User talk:Farisori

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Farisori!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Fil nik 18:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Estrella bronce.png

Please tag your images

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to the Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikipedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best use CommonsHelper
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing for Image:Estrella platino.png, Image:Estrella oro.png and Image:Estrella plata.png. Ok, I got it ;) --Farisori (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Farisori!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Curacautin invierno2.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChileRegionesHorizontal.png

File:ChileRegionesHorizontal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 09:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bloqueo

Hola Farisori. Te informo que te han bloqueado dos semanas aquí por abuso de cuentas títere, lo cual al ver el registro me sorprendió bastante, así que fui a pedir explicaciones al administrador que te bloqueó; sin embargo y pese a estar editando y respondiendo mensajes en su propia discusión el mío no le ha respondido todavía. Tienes más información en tu particular registro de bloqueos.

Sin entrar a valorar si el bloqueo es correcto o no, pues desconozco si la razón por la que se te bloqueó es verdadera o no (básicamente porque he pedido pruebas y todavía no me han dado ninguna) no me parece justo que ni se te haya colocado un aviso en la discusión informándote de la situación ni del procedimiento para pedir desbloqueo, así que como administrador local aquí también, te informo que si deseas pedir una revisión del bloqueo puedes hacerlo usando la plantilla {{unblock|razones}}. Puedes realizar la solicitud en castellano si te resulta más cómodo. Si deseas que ponga una petición de revisión en el TAB de aquí también puedo hacerlo.

Un saludo, --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 12:47, 27 November 2011 (UTC) (antes Usuario:Dferg) 'PS: vigilo esta discusión así que puedes contestar aquí, que tarde o temprano lo veremos.[reply]

Hola Marco, ¿cuenta títere? vamos!! soy bibliotecario de la Wikipedia en español y llevo más de 4 años editando sin problemas. No poseo cuenta títere alguna. Apenas tengo un bot (FariBOT) que utilizó única y exclusivamente en es.wikipedia. Te doy las gracias por avisarme, y exijo al User:Denniss que me pida disculpas por este accionar equivocado, y sin ni siquiera advertencias de ningún tipo (como sería lo correcto en caso de que efectivamente fuese culpable). Saludos y nuevamente gracias MarcoAurelio. Farisori (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Farisori. Gracias por tu aclaración. He pedido revisión en Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#User:Farisori. Un saludo. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 17:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "No tengo cuenta títere alguna. Soy bibliotecario hace años en es.wikipedia y no tengo problemas con nadie. El bloqueo está incorrecto. Solicito disculpas formales de parte del User:Denniss en esta misma página de discusión por su equivocación que perjudica mi perfil en Commons. Saludos cordiales. Farisori (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any puppet account. I'm administrator of es.wikipedia from many years ago, and I haven't any problem with anything. The blocked is wrong. I'm waiting for a formal apology from the user Denniss. Greetings. Farisori (talk) 13:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)"[reply]

Unblock reason: "No checkuser proved, Asume good faith Ezarateesteban 17:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC)"[reply]

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ suomi ∙ हिन्दी ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Dada la seriedad de la acusación que se te imputa he solicitado un análisis de tu caso, no lo tomes a mal, es para estar seguros de que no eres tu, un abrazo!!! Ezarateesteban 17:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias a ambos. Ese usuario Rogers0797 aparentemente es de mi ciudad natal, y ha causado más problemas que mejoras en es.wikipedia. Pueden ver en su página de discusión en la wikipedia para ver la progresión de mis comentarios y advertencias en su página de discusión. Saludos, Farisori (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verificación de que no tengo títeres en Chile (actualmente vivo en Barcelona)... desconozco los procedimientos en Commons, y si es que son similares o no a los de Wikipedia, pero reitero mi intención de que Denniss se disculpe formalmente aquí en mi discusión, y que para la próxima tenga más cuidado con sus botones. Farisori (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yo estoy sorprendido con esto. Sigue editando y respondiendo en su discusión; pero ha ignorado todo este asunto por completo. Estoy empezando a cuestionarme si debo llevar este asunto más arriba y pedir responsabilidades o dejarlo estar. Te invito a que participes en el hilo del TAB de commons que mencioné arriba si lo deseas. Un saludo. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 12:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Efectivamente, esto si ocurriese en Wikipedia ya hace rato habría pasado a mayores. Denniss ha actuado muy groseramente y aún quiero sus disculpas formales. Gracias por el apoyo, escribiré en el TAB ahroa mismo. Farisori (talk) 13:36, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hecho. Saludos, Farisori (talk) 13:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the erroneous block

Here. Thank you to all. Farisori » 12:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

~~Puedes reportar el caso en Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems~~, En casos muy extremo tenemos la política de de-adminship pero es para casos excepcionales, un abrazo!!! Ezarateesteban 23:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Respuesta — El hilo marcha por ahora al parecer. Un saludo y feliz Navidad. --Marco Aurelio (disputatio) 14:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Udec antigua10.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Udec antigua10.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Udec antigua10.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ralgis 21:22, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Farisori. Dado que las fotografías han sido publicadas previamente, entonces debes hacer que la entidad titular de los derechos de autor de las mismas exprese que te ha dado permiso para subirlas a Commons bajo la licencia libre que indican a través del OTRS, o de lo contrario un administrador juzgará que carecen de tales permisos y procederá a eliminarlas. También, la entidad que mencionas debe ser la titular de los derechos de autor; si no es así, deberás entonces solicitar el permiso al verdadero titular de los derechos de autor de las imágenes. Gracias. Ralgis 03:15, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biobioterremoto.jpg

File:Biobioterremoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Diego Grez ^{return fire} 19:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imágenes de Wiki Loves Monuments

Estimado,

Borré algunas plantillas de Wiki Loves Monuments que tu agregaste, ya que sólo pueden participar imágenes cargadas en Commons entre el 1 y el 30 de septiembre, y algunas ya estaban de antes. Espero sepas comprender. Saludos! --B1mbo (talk) 18:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Farisori,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 04:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Subtipos de relación binaria

Farisori: he marcado para eliminar el esquema: File:Relación binaria subtipos.png que es una de las primeras versiones de los diagramas de relación binaria y presenta algunos errores: Irreflexiva no es lo mismo que no reflexiva, y los tipos de correspondencia no están bien alineados, tenia que haberse eliminado en si día pero parece que se quedo, las nuevas imágenes son mejores y están mejor ordenadas y realizadas: Category:SVG Types Binary relation, Spanish. Dáni (talk) 18:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sobre foto de Silvio

Estimado, quería consultarte por esta imagen: File:Silvio Rodriguez - Playa Giron.jpg. No encuentro en el sitio web una declaración de cesión de derechos o un tag de licencia CC-BY que permitan usar esta imagen en wikipedia. Lo único que he visto es un aviso que dice "Si usan los contenidos de este sitio, por favor, citen su origen.", lo cual a priori no es una licencia válida. Podrías explicarme que criterio usaste para incluir esta imagen?. --Zeroth (talk) 22:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Farisori, el procedimiento que debes utilizar es OTRS. Este es un mecanismo para validar los permisos dados por los titulares de las obras a través de correo electrónico. Si tienes alguna duda, estoy a tu disposición. Abrazo, --Zeroth (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Para poder aplicar esa marca de licencia deberías conocer dos datos: el autor y la fecha de publicación en Cuba (siempre suponiendo que no cumplió las 'formalidades del copyright en EEUU' lo cual es lo mas probable). En esta foto por lo antedicho, deberías tratar de averiguar el autor original y la fecha de publicación. En esta otra solo debes saber cuando fue publicada. Saludos, --Zeroth (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Farisoni, entiendo que ambas imágenes están en DP según la plantilla que me mostraste. Felicitaciones por el trabajo.--Zeroth (talk) 13:53, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template:Cc-Gobierno de Chile

Estimado, mi primera impresión fue que si se podían usar sin problemas, ya que en el pié de página de los sitios de gobierno está la marca CC (creative commons). Sin embargo en otro link del pié de página (políticas de privacidad), se afirman cosas como "En resumen se permite el Uso de los contenidos con fines estrictamente informativos, académicos, educacionales, de investigación o personales, que en ninguna caso impliquen la utilización de los mismos para fines de lucro.", lo cual entraría en contradicción con la marca de licencia CC. Plantee este tema a algún administrador de commons para ver como se resuelve. Mientras tanto puedo recomendarte que viches esta categoría la cual contiene miles de imagenes generadas por el gobierno de Chile (y esta vez sí con una licencia compatible con commons). Abrazo,--Zeroth (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palacio Cerro Castillo - construccion.jpg

File:Palacio Cerro Castillo - construccion.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 17:14, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Farisori. No hube notado el enlace. Sin embargo, es contradictorio debido a política prohíbe el uso comercial y la modificación. Contactaré con Wikimedia Chile y, si es posible, con los administradores de ese sitio para que el asunto sea aclarado. Aunque la solución temporal sería aceptar el aviso en lugar de un mero enlace a la licencia de CC. --Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 18:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SOrtega.jpg

File:SOrtega.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 22:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That image was not submitted by me. Regards, Farisori » 23:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rehue y chemamüll

Hola. Vi que categorizaste los rehues y los chemamüll como "totem poles". Por lo que entiendo, el término en inglés hace referencia a los postes de función totémica del noroeste de Norteamérica y, por extensión, a otras estructuras de hechura y función semejante. Es discutible que entre los mapuches exita o haya existido algo semejante a los tótems (algunas veces se ha hablado de que los linajes lo serían), pero sin duda ni un rehue ni un chemamüll tienen que ver con eso. Un rehue sirve a la machi para comunicarse con el mundo espiritual, no tiene relación directa con el linaje* y solo de rebote es "insignia" de la comunidad en que esté erigido. Un chemamüll es la efigie de un muerto, es algo individual, como que pongan tu foto en tu tumba (si alguien le habla o tus parientes la toman por algo más, será por ti y no por la foto). Por eso, pienso que deberías retirar la categoría. Saludos. --Lin linao ¿dime? 15:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC) *Siendo muy rebuscado, cuando la machi accede al trance (küymin), asegura tener el auxilio de espíritus de machis antiguas (filla), no necesariamente de su linaje, pero eso es cosa de la investidura y del trance y no del rehue.[reply]

Está muy bien lo del orden en las categorías. Tanto los chemamüll como el rehue tienen relevancia religiosa, así que ppodría ir sueltos en Religión mapuche o tener categorías propias con su nombre dentro de arte y religión. Saludos. Lin linao ¿dime? 21:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, me parece muy bien. Saludos. Lin linao ¿dime? 05:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Mural.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mural.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Gunnex (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but this picture was not submitted by me ;-) Farisori » 04:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Patrick Rogel: sorry you're right. Please see if this is ok. Best regards, Farisori » 21:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There's no reason to be public domain in Chile. Permission of the illustrator of the book cover as well as name of the photographer of Daniel Belmar must be provided. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, so please delete the photos. I will try to find that information later. Yours, Farisori » 22:03, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los túneles morados.jpg

File:Los túneles morados.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Book cover: copyrighted

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Daniel Belmar.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Daniel Belmar.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marco2016.jpg

File:Marco2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Frodar (talk) 22:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernando Monckeberg Barros.jpg was recently deleted

I would like to let you know that File:Fernando Monckeberg Barros.jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.

Deleted by User:JuTa. Reason for deletion : No license since 13 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding René Pérez Joglar images

I am looking at old VRT Permission images that have not been processed. You uploaded two images of René Pérez Joglar, File:Rene Perez Residente 1.jpg & File:Rene Perez Residente 2.jpg. There is a VRT ticket that is almost three months old waiting for the photographer of the images to send in a release. You appear to be copied on the VRT ticket emails. I do not speak spanish but can see by using google translate that the photographer was copied and was asked to provide a release. Might you be able to work with the photographer to obtain his release and update the ticket? Commons policy is to delete images that are waiting for VRT permission after 30 days and the last email in the ticket was over 2 months ago. Thanks for your assistance. Captain-tucker (talk) 14:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Captain-tucker: Ok I'll write today to the photographer. Please give us some days to solve the issue. Thank you, Farisori » 14:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it would be best if you can find the last email from the VRT agent and do a reply all with the photographer copied so the last agent will see the update. If this is not possible he/she can send in a new email. There is an email template and a release generator here, that should make it easy:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries

Dear @Captain-tucker: Sorry for the delay. The photographer, Alejandro Pedrosa, has just sent an email to permissions-es@wikimedia.org releasing the three images. Best regards, Farisori » 16:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Óleo conmemorativo de la Beatificación de Santa Teresa de Los Andes, Parque O'Higgins de Santiago.jpg

File:Óleo conmemorativo de la Beatificación de Santa Teresa de Los Andes, Parque O'Higgins de Santiago.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not public domain in Chile

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Carlos yo (Discusión) 03:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Carlos yo but this photo wasn't uploaded by me. Best regards, Farisori » 03:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Surnames by ethnicity

Surnames by ethnicity has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

This is regarding Category:Hungarian surnames and other subcategories. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cueca_chilena

Cueca chilena has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.174.243.114 14:12, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Farisori

Contents

Image:Estrella bronce.png

Please tag your images

Tip: Categorizing images

File:ChileRegionesHorizontal.png

Bloqueo

Apologies for the erroneous block

RE:

File source is not properly indicated: File:Udec antigua10.jpg

File:Biobioterremoto.jpg

Imágenes de Wiki Loves Monuments

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Subtipos de relación binaria

Sobre foto de Silvio

Re: Template:Cc-Gobierno de Chile

File:Palacio Cerro Castillo - construccion.jpg

File:SOrtega.jpg

Rehue y chemamüll

File tagging File:Mural.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg

File:Los túneles morados.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Daniel Belmar.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg

File:Marco2016.jpg

File:Fernando Monckeberg Barros.jpg was recently deleted

Regarding René Pérez Joglar images

File:Óleo conmemorativo de la Beatificación de Santa Teresa de Los Andes, Parque O'Higgins de Santiago.jpg

Category:Surnames by ethnicity

Category:Cueca_chilena

Navigation menu

User talk:Farisori

Please tag your images

Tip: Categorizing images

Bloqueo

Apologies for the erroneous block

RE:

File source is not properly indicated: File:Udec antigua10.jpg

Imágenes de Wiki Loves Monuments

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Subtipos de relación binaria

Sobre foto de Silvio

Re: Template:Cc-Gobierno de Chile

Rehue y chemamüll

File tagging File:Mural.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Daniel Belmar.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Los túneles morados - Daniel Belmar.jpg

File:Fernando Monckeberg Barros.jpg was recently deleted

Regarding René Pérez Joglar images

Navigation menu

Search