User talk:Bgag

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral (Matera) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral (Matera) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza San Pietro Caveoso 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral (Matera) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

File:Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayanzag 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camels in Gobi Desert 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibet Museum (Dharamsala).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parliament of the Central Tibetan Administration 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deden Tsuglakhang 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in Naddi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deden Tsuglakhang 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village of Naddi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in Naddi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shanti Stupa (Ladakh).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leh 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral (Matera) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel in Gobi Desert 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro Caveoso 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro Caveoso 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro Caveoso 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dungenee Canyon 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main chorten of Shey Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of the Buddha at Shey Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit noisy due ISO 2000, but I guess it's quite dark there and you selected the best possible settings. --Plozessor 04:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Village of Thiksey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francesco d'Assisi (Matera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Francesco d'Assisi (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Camp Gobi Discovery 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stupa at Shey Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Shey Palace 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel at Khongoryn Els 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thiksey Monastery, Ladakh 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thiksey Monastery, Ladakh 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thiksey Monastery, Ladakh 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stok Palace 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni Battista, Matera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa del Purgatorio (Matera) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni Battista, Matera 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goats at Khongoryn Els.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dungenee Canyon 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thiksey Monastery, Ladakh 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa del Purgatorio (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa del Purgatorio (Matera) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni Battista, Matera 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:36, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro Barisano (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria di Idris (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alchi Monastery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alchi Monastery 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pietro Barisano (Matera) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:37, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni Battista, Matera 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemis Monastery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indus River in Ladakh 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape of Ladakh 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khorgo Volcano 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ongii Monastery 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:18, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayandalai, Ömnögovi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:39, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria di Idris (Matera) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni in Monterrone (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Domenico (Matera) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza Vittorio Veneto (Matera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Domenico (Matera) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape of Ladakh 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamayouro, Ladakh 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 12:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamayuru Monastery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:04, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamayuru Monastery 08 - Prayer wheels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mater Domini (Matera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Agostino (Matera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker in Matera 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria di Idris (Matera) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cave house in Sasso Caveoso (Matera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Omkareshwar Temple 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Omkareshwar Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narmada in Omkareshwar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but contrast and sharpness might be a bit smaller --Michielverbeek 06:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial photograph of the Himalayas, Ladakh 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dungenee Canyon 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Overexposed in the foreground. Is that fixable? --MB-one 14:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC) ✓ Done --Bgag 05:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni in Monterrone (Matera) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontana Ferdinandea (detail).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door knocker in Matera 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caves in Parco della Murgia Materana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Padula 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khavtsgait Petroglyphs 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camels in Gobi Desert 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stupa in Mongolia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 09:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hera Temple, Metapontum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Padula 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yak at Yolyn Am 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yolyn Am 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yolyn Am 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yolyn Am 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 00:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 00:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Look to the bottom, it needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 06:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Bgag 16:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality now --Michielverbeek 05:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khongoryn Els 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Alaca Höyük 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthostates, Alaca Höyük 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:31, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Augustus and Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Palace of Maheshwar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:09, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chhatri of Vithoji 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maheshwar Fort - Exterior 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nandi and a linga, Maheshwar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ghats of Maheshwar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arslanhane Mosque 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakda Kho 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:56, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate in Mandu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupmati Pavilion 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:26, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupmati Pavilion 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hera Temple, Metapontum 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal tomb, Alaca Höyük 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bogazkale sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hattusa-Lower City 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sphinx Gate, Hattusa 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance of Özkonak Underground City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road sign in Madhya Pradesh 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rupmati Pavilion 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:33, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Certosa di San Lorenzo (Padula) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mamleshwar Temple - Parvati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not perfect (noise, the hand) but acceptable IMO, especially in 2013 standards. --Benjism89 18:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maheshwar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good street photo. --ArildV 10:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculpture in Walter Sisulu Square, Soweto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Çarıklı Kilise, Göreme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zelve, Cappadocia 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hot air balloon in Cappadocia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baz Bahadur's Palace 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]