User talk:GT1976/archive/2021
- archive/2006, archive/2007, archive/2008, archive/2009, archive/2010, archive/2011, archive/2012, archive/2013, archive/2014, archive/2015, archive/2016, archive/2017, archive/2018, archive/2019, archive/2020, archive/2021, archive/2022, archive/2023, archive/2024, archive/2025
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_Epilobium_(Chamerion,_Chamaenerion)_dodonaei_(rosemary_willowherb)_in_the_railroad_tracks_of_Main_Station_in_Wiener_Neustadt,_Austria.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2017-10-12 (275) Epilobium (Chamerion, Chamaenerion) dodonaei (rosemary willowherb) in the railroad tracks of Main Station in Wiener Neustadt, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Categorization
[edit]Hi. Thank you for you effort to help with the mass of uncategorized images. However, I recommend to consider whether categorization into an overly general unmaintained category brings more benefits or harm. When you remove the template {{Uncategorized}}, the image will fall out of the attention of other tools that help categorize, for example, by description language, by coordinates, by use in articles, and so on. Permanently overcrowded and unmaintainted general categories like Category:People (19 529 unsorted files) do not yet help much for definitive categorization or image search.
These negative effects need to be somehow reduced or eliminated. A file that is located only in some such overcrowded category should remain tagged as uncategorized. It would be appropriate to coordinate mass categorization with other users who run tools for tagging and processing uncategorized images. --ŠJů (talk) 08:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi ŠJů! I always categorize several for example to People, then on Men, then Portrait photographs of men and further then finer. This makes me much faster than if I deeply categorize images individually in one step. If no one can find these images under the People category, wouldn't it make sense to program it so that the uncategorized flag remains in the images in this folder? --GT1976 (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
watchlists
[edit]Please, use a bot for all these milliones of categorizations, you burst again and again watchlists. I don't know how many times I've been here asking for a simple thing like that. Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]_Wiener_Stadtwanderweg_1_-_Forest_road_of_Wildgrubgasse_to_Wildgrubenbr%C3%BCcke,_Vienna,_Austria.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2019-09-19 (126) Wiener Stadtwanderweg 1 - Forest road of Wildgrubgasse to Wildgrubenbrücke, Vienna, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_Wiener_Stadtwanderweg_1_-_Forest_road_of_Wildgrubgasse_from_Wildgrubenbr%C3%BCcke_to_the_city,_Vienna,_Austria.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2019-09-19 (127) Wiener Stadtwanderweg 1 - Forest road of Wildgrubgasse from Wildgrubenbrücke to the city, Vienna, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_Wiener_Stadtwanderweg_1_-_Forest_road_of_Wildgrubgasse_to_Wildgrubenbr%C3%BCcke,_Vienna,_Austria.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2019-09-19 (125) Wiener Stadtwanderweg 1 - Forest road of Wildgrubgasse to Wildgrubenbrücke, Vienna, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I just wanted to tell you that in regards to Category:September 2015 Dresden photographs, there are a number of subcategories for images by individual date. I don't generally agree with images by city by day but it may help you in the future. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kategorien
[edit]Welchen Sinn siehst Du darin, nicht existierende Kategorien zu Fotos hinzuzuügen, wie z. B. hier? --Stepro (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wenn jemand anderer ein weiteres Bild von dieser Dame hinzufügt, dann sieht er sofort die anderen Bilder. --GT1976 (talk) 14:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lege die Kat doch einfach gleich an. Spart Anderen Arbeit und gibt deiner Arbeit Legitimation. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sie wurde bereits angelegt. Legitimation hatte diese Ergänzung auch vorher. Oft genug ist es mir auch schon passiert, dass bereits Dateien in nicht angelegten Kategorien sind, wenn ich Kategorien anlege. --GT1976 (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lege die Kat doch einfach gleich an. Spart Anderen Arbeit und gibt deiner Arbeit Legitimation. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Category:Transport_ships has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
JopkeB (talk) 11:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Template:WomenYearbyCountry
[edit]This template doesn't seem to work properly with Women of the United States in 2021 --Trade (talk) 20:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Trade! Thank you for the information. What is the problem with Category:Women of the United States in 2021? --GT1976 (talk) 04:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Countries of North America template does not appear. --Trade (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! Unfortunately, I also don't know who made this template and where it can be changed so that it works again. --GT1976 (talk) 16:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Countries of North America template does not appear. --Trade (talk) 12:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Troopships has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |