oder Inhaber des ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechts bin.

Ich erlaube, das Bild/den Text unter der freien Lizenz [ Auswahl gemäß 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Lizenzvorlagen ] zu veröffentlichen.

Mir ist bekannt, dass damit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritte das Recht haben, 
das Bild/den Text gewerblich zu nutzen und zu verändern.

Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann und kein Anspruch 
darauf besteht, dass das Bild dauernd in Wikimedia Commons eingestellt wird.

Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht  
und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) 
gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild/den Text im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der 
anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

DATUM, NAME DES RECHTEINHABERS

Einfach die Felder zwischen den [ ] ausfüllen und von <RECHTEINHABER> unterschreiben lassen und dann per email an OTRS senden.

Eine Lizenzübersicht findest Du hier, Infos zum OTRS Bestätigungsdienst hier.

Das gleiche gilt für das Bild von Riessbeck. (Ich habe das Bild auf meiner Beobachtungsliste, für den Fall das ein anderer Admin es löscht bevor du eine Genehmigung hast, ist es kein Problem das Bild wieder herzustellen. )

--GeorgHH 18:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Glanzbilder hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo nochmal, die Motive hast du nicht selbst gezeichnet, richtig? Dann bist du nicht der Rechteinhaber und benötigst eine Genehmigung für die Nutzung unter CC-BY-SA-2.5. --GeorgHH 10:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok, ich lerne ..., weg damit Hannes Grobe 15:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2007 see-kuh01 hg.jpg und Image:2007 see-kuh02 hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, das sind fantastische Fotos! Ich möchte sie gern auf Commons:Quality Images vorschlagen, dazu sollte aber die Beschreibung etwas besser sein: Kannst du bitte noch hinzufügen wo und bei welcher Gelegenheit du die Bilder gemacht hast? Danke. --GeorgHH • talk   13:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

happy new year georg! erstmal sehr herzlichen dank für deine umfangreiche unterstützung in sachen categorisierung. so langsam habe ich auch begriffen, wie es geht. danke auch für das kompliment. so über die jahre kommt halt was zusammen. da ich die neuen bilder erst letzte nacht (per commonist) hochgeladen habe, bitte ich um etwas geduld für die beschreibungen. die see-kuh ist übrigens eine see-elefanten-kuh (Mirounga leonina). description is corrected and completed. glückauf Hannes Grobe 14:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Hannes, die Bilder wurden leider nicht als Qualitätsbilder bewertet, schade! Zur Info hier noch die links zu den Nominierungen: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:2007 see-kuh02 hg.jpg und Commons:Quality_images_candidates#January_16.2C_2008. --GeorgHH • talk   23:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jürgen - trotzdem vielen Dank! Hannes Grobe 08:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dupe

[edit]

Re: Image:1985 air-gun-large hg.jpg, you need to list it with "duplicate|name of good image" or "badname|name of good image". Please fix. thanks. Same with "1982 coral-drilling hg.jpg", "Pingo greenland hg.jpg". — Rlevse • Talk • 01:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antarctic Gravity Field

[edit]

Hans, I understand that picture is edited. Could you add the legend explaining the different colors? All by itself, it's pretty useless. Diagrams should never be unexplained. Thanks for your hard work! --Jens

jens you are right, i will add an explanation soon Hannes Grobe 18:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC). done Hannes Grobe 07:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice butterflies

[edit]

Hi, thanks for the nice pictures of butterflies. I have one question (what is the F in F. Demos ?) and one suggestion : you could create a category where to put all these images, for instance "Europas bekannteste Schmetterlinge" or "Franz Demos" or whatever the correct name is.. Frédéric 21:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

there are many publications where only the initial of the first name is given. i also prefer full names but due to the fact, that this book is more than 100 years old, there is no way to find out who F. was. from my opinion, a category just for one book does not make sense. a category butterflies of europe would make sense. Hannes Grobe 17:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images

[edit]

Hi, you marked the below images for deletion saying that there is a duplicate. Can you go back to the image, and change the tag from "delete" to {{duplicate|name of other file}}? At the moment, the deletion request is incomplete, and will not be processed. Thanks for your help!

-- Deadstar (msg) 14:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done - please delete. thank you ! Hannes Grobe 17:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bild in Farbe?

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, hast Du von Image:Gotland-reef hg.jpg eventuell auch eine Version in Farbe? Viele Grüße, --Svens Welt 13:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry - no Hannes Grobe 15:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polar station

[edit]

Hello. I've made the category because i hope that someone else will add more photos to create something similar to Category:Henryk Arctowski Polish Antarctic Station. In the mean time i've liked the category that i've created in the italian wiki page of the base. Regards, --Hal8999 13:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry but the definition of categories should not be based on hope but on structure and usefullness. a category for one single antarctic station is not usefull because there will be few images; one for Antarctic stations would make sense. Hannes Grobe 09:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1989 eisberg-pinguine02 hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo, kannst Du bei dieser wirklich tollen Aufnahme noch eine nähere Beschreibung einfügen? Also möglichst Ort und Pinguinart. Die Jahresangabe in der Beschreibung weicht übrigens vom Dateinamen ab ;-) Vielen Dank! --Überraschungsbilder 09:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done! danke für hinweis. erbitte geduld bei den bildbeschriftungen. Hannes Grobe 09:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Klasse, das ging ja fix :-) Ich wusel gerade etwas bei den Pinguinen herum, da bin ich darüber gestolpert. --Überraschungsbilder 09:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geology

[edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− This category requires frequent maintenance to avoid becoming too large. It should list very few (if any) images or pages directly, and should mainly contain sub-categories. Media files and pages in this category should be moved to subcategories where appropriate. --61.197.81.246 18:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dessication Cracks -- Incredible!

[edit]

Your picture of dessication cracks is incredible, amazing work! Just two questions, what is the scale on that image? And also, what exactly is the "sludge"? -- PerryTachett's Wikipedia account

description extended - thank you for the hint Hannes Grobe 22:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Emil-schumacher-1959_hg.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Emil-schumacher-1959_hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vierge Marie 20:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

blurring is ok but why cutting the second person away Schumacher ist talking to? In this way the artist looks silly. may I suggest to reload the complete image (with the painting blurred). I would also appreciate a personal page behind "Vierge Marie" - just to know whom I am talking to. Hannes Grobe 07:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1994 geraete-einsatz hg.jpg

[edit]

Could you please fill in the missing description for this image? Thanks. --ShakataGaNai Talk 00:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done Hannes Grobe 06:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1998 crp-rick02 hg.jpg

[edit]

Please add a description. --ShakataGaNai Talk 00:35, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done Hannes Grobe 06:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Hgrobe/archive!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for this notification. i am aware about the problem and i am categorizing my images when ever i have the time. Hannes Grobe (talk) 09:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Katabatischer Wind

[edit]

Hallo Hannes Grobe,

I would like to ask your opinion on wether the term Katabatic Wind in English is the same as Katabatischer Wind auf Deutsch. And what is the difference between Fall Wind und Katabatischer Wind. IsFari (talk) 21:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Katabatischer Wind in German is correct (see german wikipedia). Katabatischer Wind ist ein spezieller Fallwind. Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, I had seen the article in german wikipedia, and previously made the interwiki-link between en:Katabatic Wind and de:Katabatischer Wind, but some robot undid my change, hence my doubts about the subject. I 'll try and fix it. And maybe try to find some sources explaining the different meaning of these types of wind.
Oh, and thanx for the nice graph on English wiki. IsFari (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Donauwelle

[edit]

Hallo! Es gibt eine aktuelle Diskussion zum Thema [2]. Dabei taucht für mich die Frage auf, was die Rote Farbe im Guß auf deinem Foto verursacht hat [3]. Da wir versuchen, eine Standardform zu finden, sollte das Bild dem auch entsprechen. Vieleicht kannst uns mit deinen Hinweisen helfen. Cu 78.51.198.81 13:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, aber beide Donauwellen (rund und auf Blech) auf Commons sind in ihrer Bedeckung persönliche Varianten, die nicht der Standardform entsprechen. Die Bedeckung besteht aus einer Mischung von Schokolade und gelatiniertem Kirschsaft. Die Standardwelle ist üblicherweise mit einer dünnen Schicht Schokolade bedeckt, in die vor dem Erkalten mit einem Kamm-ähnlichen Gerät Wellen geritzt werden. Ich werde versuchen ein entsprechendes Foto zu machen und einbinden. Hannes Grobe (talk) 16:23, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Noctiluca scintillans unica.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright Image:Noctiluca scintillans unica.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-Lycaon (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Noctiluca scintillans varias.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright Image:Noctiluca scintillans varias.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-Lycaon (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

both images are provided by the planktonnet database under a license . may I ask to remove the copyright violation tags or explain why this is a violation Hannes Grobe (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but excerpt below is literally from the website (my emphasis):
Plankton*net's content in the form of metadata and/or images associated with observations and sets are licensed under the terms of Creative Commons license attribution, non-commercial, share-alike variant. Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. For additional literature on creative commons as applied to biodiversity, read Moritz (2006).
This is a non-commercial license and not allowed on Commons. If you can provide a different license from the copyright holder, please submit via OTRS. Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 09:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you can show me the CC-by 3.0 license I may have overlooked, the it is also fine of course. Lycaon (talk) 09:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
sorry - there is no direct link to this image. if you use http://planktonnet.awi.de/ and type in Noctiluca scintillans. you will find both images in the first line. click on it will give you the specific cc-by 3.0 license for those images which does NOT include a NC. Hannes Grobe (talk) 12:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That will suffice. Thank you for the effort. I will remove the deletion requests. Lycaon (talk) 12:37, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iceage_time-slice_hg.png

[edit]

Hi ! Iceage_time-slice_hg.png is a very didactit figure : it so difficult to make perceiving time(s) scale(s). A great job ! But it seems to me that Allerød interstade isn't in the correct position (in the current version it is after Younger Dryas). Es ist schade.

Laurent Deschodt (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup! that will be changed - be sure. Hannes Grobe (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Plattenkondensator hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe,

die Idee das Bild zum Plattenkondensator einzufügen ist (meiner Ansicht nach) eine perfekte Ergänzung zum Artikel "Kondensator". Mir ist nur aufgefallen, das der Fokuspunkt und/oder die Tiefenschärfe nicht optimal gewählt sind, die Stützelemente sind leider etwas unscharf. Hast Du eine Möglichkeit, dies zu korrigieren?

Viele Grüße,

Fabian

sorry - unscharf bleibt unscharf. Hannes Grobe (talk) 11:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Thanks for uploading your Grtvikin picture.

I spent a couple of hours looking for a "free" picture a couple of years ago. I found lots that weren't free. But yours is better than any of those.

So thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 18:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you are very welcome! Hannes Grobe (talk) 08:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo!

[edit]

Bei diesem Namen fallen mir ein paar Flaschen Lauchtack in NB-Süd ein... --Plenz (talk) 22:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Hallo.........[reply]


Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_001.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_002.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_00.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_00.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_003.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_004.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Wegener_Expedition-1930_004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teofilo (talk) 20:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Hgrobe!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

done Hannes Grobe (talk) 07:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

today's new images

[edit]

Hi, Hannes Grobe, you have uploaded a lot of images today. Thanks for that. On the other hand, almost all of them seem to be missing a description and some categories. They would be much more useful, if you please could add description and categories to these images, see your page for a list of images to check for description and categories. Unless description and categories are added, it will be difficult to find and use your images. I ran across your gallery, as many of today's uncategorized images have been uploaded by you. Please see also preceeding entry. happy xmas. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

danke Herzi für den hinweis. in meinem workflow lade ich immer einen satz bilder hoch und beschreibe/kategorisiere sie dann im laufe der nächsten tage. bitte um geduld. grüsse Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, wenn ich zu schnell geschossen habe, --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Könntest du diese Bilder: File:Admiral-brommie-lesum hg.jpg, File:Admiral-brommie-text hg.jpg, File:Admiral-brommie hg.jpg korrekt kategorisieren. Das ist mittlerweile seit über einem Monat überfällig. Frohes Schaffen. --High Contrast (talk) 23:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
done! erbitte verweis auf die wikipedia-policy, die angibt in welcher zeit ein bild in commons zu kategorisieren ist.Hannes Grobe (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turtle-tob.jpg

[edit]

Do you have any identification on this excellent specimen?--Kevmin (talk) 23:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry Karl - no. If you have any idea, i would appreciate very much. Hannes Grobe (talk) 10:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello

[edit]

I am looking for pictures of Nannoplancton free of rights : Nannococus . If you have some thank you to write me !!! 19:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Salamandre (d)

? Hannes Grobe (talk)

File tagging File:Flying-saucer_cardboard.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flying-saucer_cardboard.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Flying-saucer_cardboard.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 23:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Parallels-desktop3.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Parallels-desktop3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Parallels-desktop3.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pinguineier

[edit]

Hi, ich hab da heute ein Bild eines Königspinguineis (Aptenodytes patagonicus) hochgeladen. Zumindest war es als solches im Zoo Frankfurt beschriftet. Du hattest vor gut 2 Jahren auch 2 Bilder von Pinguineiern hochgeladen; vom Königs- und Kaiserpinguin (Aptenodytes forsteri). Nun ergibt sich hier ein kleiner Widerspruch, da das Frankfurt-Zoo-Bild des Königs- Deinem Kaiserpinguinei entspicht. Entweder hat sich der Zoo Frankfurt da geirrt oder Du hattest damals was verwechselt. Zur besseren Übersicht hier nochmal die 3 Bilder:

  • "Dein" Königspinguin
    "Dein" Königspinguin
  • "Dein" Kaiserpinguin
    "Dein" Kaiserpinguin
  • Königspinguin laut Zoo Frankfurt
    Königspinguin laut Zoo Frankfurt

Kannst Du das bitte nochmals überprüfen bzw. bei der Klärung was nun richtig behilflich sein. Danke --Jutta234 (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jutta234 - danke für hinweis, gutes qualitätsmanagement. die besagten eier liegen im deutschen polarinstitut und wurden von einem veterinär/säugetierbiologen, der mit den tieren in der antarktis arbeitet, als solche identifiziert. es gibt da keinen zweifel. informierst du den frankfurter zoo über seine falsche beschriftung oder soll ich das tun? gruss Hannes Grobe (talk) 09:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK wobei Pinguine keine Säugetiere sind (smile). Ich schreib denen eine Mail und warte erst noch ein par Tage auf Antwort. Man weiß ja nie, evtl. sind sie sich auch absolut sicher dass sie richtig liegen. Wahrscheinlich muss dann meine Mail erstmal dort den Weg zu den richtigen Leuten finden. Wenn sichs so bestätigt wie im Moment aussieht stell ich dann hier einen Umbennenungsantrag auf "mein" Bild und sortiere es entsprechend um. Gruß --Jutta234 (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, ich habe heute Antwort vom Frankurter Zoo bekommen. Recht kurz:
... der Zoo Frankfurt hielt früher auch Köngispinguine. Königspinguine legen normalerweise Königspinguin-Eier.
Sie sind sich also sicher dass es sich um einen Königspinguinei handelt. Ich werd' das dann wohl nochmal auf de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Biologie/Bestimmung vorbringen. Gruß --Jutta234 (talk) 14:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ich bin gespannt wer wohl kompetenter ist als ein Fachbiologe am deutschen Polarinstitut ... Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Da hat jemand ganz guten Kontakt zu Mitarbeitern dort. Ich hatte einfach "nur" eine Mail an die auf der Webseite angegebenen Info-Mailadresse geschickt und diesen einen Satz als Antwort erhalten. Vielleicht klärt sichs ja darüber. --Jutta234 (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. File:Aptenodytes patagonicus egg hg.jpg is not a very typical egg for a King penguin. The two species in fact have very similar eggs and apart from the size are rather undistinguishable. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images good descriptions

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:Southfrance-1987-0020 hg.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the hint. this images belong to an archive of slides which are 25 to 60 years old. only in a few cases, the images are properly described and i hope for an identification by other wikipedians. the alternative would be not to upload the images to Commons. What is prefered? Hannes Grobe (talk) 21:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birgfeld-fountain hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, damit die o.g. Datei besser kategorisiert werden kann (z.B. auch nach Stadtteil), die Frage, ob Du noch weißt, wo Du das Bild aufgenommen hast (und ggfls, wie die Skulptur heißt)? Viele Grüße vom --Mogelzahn (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

der Brunnen steht im Zentrum (NW der Alster), Straße nicht mehr zu rekonstruieren. Hannes Grobe (talk) 08:18, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder aus Südfrankreich

[edit]

Hallo, Du hast interessante Bilder aus Südfrankreich hochgeladen und sie in die Category:France gestellt. Diese Kategorie sollte keine Bilder enthalten. Siehst du eine Möglichkeit die Bilder genauer zu lokalisieren? Der Name der Stadt würde schon weiterhelfen. Freundliche Grüße, --Cayambe (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bitte lesen, was ich 2 absätze weiter oben dazu geschrieben habe. gruss Hannes Grobe (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jumping_frog_hg.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Jumping_frog_hg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Tryphon☂ 08:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bugs-2x_hg.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Bugs-2x_hg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–Tryphon☂ 10:03, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wegener-marke_hg.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Wegener-marke_hg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Max Kohl catalogue

[edit]

Hi, thank you for uploading the Max Kohl catalogue. But could you move them out of Category:Physics instruments and technology to the subcategory Category:Max Kohl catalogues that I just made? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am uncertain about the procedure. new categories are produce all the time. i do not think, that the provider of images should track those and should care for the new linking. that might keep image providers quite busy. Hannes Grobe (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think you should make new separate categories when you upload so many similar images. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for your advice. if you say "i think ..." - is there any official regulation in commons on how to define categories and in particular about the usefullness of the granularity of subcategories? Hannes Grobe (talk) 13:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It depends a bit. For people, some contributors start a category even if there is only one image. That may be a good idea because it helps contributors that upload a different image at a later time, but my limit is two images of the same person. For other subjects the limit is higher, but as soon as one can fill a screen (10 or 20 images), a new category is worth considering. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:41, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the job of moving the catalogue pages out of Category:Physics instruments and technology. I looked around a bit among our old instruments in Växjö, and I found two items manufactured by Max Kohl AG. I will make some photos of en:Barlow's wheel (item here). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on one of your images at en.wiki en:File talk:Iceage time-slice hg.png

[edit]

The last 1kyr is based on IPCC '90 fig 7.1.c. See en:Description of the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age in IPCC reports for why this is a bad idea William M. Connolley (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Thought you might like to know. -Atmoz (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a note to the graf: Please keep in mind: All grafs are principle scetches and do NOT reflect the most recent knowledge of climate change in detail! Hannes Grobe (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the reply. :-) -Atmoz (talk) 20:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hgrobe,
bist du das selbst in File:Dolomiten1974 62 hg.jpg? Nur damit es keine Persönlichkeitsrechtsprobleme gibt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ja - selbst! das hast du aber recht schnell bemerkt. danke für ein zuverlässiges commons review! Hannes Grobe (talk)

Paris in der Bretagne?

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe, lag Paris 1986 tatsächlich noch in der Bretagne, wie beispielsweise hier und dort kategorisiert? -- Ies (talk) 11:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cat fehler beim massenimport - sorry - danke für den hinweis Hannes Grobe (talk)

File:Fishing-game_hg.jpg

[edit]
File:Fishing-game_hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 02:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marokko1982-136 hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Dr. Grobe - sind das wirklich Felle mit Haaren (fur skins) oder nicht doch Häute bei einem Färber? Danke!--Kürschner (talk) 12:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

da hat der Kürschner vollkommen recht - aber das fur-cat ist nicht von mir ... gruss Hannes Grobe (talk)
Danke schön - und ein tolles Jahr 2011 wünscht der --Kürschner (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Islandbilder

[edit]

Hallo hgrobe! Besten Dank für die hochgeladenen Islandbilder. Wäre es möglich, diese zu kategoriesieren? Alle Bilder in die Hauptkategorie "Iceland" zu laden, macht die Seite leider schnell unübersichtlich. Im Notfall eine Kategorie "Not categorised pictures of Iceland" o.Ä. eröffnen und die Bilder dort hinein stellen. Dank und Gruss, simisa, 17:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

bei der erfassung von archiven mit tausenden von bildern die noch dazu einige jahrzehnte alt sind, ist das leider nicht immer ohne weiteres machbar. die alternative wäre nur noch wohl kategorisierbare bilder zu erfassen. das ist aber wohl kaum policy von wikipedia. Hannes Grobe (talk) 16:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist schon okay. Immerhin sind sie ja schonmal in Iceland kategorisiert. Es wird sich schon jemand zum Kategorisieren finden. Eine gute Beschreibung ist dafür natürlich wichtig - da schreibst du ja sicherlich beim Hochladen alles dazu, was du über das Bild weißt, dann kann das Kategorisieren schon irgendwer erledigen. Beachte nur bitte, dass du die Lizenzierung richtig machst. Gebe beispielsweise bei den Bildern, bei denen du dich auf ein anonymes Werk beziehst an, wieso es anonym ist und wieso du den Autor nicht herausfinden kannst. Die Rechtslage bei den anonymen Werken ist nicht so einfach. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Yemen

[edit]

Hi Hgrobe, I have seen you have imported many pictures from Yemen. It is a nice addition. Unfortunately you have put all of them in the Category:Yemen. This category is a main category. All pictures of Yemen should be put in subcategories of the category:Yemen. It would be appreciated if you could put your pictures in the right subcategory. Thanks a lot. --Bgag (talk) 18:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bezeichnen sie bitte den namen der standorte in diese fotos. --Gavin Collins (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yemen! as described several times: those images are 25 years old and from my private archive. they will need detailed categorization from a yemen specialist. Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure I understand as it says in the image descriptions that you are the author, which I presume to mean that you are the creator and owner of these images. If this is not the case, then who is? --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i am the owner of the images and i am not going to discuss this with you in more detail. Hannes Grobe (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Southfrance

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe, Deine Bildeintragungen aus Südfrankreich (zB File:Southfrance-1987-0030 hg.jpg) bringen überhaupt nichts, weil Du keine Örtlichkeiten angegeben hast und man sie somit nicht kategorisieren kann. Vielleicht könntest Du da ein bisschen präziser sein? Grüße --Skipper69 (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für den freundlichen Hinweis. 10 zeilen drüber steht warum das so ist. Nennen Sie mir doch bitte die Anweisung in commons, nach der ein Hochladen von Bildern ohne präzise Ortsangabe nicht erwünscht ist. Oder ist Ihr Diskussionsbeitrag lediglich persönliche Polemik? Es gibt sehr wohl Wikipedianer, die in der Lage sind grob klassifizierte Bilder detailiert zu kategorisieren. Hannes Grobe (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos Bretagne à décrire et classifier.

[edit]

Il manque les descritions plus détaillées avec les noms des lieux de vos photos intitulées Bretagne. Ils contiennent des photos de Bretagne, Normandie et Ile-de-France. On ne peut pas les classifier, ni les utiliser dans les articles. Pouerras-tu ajouter les descriptions plus precises. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mailing me. If you don't remember what is the object of the picture, don't upload it. please. --Havang(nl) (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The encyclopedic value depends on the correctness of the information. The uploader is responsible for the correctness of the information, although other users give help. Not all your files uploaded as "Bretagne" were located in Bretagne. Avoid wrong uploads, please. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raffael-madonna-alba.jpg

[edit]

Only for bureaucratic reasons: Can you please add the author like: Raffaello Sanzio; Derative work / reproduction by Hgrobe. Thank you. --RE RILLKE Questions? 23:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

done Hannes Grobe (talk) 23:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Hgrobe!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

those images have been uncategorized by an other user for an unknown reason. now i am notified that imageas are uncatgerorized. do i need to understand this procedure? Hannes Grobe (talk) 15:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
About Ford. My mistake. Sorry. Kobac (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Island1984 058.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Island1984 058.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JD554 (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sea_salt-e_hg.svg

[edit]

Hallo, kannst du für File:Sea_salt-e_hg.svg noch eine Quellenangabe eintragen? (Die Grafik kann ja durchaus selbstgemacht sein, die Daten müssen ja wohl irgendwo herkommen.) DE benutzt übrigens File:Seawater_components.svg, mit den selben Daten, ich denke das ist auch ein Abkömmling von deiner Grafik. Gruss, 79.234.81.171 20:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

die frage ist berechtigt - die datenquelle ist aber leider nicht mehr zu rekonstruieren; ist zu lange her. sorry Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhv Gnesener5 hg.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe, bei der Ermittlung/Prüfung von Objektkoordinaten für die Denkmalliste ist mir zu dem Bild eine Unstimmigkeit aufgefallen. Ich sehe wohl die Hausnummer 5 auf dem Bild, aber das abgebildete Haus stimmt nicht mit den Bildern in der Datenbank des LfD (siehe Link in der Bildbeschreibung) überein. Nach der Kameraposition steht das Haus auch nicht an der Ecke Adolfstraße (Standort des Denkmals laut Denkmalkarte), sondern an der Ecke Uhlandstraße. Wäre schön, wenn Du das prüfen könntest, damit ggf. die Bildbeschreibung und die Denkmalliste korrigiert werden kann. Dank und Gruß --Quarz (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erl. --Quarz (talk) 20:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:L1130437.JPG

[edit]
File:L1130437.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

85.16.60.92 06:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 5357c2f3c5f339f888762bdc49f4d1dc

[edit]

Owner of a TUSC account!

Bild CTD-probe

[edit]

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Ctd_hg.jpg Hallo HGrobe, interessantes Gerät, die Verlängerung des Zylinderrahmens kann abgenommen werden, puffert etwas bei zu rauem Aufsetzen, kann, wenn eingedellt leicht ersetzt werden, oder macht die Gesamthöhe etwas variabel ... Für Handhabung und einer Schiffswand entlanggleiten erschienen mir nur die leichten Gewindestangen-U-Klemmen nach aussen etwas unangenehm scharfkantig. So instruktiv sind detailreiche Bilder ... Das einzige was mir am Bild fehlt ist ein mitfotografierter Vergleichsmassstab. So schätze ich den Durchmesser (des gesamten Gestells) aus Gewindegrössen, Schlauchdicken auf mindestens 80 cm, aus den Kettenhebezügen eher mindestens 1,20 m, zwecks Transportfähigkeit in Lkw oder Seecontainer auf maximal 2,40 m. Eine klare Angabe am besten des Durchmessers würde die Anschauung unterstützen. Danke für das Bild! --Helium4 (talk) 04:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you - done Hannes Grobe 06:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Dummy Image Generator

[edit]

hi Hgrobe, i wanted to inform you (and say a big thank you) that we use one of your images on http://dummy-image-generator.com/ the credits list you find here: http://dummy-image-generator.com/credits best regards immo


E X S I C C A T O R

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe, bei Deiner Exsiccator-Abbildung lautet die richtige Schreibweise: Exsikkator. In der englischen Version auf der selben Seite muss es Desiccator heißen. Bitte entsprechend ändern. Danke und Gruß Walter Fellinghauer, Wertheim

das schöne an Wikipedia ist ja, das jeder jeden Fehler korrigieren kann. Hannes Grobe 06:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

NACHTRAG ZU EXSICCAIOR Danke Hgrobe für den Hinweis zur Korrekturmöglichkeit für jeden. Leider komme ich an den Text zu Deinem Foto nicht ran, warum weiß ich nicht, dafür bin ich noch zu neu EDV-mäßig unterwegs (für den Hinweis zur Vorgehensweise dazu wäre ich Dir dankbar), sodass Du ja bitte die Änderung jetzt vornehmen kannst, dann ist es auch in den Händen des Autors. Ich habe gesehen, dass Du seinerzeit auf meinen Hinweis reagiert und den Englisch-Text entspr. geändert hast. Im Moment steht unter Deiner "Exsikkator"-Abbilung (Rubrik Laborgerät) noch fälschlicherweise Exsiccator. Weiterhin steht bei Deinem Exsi-Bild unter Kommentar/Autor noch das falsche Wort in Englisch, das Du noch nicht geändert hast und zwar in Desiccator.

Ich höre mit Interesse wieder vcn Dir und danke Dir im voraus recht herzlich --217.227.255.33 16:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC) PS: Entschuldigung, ich habe versehentlich nicht den Suchbegriff "Laborgerät" angegeben. Dort ist die Exsi-Abbildung mit dem Schreibfehler. Gruß--217.227.255.33 17:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tunis1960-115 hg.jpg

[edit]

Dear Hannes,
Looking at this picture, I am sure it was not taken in Tunisia. Both the architecture and the flora are more looking like those of Europe, maybe Northern Europe. Regards, Moumou82 (talk) 10:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your are so right. this must have been mixed in my slide collection. thanks again. Hannes Grobe 13:26, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File:CO2-variations hg.svg

[edit]
File:CO2-variations hg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 07:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wo mag das gewesen sein?

[edit]

Hallo, weisst du noch wo das Bild aufgenommen wurde? Region oder Département würde mir als Info ausreichen. Grüsse, --Stanzilla (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

tut mir leid - keinen schimmer - ist zu lange her. grüsse Hannes Grobe (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Und wo mag dies gewesen sein? Immerhin muss es irgendwo in der Bretagne sein. Ich glaub, wenn du das nicht mehr weisst, dann räum ichs einfach in eine "Bretagne-Kategorie". Grüsse,--Stanzilla (talk) 13:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ja bitte.

ABBILDUNG BAROMETER MERCURY COLUMN

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe, Deine Abbildung ist o.k., aber der Text ist falsch. Richig muss es heißen: Manometer, Bennert, Messbereich 2-180 mbar, mit verschiebbarer Spiegelglasskala, auf Holzstativ. Englisch: Manometer, Bennert, scale 2-180 mbar, with ajustable mirror scale on wood base. Im Übrigen hatte der(die)jenige Recht auf der Disku-Seite Barometer Mercury Colomn. Gruß -- 217.227.205.169 17:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vielen dank - das werde ich gleich korrigieren. gruss Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:22, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hannes Grobe, den Text hast Du geändert, aber unter File steht immer noch Barometer... Gruß -- 217.227.205.169 17:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One question

[edit]

Are you sure, this image is owned by istanbul? What is the source of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Istanbul-1959_09_hg.jpg I am a history teacher and I live in Istanbul for thirty years I think I got an error here. There is one such way of istanbul minarets. No such a minaret in Istanbul. moreover, the edge of the walls of Istanbul do not have such a rough terrain. tombstones in the different. it is not the style ottoman. it is Arab-style it looks like the walls of Jerusalem. can also be wall or another city in Palestine --Tarih (talk) 05:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much - it was to long ago ... i have corrected the title to "unknow". Hannes Grobe (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Togo-Benin

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, kannst du deine Reiseroute zur Verfügung stellen, damit zumindest Anhaltspunkte für eine Lokalisierung der Bilder bestehen? Ansonsten wird das echt schwer, bzw. bei den Bildern bei denen es möglich ist, würde die Gewissheit fehlen (z.B. File:Togo-benin 1985-067 hg.jpg = de:Ganvié? File:Togo-benin 1985-045 hg.jpg = de:Somba- bzw. Tamberma-Behausung?). --Martin H. (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

es sind bilder aus einem über 25 jahre alten archiv. die lokalität (und reisroute) lassen sich nicht mehr rekonstruieren. man möge sie so verwenden, wie sie vorliegen. dank und gruß Hannes Grobe (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unidentified locations in India

[edit]

Hi Hgrobe, please use this one and not main category:India for images of unidentified locations in India. -- Ies (talk) 06:33, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sorry - i missed that step. i will recat. thank you for the hint Hannes Grobe (talk) 08:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unidentified locations in Myanmar

[edit]

Hi Hgrobe, please use this one instead of category:Burma for images of unidentified locations in Myanmar (the former Burma). Thanks. -- Ies (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Location?

[edit]

Hi Hgrobe - do you have a location for these pics, please? File:1991 polar-bear hg.jpg, File:1991 polar-bear02 hg.jpg, File:1991 polar-bear03 hg.jpg - Thanks, MPF (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it would make things easier for you, Hgrobe, if you just write in the description of the files, that you don't know the location. We appreciate the images and it might be a bit tiresome to get asked about locations all the time.--Stanzilla (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But even an approximate location is better than none ;-) MPF (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
done Hannes Grobe (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Photo Barnstar
Danke Hannes, für über 7000 interessante und für die Bebilderung der Wikipedia wichtige Fotos! --GeorgHH • talk   22:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
welche ehre - vielen dank. ein paar kommen noch ... Hannes Grobe (talk) 22:37, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolbenluftpumpe hg.jpg

[edit]

Hi Hannes, Under your licence of this image I would like to adapt/remix it for a self-published book. The image would be quite altered from the original and used in combination with other imagery and text. What attribution, if any, would you require?

feel free to use it as you like. good luck Hannes Grobe (talk) 19:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks

File:Ernst wilhelm nay stamp.jpg

[edit]
File:Ernst wilhelm nay stamp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Correlatio (talk) 21:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Niki herrenhausen-l hg.jpg

[edit]
File:Niki herrenhausen-l hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gind2005 (talk) 18:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:India1961-153 hg.jpg

[edit]
File:India1961-153 hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland 19:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

File:India-1970 038 hg.jpg

[edit]
File:India-1970 038 hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland 19:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Using Pearl-variety hg.jpg

[edit]

Dear Mr. Grobe Can I please use your picture on my business website but replacing the black background by a white one?

you are welcome to do so. Hannes Grobe (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. It's been agreat help. You will find it under www.8elements.eu If you have any suggestions for attribution pls let me know.

Request for Historia Publishing, Paris

[edit]

Historia printing are working on a light numerical support for 6 to 8 years old children. The topic is Ulysses and his journeys.

Ulysses story will be told with drawings. But the author also wants a photographic support from time to time.

To illustrate this purpose, we should like to reproduce your photo about Djerba.

Would you be kind enough to give us your agreement.

This project is still experimental. The application on Apple store will be sold no more than 4 €. That means we have no money left for the pictures. We should understand a negative answer, of course. In the contrary, if you accept our proposal, your credit line will be printed and we’ll send you a copy.


Be sure we shall be grateful for the attention you’ll paid to our request.

Best regards. Claire Segura Picture Researcher Sofia Publications/ Historia

Dear Claire - please make yourself familiar with the use policy of wikipedia images. all images are free to use for any purpose - it is just required to properly cite the author. Please cite my images as: Hannes Grobe/AWI - Kind regards

Myanmar 1981 oder 1971?

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, ich kann und würde gern einige deiner Bilder aus Myanmar bearbeiten (genauere Ortsangabe z.B. und Kategorien). In den Bildnamen steht stets File:Burma1981-XXX.jpg, in den Beschreibungen aber "Image from Burma in 1971". Wenn du mir das richtige Jahr sagst, kann ich das gleich mitändern. Gruß, Denis Barthel (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was ist das denn für ein Schlamassel? Sehr herzlichen Dank Denis, dass Du Dich dem annehmen möchtest. Die Reise war 1981. Viele Grüße Hannes Grobe (talk)
Danke! Lieben Gruß, Denis Barthel (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hannes, so, jetzt habe ich getan, was ich konnte, d.h. den Tippfehler korrigiert, die Bilder der Shwedagon-Pagode in Rangun und die Bilder aus Bagan näher einsortiert und alle neu kategorisiert. Dazwischen allerdings ist noch einiges offen. Für die Bilder von den lfd. Nummern Burma1981-035.jpg bis zu denen ab Burma1981-121.jpg fehlt leider jede Information. Falls du dich beim Drüberschauen also an irgendetwas erinnerst, so wäre das sehr wertvoll, denn diese Fotos sind bereits jetzt durchaus von historischem Wert, gern übernehme ich dann eine genauere Aufarbeitung, soweit möglich. Liebe Grüße, Denis Barthel (talk) 21:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Denis - super!. Die Bilder sind aus unserem alten Familienarchiv - eine Beschreibung/Rekonstruktion einzelner Bilder ist aussichtslos nach über 30 Jahren. Mit besagtem "historischen Wert" hoffen Sie auf weitere hilfreiche Wikipedians - wie Du einer bist - um geordnet zu werden. Grüße Hannes Grobe (talk) 19:12, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected: 

Eleassar (t/p) 22:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ittoqqortoormiit mikkelsen hg.jpg

[edit]
File:Ittoqqortoormiit mikkelsen hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 08:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beamter 1940 hg.jpg

[edit]
File:Beamter 1940 hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rybec (talk) 00:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chai Wan Estate

[edit]

Hello, thanks for all your excellent older images of Hong Kong. I had a fun time figuring out the location of this one. Totally unrecognisable! Regards, Citobun (talk) 12:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for your all help. with those building i can not help. sorry - the images are too far away in time ...Hannes Grobe (talk) 09:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Three more: 1, 2, 3. The high resolution helps! Citobun (talk) 06:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
you are just excellent! Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kernsprung1_ka.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Hannes! Kannst du hier noch den Ort der Aufnahme hinzufügen? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kernsprung1_ka.jpg Danke --Philmo1 (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

done - danke für Hinweis Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007 lobster-release hg.jpg

[edit]

Hi, Hgrobe, this image should be renamed because of misleading. Since you have beeen the uploader, do you have a suggestion? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

REM-Fotos des Arnager-Kalkes

[edit]

Hallo Herr Grobe,

ich bin heute auf die REM-Aufnahmen des Arnager-Kalkes gestoßen und habe dabei festgestellt, dass in den meisten Bildbeschreibungen nicht wesentlich mehr steht, als der Dateiname bereits aussagt. Eine Ausnahme bilden die Abbildungen mit den Coccolithen. Es wäre nun nicht verkehrt, wenn auch die anderen Bilder eine etwas detailliertere Beschreibung des Bildinhaltes bekämen. Was sind das für Kristalle (ich vermute Calcit, aber mit sicheheit kann ich es nicht sagen) und worum handelt es sich bei den so oft abgebildeten sphärischen Strukturen? Nannofossilien? Evtl. Calcisphären (kalkige Dinoflagellatencysten) oder Pollen? Oder doch abiotische Bildungen? Da ich anhand eines Teils Ihrer Uploads und anhand Ihres Profils gesehen habe, dass Sie vom Fach sind, hoffe ich, dass Sie das aufklären können. Ich selbst habe zwar auch Kenntnisse in Geologie und Paläontologie, aber das zur Beantwortung meiner obigen Fragen nötige Detailwissen zur Mikropaläontologie des Arnager-Kalkes müsste ich mir erst anlesen, was vermutlich mit relativ aufwändiger und langwieriger Recherche verbunden wäre. --Gretarsson (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo - vielen Dank für den Hinweis - Sie haben recht - man müßte das genauer spezifizieren. Fassen wir die Antwort zusammen als authigene Minerale. Als Geologe wissen Sie, dass es sich da um eine eigene Teildisziplin handelt, ich bin da kein Fachmann. Auch wenn 30 Jahre alt, wollte ich die Bilder nicht entsorgen, sondern der Allgemeinheit zur Verfügung stellen. Beste Grüße Hannes Grobe (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OK, authigene Minerale. Für die prismatischen Dinger würde ich das ohne weiteres als Erklärung durchgehen lassen, auch ohne nähere Bestimmung des Minerals, aber die Sphären? Keine Fossilien? Das überrascht mich etwas... Trotzdem danke für die zügige Antwort. Vielleicht findet sich ja irgendwann jemand, der die Dinger identifizieren kann. Jedenfalls war es dahingehend nicht verkehrt, die Bilder hier hochzuladen. Cheers! --Gretarsson (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, ich nochmal. Ich hab die Beschriftung und die Kategorisierung der oben angesprochenen Bilder entsprechend geändert bzw. konkretisiert. Vorher hatte ich mich noch ein klein wenig schlau gemacht und bin nun weitgehend davon überzeugt, dass die „Sphären“ abiotischen Ursprungs sind. Es handelt sich sehr wahrscheinlich um Aggregate von Tonmineralen. Cheers! --Gretarsson (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
herzlichen Dank! Hannes Grobe (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unbekannter Ort

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe, kannst du für die Datei File:Monument-deutsche-einheit h.jpg den Standort ergänzen (Bildbeschreibung, Kategorie)? Viele Grüße --Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 10:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

habs versucht soweit es noch möglich ist. dank und gruss Hannes Grobe (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

[edit]
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boje

[edit]
Projekt?

Hallo, kannst du noch ergänzen zu welchem Projekt die Boje gehört? gruss. --Itu (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes - done. danke für den hinweis. Hannes Grobe (talk) 05:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank - auch für die vielen anderen Sachen, die hier beisteuerst! --Itu (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

[edit]
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Hgrobe,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entartete-kunst nolde.png

[edit]
File:Entartete-kunst nolde.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 08:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth

[edit]

Hallo, heute hast Du ein Foto aus dem Naturschutzgebiet Weserportsee hochgeladen. Du kannst damit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2014 teilnehmen. Formal fehlen dazu noch zwei Eintragungen auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite: {{Wiki Loves Earth 2014|de}} [[Category:Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2014, DE-HB]]. Info: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in Germany. Gruß--Quarz (talk) 05:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

danke für den Hinweis Hannes Grobe (talk) 07:45, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Sediment core

[edit]

Hello, could you add information about age, time scales of your uploaded image, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Isotope_Stage_11#mediaviewer/File:PS1920-1_0-750_sediment-core_hg.jpg a reference would be very useful. Thanks. Prokaryotes (talk) 12:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

core is still under investigation, thus no detailed stratigraphy exists so far. color variation mark climate variations, a base age of 1 m.a is assumed. Hannes Grobe (talk) 07:44, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue devant le Trocadéro, Paris 1986-150.jpg

[edit]
File:Statue devant le Trocadéro, Paris 1986-150.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaste-fish hg.jpg

[edit]
File:Plaste-fish hg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Vikiçizer (talk) 13:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson Cycle illustration

[edit]

Hello,

Just wanted to congratulate you on the Wilson Cycle illustration, where they stages are superimposed on the world map. Such a simple, yet such an important idea. And such a nice execution. Chapeau bas!

Best wishes, LL

thank you !

File:Mandelstein_prydz-bay-groenland.jpg

[edit]

Könnten Sie mir bitte helfen? Ich habe eine Abweichung im Beschreibungstext Ihres Fotos File:Mandelstein_prydz-bay-groenland.jpg zwischen Prydz Bay und Grönland aufgefunden. Prydz Bay befindet sich in Antarktis, nicht wahr? Kommt dieses Stein wirklich aus Grönland (aber von wo in Grönland?) oder aus Antarktis (vielleicht aus Prydz Bay?) oder ...? Bitte korrigieren Sie die Beschreibung. Ihre Hilfe ist sehr willkommen. (Deutsch ist eine Fremdsprache für mich. Entschuldigen Sie meine Fehler. Bitte antworten Sie mir auf Deutsch oder auf Englisch).GeoWriter (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ist ja faszinierend, was ich da für einen blödsinn produziert habe - herzlichen dank, dass sie das herausgefunden haben. habe es jetzt soweit korrigiert. (ihr deutsch ist hervorragend!) Hannes Grobe (talk) 07:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank. Ich freue mich, dass Sie meine Kommentare verstanden haben. Ich habe gerade zwei weitere Kategorien hinzugefügt. GeoWriter (talk) 14:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roxio-toast8.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Roxio-toast8.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 17:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Plume-dump.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Plume-dump.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Plume-dump.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 19:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Hgrobe - could you split up User:Hgrobe/gallery into about ten sub-galleries, please? It is so large in makes my computer crash if I try to open it. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this page is a personal view on my uploads. but you are right, its now quite lengthy. i will try to divide it. thank you! due to the fact that you are an admin on commons - how many images per page max would you recommend? Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wo ungefähr ist das

[edit]
Ostküste von Grönland

Hallo Hgrobe, wo ist das ungefähr? Die Ostküste von Grönland ist immerhin 2000 Kilometer lang, da wäre eine genauere Verortung sicher hilfreich. Grüße,--Ratzer (talk) 12:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

danke für den Hinweis - aber da ich nicht weiß wo das Flugzeug langflog, ist das kaum zu rekonstruieren - wie Sie richtig sagen - die Küste ist lang. Ich werde mit google earth probieren. Grüße Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Blickrichtung immerhin ist Norden. War das auch die Flugrichtung? Ist das Flugzeug kurz (oder lange) danach irgendwo gelandet? Auf welchem Flugplatz? Vielleicht können wir es so eingrenzen. Grüße,--Ratzer (talk) 07:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
das Foto ist aus den 90er Jahren und ich bin nicht selbst geflogen. Sorry - ich kann da nicht weiterhelfen. Hannes Grobe (talk) 11:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. that calculator's image is Awesome

[edit]
Wow. that calculator's image is Awesome
Wow. that calculator's image is Awesome. RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Hgrobe,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Um welches Lotsenhaus handelt es sich?

[edit]

Hallo Hannes Grobe, du hast vor einigen Jahren dieses Bild angefertigt: Ich würde es sehr gerne in einen neuen Artikle miteinbinden. Nun ist die Frage, ob es sich um das Lotsenhaus der Bremerhavener Lotsen oder das der Weserlotsen handelt. Kennst du die Adresse?

PS, hat sich erledigt, ich habe nach etwas Recherche herausgefunden, daß es sich um das gemeinsame Lotsenhaus der Lotsenbrüderschaften Weser I und der Lotsenbrüderschaft Weser II/Jade im Vorhafen von Bremerhaven handelt.
vielen Dank! Habe Deine Beschreibung dem Titel hinzugefügt. Hannes Grobe (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kamerun in 1969

[edit]

Hallo Hgrobe,

Wissen Sie noch wo Ihre Bilder aus Kamerun in 1969 aufgenommen wurden (mindestens manche) ? Wir würden sie gerne auf WP-FR benutzen [4].

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cameroon_in_the_1960s

Vielen Dank im voraus,

Ji-Elle (talk) 09:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sorry - no - ist zu lange her. Hannes Grobe (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder benutzen

[edit]

Hallo Herr Grobe,

darf ich Ihre Bilder in Videos von mir benutzen (einzelne wo nötig) in einem Deutschkurs ohne zweite Sprache, kostenlos im Internet www.violetta.de/deutsch_fuer_alle.htm (CAPTCHA funktioniert nicht, deshalb hier kein echter link), wobei ich keine Quelle angeben kann, weil der Kurs an dieser Stelle noch so Basic ist, dass jede Quellennennung nur verwirrt, weil nicht erkennbar ist, was der Text heißen soll. Bisher habe ich deshalb alles selbst fotografiert und gedreht, aber es wäre ein große Erleichterung (z.B. Pfefferminze oder auch Ausschnitte aus Bildern, voraussichtlich ohne Personendarstellung, das mache ich selbst mit meinen Freunden). Tut mir leid, wenn das vielleicht nicht der richtige Ort für die Nachricht ist, aber ich bin sehr unerfahrender Wiki-user, so dass ich noch immer nicht die richtigen Kanäle finde. Vielen Dank

sehr gern - verwenden Sie meine Bilder wie auch immer benötigt Hannes Grobe (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


--Kunstwirkt (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank! Wenn Sie meinen Sprachkurs interessant und nützlich finden, gern weiterverbreiten!--Kunstwirkt (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queen logo.png

[edit]
File:Queen logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

[edit]
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anfrage zur Kupferscheibe von Helgoland

[edit]

Hallo Hannes, Auf der Diskussionsseite des Artikels de:Helgoland wurde heute von einem anonymen Benutzer eine Anfrage des Museums Helgoland zu der in der Abbildung File:Copper-barren hg.jpg gezeigten Kupferscheibe gestellt. Könntest du bitte so nett sein und diese Anfrage beantworten? Viele Grüsse, --BurghardRichter (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

done - Danke für den Hinweis. Hannes Grobe (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herr Dr. Grobe, das Museum Helgoland hat von Prof. Schulz alle Aufzeichnungen und Unterlagen zur Verwahrung bekommen, so auch eine Liste aller damals bekannten Funde von Kupferscheiben sowie deren Besitzer. Sie stehen nicht auf dieser Liste. Da es sich bei den Kupferscheiben um ein wichtiges Kulturgut handelt, führen wir diese Liste von Prof. Schulz weiter. Wir haben ihre Kupferscheibe jetzt mit erfast und als Verbleib dem Schifffahrtsmuseum Bremerhaven zugeordnet. Gern hätten wir von ihnen noch zwei Angaben, das Gewicht der Scheibe und den Durchmesser. Mit Gruß Museum Helgoland, Mail Adresse: schumacher@museum-helgoland.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roterfeuerstein (talk • contribs) 12:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bei der in Wikipedia abgebildeten Scheibe handelt es sich um eine Replik aus Kunststoff - kein Original. Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:56, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown locations

[edit]

Hi Hgrobe, Thank you for posting so many wonderful photos from your travels. Having photos like these from the 1960, 70s and 80s are so valuable since copyright laws make it so difficult to get photos from this period. I have been trying to correctly tag some of these images with dates and locations but some are a little difficult. Some from 1965 simply say "Somewhere in Southeast Asia " ([[5]]) and there are some some from Hong Kong that don't give many details but look like they are from a refugee camp ([[6]]). If you could add any additional description to these historical images it would be very helpful and I will keep trying to provide correct tags and incorporate them into Wikipedia articles. Thanks!Monopoly31121993(2) (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

sorry to say but there is no more information left. thank you for tagging. Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Hgrobe,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Apple iWork-06 hg.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Apple iWork-06 hg.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hgrobe/archive&oldid=323677623"