User talk:Gzen92/QI/2020

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Mairie - décor de Noël (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Marchands depuis le Koïfhus (Colmar) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality to me, and a nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 22:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 20:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le palais Chaillot et la Défense, vu du deuxième étage (Paris).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMHO sharp enough for QI. --Domob 13:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le palais Chaillot et la Défense, vu du troisième étage (Paris).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMHO sharp enough for QI. --Domob 13:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation - intérieur - gisant (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction. Left part is hanging to the left and right part is leaning to the right. --Michielverbeek 18:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)  Done It should be little better, Gzen92 11:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC) Good now --PantheraLeo1359531 16:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - aile nord (Saverne) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - façade avant - portail (Saverne).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:37, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - façade avant - fronton (Saverne).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - façade avant (Saverne).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - façade avant - statue (Saverne) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon sauvage (Feral pigeon) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - façade arrière (Saverne) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:31, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - façade arrière (Saverne) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 17:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare (Saverne) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des Têtes (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Théâtre - statues (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - chapiteau de l'église abbatiale d'Alspach - aigle de saint Jean (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Might have been a little bit sharper on the left side, but otherwise OK. --Peulle 09:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - chapiteau de l'église abbatiale d'Alspach - dernière communion de sainte Marie l'Égyptienne (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - chapiteau de l'église abbatiale d'Alspach - les Justes dans le sein d'Abraham (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - chapiteau de l'église abbatiale d'Alspach - lion de saint Marc (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - couvent des Unterlinden - cloître (Colmar) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - couvent des Unterlinden - cloître (Colmar) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality considering the conditions --Podzemnik 18:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - couvent des Unterlinden - cloître - puits (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 13:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - armoire à sept colonnes (1665).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks deformed, it'd benefit from an adjustment of tilt/perspective --Poco a poco 16:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 08:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - chapiteau de l'église abbatiale d'Alspach - Triton (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo looks somewhat distorted to me. Can you fix the horizontal perspective? --PantheraLeo1359531 12:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)  Done It's true. Gzen92 15:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC) Thanks --PantheraLeo1359531 16:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Matthias Grünewald - retable d'Issenheim - Résurrection & Annonciation (1512-1516) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Matthias Grünewald - retable d'Issenheim - Saint Sébastien, Crucifixion, Saint Antoine abbé & Déposition (1512-1516) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Matthias Grünewald - retable d'Issenheim - Tentation de Saint Antoine & Visite de Saint Antoine à Saint Paul (1512-1516) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 23:14, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - entrée (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:59, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - plaque (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Martin Schongauer - retable d'Orlier - Annonciation (1472) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Martin Schongauer - retable d'Orlier - Nativité (1472) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Martin Schongauer - retable des Dominicains (~1480).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Retable de Saint-Georges (XVe siècle) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Matthias Grünewald - retable d'Issenheim - Concert des anges & Nativité (1512-1516) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Crucifixion (~1480).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - retable de Bergheim (~1510) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Lucas Cranach - La mélancolie (1532) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Lucas Cranach l'Ancien - Crucifixion (~1515).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Musée Unterlinden - escalier (Colmar) (1).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - escalier (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok for me --Uoaei1 05:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)  Comment why is it in CR, error? Ezarate 18:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. – The CR is probably due to a meanwhile removed vandalism. -- Spurzem 12:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality - --GRDN711 21:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - collégiale Saint-Martin de Colmar - Prophètes (~1350) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - salle des Demoiselles anglaises - plafond.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - salle des Demoiselles anglaises - sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Théophile Klem - maquette du maître-autel de la basilique Saint-Epvre de Nancy (~1864).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Henri Lebert - Vue du Haut-Landsbourg (1833).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Henri Lebert - À la Wormsa (~1828).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Musée Unterlinden - escalier (Colmar) (2).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - escalier (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - couvent des Unterlinden - cloître - galerie (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Unterlinden - Henri Martin - Chaumières au printemps (1921).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundestag (Berlin) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 13:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Checkpoint Charlie - plaque (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonne de la Victoire (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. JiriMatejicek 21:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colonne de la Victoire - statue (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 10:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 10:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument à Bismark (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mémorial Beethoven-Haydn-Mozart - Mozart (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 10:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Checkpoint Charlie - avant (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:29, 26 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 06:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Checkpoint Charlie - délimitation (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 06:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tortue étoilée de Madagascar (Astrochelys radiata).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Categorisation should be better --Ermell 20:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Sorry, category was in description. Gzen92 10:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bundestag - fronton (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC) I'd recommend better centering. JiriMatejicek 22:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Checkpoint Charlie - panneau (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhpas straightening the right side would bring it to QI mark --Podzemnik 05:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Done A little better i hope, Gzen92 13:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Support QI to me --Podzemnik 05:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiergarten - Max Baumbach - Chasse au lapin (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiergarten - Wilhelm Haverkamp - Chasse au renard (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plan de Berlin pendant la guerre froide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Any chance to get more space on top? Also, straightening the verticals would be benefical --Podzemnik 05:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Done I cut the borders, Gzen92 13:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carschten 18:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agglomérat de déchets dans un centre commercial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 18:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église du Souvenir (Berlin) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pandakekok9 12:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiergarten - Carl Begas - Chasse au sanglier (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments would suggest to crop out the photographer's shadow. Otherwise fine --MB-one 09:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Brandebourg - avant - quadrige (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pandakekok9 12:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Brandebourg - avant avec starburst (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments more categorization needed --MB-one 14:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Side Gallery - Dmitri Vrubel - Le baiser (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de la réconciliation (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centre commercial et Bundesrat (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiergarten - Fritz Schaper - Chasse au bison (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks like it needs a til/perspective correction --Poco a poco 10:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Very disturbing shadows -- Spurzem 12:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)  Support I understand Spurzem's comment but shows of trees in a park can be tolerated IMHO, Spurzem feel free to move to CR if you like --Poco a poco 21:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église du Souvenir - fronton (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Brandebourg - arrière - quadrige (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Checkpoint Charlie - écriteau (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église du Souvenir - sculptures (Berlin) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but it needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 09:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 13:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église du Souvenir - sculptures (Berlin) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but it needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 09:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 13:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia (Magnolia) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carschten 08:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia (Magnolia) avec starburst (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Mandala Suites - Vue depuis la salle du petit déjeuner (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église du Souvenir - tours (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What is the building on the right --Poco a poco 09:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Left : old church partially destroyed during the war. Right : new tower built after. Gzen92 13:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Sorry, I formulate my question in a different way: could you please add a cateegory about the building on the right? --Poco a poco 18:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC) Sorry, i added a category. But I think it's the same church, a modern bell tower has been built. Gzen92 08:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Ah, ok, sorry, looked like a skyscraper to me --Poco a poco 15:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur de Berlin et mirador (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur de Berlin - mirador (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 21:54, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! À l'aéroport - A320 HB-JXR (2014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would crop some sky to achive a natural aspect ratio. Otherwise fine --MB-one 14:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A320 HB-JXR (2014) - Aile (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! À l'aéroport - A320 HB-JXR (2014) - aile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur de Berlin - écriteau (Berlin) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Brandebourg - arrière (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a bit dark --MB-one 10:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:15, 8 April 2020 (UTC) null --MB-one 09:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --MB-one 09:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambassade de France (Berlin).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Categorization needs improvement, otherwise fine --MB-one 12:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Categorization has been improved now hopefully. Can this review be passed? --Rahul Bott 15:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality now --MB-one 09:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A320 HB-JXR (2014) - Aile (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't it tilted? --Podzemnik 00:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)  Done Hard to say in the sky, I changed, it looks better. Gzen92 12:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)  Support ok --Podzemnik 00:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pissenlit (Taraxacum) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue - cabine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue - cabine (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renoncule rampante (Ranunculus repens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (49).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (50).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight underexposure, but good enogh imho. --Smial 09:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert mâle (Anas platyrhynchos) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:20, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marronnier (Aesculus) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) - queue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (53).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (55).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) - patte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) - tête (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 01:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert mâle (Anas platyrhynchos) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would crop a bit from the bottom to achieve a better balance in composition --MB-one 15:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good now --MB-one 19:08, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture should be aligned horizontally and the brightness a bit reduced --Ermell 20:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)  Done (the "island" in the background is round) Gzen92 12:13, 7 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - sommet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - sommet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would reduce the contrast a bit --Michielverbeek 13:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église des Dominicains - clocher (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artillerie (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please, add a more specific categoriy --Poco a poco 16:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosacée (Rosaceae) (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The main subject could be a bit brighter but overall good enough --MB-one 11:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artillerie - écriteau (Trois-Épis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks tiltetd CW --Moroder 05:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Scherwiller).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Ortenbourg - tour (Scherwiller).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Ortenbourg - enceinte et tour (Scherwiller).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 15:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Morand (Lohkâpala) (Steinbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Écoles (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Écoles (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you tell me what is not good, light, cropping ? Thanks, Gzen92 07:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Good quality IMO, nice colors (pastels)--PJDespa 20:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you tell me what is not good, light, cropping ? Thanks, Gzen92 07:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Tilted a little bit, fix it acw (sens contraire des aiguilles d'une montre}--PJDespa 21:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks, Gzen92 08:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Better now, good quality IMO --PJDespa 10:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphée odorante (Nymphaea odorata).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Underexposed (correctly to protect the highlights), should be brightened --Aristeas 10:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC) @Aristeas: Please notify the author directly. @Gzen92: Can you improve the image? --Hangman'sDeath 10:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you very much! IMHO good now. --Aristeas 13:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Six-Montagnes-Noires (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Chasseur (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Marchands (Colmar) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Truite (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Schwendi (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise (Colmar) (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:30, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cathédrale (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quai de la Poissonnerie (Colmar) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du 2-Février (Colmar) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus (Hibiscus syriacus) et bourdon (Bombus) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Johannes Maximilian 14:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC+2)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bibliothèque humaniste (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:47, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue du château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (Orschwiller).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hibiscus (Hibiscus syriacus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please identify the flower. -- Ikan Kekek 10:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC)  Done I found the species. Gzen92 07:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC) Yay! Depth of field is short, but I'll  Support for enough of the center being sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Foy - portail (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IM3847 08:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arsenal Sainte-Barbe (Sélestat).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you remove the spot in the top right corner? --Poco a poco 10:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de la Cathédrale (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosacée (Rosaceae) (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice photo! --Scotch Mist 08:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons à colombages (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrée de jardin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:33, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochon d'Inde (Cavia porcellus) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very cute! Good focus on guinea pig's head. -- Ikan Kekek 07:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochon d'Inde (Cavia porcellus) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Lycée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 17:59, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mare (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --NeoMeesje 11:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:00, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigognes blanches (Ciconia ciconia) (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Maréchaux (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour des Maréchaux (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Étienne - façade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour à Auneau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terrasse à Telgruc-sur-Mer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cour de Lucelle - inscription.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a more specific cat about the inscription --Poco a poco 11:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)  Done I changed the category. Gzen92 07:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre à Châteaubourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Notre-Dame-de-Rocamadour (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Notre-Dame-de-Rocamadour (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. Isn’t it leaning a little bit to the right? I know that the walls of such old buildings are often titled in reality, but here most verticals seem to be leaning a little bit to the right. No offene, I just want to help. --Aristeas 07:32, 8 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Effectively the tower... Gzen92 08:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you! --Aristeas 09:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle de Notre-Dame-de-Rocamadour (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:42, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fanal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sky is a little grainy but OK. Good quality. Just so you know, this isn't a lantern. A lantern is a portable light, such as one with an oil lamp inside. This is a lighthouse. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC) Google translate... It's fanal Gzen92 11:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC) Which is given as an archaic word in English. As I said, the word is "lighthouse". -- Ikan Kekek 00:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fanal (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales et de la guerre d'Indochine (Cernay).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The quality is good, but I ask if you could darken the highlights a little, so that the sky can recover some volume and texture. Thank you --Lion-hearted85 22:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)  Done I modified. Gzen92 07:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment Thank you! Sorry for my late reply. I think you could dial back a bit this edit to make it subtler and avoid too evident dark halos on the monument and on the building's roof. Some banding and compression artifacts have also appeared now, which I think are avoidable with a softer touch. Thanks --Lion-hearted85 10:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Better like this? Gzen92 12:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks very good to me. Artifacts have disappeared and both the monument and the sky have more presence, while maintaining a natural look. Thank you for the edits! --Lion-hearted85 17:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Vauban (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Vauban (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Vauban (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Camaret-sur-Mer (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:53, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de Camaret-sur-Mer (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Épave de langoustier de 1964 (MX195448) sur le port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 12:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Corentin - intérieur - sculpture (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:42, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Corentin - intérieur - sculpture (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Corentin - intérieur - vitrail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourdon (Bombus) sur rose d'Inde (Tagetes erecta) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tourteau (Cancridae).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:51, 14 October 2020 (UTC) is this alive please? --Charlesjsharp 10:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Yes, 10 minutes after leaving the fishpond.  Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 15:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuisine à Telgruc-sur-Mer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin Donatien Laurent (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Écoles (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourdon (Bombus) sur rose d'Inde (Tagetes erecta) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Tanneurs (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Tanneurs (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:58, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Vauban (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Ronan - intérieur - vitrail (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Ronan - intérieur - vitrail (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière et calvaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it's slightly tilted ccw. See the verticals on the right house. Additionaly it might need some small perpective correction. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Gzen92 14:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Well done! --Augustgeyler 23:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin Donatien Laurent (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image! But is it possible this is tilted slightly ccw? --Augustgeyler 09:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Gzen92 14:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ar Brigourien (les Causeurs).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bateau des sauveteurs en mer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bateau Enez Sun (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tight top crop, otherwise good quality. --Peulle 12:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bateau Enez Sun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Ronan - intérieur - sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Écoles (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Corentin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (37).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand phare de l'île de Sein (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Oppose Very similar to 37 (!), but with distracting crop on top. Why promote both? --Kallerna 11:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment firstly, similars are allowed by the rules, QI is not a FP. Secondly, images 36 and 37 have several differences (see leg position and head rotation). But agreed, a little cropping on top (without dark areas) would be better --George Chernilevsky 11:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment Then we should change the rules, definitely there is no point promoting duplicates. --Kallerna 12:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Support From taxonomic point of view, its important to show differents aspects of the animal. This picture show leg and foot structures differents from the other picture. --Jani Pereira 19:07, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Per every supporting vote --Trougnouf 22:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment With George Chernilevsky, it should be cropped a little on top. --Augustgeyler (talk) 06:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you for your comments, I cut top of picture. Gzen92 07:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Support per others, and Kallerna, a nomination response thread is not a place to propose new guidelines. Start a thread in the appropriate talk page. -- Ikan Kekek 10:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Support --Augustgeyler 15:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison à Locronan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Oppose blown sky --Kallerna 17:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks like the sky of a cloudy day to me. Please discuss. --Lion-hearted85 09:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)  Support ok for me.--Ermell 10:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment Rainy day, see other photos. Gzen92 07:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Support OK. --Aristeas 09:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de marchand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Oppose blown sky --Kallerna 17:36, 22 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks like the sky of a cloudy day to me. Please discuss. --Lion-hearted85 09:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)  Support The sky is ok.--Ermell 10:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment Sky is perhaps just slightly overexposed, and it looks like there's a bit of magenta CA on the left side of the chimney. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment Rainy day, see other photos. Gzen92 07:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Support OK. --Aristeas 09:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté juvénile (Larus argentatus) (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté juvénile (Larus argentatus) (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 11:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison et phare de Men Brial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand phare de l'île de Sein (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments File size very low for 20 MPx image. Do you have a better quality version? --PantheraLeo1359531 19:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Done I modified, but far (atmospheric veil). Gzen92 08:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC) This is better for me, thank you --PantheraLeo1359531 10:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:03, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phare de Men Brial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Asmodea Oaktree 14:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage (Île-de-Sein) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abri du marin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:24, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Good quality. --Peulle 08:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Oppose Tighter crop needed. --Kallerna 12:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Crop fine for me. I don't see a good reason why the environment of the bird should be removed --PantheraLeo1359531 16:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)  Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 10:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Weak oppose Sharp bird. But the composition is poor. I'd suggest to crop 30 % of the right part of that image. --Augustgeyler 10:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)  Support per others. -- Johann Jaritz 04:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port d'échouage à Audierne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragoût de homard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and looks delicious! I think you should add categories for lobster and salad. -- Ikan Kekek 13:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochers (Île-de-Sein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue de l'île.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Côte (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis le viaduc - mairie (architecture).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Côte (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Asmodea Oaktree 14:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruelle (Île-de-Sein) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Guénolé - intérieur - vitrail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux Bretons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage à Audierne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) - tête (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 12:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alignements de Lagatjar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 13:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alignements de Lagatjar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 13:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rochers (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouton (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Pen-Hir et les Tas de Pois (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis le viaduc (architecture).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tas de Pois (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis la pointe de Pen-Hir (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel (Saint-Rivoal) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand phare de l'île de Sein (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Michel - intérieur - croix (objet).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Magloire - intérieur - vitrail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Magloire - portail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Magloire - statue de l'enclos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tas de Pois (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! The horizon appears like falling to the right; IMHO this means the photo should be rotated a bit counterclockwise. --Aristeas 09:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)  Support It’s better now --Aristeas 07:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage (Île-de-Sein) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well composed scenery. Could you please reduce noise reduction in order to raise the level of detail? Aditionally the buildings might need some sharpening. --Augustgeyler 18:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Difficult for me, it's better ? Gzen92 08:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)  Weak support It improved. Level of detail is still low. But OK for QI. Thank you! --Augustgeyler 10:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons le long de la plage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mer (Île-de-Sein).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Sainte-Marie-du-Ménez-Hom (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Sainte-Marie-du-Ménez-Hom et calvaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Sainte-Marie-du-Ménez-Hom - intérieur - autel (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiosque à musique (Morlaix).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand phare de l'île de Sein (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but maybe there is a bit too much perspective correction: the vertical lines of the lower buildings are leaning out now. Please reduce the perspective correction. --Aristeas 10:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 10:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you! It’s better now. --Aristeas 10:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viaduc (Morlaix).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Too much of the sky, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 09:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis le gîte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 13:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis le viaduc - église Saint-Mélaine (architecture).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis le viaduc - église Saint-Mélaine - clocher (architecture).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Sauveur - intérieur - vitrail (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruelle (Île-de-Sein) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 00:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Guénolé - intérieur - nef.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle l'Écuyer (Dinan).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la guerre d'Indochine (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Possibly a touch too bright but well composed and a very sharp presentation of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek 12:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Pen-Hir et les Tas de Pois (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison (Dinan) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Sauveur - intérieur - vitrail (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks deformed --Poco a poco 11:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:22, 9 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Much better --Poco a poco 09:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Sainte-Marie-du-Ménez-Hom - portail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Should the portal not be horizontal? --Ermell 11:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Much better. Thank you. --Ermell 21:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Magloire - intérieur - Pennon armorié (fin XVI, début XVIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some perspective adjustment necessary? --Scotch Mist 06:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 08:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC) Sorry but still appears tilted, left verticals not square ... --Scotch Mist 11:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue depuis les remparts - pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Merciers (Dinan).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viaduc - arches (Morlaix).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Foreground is a little blurred at 100% but still acceptable given that the aim is to capture detail into the distance. Good composition and exposure. --Bobulous 16:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)  Request I modified sharpness, I ask for a discussion. Gzen92 07:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good and interesting image -- Spurzem 12:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)  Comment It is a very good composition. The only thing I could find was that the surfaces are looking unnatural at 100%. Perhaps to strong noise reduction or intense sharpening was applied or the combination of both? --Augustgeyler (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)  Support per others. I don't understand why you moved this to Discussion after a supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek 19:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)  Comment I changed the sharpness after approval. Gzen92 10:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)  Comment You added sharpness though, right? So that doesn't seem to be a reason to move this to discussion. -- Ikan Kekek 16:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC) Ok thanks, I didn't know. Gzen92 10:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Vincent - intérieur - chœur - orgue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort de l'île Harbour (Saint-Malo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) - tête (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Balon Greyjoy 11:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté juvénile (Larus argentatus) (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison (Saint-Malo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la résistance de la Seconde Guerre mondiale (Saint-Malo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort National - maison (Saint-Malo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Vincent - intérieur - vitraux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The depths could be darker so that you do not see the noise --Ermell 11:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Thank you, good advice, Gzen92 09:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 07:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort National (Saint-Malo) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The horizont should be aligned. --Ermell 11:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 09:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)