User talk:GlowstoneUnknown
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2023 New South Wales Legislative Assembly.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:2023 New South Wales Legislative Assembly.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2023 New South Wales Legislative Assembly.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
0x0a (talk) 11:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:2023 Zeeland Council.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:2023 Zeeland Council.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:2023 Zeeland Council.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
French polling graph
[edit]Please, stop replacing the graph I created with an identical graph whose only difference is being created by yourself. If you think anything can be improved you should discuss it instead of uploading duplicated files. Basque mapping (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I initially wasn't aware you were intent on updating the file, so I created my version in order to have one that I am able to update regularly. I've had experience replacing abandoned polling graphs before and decided it's best not to wait and just to make sure that the page is up-to-date. The reason I put my version back after you reverted it is because I think the smoothing options you chose aren't as good at depicting the change in vote share and I personally think that the 5% breaks make more sense here as the numbers are lower and the polls are closer than a lot of other polls.
- My recommendations for your graph are that you change the smoothing to something closer to 8.500-8.750 and that you add
,breaks = seq(0,35, by = 5)
afterlimits=c(1,35)
. - I'm sorry I didn't realise you were the original creator of the French opinion polling graph and that I assumed you'd forgotten about it (like the previous people with the Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, and Austrian graphs before me). GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Thanks for the answer. I've changed the smooth to 9.0 but I haven't changed the 10% breaks (as this are almost always used in other graphs). I can't guarantee you updating the graph everyday, but I will do my best to maintain the graph updated. Now I'm going to replace the graphs on the polling articles. Cheers! Basque mapping (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Opinion polling for the 2024 Austrian legislative election.svg
[edit]i think there is a KPÖ poll missing (1%; 17–21 Feb 2023) could you add their election result too? Braganza (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for drawing this to my attention, but thankfully past me noticed this, and when I checked my CSV, it was already included, I must have noticed the efn before whilst I was setting up the R code. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 02:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- i think adding their 2019 result would push the KPÖ line down at the start before their actual breakthrough (there was only one scenario like poll which had them at 4%) Braganza (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- The CSV includes their 2019 result, just for some reason the line won't go back that far when I generate it, probably because of smoothing issues with extrapolating a line between two points that long – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 11:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- i see but but the "crystal" is not visible either for some reason
- anyway if it was missing, i had ask you to include Wandl too but i guess it won't work either ;) Braganza (talk) 13:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah the crystal won't show up no matter what I do for whatever reason, I've since added the polls for KEINE & LMP, but the crystal won't show up for them either I believe. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 13:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- The CSV includes their 2019 result, just for some reason the line won't go back that far when I generate it, probably because of smoothing issues with extrapolating a line between two points that long – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 11:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- i think adding their 2019 result would push the KPÖ line down at the start before their actual breakthrough (there was only one scenario like poll which had them at 4%) Braganza (talk) 10:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Norwegian threshold
[edit]Hi! I noticed you moved the Norwegian threshold in the 2025 polling graph from 4% to 3%. As far as I know, no change has been made to the threshold in the election law, nor is it scheduled to be done at some point before the 2025 election either. I could have somehow missed it, I suppose, so I was wondering if you could share what you based this change on? Cheers! Μαρκος Δ (talk) 12:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I implemented this change largely based on this passage in the 2021 page, to be fair, I didn't reconcile this with other sources and it may not have been implemented after the change of government. I should have fact checked that, my bad. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 12:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah I see, that's understandable! However, valglovutvalget (essentially an electoral law reviewing committee, which is re-appointed and makes new reports every couple of years) does not make any binding decisions, just recommendations. They recommended a 3% threshold, but none of the politicians with the power to do so, including Solberg, have given any signal that they're going to actually make that change, unfortunately, so it should still be 4%. Thanks for the explanation though, and sorry to intrude :) Μαρκος Δ (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- No need to apologize, thanks for pointing it out and helping make the encyclopædia better, I've since reverted the change on the file. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 02:03, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ah I see, that's understandable! However, valglovutvalget (essentially an electoral law reviewing committee, which is re-appointed and makes new reports every couple of years) does not make any binding decisions, just recommendations. They recommended a 3% threshold, but none of the politicians with the power to do so, including Solberg, have given any signal that they're going to actually make that change, unfortunately, so it should still be 4%. Thanks for the explanation though, and sorry to intrude :) Μαρκος Δ (talk) 22:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Graphs
[edit]Hi, in what program do you create charts for pollings (like Austria elections)? 8FabianS (talk) 22:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I use RStudio to generate the images and the code can be found here. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 02:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
File:2025_Polish_Presidential_Polling.svg Misspelling
[edit]Hello, would you be willing to fix the spelling of "Trzaskowski" on this graph? Thank you for your great work. Mcshadypl (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:GlowstoneUnknown polpart RKoM.png
- File:GlowstoneUnknown PakehaRopu.png
- File:Roopu Hapori GlowstoneUnknown.png
- File:Ropu Kakariki GlowstoneUnknown.png
- File:Party GlowstoneUnknown Rangatiratanga.png
- File:Ropu Kaitaki GlowstoneUnknown.png
- File:Mahi-Maui.png
Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 05:35, 22 October 2024 (UTC)