User talk:GFreihalter/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Houdan Castle
Dear GFreihalter,
I am writing a local history book about Longtown Castle on the English/Welsh border. Our castle resembles Houdan and I believe they are connected. Would it be possible to use your photograph in the book?
If you agree, the publisher doesn't want to use URLs in captions, so how should I attribute the picture to you.
Martin Cook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Clodock (talk • contribs) 19:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Plaque enceinte gallo-romaine 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 1er Quai des Orfèvres 155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 7e Jardin du Potager 147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Cimetière Montparnasse 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 17e Avenue de Villiers 4 Heurtoir 934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 4e Place des Vosges Hôtel Marchand 572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris MNMA Thermes de Cluny 848.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Augustines du Saint-Coeur de Marie 808.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 17e Rue de Prony 7 Heurtoir 916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 9e Rue de Rougemont Fontaine 175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Cimetière Montparnasse 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 1er La Samaritaine 434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Square Louise-Michel Fontaine monumentale 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Square Louise-Michel Fontaine monumentale 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Square Louise-Michel Fontaine monumentale 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 7e Jardin du Potager 146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Türgriff 276.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Quai de la Mégisserie 546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Locronan Maison 335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris 10e Canal Saint-Martin 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Merci
Merci pour votre jolie photo de l'église de Couhard qui orne maintenant son article. tyseria (d) 03:59, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Preuilly-sur-Claise Église Saint-Pierre Vitrail 419.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Miniwark (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Do you know where in Montparnasse Cemetery is the grave of Barnard Lazare?
Hello GFreihalter, I know this is a long shot but by any chance do you know what part of Cimetiere Montparnasse your photo of Barnard Lazare's grave is in? He's not listed on the tourist map, in fact your photo is the only thing I could find. Thank you! Nicemicemeanmice (talk) 21:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Houdan Maison 689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Paris Gratte-Ciel 216.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Paris Gratte-Ciel 217.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Paris 16e Palais de Tokyo 068.jpg
- File:Paris 16e Palais de Tokyo 070.jpg
- File:Paris 16e Palais de Tokyo 073.jpg
- File:Paris 16e Palais de Tokyo 074.jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Jesenwang St. Michael 767.jpg
- File:Jesenwang St. Michael 771.jpg
- File:Jesenwang St. Michael 772.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hiers-Brouage Remparts 203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Paris 14e Peinture murale 959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Paris Sainte-Bernadette252.JPG
- File:Paris Sainte-Bernadette253.JPG
- File:Paris Sainte-Bernadette254.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster379.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 02:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster378.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster380.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster381.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster382.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster383.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster391.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster392.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster393.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster394.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster395.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster397.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster399.JPG
- File:Altenahr MariäVerkündigung Glasfenster401.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 960.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 961.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 962.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 963.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 964.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 965.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 966.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 967.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 968.jpg
- File:Donzenac Saint-Martin 969.jpg
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Stuttgart Stiftskirche Fenster 378.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Foto ohne Kategorie
Guten Abend GFreihalter, durch die Änderung gehört das Foto zu keiner Kategorie mehr. War das so beabsichtigt? Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 19:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Danke für die Kategorisierung. Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 18:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Quai de la Mégisserie 547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thank you for your photos
Hi, I have used two of your photos of the church of Marestay (Matha) in Charente-Maritime (France). I was thrilled to find those "têtes plates" (beakheads) which represent cats'heads in one and human heads in the other. Thanks so much. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:T%C3%AAtes_plates_in_Charente-Maritime Pimprenel (talk) 20:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paris Square Louise-Michel Fontaine monumentale 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin 341.JPG
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin 343.JPG
- File:Survilliers Saint-Martin Chor 355.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 00:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Ahrweiler St.Laurentius628.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Adamant1 (talk) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Similar tile carvings in a mosque
@GFreihalter Hi I have found that the closest thing I could find was the pictures you have taken from the church in Portugal does these pictures look familiar to you? https://imgur.com/a/X042OCQ Thewonderinguy (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:München Natascha Kohnen 902.jpg
- File:München Natascha Kohnen 903.jpg
- File:München-Giesing Gülseren Demirel 904.jpg
- File:München-Moosach Albert Duin 901.jpg
- File:München-Moosach Diana Stachowitz 900.jpg
- File:München-Schwabing Ludwig Spaenle 902.jpg
Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:München Natascha Kohnen 902.jpg
- File:München Natascha Kohnen 903.jpg
- File:München-Giesing Gülseren Demirel 904.jpg
- File:München-Moosach Albert Duin 901.jpg
- File:München-Moosach Diana Stachowitz 900.jpg
- File:München-Schwabing Ludwig Spaenle 902.jpg
Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)