User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive11

Группа "Кафе"

По какому праву вы удалили фото со странички про группу "Кафе"? Все фото на этой страничке из личного архива музыкантов группы, и предоставлены ими. --Supersanya (talk) 12:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

В таких случаях надо посылать разрешение от авторов/обладателей авторских прав (смотрите образцы на Commons:Email templates) в Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Фото сделаны людьми из окружения группы и предоставлены специально для размещения на страничках группы в Интернете. Авторские права на эти фотки, само собой, никто не заявлял. Страничка открыта по просьбе музыкантов и с их ведома, все материалы предоставлены ими(а не взяты из Интернета). Так что ваши действия мне непонятны.--Supersanya (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Авторские права заявлять не надо. Достаточно факта создания произведения (смотрите, например, законодательство РФ).

Свободные лицензии (== отказ от некоторых из авторских прав) — исключение, а не правило. Поэтому и требуется подтверждение от авторов. Это может быть сделано на сайте группы или в письме от неё.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

percentages

Hi! ... I think Commons:Administrators/Requests/J Milburn percentage should be 100%, no? Neutrals don't count for either support or oppose. Best. ++Lar: t/c 15:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I counted neutrals always. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I had not realised that. I don't think most of the rest of us do so. Also, how do you count them? As opposes? They're not opposes... they're neutral and it's not fair to the candidate to count them with the same weight as an oppose. They should be treated more like comments (except where we are needing a total number of participants, as with CU and OV candidacies). Perhaps we need to discuss this further. What do you think? Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 17:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Neutral votes is not support votes too and we have special templates for comments. I think will be good idea to discuss this issue. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I think you'll find it's common practice elsewhere to calculate the percentage as Supports/(supports + opposes) ... I know that's how it's done on en:wp and I suspect it's how all the other crats here do it. Mostly this doesn't matter, most of our our RfA/B/C/Os aren't close. But ya, we better thrash this out. Q: Where? COM:A's talk? ++Lar: t/c 15:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I think it's most appropriate place. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Done. Commons_talk:Administrators#On_counting_neutrals_in_the_final_percentage_tally. Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 18:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Changing username/usurp requests

Hello! Could you please help me with my request there? Thank you, Ravit (talk) 13:23, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! :-) Ravit (talk) 17:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Remove account automatically created by SUL

Hello! I'm currently renaming my accounts on different Wikimedia projects and it worked out fine almost everywhere, but now I have a problem with SUL. My first account was DenkerChris (this one) which I used with SUL. Then I renamed it to Konzertheld in the German and English Wikipedia and created a new SUL account Konzertheld, which now automatically created an account Konzertheld on Wikimedia Commons before I could rename the old Commons account DenkerChris. Could you help me out? I saw you did some renamings and usurpations, maybe you could kill the automatically created account and then rename DenkerChris to Konzertheld? I can't usurp DenkerChris from the Konzertheld account because there are edits I've done with DenkerChris... Thank you very much! --DenkerChris (talk) 20:19, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done. User:Konzertheld has been renamed to User:Konzertheld (usurped), and user User:DenkerChris has been renamed to User:Konzertheld. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! --DenkerChris (talk) 16:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Starie dorogi ispolkom.jpg

Здравствуйте! Касательно этого файла и еще нескольких из этой серии... а чем selfmade (что я понимаю как "собственная работа") не подходит как источник ? Автор был Lubsoy, он его и загрузил в ру-вики в свое время, он же указал PD-self. Что я сделал неправильно? Spectorman (talk) 20:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Думаю, что для подтверждения авторства не помешали бы фотографии в лучшем разрешении с EXIF-информацией. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Ну, не знаю. Я изначально предполагаю добрые намерения участника, плюс он заливал картинки только по этой тематике, все pd-self: скорее всего, он там живет и фотографирует. А касательно качества и exif... ну вот есть такого же качества его изображение (правда о другом) с exif: ru:Файл:Портрет.jpeg. tineye тоже совпадений по его файлам не выдает. Может, всё таки верить участнику до доказательства обратного? Rubin16 (talk) 19:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Думаю, что спросить участника не помешает. Доверяй, но проверяй :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Я отписался ему на ЛС, но он вроде неактивен с 2008 года :( Rubin16 (talk) 10:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Kolgrim

Hello. Why you delete the photo Kolgrim_padden.jpg?--Progenie of the great apocalypse (talk) 12:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

If you an author of this image (and other thumbnails too), please upload it in full resolution with EXIF information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Need your russian language skills

Hello Eugene!

Can you have a look at User:El1604's uplaods. It seems that there is something wrong. He oftens gives "неизвестен" and "архив" as source, but these aren't valid sources. Or are they? Thanks for helping. --High Contrast (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

You are right, archive (архив) and unknown (неизвестен) is definitely not valid sources for modern images. I also tagged several of such images with unknown templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Administrator?

Hi Eugene.

I was on vacation for the last three weeks and just read your message on my talk page. Thanks for your confidence in me :-) Yep, I tagged quite a lot of problematic images, but I don't think I'm active enough on Commons at the moment to be a good admin. I usually edit here when I'm feeling bored or stressed out on the other projects I'm working on. I tag a few dozen images, try to hunt down copyright information for some images or revert some vandal edits and then return to other projects again. And it's nice that I can just ignore Commons for a few days or even weeks, without feeling the need to be here every day and use my "admin powers". Maybe I'll change my mind when I become more active on Commons again. --Kam Solusar (talk) 03:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

---

About File: Vamp team.jpg

19:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)--Vampshow (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Vampshow

Доброе время суток Eugene ! по поводу источника файла File: Vamp team.jpg Я являюсь автором и владельцем данного изображения, но забыл проставить my own (self made) - сейчас исправлено. Изменил лицензию на public domain. надеюсь, теперь удаления не последует? Прошу извинить за беспокойство. С уважением, --Vampshow (talk) 19:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Vlad

Дело не в лицензии. Большинство этих фотографий было не в полном разрешении и без EXIF-информации. Если вы загрузите оригиналы, то все сомнения рассеются :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Прошу помощи по лицензированию

Добрый день, Евгений! Я хотел бы пополнять Викисклад собственными фотографиями, однако для начала выбрал, очевидно, не самое простое направление — банкноты, и столкнулся со сложностями. Сначала я загрузил фотографии банкнот Национального банка Дании, оформленные в соответствии с указаниями — с разрешением 72 dpi. Затем — изображения танзанийских шиллингов, аналогичные уже имеющимся на Викискладе, с такими же лицензиями. Однако в итоге все мои файлы были удалены, к сожалению, без подробных комментариев ([1], [2], [3], [4]). Не могли бы вы указать на мои ошибки в данных случаях? Maksatmp (talk) 09:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Сканирование работ других авторов не делает Вас автором. Поэтому надо искать лицензию для оригинальных изображений. Есть Commons:Currency, но она не всеобъемлющая :-(, поэтому статус авторский прав для денежных знаков надо искать в национальных законодательствах (и при возможности пополнить Commons:Currency). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо, попробую разобраться. Дело в том, что я ориентировался на другие изображения в категории Banknotes of Tanzania. Получается, что они тоже подлежат удалению? Maksatmp (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Думаю, что да. Во всяком случае запрос на удаление может помочь юридическим изысканиям :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Грустно-то всё как… Ладно, буду машинки фотографировать. Maksatmp (talk) 18:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello Eugene, I was going to explain him/her the matter but maybe he's more comfortable speaking to you in his mother tongue. Just let me know if the deletions were wrong though, according to the rules, actual currency in most countries is copyrighted. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Предполагаю, что право и возникло из-за того, что в жизни пересекаются интересы разных лиц. Авторское право — не исключение... --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

---

Ещё раз добрый день! Я всё по тому же вопросу. Я внимательно изучил Commons:Currency и в целом понял ситуацию с воспроизведением изображения денег — опираться следует на закон страны, которая их выпускает. Я нашёл закон о праве Танзании, однако затрудняюсь сделать вывод, разрешает ли он воспроизведение танзанийских шиллингов в проекте Викимедия или нет. Дело не только в том, что не будучи носителем английского, я затрудняюсь в выборе значений некоторых ключевых слов, но и в том, что я не знаю особенностей функционирования Викимедии (например, является ли она публичной библиотекой и чем ограничивается использование изображений в ней). Не могли бы вы помочь с приглашением на страницу Commons_talk:Currency#Tanzania специалистов, которые могли бы дать ответ — разрешает ли данный документ воспроизводить валюту Танзании, запрещает или не даёт конкретной информации по этому вопросу? Maksatmp (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Мне кажется, что эта статья нет (PDF почему-то не открывался). На мой взгляд, она про добросовестное использование (fair use), Commons же разрешает только изображения, сторые каждый может использовать в любых целях (Commons:лицензирование).

Надо поискать статью про исключения из авторских прав (exemption).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Images by Muray Róbert

Please restore these images, the author gave permission (OTRS #2009090710035426:

• Állatkerti madarak.jpg
• Diszmadarak.jpg
• Madarak 2.jpg
• Lovak - búvár.jpg
• Háziállatok.jpg
• Védett madarak.jpg

Also, it might not hurt to stop and think before pressing the del button. If the author and the uploader has the same name, the image is quite likely not an infringement. There is a template for such cases which leaves a few days for the author to give permission in a verifiable way. --Tgr (talk) 17:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

OTRS confirmation is much more reliable evidence then user name. Images were already marked for speedy deletion. I restored them. Please add OTRS information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, done. User name is of course not evidence, but it can be indication that the evidence exists at all (the uploader does own the rights necessary to upload) and just has not been provided yet. Speedy deletion (which is used way too liberally on Commons) is not a good reaction in such cases - it can be rather discouraging when your images are already deleted by the time you could try to explain that you are the author (or heir in this case). --Tgr (talk) 22:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

No source

Hi Eugene,

I'm working on our backlogs and I'm in doubt of something, you tagged 20 a 30 files like this for no source but the source page say's own work.

Could you please tell me why you think it isn't own work, I don't feel secure enough to just delete them now.

Best regards, Huib talk 04:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Most of the files by this uploader are in relatively small resolution without EXIF data. Several of files was much more older (or technical drawings) which were also clamed own work. So, these were reasons for suspicions.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer, I was a kind of already thinking in that direction, but when I delete the files and receive questions why I deleted the files I can now give this answer. Its always better to double check :) Huib talk 16:44, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure :-) As Russian proverb says "You should measure seven times, cut only once". --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Панарама Менску

Прывітаньне! Я загрузіў дзьве вэрсіі выявы File:Miensk - Plac Niezaležnaści.jpg, таму што не заўважыў, што ў першай зь іх засталіся службовыя накіравальныя лініі (дакладней, ня думаў, што яны захоўваюцца ў jpg, аказваецца — захоўваюцца), якія абсалютна непатрэбныя для выніковага карыстальніка (ці могуць нават нашкодзіць). Якасьць абодвух вэрсіяў выяваў абсалютна аднолькавая. У сувязі з тым, што гэта файлы вялікага памеру (больш, чым па 5 Мб), магчыма, будзе сэнс выдаліць першую вэрсію файла, проста каб не займаць месца. Калі так, то выдалі, калі ласка, ну а калі не, то хай захоўваюцца абедзьве, бо мне асабіста гэта ня вельмі істотна. Дзякуй. —zedlik (talk) 17:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Зроблена. Выдаленыя файлы захоўваюцца (каб была магчымасьць аднавіць), так што месца менш займаць ня будзе :-)

Можа паспрабаваць намінаваць у якасныя?

Дарэчы, не перашкодзіла замяніць выявы ў шаблёнах ў артыкулах пра Менск у розных Вікіпэдыях. Усё ж сапраўдная панарама :-)

Яшчэ бы панараму Верхняга гораду (з гасьціны «Беларусь»?)...

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Насамрэч захоўваюцца, нешта я пра гэта не падумаў. Але ўсё роўна дзякуй :) Зь цягам часу шаблёны, я думаю, заменяцца. Зь «Беларусі» сапраўды было б супэр, але нават патрапіць у пэдагагічны ўнівэр было пэўнай праблемай :) З агляднымі пляцоўкамі ў Менску ня вельмі. Калі якасьць адпавядае, каб выяву вылучыць на якасныя, то я, вядома, толькі падтрымліваю. Здымак рабіўся праз шкло, адкрыць якое не было ніякай магчымасьці, таму пэўныя хібы і скажэньні з-за старога шкла ўсё ж ёсьць. Але з гэтым, на жаль, нічога ня зробіш. —zedlik (talk) 00:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Трэба ідэю гарвыканкаму даць па разьвіцьцю турызму і павялічэньню прыбыткаў :-) Канешне, калі пэрыядычна вокны мыць будзе таньней :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Такая магчымасьць прападае! :) —zedlik (talk) 17:05, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Выставіў на абмеркаваньне — Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#September_15.2C_2009 — паглядзім, што з гэтага выйдзе :) —zedlik (talk) 00:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

File:UlrichTholuck.jpg

You tagged the File:UlrichTholuck.jpg "no source" while the author clearly stated "own work" and published his own work cc-licensed. So why do you think there is "no source" ?!? axp_de^Hello! 11:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Thumbnail size doesn't support own work claim. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

What??? I guess the picture is a cut off a larger photo he took, with many people on it, so it's not possible to have this picture at a larger size! axp_de^Hello! 21:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

May be, may be not. This question was addressed to uploader. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Well then you should ask the author himself! His unique action on commons was to upload the picture, and even on de-wikipedia he stopped editing a day later. Maybe you should send him an email, if you're keen on deleting his work! axp_de^Hello! 12:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I notified uploader on talk page. Uploader didn't enable e-mail features. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Notified the uploader on his german talk page, hopefully he will notice this ... axp_de^Hello! 15:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Corvette logo

Hello Eugene

Why did you delete my File:Corvette-logo.jpg ? It was (it IS actually) my own picture I took several years ago. Why you did it without any comment from my side??? Maybe you should also delete for example this one: or this one:  ? What kind of copyright violation did you find?

Regards

--Grzegorz Polak (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Corvette logo does not fit into {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

POTD

Hello. There has been a change in the POTD arrangement for the coming days (you can see the justification at the POTD talk page) and File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG was selected for September 30. As you can probably see, the picture lacks the majority of captions, including the Belarusian one which is VERY important here. I would like to ask you to go here and translate the English caption into the template in Belarusian (and into Russian too, if you could). Thank you very much. Airwolf (talk) 17:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done Belarusian and Russian translations. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. And could you also go here (bottom of the page) and add the Belarusian and Russian description in the templates? They are almost the same, just with this addition: Today marks exactly one month from that event. Thank you again, miłego dnia :) Airwolf (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Radziwiłł Ościkowicz

Зазірніце сюды, калі ласка: File talk:Radziwiłł Ościkowicz.jpg. Ёсць уражанне, што з ідэнтфыфікацыяй асобы на выяве блытаніна. AntonBryl (talk) 12:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

І сюды: File talk:Zygmunt Korybutowicz seal 1433.PNG. --MaximLitvin (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Мяркую, што слушная заўвага, але варта было бы па кнігах паглядзець. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Пад патрэтам ёсць арыгінальны подпіс, на пячатцы таксама літарамі напісана. --MaximLitvin (talk) 11:41, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Да я разумею, але, на жаль, лаціны ня ведаю :-( Дый, наколькі зразумеў, патрэбныя ўдакладненьні. таму і пісаў пра кнігі. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Там па лінку "Пераназваць" пераназвалася замест малюнка старонка размоў :( Пра кнігі: пра тое, што Радзівіл Войшвілдавіч гербу Суліма і Радзівіл Осцікавіч гербу Трубы - розныя людзі, пісаў Сэмковіч у "O litewskich rodach bojarskich". AntonBryl (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Пакуль што пераймяноўваць выявы могуць толькі адміністратары (дый і тое зрабілі нядаўна). Перайменаваў. Мяркую, што варта прайсьціся па артыкулах, што выкарыстоўваюць выяву і выдаліць там, дзе няслушна. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

На пячатцы напісана magn'dux . litv . rus . et -- вял'кн . літ . руск . ін, Жыгімонт Карыбутавіч не быў вялікім князем, гэта выява з Лакіера, там побач з ёю і пячатка Карыбута -- бацькі Жыгімонта Карыбутавіча, той хто рабіў скан нешта наблытаў, гэтая -- пячатка Жыгімонта Кейстутавіча, ён і вял.кн. быў, і Калюмнамі карыстаўся (яны на тарчы), і ў Лакіера яна менавіта так атрыбутаваная. --MaximLitvin (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Якая назва файла будзе слушнай (прашу прабачэньня, маіх ведаў не хапае, а часу няма :-()? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

"Пячатка Жыгімонта Кейстутавіча", у АнглВікі яго называюць Sigismund Kęstutaitis. --MaximLitvin (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Зроблена. Мяркую, што варта прайсьціся па артыкулах, што выкарыстоўваюць выяву і выдаліць там, дзе няслушна. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

t.A.T.u.

Why did you delete file "Tatu_at_VivaComet_08.jpg"?!

This image didn't have license information since September 5. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Alamandi & Intenium

Здравствуйте, Вы удалили два изображения Intenium_logo.jpg и alamandi.png, которые я заливал. Чтобы их восстановить нужны письма от наших художников создавших изображения или нужно заливать изображения заново? Подскажите как быть с тем, что по трудовому договору все, что работник создает, является собственностью компании? -- Kravchenko Anton Kravchenko Anton (talk) 15:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Надо разрешение от правообладателя (компании или художника) не распространение согласно какой-либо из свободных лицензий. Смотрите Commons:Email templates и Commons:OTRS.

Файлы можно восстановить без повторной загрузки. Но думаю, что сначала стоит разобраться с разрешениями.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, на прошлой неделе отправил на адрес permissions-commons@wikimedia.org для разблокирования изображений письмо следующего содержания:

Hello, my name is Kravchenko Anton I hereby assert that I represent INTENIUM GmbH as owner of the exclusive copyright of Intenium.jpg and Alamandi.png, which were removed from wiki commons server (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EugeneZelenko#Alamandi_.26_Intenium). I agree to publish that work under the free license Free Art License v1.2, 1.3]. I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me. I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. 06/10/2009 Kravchenko Anton, Regional manager Russia and CIS INTENIUM GmbH

Just as was written in Commons:OTRS. Но до сегодняшнего момента, изображения не восстановлены. В чем может быть причина? Kravchenko Anton

Думаю, стоит добавить запрос на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Возможно, нет возможности или добровольцев, чтобы читать каждый зарос.

Мне кажется, что подобный запрос должен быть отправлен от головной компании (кому принадлежат права), а не регионального филиала.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо, добавил заявку. Я напрямую подчиняюсь директору по развитию. Периодически выполняю работа различного рода. Прежде чем отправить запрос уточнил о правомерности моих действий у руководства. Kravchenko Anton (talk) 13:39, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Думаю, в идеале стоит провести заявку через юридический отдел (если таковой в компании имеется). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello Eugene! I don't understand Russian (is it Russian?). I am working on the ticket from Kravchenko Anton (which is written in English). Could you please undelete the files in question with {{OTRS received|2009100610050024}}. I will then recheck the validity of permission (I'm confused because the e-mail arrived from another address than the main homepage of the company, so I must send a mail to the address given on the homepage of the main company). I assume everything is OK, but it is important to be sure. Nillerdk (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done. I also think that will be good idea to receive permission from corporate headquarter in such cases. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Еще раз здравствуйте. Возникла путаница, вина за которую отчасти лежит на мне - я загрузил несколько раз логотип компании. Но даже в логе истории страницы (http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intenium&action=history) указано имя файла Intenium.jpg. Восстановленным же оказался файл Logo-intenium.gif. Изображение существенно разнятся графикой и качеством. Каковы действия мои/ваши в данной ситуации? Kravchenko Anton (talk) 11:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello Eugene! I don't understand what Kravchenko Anton wrote just above, but it was the wrong logo you undeleted (I didn't know there were more). Could you please delete File:Logo-intenium.gif‎ again and undelete File:Intenium.jpg which should be the right one? Of course, Kravchenko Anton would have to confirm this afterwards. I'm still in contact with him through OTRS. Thanks Nillerdk (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done Я восстановил второй файл. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Доброе утро. Спасибо за помощь. Все изображения восстановлены. 83.219.130.117 05:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello, could you please temporarily undelete the following files (you deleted them because of missing information)? I have received a OTRS-ticket regarding them. You could add {{OTRS received|2009091010040173}} to each of them after undeleting. Thank you. File:Palazzo_Versace_Dubai_-_Indicative_Interior.png, File:Palazzo_Versace_Dubai_-_Indicative_Interior2.png, File:Best_daytime_PV_Dubai_image.png. Nillerdk (talk) 09:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done Please add OTRS information. Sorry, I can't verify OTRS information myself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm still communicating with the copyright holder. Nillerdk (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

My Username.

I would really appreciate it if you changed my username (the one I have now is embarrassing). Babyaministraor (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Please add request on Commons:Changing username. Anyway, I don't know target user name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

This art

Is this modern art that cannot be on Commons since Belarus has no FOP?

• File:BLR Vetka Museum of People's Art Gates made by Shklyarov.jpg

I read here (at the bottom) that a certain F. G. Shklyarov did some art work in the Vetka museum in 1987. If true, then he cannot be dead for 70 years....unless it is a different Shklyarov. As an aside, are you a Bureaucrat or an Admin? You don't say so on your userpage. With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Creator died in 1988.

Same uploader imported many other images from Flickr, which should be reviewed.

I'm both administrator and bureaucrat. However is it so important to advertise on user page? :-)

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

• I have voted to delete in the DR. Many new users may not know about your status if you don't say you are an an Admin, I suppose, on your userpage. But that is your call. I was just curious...nothing more. With kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I added templates. May be they'll be helpful :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks. They do indeed help a lot. With kind Regards from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Mr.Dantes

http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Mr.Dantes proves that Mr.Dantes is Unique.Mr. Dantes 04:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Please see the license

[File:Derecho en Paro UChile de AlejandroJimenez2.JPG] (see the number 2 I have problem with the original name)

See the license and permission now. It is good? I hope do not make a new mistake again. File:Derecho en Paro UChile de AlejandroJimenez.JPG (it is the original)

Thank.

Bye --Ciberprofe (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Could you please upload this image in better resolution? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Initiative Zivilgesellschaft logo

I'm the creator of the logo and the picture mark is not protected by law yet in any way. Why shouldn't it be possible to publish it on Wikipedia? Please explain why you think that's a problem! The logo ist the best way to recognise the NGO Initiative Zivilgesellschaft. --Onsemeliot (talk) 13:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Please confirm you authorship and fact that organization doesn't own copyrights with Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

I uploaded it as own work. There is a further confirmation necessary? And the photographer Monika Muck Springer confirmed her agreement with the use of her two pics Wien_130609.jpg and Wien_180609.jpg in the Wikipedia-article "Oteration SoKo Pelztier" on 2. October 2009 in an e-Mail to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org. Nevertheless you deleted it. I can't understand what went wrong with those images as well. Am i supposed to delete the copyright remarks? I thought somebody else would do that afer receiving those e-mails... --Onsemeliot (talk) 13:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

I think will be good to confirm your real identity and authorship for logo.

OTRS ticket information was missied on file:Wien_180609.jpg. Please use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for request. I don't have OTRS access.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Eugene,
I've un-deleted the two demonstrations photos (File:Wien 130609.jpg and File:Wien 180609.jpg) as the photographer seems to have sent permission to OTRS (as of uploader). I'll ask the uploader to confirm the legal status of the logo per OTRS, as you've suggested.--Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Rename request

Здравствуйте Евгений, не могли бы вы переименовать мой акаунт George Mel в user:Gaeser. Переименование уже произведено в Ru wiki. Заранее спасибо.--George Mel (talk) 15:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Serzh Sargsyan at Tatev Hydro Power Plant.jpg

Привет. По поводу удаления файла File:Serzh Sargsyan at Tatev Hydro Power Plant.jpg. Насколько я понимаю, в лицензии, сопровождающей этот файл: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ прямо указано, что You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work - т.е. говорится о возможности его свободного распространения при сохранении лицензии и авторства. Для аналогичного сайта РФ существует шаблон {{kremlin.ru}}. Как понимаю, на армянском сайте те же правила. Я не очень хорошо разбираюсь в юридических тонкостях коммонса, поэтому прошу объяснить, почему его нельзя использовать в статьях ВП. --Allocer (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Лицензия CC-BY-ND явно запрещает создание производных работ (в пункте ND, грубо говоря, даже вырезать часть картинки или изменить цвета), что не соответствует Commons:Лицензирование. В случае с {{Kremlin.ru}} такого ограничения нет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

А... Теперь понял, спасибо. --Allocer (talk) 08:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

переименование изображения

Привет ещё раз! Загруженное мной изображение Active Electronically Scanned Array IRBIS E.jpg называется некорректно. У Ирбис-Э пассивная ФАР, так что изображение должно называться либо Passive <...>, либо просто Electronically Scanned Array IRBIS E. Каким образом это можно переименовать? С уважением, --Allocer (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Можно использовать {{Rename|<Новое имя>|<Причина>}}. Другой способ — загрузить под новым именем, а в описании старого поместить {{Bad name|<Новое имя>}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Запросы на узурпацию

Привет. У меня такой вопрос. В Wikimedia Commons у меня два аккаунта. Я хочу их объединить. Куда мне надо для этого обратиться? Вот сюда?

Заранее спасибо. P.NaZ (talk) 17:15, 21 October 2009 (UTC)P.NaZ

К сожалению, учётные записи объединять нельзя. Можно переименовать, но тогда одной из них придётся пожертвовать. Запрос подаётся на Commons:Changing username#Current Usurpation requests, но если Вы не знаете английского, то можно и здесь. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Basin.jpg

Вы написали мне что не хватает какой-то информации. Там указано все: и то, что я автор этого фото, и лицензия. Что еще нужно?! --Pessimist2006 (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Вы не могли бы загрузить это изображение в лучшем разрешении с EXIF-информацией? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Rename

Thanks!--Lépton ^✉ 16:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

How to nominate these stamps?

How do I nominate the contents of several categories for deletion? Carpkazu has uploaded many Japanese stamps but the {{PD-Japan}} does not permit the uploading of stamps newer than 50 years old, so all the images in Category:Stamps of Japan from 1962 onwards are copyright violations as are Category:Stamps of Okinawa, Category:Furusato Stamps of Japan. The details on Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Japan seem rather contradictory and not easily understandable now that this information was added by the same editor. He was warned about using stamps newer than 50 years here but has failed to respond in English even though I asked for a translation of his response. However it appears that most of his recent uploads have been pre-1959 images so they are ok. Do I just nominate the categories for deletion or all the images? I am watching this page for a while so no need to respond on my talk page. TIA Ww2censor (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

I think in this case you could to create one nomination and list all stamps images which are newer then 1959 year. However, will be good idea to notify all uploaders about deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

I have completed it at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Carpkazu and hope it is done properly. You may want to weigh in. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately I'm not good expert in Japanese law. Also I don't know Japanese which should be great help in this case. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Can you suggest someone? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 18:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I think Commons talk:Licensing is good place to bring attention to such questions. However you already did so :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I also found a few active Japanese speaking administrators and have asked then to contribute if possible. we shall see how this one turns out. Again thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at Commons:Bots/Requests/vertrepbot#Discussion. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If it's ok, would you set the flag? -- User:Docu at 12:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

I think will be good idea if other administrators/bots owners will express their opinions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure, but if they dont, how long is a request usually open? My last one was closed after one week. -- User:Docu at 15:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Bot requests don't have hard set time limit. You could invite more participants like User:Multichill. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

I think he is aware of it as I mentioned it on the page for the Navy News Service upload. -- User:Docu at 02:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Purpose bot status request is has as broad discussion of of bot's operation as possible. It's hard to rely on guesses, so explicit opinions expressions is much better. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Нарушение АП

Доброе время суток! Один из участников не совсем разобравшись в правилах ВП загрузил большое количество изображений со спорным правовым статусом. В частности, изображение [5] явно принадлежит Саиду Аминову. Не знаю, что в этом случае нужно сделать - наверное, нужно выносить на удаление, как нарушающее АП. --Allocer (talk) 16:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Вообще-то их должны удалить где-то через неделю. Но если у Вас есть время проверить условия использования на указанных источниках, то можно добавить {{Copyvio}} там, где изображения явно не являются свободными. Тогда удаление будет гораздо быстрее. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Спасибо за совет. --Allocer (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Ducious PD-files

Hello Eugene!

You are an experienced Administrator on Commons. I am quite confused about a certain Copyright discussion: Can you have a look at this discussion. Karol 11:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

 Done EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Queen Anne

What's "Queen Anne" about File:USA-San Jose-464-466 South Seventh Street.jpg? The only thing I see that's even vaguely so is a bay window. - Jmabel ! talk 05:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not specialist in architecture. All categorization is based on document from City of San Jose. Feel free to fix mistakes and report them to City of San Jose too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

New name Tyk

Thank you very much. --tyk (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Дмитрий Кошелев

Has upload tons of clearly non-commercial images (linksearch belyaefff.livejournal.com), and tons of images from websites that not contains the selected license nor contains any evidence that the images are free for commercial use (www.nashgorod.ru, www.2men.info & File:Tumen pesh bulvar.jpg). Besides this three sites there are some 3D reproductions under pd-old claim like File:Главный купол храма Христа Спасителя.jpg. Help in Russian language is appreciated. --Martin H. (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

You are correct. There is no evidence of free licensing. Additionally materials from nashgorod.ru is All rights reserved (Все права защищены).

I left message on user talk page. Will be good idea to add no permission to all images from nashgorod.ru/2men.info. I added to some of them manually, but will be great to do this with bot/AWB (sorry, I can't do myself and I don't have too much time to do this manually). I'll ask User:Multichill.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Eugene, Im sorry for loading this work to you. I hope thats not a problem and I hope that, albeit the long discussion below, it is more comforting for Дмитрий to have the issue explained and resolved in his language. So thanks for your help. --Martin H. (talk) 10:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Вы не торопитесь их все удалять. Дайте неделю, чтобы можно было на тех источниках, где это получится, исправить лицензионнные оговорки (на двух точно получится). Дело в том, что на русском языке нет стандартных форм лицензионных оговорок, которые допускаются на Викискладе, поэтому приходится пробовать методом тыка. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 19:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Посмотрите новую лицензионную оговорку на 2men.info: "Для участников Википедии: использование изображений, размещённых на сайте, разрешается на условиях лицензии СС-BY-SA 3.0". Так пойдёт? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Это должно быть не только для Википедии. Потом насколько понимаю, это сборник фотографий разных авторов. И каждый из них должен дать согласие на публикацию согласно условий СС-BY-SA 3.0, если не было передачи авторский прав 2men.info (что весьма сомнительно). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

То есть убрать выражение "для участников Википедии"? Не вопрос. Хотя по смыслу это ничем не отличается от File:Kremlin_authorisation-Russian.pdf. Всё-таки плохо, что нет общепризнанного шаблона.

На сегодня 2men.info - это сборник фотографий одного автора, некоего Александра. Но даже если бы авторов было несколько, то см. пункт 2 ст. 1265 Гражданского кодекса РФ: "При опубликовании произведения анонимно или под псевдонимом (за исключением случая, когда псевдоним автора не оставляет сомнения в его личности) издатель (пункт 1 статьи 1287), имя или наименование которого указано на произведении, при отсутствии доказательств иного считается представителем автора и в этом качестве имеет право защищать права автора и обеспечивать их осуществление. Это положение действует до тех пор, пока автор такого произведения не раскроет свою личность и не заявит о своем авторстве." Жду комментария с Вашей стороны.

Авторские права принадлежат автору, а не издателю, если не было договора об их передаче. Соответственно, отказаться от части из них (== свободой лицензии) может только автор.

Думаю, лучшим решением будет, если владелец 2men.info пометит авторство своих фотографии и укажет, что они (но не все) лицензируются согласно условий СС-BY-SA 3.0.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Как человек с высшим юридическим образованием (специализация гражданское право), 12-летним стажем работы по юридической профессии, публикациями в реферируемых журналах ВАКа - уверяю Вас, что процитированная статья ГК РФ даёт издателю все права быть представителями авторов (т. н. "законное представительство") и совершать сделки (то есть РАСПОРЯЖАТЬСЯ исключительными правами) от их имени (ст. 182 ГК РФ). В данном случае отношения между автором и издателем базируются на договоре присоединения (ст. 428 ГК РФ), одобряемом с помощью конклюдентных действий (п. 3 ст. 438 ГК РФ).

Ситуация абсолютно аналогична прецеденту с Кремлином.ру: материалов много, в том числе изображений, у них наверняка разные авторы (особенно у фото), однако владелец ресурса в качестве законного представителя автора распоряжается авторским правом. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Kremlin.ru может быть собранием произведений выполненных в рамках служебного задания. Не думаю, что размещая снимки на сайте, автор передаёт исключительные права на них владельцу сайта. Думаю, что без договора это не имеет юридической силы.--EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Ваша правда. Наверняка так и есть. Но ведь по-хорошему Кремлин.ру должен был тогда упомянуть, что изображения созданы как служебные произведения, поэтому правообладателем и выступает Кремлин.ру, не так ли?

В конечном счёте моя цель - не нарушение авторских прав, а автоматизация процесса. Например, чтобы при загрузке изображения в хранилище файлов автор давал согласие на какое-нибудь лицензионное согашение типа того, которое мы отправляем в OTRS (как это сделано на Panoramio.com). Вопрос только в выработке процедуры, кторая бы всех устроила. Можете здесь что-нибудь посоветовать? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Думаю, что надо, чтобы создатель сайта объявит, что все авторы присылаемых снимков должны согласится лицензировать свои (и только свои) снимки согласно условиям свободной лицензии. Да ещё и объяснит, что это значит, чтобы избежать недоразумений, типа Википедия — некоммерческий проект (пример: http://freedomdefined.org). Для выполнения условий СС-BY надо ещё упоминать авторов индивидуальных снимков. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Здравая мысль. Примерно в этом направлении и надо что-то сочинить. Где-то к началу следующей недели сформулирую. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 09:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

На http://belyaefff.livejournal.com/profile сейчас новая лицензионная оговорка: "Использование изображений, размещённых на данном ресурсе, разрешается на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 Unported." Она соответсвует правилам Викисклада? — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 11:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Опять же ни слова про авторство или источник. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

В процитированном мною письме пресс-секретаря Президента РФ, которое считается на Викискладе образцом согласия на свободное лицензирование изображений, также "ни слова про авторство или источник". Оспорить это письмо не желаете? В общем, давайте так: Вы даёте форму, я сообщаю владельцу ресурса, он её в точности воспроизводит. — Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Прочтите само письмо? Там довольно чётко говорится, что CC "не является частью российского законодательства"; а Вы пытаетесь сейчас в споре на российское законодательство ссылаться.

На проходившем в апреле круглом столе в рамках программы ЮНЕСКО, посвящённом всем этим вопросам, говорилось, что до тех пор, пока в России нет прецедента судебной практики по CC/GFDL, говорить о том, как они вписываются в законодательство, невозможно. Могу назвать конкретные имена специалистов, занимающихся этим вопросом, если Вас будет это интересовать. Обратите также внимание: у CC пока что нет совместимых лицензий.

Как юриста с кучей регалий Вас все вышеперечисленное не заставляет задуматься?

В ситуации подобной неопределённости стоит ориентироваться на максимальную защиту прав, то есть - на прямое указание конкретной лицензии. Жаль, если Вам это кажется возмутительным. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 06:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Если Вас не устраивает упоминание в оговорке лицензий СС, давайте тогда дословно воспроизведём формулировку с http://www.kremlin.ru/about/copyrights. В конечном счёте всё упирается в то, что ни Вы, ни другой мой уважаемый оппонент до сих пор не смогли предложить НИ ОДНОГО варианта лицензионной оговорки. Вообще ни одного. Я уже не говорю о том, что давным-давно можно было элементарно перевести на русский язык правила Викисклада. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 08:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Не понимаю, что Вы имеете ввиду под "вариантом лицензионной оговорки", к сожалению.

Да, конечно, перевести на русский язык правила Викисклада было бы хорошо; у Вас для этого есть абсолютно такой же доступ, как, например, у меня; среди носителей русского языка много потребителей переводов, но, увы, слишком мало переводчиков. Впрочем, и перевод правил Викисклада - не панацея; локализация Creative Commons, например - совершенно отдельный процесс, к которому Вы можете присоединиться, например, связавшись с представителями webpublishers.ru

По поводу способа воспроизведения формулировки попробуйте связаться с представителями ru:wp:OTRS, на самом деле. Они должны помочь, если это вообще окажется возможно. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 09:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Я на Викискладе всего полгода (или меньше?), так что правила перевести, извините, пока не успел:) Представители OTRS - на самом деле это обычные администраторы Викисклада (с русским OTRS как-то уже контактировал). У меня следующее предложение: я вынес затронутые здесь идеи на общее обсуждение на форуме - вдруг кто-нибудь подаст здравую идею, а то мы пока что в тупике. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Не сочтите за поучение, но раз Вы полгода на Викискладе, я на всякий случай замечу, что не все волонтёры OTRS - администраторы Викисклада, и не все администраторы Викисклада - волонтёры OTRS. В OTRS то, чего Вы пытаетесь добиться здесь, обсуждается целенаправленней, так как в конечном счёте при отсутствии прямого указания нужной лицензии на сайте всяко надо работать с этой службой. Анастасия Львова^ru (ru-n, en-2) 12:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Так я и хочу добиться, чтобы на сайтах была "нужная лицензия". То есть автоматизировать процесс, по аналогии с Крмелином. Потому что добьюсь я, допустим, разрешения по OTRS для какого-то сайта - а другой участник Викисклада знать об этом не будет, потому что на сайте ничего не сказано. И либо не станет загружать с этого сайта изображения, либо снова будет ломиться к администратору за разрешением. Ну и кому это надо? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Подведу промежуточный итог. По linksearch belyaefff.livejournal.com и www.2men.info жду варианта лицензионной оговорки (как в том, так и в другом случае у изображений один автор). По www.nashgorod.ru и http://www.tobolsk.info/ связываюсь с авторами и OTRS. Соответственно, если от каких-то авторов приходит отказ или ни слуху ни духу до 01.12.2009, то сообщаю об этом - их файлы Вы удаляете. Там, где авторы дают согласие, я сам вношу изменения в описание файлов. Так нормально будет? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Хорошо. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Из www.nashgorod.ru удаляем творчество авторов Abyss, Соколова Мария, Imarion, zheltyj_angel, РусMAN, LisaSimpson, Андрей Аблакатов, Лениза и Biohazard. Из http://www.tobolsk.info/ удаляем всё. Остальные оставляем. С администратором www.2men.info сегодня спишусь, чтобы поправил у себя лицензионную оговорку. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 06:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Извиняюсь, времени по всему пройтись, к сожалению, нет :-( Вы можете помочь, если добавите в описание удаляемых изображений {{copyvio|no free license granted}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Вроде бы удалил все. Но на всякий случай стоит проверить.

Заметил, что были фотографии современных скульптур. Думаю оставшиеся снимки стоит просмотреть и запросить удаление тех, где статуи — основной объект снимка. Смотрите Commons:Freedom of panorama.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Теоретически это File:Скульптура мамонта (Тюмень).jpg. Но скульптура песочная, её уже и нет давно. Автор скульптуры нигде не обозначен, доказать своё авторское право не сможет. Получается, что это изображение - единственное, что осталось от скульптуры. В общем, Ваше мнение? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 08:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Такая же ситуация с ледяными скульптырами, которые считаются такими же произведениями исскусства, как и настоящие.

Думаю, что автора при желании можно найти (должно же было в новостях мелькать) и попросить разрешения. Иначе — анонимное произведение (соответсвенно срок охраны 70 лет со дня создания).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

А ледяные скульптуры попали в фотографию цирка или где они ещё? Если в фотографии цирка, то надо оставить, потому что там основной объект воспроизведения здание цирка, а не эти скульптуры (ст. 1276 ГК РФ). В остальных фото убрать. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 08:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

http://www.2men.info/ is not sufficient. The website now says "Для участников Википедии: использование изображений, размещённых на сайте, разрешается на условиях лицензии СС-BY-SA 3.0" - ok so far, but they also say: Все желающие из других городов могут рассказать о них и показать нам фотографии [...]. Thats not ok. A website can not host other peoples work and suddenly decide to license the material under cc-by-sa and to allow for free commercial reuse. Only the copyright holder(s) can license, not anyone else. 2men.info is not the copyright holder of the images other people uploaded there and so 2men.info can not provide any valid license. It seems like Дмитрий can modify the licensing himself or has contact to the website owner. I strongly suggest to remove this license from 2men.info as it is an infringement of other peoples copyright and I suggest to remove the 2men.info images from Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

According to User:Дмитрий Кошелев who contacted 2men.info owner, 2men.info currently host only images of site owner only. I think will be good idea to have OTRS confirmation of this words from 2men.info owner.

I already suggested that 2men.info should change license text and also attribute author(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Вы уж скажите, что конкретно должен написать the website owner, а то человек уже на нервах весь:) Цитирую:

"Ну Дмитрий, когда я прочитал на форуме Вики ты сравниваешь мой сайт и раздел сайта Нашгород, подразумевая, что они примерно похожи, я очень удивился. Простой список фотографий без подписей на Нашгороде, где нет авторства потому что там автором миллион и маленькая тележка, так сказать фотографии от многих горожан и мой сайт где я единственный автор, где снимки жестко структурированы, описаны и все прочее.

И вообще я не понимаю всей ситуации, я один автор, мой сайт, мои снимки, всем и вся я разрешаю использование снимков с указанием источника и ссылки на источник. Но почему то редакторам или кому то на Вики этого мало и они еще что-то придумывают, какие то лицензии и прочее.

Мне кажется это все очень странно и кажется кому то просто заняться не чем.

В общем я запутался, вроде меня должны росить в такой ситуации, а тут получается я еще и сам прошу, так что закроем ка тему на моих словах.

МОИ снимки размещены на МОЕМ сайте www.2men.info - я владелец сайта и автор всех снимков, размещение фотографий на ресурсах Вики я разрешаю."

Жалко человека, да и неохота оплачивать ему психиатра, если что... Про OTRS confirmation уже ему говорил. Кстати, в OTRS мне ответили, что лучше на сайте разрешение написать, чем каждого к ним гонять. Может быть, Александру просто убрать эту загадочную фразу "Все желающие из других городов могут рассказать о них и показать нам фотографии [...]" - и дело с концом? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 08:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Очевидная проблема с размещение фотографий на ресурсах Вики.

Думаю ему достаточно будет указывать авторство снимков, а где-то написать (например на странице про автоские права), что все снимки сделаны только им распространяются согласно условий CC-BY-SA-3.0. Снимки других людей охраняются авторскими правами и размещены по желанию их авторов. Смотрите, например, http://radzima.org.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Он там поправил. А призыв показать свои фотографии относился вообще к другому сайту, оказывается, к www.fototyumen.ru — Александр тоже это дело уточнил. - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 17:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

На мой взгляд, всё нормально. Думаю, еще стоит дать ссылку на текст лицензии (смотрите {{CC-BY-SA-3.0}}) м возможно использовать официальную иконку лицензии с http://creativecommons.org. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Файл File:Tyumen RespublikySt DaylyTTrafficJam Smog.jpg

Чего-то я вообще уже перестаю понимать. Файл был размещён в английской Википедии под свободной лицензией cc-by-3.0, использование которой разрешается и на Викискладе. Размещён непосредственно автором изображения. Затем перенесён на Викисклад под той же самой лицензией. Источник и автор указаны. На каком основании поставлен шаблон "Нет источника"? - Дмитрий Кошелев (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

В английской Википедии было Cc-by Giprotyumenneftegaz. Источник подобного утверждения не указан. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Всё ясно. Ромуальда просто бес попутал:) Это (почти) профессиональный фотограф, у него куча фотографий, одна из которых как раз называется Giprotyumenneftegaz. Кстати, в английской Вики она тоже есть - w:en:File:Tyumen KeyBussiness Giprotyumenneftegaz HQ.jpg. Может, ошибся? Напишите ему на страницу обсуждения (желательно по-английски, а то по-русски он вообще никак не реагирует), наверняка он даже не знает о проблеме:)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

По поводу удалённого файла Bounty_(chocolate_bar).jpg

Здравствуйте. С некоторым опозданием обнаружил, что Вы удалили загруженный мною файл, изображающий шоколадный батончик Баунти. В чём логика? Если, по-Вашему, это изображение является несвободным, тогда, возможно, следует поудалять добрую половину изображений из категории Chocolate_bars? ([6]) Mevo (talk) 08:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Дизайн упаковки Bounty достаточно сложен, и потому может охраняться авторскими правами. В Category:Chocolate bars присутствуют лишь фотографии упаковок, которые могут подпадать под {{PD-textlogo}}.

Вообще не думаю, что фотография упаковки настолько важна для иллюстрации статей о продуктах. Неужели не достаточно самого продукта?

Смотрите также Commons:Производные работы.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

This DR

Its unfortunate there is no system to check for panoramio images. If there is a clear license specified, please feel free to close this DR and pass the image as I can't read the cyrillic discussion on the panoramio link. But it is presently ARR unlike this photo I passed: File:Drysa river - Belarus.jpg Thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I think will be reasonable to await for week to possible license change. As for now status is unverifiable. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Eyes of Tomorrow.jpg

Aftermath "Eyes of Tomorro" cd cover deletion. I am not well versed in the workings of WIKI COMMONS, however, I have the trademark to the album cover for Aftermath's Eyes of Tomorrow cd. I have noticed that you deleted the cover from the band's wikipedia page and I wanted to have the cover put back on the page. Not sure how to do this, please help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoident (talk • contribs)

Hi, I have tagged your uploaded cd cover as copyright violation again before reading this so will try to answer. If you are copyright holder of this cover please send email containing evidences to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, please read Commons:OTRS for further information about verification process. For now I have changes copyright violation notice to no permission tag. --Justass (talk) 18:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

I have sent the email as you requested. I hope this resolves the issue. I still need help getting the cover back on the band's article.

Image from Francisco Azuela has been removed...Tristan Azuela

Dear Eugenio,

The day we upload the biografy of the Mexican Writer and Poet, Francisco Azuela I used one photo that personaly I took from my father.

As we could see few days ago, the photo in his biography was removed for you, and we would like to solve this situation. What do you need from me to make this photo appear again.

regards Ttristan

First question, who is author of this photo? At least claims of own work is incorrect (one photo that personaly I took from my father), if I understood you correctly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Dear Eugenio, I am the autor of the Foto francisco_azuela.jpg, My name is Tristan Azuela. Any information you need let me know. What is the process now eugenio. waiting for your news. Regards

I restored File:Francisco azuela.jpg. Please replace {{No license}} with free license of your choice (see Commons:Licensing).

I didn't restored thumbnail of File:Francisco azuela.jpg. MediaWiki allow to create thumbnails with size parameter when you use image.

I'm not sure about book cover. Who own copyrights? You father/artist/publisher?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Dear Eugenio,

I am very awfull with this internet thing. Somebody has delet the image again, I wrote the person. Been honest with you I don't know what I need to do to keep the image online. You mentioned me about replace something of no license, I have no idea where I need to start finding this.

Would you mind to help me with this or I will never finish..

Thank you

Sorry, you didn't follow my recommendation: Please replace {{No license}} with free license of your choice (see Commons:Licensing). Images without license are not supposed to be kept for more then week.

License mean conditions under which other may use your image. If you'll happy only with attribution, you could choose {{Cc-by-all}}, if you want your image and all derivative works always under free license your could choose {{Cc-by-sa-all}}. It's your choice, but it should be made by you when you understand all consequences.

If don't know English well, try to speak with Spanish-speaking administrator.

I restored image again.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Molotov, Stalin and Voroshilov, 1937.jpg

Если не ошибаюсь, фото, опубликованные в 1940 году, пока что не в PD. К тому же, хорошо бы указать точно номер и дату выхода газеты.

Тут надо пойти в библиотеку и полистать подшивки основных газет тех лет. К сожалению, у меня такой возможности нет :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Molotov, Stalin and Voroshilov, 1937.jpg

File:Molotov, Stalin and Voroshilov, 1937.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Nut1917 (talk) 08:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi EugeneZelenko, I've converted this into a regular deletion request. Cheers, AFBorchert (talk) 12:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Максим Коршунов

User:Максим Коршунов has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--El. (talk) 10:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Higordouglas → Higor Douglas

• Current name: Higordouglas (talk · contribs · logs · block log)
• Requested name: Higor Douglas (SUL reports: old & new) (rename user)
• Reason: I have my name right

Higordouglas (talk) 02:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

 Done EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Regards Higor Douglas (talk) 00:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

My pictures

In the picture, File:TOBB_ETÜ.jpg, the source information is already given by using "own" tag. But you have added that the picture did not have source information. can u check the picture given again ?--Charismaniac (talk) 14:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please upload this file in better resolution with EXIF info. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the change. Oh, by the way, Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! – Jake ^Talk 10:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

File bsa038.jpg

hello, I don't speak english very well, you deleted my image and Justass asked me to contact you about the photography bsa038.jpg i would want to know how add a license tag for this image. the author just said me in a email that i could use it. thanks Floriane

This file missed license information. Photographer/copyrights owner also should send permission to Commons:OTRS (see Commons:Email templates as example). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Jorge_Toriello.jpg

Sorry but ¿What you mind? I don't undestand you.

Place: Guatemala Date: There is.

And I put own, I don't pic it but who pic it die many long time before. That I did was edit some the real photo.

LMEF2009 (talk) 03:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, you can't claim authorship over other people works. Even if author died, terms of copyrights protection is counted after author death, and 70 years is quite usual. Of course, it's good idea to look at copyrights law of Guatemala.

I think help of Spanish-speaking administrator will be useful for you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Username

Please, could you rename my username (Commons:Changing username)? Thank you very much--Ula (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

My username

Hello! I forgot my password for my username, iBen. I am trying to unify my logins. I didn't enter an email when I signed up, so I can't access that account. Could you point me in the right direction to someone who can rename it to iBen 2 or something like that. After it's been renamed, I'll recreate my account and be on my way with my universal login. I would be fine if someone blocked the second account as well (I don't sock). Any guidence would be appreciated. Please respond on my Wikipedia page (w:User talk:iBen). Thanks!68.104.158.220 03:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Could you please post on your user/talk page in other project (for example, Wikipedia) with same words and post link to diff into your request? Search proof of ownership on Commons:Changing username/Archive10 as example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, I posted on MY talk page at Wikipedia (w:User_talk:IBen#Commons_Username_Issue). Please respond there.--68.104.158.220 06:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC) (iBen)

See diff (DIFF) (iBen)--68.104.158.220 06:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:File:Map of the Minsk Ghetto.jpg

I got a verbal permission from the author to use a free license and upload the image to Wikipedia. I asked her now to @ OTRS with the permission, too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

If she does not reply, will we have to delete the image? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 15:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

We should do so. However, I think, it's possible to do similar image based, for example on http://openstreetmap.org. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Forum_Mleczarskie_Praktyka.JPG

I get a bit pissed about the deletion-bingo at Commons. I clearly wrote when uploading the above file, that OTRS already twice received permission from the copyright holder about this file. Already another hero deleted this file a week ago, although permission has been sent already (which was said already too !) ! So I just spent again time to upload and put it back to two Interwikis (de:WP and en:WP) - wasted time ! Now the next one ... So what exactly is your problem  ? --Wistula (talk) 17:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Image didn't have permission. You could use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for help. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

It seems, that the deletion-department works much faster than OTRS. As I said: I sent the permission already a week before loading up (and announced that !), so I can't see any sense in a deletion. I exactly followed the rules ! --Wistula (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make OTRS department faster :-), please use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Файл: Openiv.png

Почему был удален файл? В чем здесь нарушение авторских прав? Обладателя файла я знаю лично и, уж поверьте, он не против размещения этого файла на википедии! SashaFAN (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

У как про это могут узнать другие? Для этого и существует система архивации разрешений. Смотрите также Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:GDL Baracinka 1665.jpg
• File:LocationMacau.png
• File:Ludwik d'Anjou.jpg
• File:GDL Grosz 1536.jpg
• File:GDL Paugrosz 1548 Reverse.jpg

BotMultichillT 20:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Hiob rename

Hi,
I just want to say : merci. See you later, H_iob ^(•) 16:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: File:Ludwik d'Anjou.jpg

I am sorry to say that I am unable to find the picture anywhere on the Internet except Wikimedia; I have also searched the database of the Polish National Library and couldn't find the book in question (here is the English search page). I suggest asking the uploader for the source, he seems to be quite active in the Polish Wikipedia, and he's right here, on Commons, too. Best regards, odder (talk) 19:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for help! I asked original uploader. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Aleksander Lesser, and new version of pic. http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Louis_I_of_Poland_and_Hungary.PNG (talk) 20:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Dziękuję bardzo! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Rioita.jpg

FYI, I've opened an undeletion request for this file. Feel free to leave a comment there. –Tryphon^☂ 09:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Fraxinus → Ségala

Hello, Bonjour,

Thank you for changing my username so quickly ! Best wishes and bonne année 2010, --Ségala (talk) 11:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Jesse Marunde.jpg

Witaj. Wysłałem licencję na użycie tego zdjęcia Jesse Marunde.jpg do: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

Artur

I added request on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Jesse Marunde.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Jesse Marunde.jpg

Hello. I have send the permission (to use this picture) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.

Artur

Re: Administrator?

Thank you very much for your suggestion, I also think that admin tools can be very useful for me, since I spend most of my time here finding licensing and copyright problems, also I am planning to start translating templates and some other parts of Commons to Persian language and admin permission gives me access to many protected pages and templates, I am very honored and fortunate that you have asked me about this and actually I wished that somebody else propose and nominate me for adminship, so I would be very happy if you nominate me, thanks again.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  23:55, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

You don't know how I feel when I saw your message, thank you very mush for your trust, this means so much to me.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  19:49, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletion request

Please close this deletion request. The file has been speedily deleted due to copyright violation. --Francisco (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

File:V.M. Doroshevich-Sakhalin. Part I. Types of prisoners-15.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Felipe Méndez

Hola Eugene! Qué placer me da saludarte! Vi tu advertencia sobre (File source is not properly indicated: File:Felipe_Méndez.jpg). Yo había levantado esa imagen para mi foto de perfil como wikipedista, pero no funcionó. Te pido que elimines esa imagen por favor, porque yo no sé eliminar fotos en Commons =(. Gracias por estar atento a mi trabajo, por favor, ayúdame en lo que sea para que pueda colaborar de la manera adecuada. Un Saludo! --FF MM (talk) 13:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak Portuguese/Spanish. Please upload this image in full resolution EXIF info. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

new user name

hi - i would like to change my username on here, and then close the account - the photos i have uploaded have my real name associated with them (which is good), but for privacy reasons i do not want this account associated with the same account name on other wiki sites - so i would like this changed to something else. how can i do this in such a way that it can't be traced by a casual user? (sorry to bother you - i saw you were doing most of the name changes at the request page).. thanks! Luminifer (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

We can't delete accounts. You could request rename to something unrecognizable. However, I don't see any uploads from Luminifer account. If you still didn't upload any file, you could just create new account with unrecognizable name. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

i do have a single upload - is it ok if i follow up with you on email? i feel very uncomfortable revealing much more on here as i have been stalked by a blocked user. Luminifer (talk) 01:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure, you could use e-mail. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Changing username

Can you look at Commons:Changing username#OrGuttman → אור גוטמן? Thank You. OrGuttman (talk) 20:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your vote on my RfCU

I would like to thank you for taking the time to review my request for checkuser rights. I hope one more CU will make a difference, at least for the other CUs' workload! Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Old Faithful

Hi Eugene, I saw that you uploaded a picture of the Old Faithful geyser in 2004. Last Sunday, I've made a video of the geyser. I thought that might be of interest to you. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Great! Thank you!

If you'll be interesting to find out more good places to make photos in Bay Area, I could recommend some :-).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, great. Everything that moves is interesting to me (animals of California, old engines, forgotten technologies, etc.) Landscape, buildings, etc. can better be captured with a photo camera. I live in Santa Rosa – please let me know if you know anything of interest nearby. Thanks in advance --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

If you are interested in insect, I definitely recommend to find pound or creek around. In my area (San Jose), I found 10 species of dragonflies and 5-6 of damselflies. Some of them (Libellula saturata, Libellula luctuosa) have favorite branches, so you likely to be able to repeat shootings. Especially if you have DSLR with good telephoto lenses and ability to shoot HD video. There are also carpenter bees.

I can't claim good knowledge of north bay area :-( There are Pacific Coast Air Museum. There is also ships graveyard in mouth of Sacramento river. Category:Fort Ross is great place and geothermal plant nearby.

Just look for historical buildings information of cities web sites. There are many white spots on coverage of National and California Historical Landmarks.

You may also be interested to visit MakerFair in San Mateo (and volunteer for WMF) in end of May. Last year I saw operating huge steam engines there.

Actually you could subscribe to wikimedia-sf at lists dot wikimedia dot org.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, the insects are a very good idea! I own a very good HD videocam and bought a macro lens as well. I've been at the last MakerFair but I won't be able to make it this year. Thank you very much! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC) P.S. I am on the mailinglist since I moved to the United States ;-)

Russian language skills

Hello Eugene!

Can you have a look at this image and especially on its talk page? A user claims copyright and it seems that one can reach him in Russian better. I hope you can help. Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 17:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

My rename request

Just letting you know that my rename went ahead on en.wikipedia so that you can have another look at my request, thanks. --Searle, L. (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks --LukeSearle (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Beaujolais_Nouveau_bottle.jpg

Why? This picture was taken by me. There are plenty of similar pictures of wine-bottles on Commons, which are not marked for copyvio. If you think that the picture of bottle of wine with labels on them having a pice of arts are copyvio - please mark them all for mass-deletion. Just some examples below:

• File:Beaujoulais nouveau 2009.png
• File:Lafite-1986.JPG
• 
• File:Mouton Rothschild 1999.jpg
• 
• File:Latour-Pergament.JPG
• File:Cos-d-Estournel-1975.JPG
• File:Chasse-Spleen 1990.jpg
• File:Bottle Coccinellidae 03.jpg
• File:Beychevelle-1994.JPG
• File:Belgrave-2001.JPG
• File:Beaujolais nouveau 2004 QT.JPG

Category:Winebottles.

If think that all such pictures should be deleted it should be done via discussion - not via speedy deletion on just my picture. Please explain your fast action !!!!!

Cheers,

Polimerek (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that such images are Commons:De minimis and it's good idea to review this category. And I don't believe that label is important to display product itself in. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

So - please mark them all for speedy deletion ASAP - or undelete my picture ASAP and take all those pictures above - together with my for proper discussion. !!! Polimerek (talk) 16:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image was already in Category:Copyright violations. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes - becasue it was marked as such by the user, who do not prove it !!! My picture was used on many Wikipedias - I guess now - bots are removing link to this picture, so in order to stop this action - please udelete my picture. !!! This is even not proved that the picture used on label is still under copyright - it might been in public domain (and therefore used on label) and there was no any copyvio at all. ! Polimerek (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, usage in many Wikipedias are not warranty that this image is free content. Burden of proof of public domain lies on you. And you should do this before uploading image. And again why wine itself (in glass of course) is not better illustration? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

So - Please delete all other wine-bottles !!! Wine in a glass does not inform the readers what it is :-) This picture was used as an example of Beaujolais Nouveau on the following Wikipedias:

Ten plik jest wykorzystywany także w innych projektach wiki:

   * Wykorzystanie w ca.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais nouveau
   * Wykorzystanie w cs.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais nouveau
   * Wykorzystanie w de.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais
   * Wykorzystanie w de.wiktionary.org
         o Beaujolais
   * Wykorzystanie w en.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais nouveau
   * Wykorzystanie w en.wiktionary.org
         o bottle
   * Wykorzystanie w es.wikipedia.org
         o Wikiproyecto Discusión:Francia
         o Viñedo de Beaujolais
         o Beaujolais nouveau
   * Wykorzystanie w fr.wikipedia.org
         o Wikipédia:Le Bistro/novembre 2005
         o Wikipédia:Le Bistro/14 novembre 2005
   * Wykorzystanie w hr.wiktionary.org
         o boca
   * Wykorzystanie w incubator.wikimedia.org
         o Wt/arz/ازازه
   * Wykorzystanie w ja.wikipedia.org
         o ボジョレー
   * Wykorzystanie w ku.wiktionary.org
         o botl
   * Wykorzystanie w lt.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais nouveau
   * Wykorzystanie w nl.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais (wijnstreek)
   * Wykorzystanie w pl.wikipedia.org
         o Beaujolais nouveau
   * Wykorzystanie w ru.wikipedia.org
         o Божоле нуво
   * Wykorzystanie w uk.wikipedia.org
         o Божоле
   * Wykorzystanie w vi.wiktionary.org
         o bottle
   * Wykorzystanie w zh.wikipedia.org
         o 薄酒萊葡萄酒

Now - the bots are removing my picture from all of them and in the same time all other pictures of wine-bottles with lables on them are untoched. This is not fair. If you think that all of them are copyvio - please remove all of them. The sitation with them is exactly the same as with my picture. Polimerek (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have time for this task today. I'm cleaning Category:Copyright violations and I already deleted several similar images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

So - if you have no time - so please undelete my picture and take all similiar under discussion when you find time for it. Otherwise your action is not fair. Polimerek (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I just viewed you image again and label look quite modern. If you want to undelete it, please find proof of public domain status (author, date of creation, etc) and file request on Commons:Undeletion requests. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I think deletion actions of pictures which are widely used in many wikimedia projects for years should be undertaken with great care - not just speedy deletion and without any time for uploader to react, especially if the similar pictures exist in Commons and are untouched. So, I ask again - undelete my picture and take it under fair discussion with all other similar pictures. This is the only fair action to be taken in such case. For example, what about this picture: File:Beaujolais nouveau 2004 QT.JPG]. Why my was deleted - and this one not? The picture of my bottle is probably an art noveau pice of art, probably end of XIX century. Category:Art Nouveau. Polimerek (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Moulin aV 1.jpg

Copyvio? Delete it ASAP !!!

Yes.. And the bots did their job right now. Even if you undelete this file now - it was removed from all wikimedia projects, in which it was used for several years. Just one your fast action. With no chance for me to do something with it. Great job. Thank you. You are really good and resonable admin. My congratulations.  :-(

File:4 beaujolais nouveau 2008.jpg

to be deleted - copyvio - do it ASAP - don't wait, don't think, do not check anything - this is uploader obligation only - if my picture was copyvio - this 4 x copyvio as well

File:BEAUJOLAIS BILE.JPG

to be deleted - copyvio - don't wait, don't think, do not check anything - this is uploader obligation only

Delete, delete, delete, don't think. Just delete. You are good admin, don't you ? Polimerek (talk) 17:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Some more pictures (I guess at least several thousands) for deletion for you, you can find in Category:Alcoholic beverages. I guess around 80-90% of these pictures contain lables of commercial products, as the alcoholic beverages are commercial products usally (maybe except Самогон). If you finish it, take a look on Category:Cooking oils, then on Category:Mineral waters, and then, when you finish I have several other categories to clean up from as you wrote in deletion explanation "(Derivative of non-free content: Commercial packaging)". Good luck. I hope, you treat your own words seriously. Polimerek (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

See: Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Beaujolais_Nouveau_bottle.jpg. Polimerek (talk) 13:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Dear Eugene Zelenko, the file Venuswein.jpg is correctly licensed, because the artist of the label allowed me to upload the file. The artist sent an email to 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org' today at 08:35 to confirm that. --Marinelli (talk) 06:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Reguarding File:Switch can.JPG

It appears you have deleted my image File:Switch can.JPG as a copyright violation. Could you please restore it so I can move it to the English Wikipedia for fair-use? Thanks. -NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits) 21:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Please tell me your e-mail. I'll send file there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Special:EmailUser/NerdyScienceDude. -NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits) 22:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Admin request archival

Hey, I was wondering if you'd be able to add categorization (Category:Successful requests for adminship and Category:Unsuccessful requests for adminship) to future closures. Juliancolton recently created the categories and added all requests in there, and it's quite useful to have these requests in a category. I don't know if you use a template for the archiving, but if so, the cat could be added there. Anyways, thanks for your frequent handling of the adminship requests, it's very good work. --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, looks I missed discussion about this category. I'll try to remember :-)

I usually copy text from Special:UserRights, so category may be added there.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Ah ok, never noticed this coding there. I've added it there, if that's fine for you. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! It'll definitely help memorizing :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Semel 2008(extra chico).png

Thank you for deleting this copyvio.

Please have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sakartvelos Skauturi Modzraobis Organizatsia 1992.svg, as most Scout logos are not free use, and these are improperly placed there, improperly licensed. Please feel free to weigh in. There will be more but we need to rescue them first.

1. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kindred of the Kibbo Kift.gif
2. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Join In Moot.jpg
3. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Corpo Nacional de Escutas.jpg
4. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Baden-Powell Scouts Association.png
5. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Association of Armenian Scouts.svg
6. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Asociación de Grupos de Scouts de México.jpg
7. Commons:Deletion requests/File:6th World Scout Jamboree.svg

Please also check out:

• File:Aebp simbolo.gif
• File:Scouts Canada Labrador.jpg
• File:Scouts Canada Newfoundland and Labrador.jpg
• File:Bandalag íslenskra skáta 1940s.svg
• File:Scouts Chrétiens du Liban.png

--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to add links to date of creation/author information to these requests. I agree that logos which are not public domain should be deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted image

Hi. You (I think) deleted an image under some speedy clause ("Derivative of non-free content: Commercial packaging"). Whereas I understand the derived copyright claim is the current grievance that such images are now under deletion request, I'd appreciate it if you could have the image restored long enough for me to transfer it elsewhere: File:Cantemerle bottles.JPG. Thanks, Murgh (talk) 11:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I think it's obvious case (unless there is evidence that label design in public domain) and not Commons:De minimis. There is not principal difference with photo of newspaper, magazine, CD/DVD cover, etc.

If you need to illustrate wine, you could make a photo of wine in glass. Bottle label which may be copyrighted is not required.

I could send image to you via e-mail.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Drazdovic Monument in Minsk Small2.jpg

Не зразумеў прычыну выдаленьня маёй уласнай фатаграфіі. Няўжо нейкі закон забараняе фотаздымкі помніка, які разьмешчаны пасярод гораду?? --Bacian (talk) 22:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Закон забараняе выкарыстоўваць падобныя здымкі ў камэрцыйных мэтах без дазволу аўтара (артыкул 19). Забарона на камэрцыйнае выкарыстаньне супярэчыць ўмовам Commons Дарэчы, падобная праблема ёсьць і іншых краінах. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Дык ці ёсьць нейкая іншая магчымасьць загрузіць гэты файл, каб дадаць яго да артыкулу пра Драздовіча? Вельмі трэба. :( --Bacian (talk) 16:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Можна паспрабаваць скантактавацца са скульптарам. Ня ўпэўнены, што выяву можна як не свабодная выкарыстоўвацца ў артыкуле пра Язэпа Драздовіча ў Вікіпэдыі, бо ёсьць вольныя альтэрнатывы... У артыкуле пра скульптара альбо саму скульптуру — так. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Глядзіце, а ёсьць жа такая агаворка: "images of copyrighted architectural works, photographic works, or works of fine art (which includes sculptures and statues) that are permanently located in publicly accessible places may be published only if the depicted copyrighted base work is not the main subject of the image and the image is for non-commercial purposes." Такім чынам, калі на здымку будзе выява ня толькі помніку, але і навакольля, то ўсё будзе ціп-топ? Подпіс зрабіць: "Траецкае прадмесьце і помнік Язэпу Драздовічу". Што скажаце? --Bacian (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Так, але помнік мусіць займаць нязначную частку здымка. Дарэчы панарама ў добрым разрозьненьні, дзе помнік можна праглядзець пры павялічэньні — добрае выйсьце. Але цяжка сказаць наколькі гэта магчыма ў выпадку помніка Язэпу Драздовічу. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

А ці магчыма загрузіць здымак не ў Команс, а на беларускую Вікіпэдыю? Калі так, то пад якой ліцэнзіяй? --Bacian (talk) 17:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Магчыма, але як не свабодны і выкарыстаньне мусіць адпавядаць be-x-old:Вікіпэдыя:Крытэры добрасумленнага выкарыстаньня. Адпаведна ўзьнікне праблема, які артыкул можна ілюстраваць выявай, пра што я пісаў вышэй. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Дарэчы, рыхтуецца абнаўленьне закону РБ аб аўтарскім праве. Варта было бы паспрабаваць паўплываць на заканадаўцаў, каб была дазволеная свабода панарама. Я пісаў некалькі лістоў на адпаведныя катэдры БДУ, БДЭУ і Цэнтар інтэлектуальнай уласнасьці, але безвынікова :-( Калі ў Вас ёсьць магчымасьць паспрабаваць скантактавацца з тымі, хто можа паўплываць на сытуацыю, было бы проста цудоўна! Дарэчы, лісты ў мяне захаваліся. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

request of moving

Hi. Could you moved this picture (Hazazlar.png) to Hazarlar.png? You can see the right name. Regards...--Sabri76 23:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done I also fixed type (File:Hazarlar.jpg). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Me, too! :) Happy Men's Day, Eugene! Would you do me a great favor and rename/delete these categories: Category:Adhesive labels of Estonia and Category:Stamps of Venden? Thnaks! :) --Michael Romanov (talk) 05:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Unknown plant-18.jpg

It looks like Prunus armeniaca, but hard to tell from one image.

Thank you for help! I uploaded other image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Cyrillic renames in the queue

Hi Eugene, There are a number of requests for renames in Cyrillic characters (at the end), and some are converted to English, which I do not see as the way forward. Do you know which admin may be handling those, if no one comes to mind, do you know who might be available to assist me to convert them back to Russian without the initial errors. Or you can point me to someone who can just check them and correct as necessary, and then say that they are right to go. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I could help with Russian and Belarusian requests. I can't claim too big knowledge about other languages which uses Cyrillic.

I glanced through first 200 files and found only File:COA Kobrin 1987.gif. Kobrin is transliteration from Russian, Kobryn is transliteration from Belarusian. It's hard to claim that this is error, question is more in political area.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Those in question are all at the end of the list due to their Cyrillic characters, and once in Cyrillic I cannot pick Russian from any other. :-/ — billinghurst sDrewth 13:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll look into it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Steven Walling

Hi, I'm rather confused here. I'd say consensus is clearly on the side of promotion, but either way, you've not provided a closing result. Could you please explain? Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I'd forgotten we'd changed the rules - it is 8 support votes needed now I see. Depending on views I could make mine a support. Frankly I don't feel strongly but I do think we have worse admins :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately we don't have a consensus how to count neutral votes. I sent e-mail to bureaucrat mailing list with this question. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Eugene - let me know if I can help at all. I'd forgotten the rule change but I don't feel he would be a threat to Commons :) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't aware about rule change at all :-( So definitely comments of other folks is good idea. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

hmm, alright. In the future though could you please specify the result in the closing template, so it's easy to determine the outcome easily? Cheers, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll include status in such non-trivial cases. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Here's the rule-changing discussion: User talk:Abigor/Vote proposal. Rocket000 (talk) 01:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Personally, I think he should be promoted as the minimum number of votes rule wasn't updated before he initiated his request. This even though I probably would have opposed if my neutral vote would have counted as support. -- User:Docu at 17:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

It was updated in one place but not the other, leading to confusion. Not a good situation. ++Lar: t/c 18:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for dealing with my RFA. Can I ask how the bureaucrats came to their conclusion about how to deal with neutral votes? I appreciate your work, but I am uncomfortable with the lack of transparency when it comes to the closure of my case. Why did they decide the rule about 8 votes applies, even though at the start and throughout my RFA Commons:Administrators continued to say only four were needed? Steven Walling 18:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Non-trivial closures are discussed in mailing list after it was created. Early discussion page of nomination was used. Frankly, I don't know which way is better...

Discrepancy with support votes was present on Commons:Administrators. It listed both 4 and 8. Sure, it's not good... But it's fixed now.

I'm tend to account neutral votes in final result. And this is reason why I'm personally only make comments instead of adding neutral vote.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Logo ORTF.svg

I hate these speedy deletions that go against opinions of others - why not use a normal DR? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Should we convert each speedy deletion to DR, because original uploader definitely have own ideas? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

I had removed the {{Logo}} tag, and labeled it is pd-ineligible. Please restore, and file a dr if you must. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I was not alone who had opinion about triviality. Probably you actions with reverting was not correct too. Feel free to file Commons:Undeletion requests. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Need your language skills again

Hello Eugene!

Can you have help here: [7]? A new user has problems in understanding what the problem is in this case. I think it would be more effective if somebody explains it to her/him in her/his own language. Sorry for bothering again. --High Contrast (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Номинировался

Я номинировался на администратора - проверьте, если не трудно, не нарушил ли я процедуру выдвижения. Commons:Administrators/Requests/Zimin.V.G. Zimin.V.G. (talk) 11:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Кажется всё в порядке. Из общих соображений — я бы посоветовал быть более активным, если есть время, а также больше общаться с другими участниками и сообществом. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Быть более активным? Для социализации не обладаю должным знанием языков. А в ru я излишне активен :) Zimin.V.G. (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Можно, например, патрулировать новые файлы. А стандартные сообщения (гаджет User Messages) переводятся автоматически. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

wrongly deleted images

U have deleted two images that are free in Israel. In Israel - a map permenantly displayed in a public location is free (FOP). Please undelte both File:Acco IMG 0191.JPG and File:Acco IMG 0294.JPG. Deror avi (talk) 07:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Please file undeletion request. I don't think that touristic maps are permanent display. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Svyatogorskaya Blessed Virgin.png

Вы номинировали на удаление фото File:Svyatogorskaya Blessed Virgin.png в связи с тем, что скульптор жив и на лицо нарушение его прав в соответствии с Украинским законодательством.

Я обсудил ситуацию с представителем автора скульптуры и получил его одобрение на публикацию. Подскажите, pls, как правильно оформить его разрешение на публикацию данной фотографии, не нарушая его авторских прав. Заранее благодарю, --Vd437 (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Примеры текста разрешения можно найти тут. Само разрешение представитель автора скульптуры должен послать в OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Передал автору скульптуры. Как только отошлют, отпишусь здесь. --Vd437 (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Кстати, имело бы смысл попросить разрешения на все фотографии всех его скульптур. А сообщать о разрешении лучше на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Разрешение на фотографии скульптур с сайта http://www.kingofmarble-shmatko.com/ есть: {{OTRS|2008122910005298}}

Но данная фотография не с сайта, а сделана мною "с натуры", так сказать. В том и тонкость вопроса, как я понимаю. Я, при размещении этого фото здесь, не учел нюансов "свободы панорамы" в рамках украинского законодательства. Снимок автором скульптуры одобрен, теперь осталось получить его благословение на публикацию данного конкретного снимка под свободной лицензией. Обсуждение данного вопроса можно почитать здесь. --Vd437 (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Да, это разрешение для Вашей фотографии использовать нельзя. Поэтому я и упоминал про полезность попросить разрешения на все фотографии всех его скульптур. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Ок. Я понял, что Вы имели в виду. Но давайте двигаться постепенно - пусть переварит разрешение на одно фото, а потом задам вопрос по поводу всех. --Vd437 (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Разумно. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Foto Carolina Goci

It is an original photo, 26 February 2009 the deputy attended a homage to Eduardo Frei Montalva in the Plaza de la Constitution,

User:JuanMarchant

Could you please be more specific about file? I can't find it in your upload log. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Deleted file

Hi, could you please let me know why the file Authentic_Neapolitan_Pizza_Marinara.jpg was deleted by you? Was there a problem with it? --Guarracino (talk) 10:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

I was marked as no source at 31 January 2010. Most likely resolution and/or absence of EXIF information was issue. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Guys like you ...

So called "editors' like you should not be able to edit anything. You removed a photograph without telling me, just so you could play the big editor. Now, what did that do for you? I stated that I owned the photography and I gave it to the world for use. That happened to be in the licensing. But, you had to remove it. You see ... guys like you are the reason that people like me will not ever donate money to Wikipedia.

Please calm down. Will be good idea if you'll upload full resolution/size photos to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

New username

Hello! I would like to change my login. Could you help me? Preferred new login: "Pqrscom". Thank you! --WłosProsiOGłos (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Do you plan to change username in other projects? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

In Polish Wiki now I use login "Pqrs". Is it a problem?

No. But you have WłosProsiOGłos accounts in other projects too. It's good idea to keep user name same for SUL. And we always ask ownership confirmation in non-trivial cases. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

So, new username "Pqrs" (not "Pqrscom") in Commons is -in my my opinion- acceptable. Right?

Sure. Just correct your request on Commons:Changing username and state that you renamed account on home wiki. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Moisey

Здравствуйте. Данный участник продолжает на Викискладе деятельность, которая уже стала причиной бессрочной блокировки в русском разделе: загрузка копивио (File:Bionitsheskoiy glaz.jpg, File:Shkala savisimostey v metrologii.jpg, и т.д.), загрузка схем, противоречащих представлениям современной науки (File:Spin +.jpg, например, физики наверняка найдут больше). Множество файлов уже удалялось, см. User talk:Moisey/Архив-2009. По опыту деятельности в РуВП можно сделать вывод, что предупреждения и краткосрочные блокировки здесь бесполезны и требуется бессрочная блокировка и массовая чистка файлов. Скажите, нужно ли для этого обращаться на Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks & protections или еще куда-то для более широкого обсуждения или возможно заблокировать его сразу бессрочно? --Blacklake (talk) 10:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC) И нарушение лицензии: File:Contactlenzen Confortissimo +.jpg в общественном достоянии, а оригинал File:Contactlenzen Confortissimo.JPG был под GFDL. --Blacklake (talk) 11:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, что Commons:Administrators' noticeboard или Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks & protections — самые подходящие места для подобных обсуждений. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Ок, спасибо. --Blacklake (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

user:Foxpry - user:GwenofGwened

Hello Eugene, I have some problemes with this account : user:GwenofGwened, it sould be created since your intervention but it's not the case..... Could you check please ? It's a necessity for my unified login. Tks Foxpry (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, most likely my mistake.  Done now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you ;) GwenofGwened (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Panotarr23.jpg

Could you please explain why you tagged this as missing source? --80.145.66.118 22:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Resolution for this image is quite usual for Flick, Panoramio, etc. So ownership claims looks not rock solid. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Нужно удалить файлы с фальшивой лицензией

Евгений, добрый вечер! Посмотрите, пожалуйста, на вклад (Special:Contributions/Aghayev) - на всех четырёх файлах указана свободная лицензия, но "автор" честно пишет в описании - Source=www.bakcell.com, Author=Bakcell . Удалите их, пожалуста! Спасибо! --Ds02006 (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Большое спасибо! --Ds02006 (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

3D VYGOlogo.png

Dear Eugene,

Can you please restore the above logo. I'm discussing the possibilities how to change the licence with an other wiki editor at this moment. I am the licence holder and have registered the logo as trademark. Please give us some more time.

Regards Rudy den OuterVYGOcommons (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done. Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS. I also recommend you to upload images in full resolution to avoid any authorship suspicions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks I will follow your advice for future files. RudyVYGOcommons (talk) 15:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

• Добрый день! Просьба высказать своё мнение (любое). - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mapa_from_Ukraine_postcard_1919.jpg --Vizu (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

  Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

  Спасибо! (talk)

File:Standardbred.png

Source is "own work" - that is enough. Kersti (talk) 20:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

It will be good idea if uploader will upload image in full resolution with EXIF info to support such claims. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Buddhism in Russia ?!

Hello Eugene, can you have a look at this gallery please, of user "arariarara": [8] - he uploads several files with buddhistic people in Russia (?) as far as I understand, some without categories. Unfortunately I cannot read the kyrillic descriptions.... - Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Topic is too specific for me :-(. I added some categories to easier subjects. Also many files form this user originates form other sites or derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks - if the descriptions are not useful, you have no advantadge over me in this case... Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Descriptions is definitely may be useful for people who familiar with Buddhism. But I'm not :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Request my images back - please do no delete

I have copyright for these images. How can I request undeletion? What tag should I add for copyright clearance? I believe that the images were loaded fine and tagged correctly. Art used in CD covers, but was not specifically created for that. The files are:

Image:MutantPress EVIL.jpg File:ReverendJeromeTYoungman.jpg File:Hooks nyc 1979.jpg File:Things_you_dont_know_MuntantPress.ogg.

Please, let me know what tag or information (email, web page) is requiered.

 Done Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Eugene, please give me a little time to add the correct tags and correct CC attribution for the images. I am using them in my Wikipedia articles. Thank you!

History of Morocco

Hi!, I put sources and information, if you see this map its corrects (almost all). Please do not delate this map, because Omar-Toons tried to exilie from Wikipedia Bokpasa (talk) 07:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Could you please be more specific about file in question? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)