User talk:GerhardSchuhmacher
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Poster openstudios 2013 funkhaus nalepastrasse.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Poster openstudios 2013 funkhaus nalepastrasse.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 00:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
- thanks, but I think, the licence ist clear: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poster_openstudios_2013_funkhaus_nalepastrasse.jpg -- Gerhard Schuhmacher
OTRS received
[edit]Please do not add an OTRS received template like you did here. The usage of this template is strictly reserved for members of the OTRS team. Jcb (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:FU 76-77 (2.17).jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:FU 76-77 (2.17).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks, but the licence for this file: - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FU_76-77_(2.17).jpg - is clear! Look for the OTRS-number, Gerhard Schuhmacher
Copyright status: File:Tank during 17 November 1973.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tank during 17 November 1973.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, I found the file in the Russion Wikipedia - https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Tank_during_17_November_1973.png -. But it wasn't possible, to use it (or: to get it) for an article in the German Wikipedia. The russian file has a licence (it's an international press-foto). I made an upload for the commons, but i don't speak Russian and so I can't translate the licence. (for me it wasn't possible to copy it). But I expect, that if the foto is respected in the Russian Wiki, so it's the same for commons. (?) Please support me. Gerhard Schuhmacher
Copyright status: File:Polytechneion 18 November.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Polytechneion 18 November.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 14:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
same situation:
- Hello, I found the file in the Russion Wikipedia - https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Tank_during_17_November_1973.png -. But it wasn't possible, to use it (or: to get it) for an article in the German Wikipedia. The russian file has a licence (it's an international press-foto). I made an upload for the commons, but i don't speak Russian and so I can't translate the licence. (for me it wasn't possible to copy it). But I expect, that if the foto is respected in the Russian Wiki, so it's the same for commons. (?) Please support me. Gerhard Schuhmacher
![]() |
File:Tank during 17 November 1973.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
XenonX3 (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Polytechneion 18 November.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
XenonX3 (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Stromaggregat im Anhalter Hochbunker.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Stromaggregat im Anhalter Hochbunker.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 13:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Rbf Fabrik (81).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sebari (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:MWB Arbeitsplatz 16mm.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:MWB Arbeitsplatz 16mm.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Weizen Hotel Sonne.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Weizen Hotel Sonne.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Weizen Hotel Sonne.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 23:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Kategorien
[edit]Moin! Erstmal vielen Dank fuer die tolle Arbeit! Aaaaber, bitte Fotos nicht mit Kategorien fuellen, die in der uebergeordneten Kategorie bereits vorhanden sind. Beispiel: Foto Fuhrpark Seipp hatte z.B. Furniture shops in BW. Diese Kategorie ist bereits in der Kategorie Einrichtungshaus Seipp vorhanden. Oh, und als Lizenz nicht eigenes Werk verwenden wenn Du nicht der Fotograf bist. Ich sag einfach mal Du. Andernfall Info, bitte. Soweit genug Gemecker! Schoenes Wochenende!
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Danke, das war ein wichtiger Hinweis, mit der übergeordneten ‚Namenskategorie‘, der auch Arbeit erspart. Die wichtigsten Bereiche habe ich ausgeputzt und gehe das auch noch systematisch durch. Wo ich aber Bilder anderer als „own work“ verwende — das solltest Du konkret benennen. Mache ich eigentlich nicht, Gruß --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 10:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Schau mal hier: [1] Im Fuhrpark hatte sich diese Lizenz eingeschlichen:
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all|migration=redundant}}
Wenn Du das Foto nicht selbst geschossen hast, bitte self weglassen. Kein grosses Problem, passiert immer wieder mal mit den Doppellizensierungen. LG, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)- „Eingeschlichen“ ist richtig — von meinen Kennnissen her wäre ich nicht in der Lage gewesen, dieses „self“ einzuführen. Vielleicht passiert, weil der stellvertretende Nutzungsrechteinhaber (C. Söhngen) zuerst eine Erlaubnis ohne Fotografennamen versand hat (am 15.01., war mein Fehler, da ich dachte, NR reicht aus) und ich sie dann nochmals mit dem mittlerweile ermittelten, neu eingetragenen Namen am 25.01. abschickte. Wenn Du das mit „Doppellizensierung“ meintest? Aber mein Name steht nirgendwo, auch nicht auf der Erlaubnis, also eben nur automatisch als Uploader. Danke, eben für jede Wissenserweiterung. Gruß, --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nee, Doppellizensierung GFDL und CC war gemeint. Ist auch wurscht, passt schon.
--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nee, Doppellizensierung GFDL und CC war gemeint. Ist auch wurscht, passt schon.
- „Eingeschlichen“ ist richtig — von meinen Kennnissen her wäre ich nicht in der Lage gewesen, dieses „self“ einzuführen. Vielleicht passiert, weil der stellvertretende Nutzungsrechteinhaber (C. Söhngen) zuerst eine Erlaubnis ohne Fotografennamen versand hat (am 15.01., war mein Fehler, da ich dachte, NR reicht aus) und ich sie dann nochmals mit dem mittlerweile ermittelten, neu eingetragenen Namen am 25.01. abschickte. Wenn Du das mit „Doppellizensierung“ meintest? Aber mein Name steht nirgendwo, auch nicht auf der Erlaubnis, also eben nur automatisch als Uploader. Danke, eben für jede Wissenserweiterung. Gruß, --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Schau mal hier: [1] Im Fuhrpark hatte sich diese Lizenz eingeschlichen:
Hallo Hedwig, irgendwie ist ein Bild, das Du oben bearbeitet hattest: ( SW Horheim 1949.jpg ) in Vergessenheit geraten oder durchs Raster gefallen. Da sollte nun alles stimmen. Klar ist, auch warum mir "self" untergekommen war (ich bin Rechercheur): Ich hatte automatisch eine bestimmte Lizenz angewählt (4.0), die an einer bestimmten Stelle stand, aber dann wurde der Aufbau geändert und es stand an diesem Platz die irrtümliche ... Ok, dafür habe ich auf "SW Horheim 1949.jpg" noch das unbekannte Fahrzeug identifizieren können. Jetzt ist scheint aber alles korrekt zu sein. Danke, --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:HW Theater Geiger.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:HW Theater Geiger.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:HW Theater Geiger.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Kapellenberger 1962.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Kapellenberger 1962.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kapellenberger 1962.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:HW Zylinder.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:HW Zylinder.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
File tagging File:GM Spielstationen-Parcours-Liebesbarometer.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Spielstationen-Parcours-Liebesbarometer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:GM Spielstationen-Parcours-Liebesbarometer.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GM Wertheim Antike.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Wertheim Antike.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GM Wertheim Haus-Burg.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Wertheim Haus-Burg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GM Wertheim Millefiori.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Wertheim Millefiori.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GM Wertheim Nuppenbecher.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Wertheim Nuppenbecher.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GM Wertheim Plasmakugel.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Wertheim Plasmakugel.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:GM Wertheim Venezianische Flügelgläser.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:GM Wertheim Venezianische Flügelgläser.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Parzival GM Wertheim.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Parzival GM Wertheim.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Parzival GM Wertheim.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Krd 04:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:OD LKW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]
This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Portraet Markus Beile.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Portraet Markus Beile.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 06:07, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Portraet Markus Beile.JPG
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:BB Stadtrechtslinde (1950).JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:BB Stadtrechtslinde (1950).JPG
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BB Stadtrechtslinde (1950).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ASW (GMS) Marktplatz 1.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:ASW (GMS) Marktplatz 1.JPG
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ASW (GMS) Marktplatz 1.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
File: Zurzach Verena-Statue Hochrheinbrücke von Ernst Suter
[edit]Hallo Gerd ich konnte für meinen neuen Wiki Artikel über den Bildhauer Ernst Suter dein Foto von 23. März 2018 "Zurzach Verena-Statue Hochrheinbrücke" verwenden. Der Künster heisst jedoch Ernst Suter und nicht wie Du geschrieben hast "Aargauer Künstlers Konrad Sutter". Ich habe mir diese Bild Korrektur des Textes erlaubt. Grüsse --EinDao (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hallo EinDao, danke für die Information und schön, dass Du das Bild verwenden konntest. Ich schaue noch nach, woher die Falschinformation zum Namen kam. Natürlich eine wichtige Korrektur, Gruß -- GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 06:36, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Die falsche Namensnennung stammt aus einem Artikel der Wochenendbeilage des Alb-Boten (Südkurier), dem “Waldshuter Erzähler” vom 1. September 2001, den ich archiviert habe. Weiter zurück könnte es allenfalls noch vom Büro Sennhauser kommen, das die Abbildung der Statue lieferte. Gruß--GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ZU Lkw Stadt.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:ZU Lkw Stadt.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ZU Lkw Stadt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ZU Ausbildung im Betrieb (Gleichstellung).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:ZU Ausbildung im Betrieb (Gleichstellung).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ZU Ausbildung im Betrieb (Gleichstellung).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Jcb (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:KB Dangstetten St. Blasier Hof ca. 1920.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:KB Dangstetten St. Blasier Hof ca. 1920.JPG
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:KB Dangstetten St. Blasier Hof ca. 1920.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:KB Rheinheim am Engel - Musikverein Zurzach.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KB Rheinheim am Engel - Musikverein Zurzach.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KB Rheinheim am Engel - Musikverein Zurzach.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:KB Gasthaus Engel 1920er Jahre.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KB Gasthaus Engel 1920er Jahre.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KB Gasthaus Engel 1920er Jahre.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:10, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:KB Rheinheim Flugbild 01.07.1938.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KB Rheinheim Flugbild 01.07.1938.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KB Rheinheim Flugbild 01.07.1938.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:11, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:KB Gasthaus Engel 1960er Jahre (v. Kirchturm).jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:KB Gasthaus Engel 1960er Jahre (v. Kirchturm).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KB Gasthaus Engel 1960er Jahre (v. Kirchturm).jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:11, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
File:HW Theater W. Tell 1952.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:HW Theater W. Tell 1952.jpg was recently deleted by Reinhard Kraasch, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:KB Rheinheim Flugbild 1963.jpg
- File:KB Dangstetten Straßenszene 1932.jpg
- File:KB Rheinheim Flugbild 01.07.1938 (2).jpg
- File:KB Dangstetten St. Blasier Hof ca. 1920.JPG
- File:KB Rheinheim Kirche ca. 1920.jpg
- File:KB Rheinheim Flugbild mit Brücke 1938.jpg
- File:KB Rheinheim Brücke 01.07.1907.jpg
- File:KB Rheinheim Brücke 21.05.1906.jpg
- File:KB Bechtersbohl Flugbild ca. 1930.jpg
- File:KB Luftbild Reckingen (Postkarte 1918).jpg
- File:KB Dangstetten Kirche 1919.jpg
- File:AR Gasthaus Adler 19. Jhdt.jpg
- File:StB AR 017 Postkarte Wutachbrücke.jpg
Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Stellungnahme
[edit]Zu der reklamierten Aufnahme — Gasthof Engel (Rheinheim) — hat ein Wikipedianer (Nat) nachgewiesen, dass das Bild 1928 im Umlauf war und von einem Fotograf aus Zürich stammte. Mehr ist wohl nicht bekannt und es wird zu aufwendig sein, sein Todesdatum zu recherchieren. Der Zeitraum beträgt bis heute 92 Jahre ...
Zu den weiteren Aufnahmen und zum Vorgang: Die Gemeinde Küssaberg (KB) erhält als Vermächtnis von verstorbenen Personen oder durch persönliche Übergabe von Erben Fotos (als Positive), die Rolf Bendel im Auftrag der Gemeindeverwaltung archiviert. Das wäre über den Bürgermeister zu bestätigen. Frage ist, ob es damit als Nutzungsrechteübertragung zu werten wäre. (Im Upload: > „Archiv Rolf Bendel“). (Rheinheim, Dangstetten, Bechtersbohl, Reckingen). Genehmigung der Gemeinde ist (dadurch) vorhanden. Sie wäre auch auf diesem Wege zu erlangen, wenn es ausreicht.
Das Bild vor dem Gasthaus Adler hängt gerahmt im Gasthof und stammt aus der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts — also spätestens 1850; das sind 170 Jahre, wo liegt das Problem? Das Bild der Postkarte der Wutachbrücke, 1920, ist 100 Jahre alt. Die Seiten mit Rotlinks im Upload sind übrigens in der deutschen Wikipedia vorhanden! Wenn es hilft, bitte ich D. Reimer, ein Genehmigungsformular auszufüllen. Schließlich hat er es unter seinem Namen in Literatur veröffentlicht.
Bitte prüfen--GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 14:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keine Resonanz? Ich fände es schade, wenn nun ein Einzelkämpfer wegen Fristablauf die Bilder löscht. Denn verloren gehen sie Wikimedia! Bilder dieser Art wurden noch bis in die frühen Nachkriegsjahre von Berufsfotografen gemacht, es gab noch keine Apparate für Privatleute. (Kodak-Instamatic in den 60ern). Die Namen wurden nicht festgehalten (wozu auch?), die Nutzungsrechte gingen selbstverständlich an die Auftraggeber. Es ist sinnlos, die die Aufnahmen auslösenden Personen ermitteln zu wollen. Später gingen die Rechte an die Erben der Auftraggeber. Durch Weitergabe der Bilder durch die Erben an Institutionen (ob mit oder ohne Verkauf) findet faktisch eine erneute Übertragung der Nutzungsrechte statt. Nur dies ist auch für Wikimedia von Bedeutung. Deshalb sollte eine Urheberrechtsregelung eng ausgelegt werden — mit einem angenommenen Tod des Berufsfotografen von 20 Jahren nach Erstellung beispielsweise. Meines Erachtens dürfte im Falle der offensichtlichen Auftragsfotografie dies keinerlei Rolle spielen. Vor allem dürfte dies nun nicht von der französischen Rechtssprechung (Patrick Vogel?) abhängig werden.--GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 18:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Obiger Vorschlag ist auf den Weg gebracht – Legitimierung von verwaisten Urheber- und formal ungeregelten Nutzungsrechten durch Erben bzw. durch die Originale verwahrenden Institutionen. Zur Wiedervorlage durch mich bis Ende August. --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 09:11, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Siehe nun auch den Eintrag in der Löschdiskussion unter: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by GerhardSchuhmacher.--GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 07:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Entstehungsdatum, Ort (1942 in Blumberg) und Urheber (Hans Scholl) der Fotografie sind nach neuesten Erkenntnissen (https://www.badische-zeitung.de/im-schwarzwald-erlebte-sophie-scholl-einen-wendepunkt--201626502.html) fraglich; von Dr. Jörg Hannes Kuhn, Bad Münstereifel, datiert auf 1938, bei unbekanntem Urheber. Eine Anfrage an die Stadt Blumberg als Lizenzgeber (2018) wurde von mir inzwischen gestellt; bis es zur Klärung kommt, sollte die Fotografie im Sophie-Scholl-Artikel der WP nicht verwendet werden. Ich habe sie dort gelöscht.--Markus Wolter (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nachsatz: Von wem stammt eigentlich die Info: "Das Foto wurde bei einem Besuch von Sophies Bruder Hans Scholl in Blumberg von diesem aufgenommen (...) und gelangte ins Familienarchiv."? Hat das die besagte "Tante" Sophie Scholls bei Foto-Schenkung 1991 gesagt, oder die Stadt Blumberg 2018 im Zusammenhang mit dem OTRS-Ticket "bestätitgt"? Ich bitte um baldige Klärung, andernfalls werde ich das Foto wohl zur Löschung vorschlagen müssen.--Markus Wolter (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Es kann sein, dass ich die Sache mit der Schenkung aus der Chronik von Blumberg und dem dortigen Beitrag des Autors J. Sturm entnommen habe. (War wohl 1992). Das Buch befindet sich nicht in meinem persönlichen Besitz und ich kann es vorerst auch nicht entleihen. So wie ich zum Bild schrieb, könnte das aber auch eine Auskunft aus der Tagesstätte sein: „Dort entstand ein Foto von Sophie, das laut Auskunft ‚von einer Tante Sophie Scholls zur Eröffnung der Kindertagesstätte Achdorfer Straße 30a, 1992 der Stadt Blumberg geschenkt wurde.’” Die Stadtverwaltung habe ich auf deine Initiative angeschrieben, aber noch keine Antwort erhalten. Durch meinen Wikipedia-Beitrag ist wohl der SWR (TV) aktuell auf Blumberg aufmerksam geworden und hat dort gedreht. Dies war eine gute Sache. Wenn das Bild dann fehlt, ist es schade, aber ich kann auch nichts dran ändern. Gruß --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 16:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Dann warten wir also erstmal die Stellungnahmen Blumbergs auf deine und meine Anfragen ab. Danke. Vgl.: WP-Disku zum Thema--Markus Wolter (talk) 06:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Es kann sein, dass ich die Sache mit der Schenkung aus der Chronik von Blumberg und dem dortigen Beitrag des Autors J. Sturm entnommen habe. (War wohl 1992). Das Buch befindet sich nicht in meinem persönlichen Besitz und ich kann es vorerst auch nicht entleihen. So wie ich zum Bild schrieb, könnte das aber auch eine Auskunft aus der Tagesstätte sein: „Dort entstand ein Foto von Sophie, das laut Auskunft ‚von einer Tante Sophie Scholls zur Eröffnung der Kindertagesstätte Achdorfer Straße 30a, 1992 der Stadt Blumberg geschenkt wurde.’” Die Stadtverwaltung habe ich auf deine Initiative angeschrieben, aber noch keine Antwort erhalten. Durch meinen Wikipedia-Beitrag ist wohl der SWR (TV) aktuell auf Blumberg aufmerksam geworden und hat dort gedreht. Dies war eine gute Sache. Wenn das Bild dann fehlt, ist es schade, aber ich kann auch nichts dran ändern. Gruß --GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 16:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nachsatz: Von wem stammt eigentlich die Info: "Das Foto wurde bei einem Besuch von Sophies Bruder Hans Scholl in Blumberg von diesem aufgenommen (...) und gelangte ins Familienarchiv."? Hat das die besagte "Tante" Sophie Scholls bei Foto-Schenkung 1991 gesagt, oder die Stadt Blumberg 2018 im Zusammenhang mit dem OTRS-Ticket "bestätitgt"? Ich bitte um baldige Klärung, andernfalls werde ich das Foto wohl zur Löschung vorschlagen müssen.--Markus Wolter (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:BB Sophie Scholl (Blumberg 1942).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Markus Wolter (talk) 08:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:FS Scheelen Firmengebäude.JPG
[edit]Copyright status: File:FS Scheelen Firmengebäude.JPG
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:FS Scheelen Firmengebäude.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please realize:
- Gesendet: Freitag, 23. September 2022 um 11:26 Uhr
- Von: "Verena Christ, SCHEELEN® AG" <verena.christ@scheelen-institut.de>
- An: "permissions-de@wikimedia.org" <permissions-de@wikimedia.org>
- Cc: "Gerhard Schuhmacher" <G-Schuhmacher@web.de>
- Betreff: FS Scheelen Firmengebäude.jpg
- Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild <{{{FS Scheelen Firmengebäude.jpg}}}, {{{www.scheelen-institut.com}}}, dass ich
- a) die Inhaberin eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes (Scheelen AG) rechtmäßig vertrete.
- b) Fotograf: Daniel Gerteiser
- Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de).
- Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
- Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
- Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
- {{{23.09.2022}}}, {{{Verena Christ}}} GerhardSchuhmacher (talk) 11:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)