User talk:Miniwark

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please respect user defined schemes

[edit]

I've seen your request Revision of 766901290. You respected the user id, but you didn't respected the user defined filename scheme. And you didn't respected the license, because the filename is part of the attribution. You said, the filename was meaningless or ambiguous. No, Paris is right, Louvre is right. May be a more detailed name would be better. I renamed the file again, back to user defined scheme and with respect to your request with a more detailed name. Please be much more careful with requests to rename files. XRay 💬 08:35, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay OK, i will do Miniwark (talk) 08:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Files of Louvre with bad file names

[edit]

Bonjour @Miniwark: , merci pour avoir pris en charge une partie non négligeable des demandes de renommage que j'ai formulées pour les fichiers de la catégorie :Files of Louvre with bad names

J'arrive à un point dur où j'ai maintenant du mal à identifier les quelques fichiers qui restent (à ce jour)... Dans un premier temps, pour y voir plus clair, que penseriez vous de proposer à la suppression les fichiers restants de Darafsh qui comportent une partie importante des cartels et sont donc susceptibles d'enfreindre le droit d'auteur ?

Par ailleurs, je suis à 10 mn à pied du Louvre et si vous avez des suggestions, je peux à l'occasion me rendre sur place.

Bien cordialement

Ted1968 (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Ted1968 Sauf erreur de ma part, j'ai déjà proposé à la suppression toutes les cartouches restantes de Darafsh. Les seules ou il pourrait y avoir débat. Certaines pourraient être recadrées pour ne conserver que les petits objets, mais je doute de l’intérêt.
Sinon oui, on est partit de loin ^^ rien que Darafsh a du ajouter plus de 2000 images. On a vu le bout youpi !
Pour votre proposition, la principale suggestion que je vois c'est la chasse au objets de la catégorie Unidentified works in the Louvre. Sachant que, probablement, une partie n'est plus exposée. Sinon, sincèrement, là je n'ai pas d'idée, peut-être des photos du département objets d'arts qui me semble le plus négligé par rapport au reste.
Bonne journée Miniwark (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de votre réponse, j'ai indiqué mon accord pour la suppression de fichiers de Darafsh sur une page où il a plusieurs fichiers de mentionnés. J'ignore si c'est vraiment la page où on donne son avis. Oui il y a encore du travail sur unidentified works in the Louvre. Je regarderai pour les objets d'arts. Bien cordialement Ted1968 (talk) 12:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]