User talk:Ejjejejejjejeje
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.
|
Yann (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann: What other account(s) did this person abuse? Please categorize more informatively. — Jeff G. ツ 17:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, This account was blocked by Nick, not by me. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann and Nick: Fine. Each of you had the information and the capability to act, yet neither acted. Please act. — Jeff G. ツ 17:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, I don't understand what you want. AFAIK this user was blocked for vandalism. Please see the block log. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann and Nick: The block log says "Abusing multiple accounts", so for the sake of transparency I want to know which other account or accounts were abused via categorization in the appropriate sockpuppet category. If Nick chose that explanation in error, I would like to see that error rectified. — Jeff G. ツ 18:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please review w:WP:DENY and stop causing a scene, Jeff. Nick (talk) 18:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Jeff, please have a look at the recent reverts at (among others) Category:Lesbians or Category:Females tongue-kissing other females. Btw, he is socking as we can see, but I'm not convinced that he's a sock of User:Isaiasad. --Achim (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's not Isaiasad, it's PhoenixS15 (refer to w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PhoenixS15/Archive for further details). It's an LTA, not one of our 'own' users misbehaving, hence block, forget and very definitely deny them any publicity. I generally block sockpuppets with details of the master, if I choose not to, it's for a very good reason (which I expect to be asked about on my talk page, and ideally, in private). Nick (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nick, thanks for that info, so Category:Sockpuppets of Isaiasad needs some cleanup. --Achim (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's not Isaiasad, it's PhoenixS15 (refer to w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/PhoenixS15/Archive for further details). It's an LTA, not one of our 'own' users misbehaving, hence block, forget and very definitely deny them any publicity. I generally block sockpuppets with details of the master, if I choose not to, it's for a very good reason (which I expect to be asked about on my talk page, and ideally, in private). Nick (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann, Nick, and Achim55: Sorry for the scene. You have my permission to revdel my comments here per DENY. — Jeff G. ツ 18:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Jeff, please have a look at the recent reverts at (among others) Category:Lesbians or Category:Females tongue-kissing other females. Btw, he is socking as we can see, but I'm not convinced that he's a sock of User:Isaiasad. --Achim (talk) 18:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Please review w:WP:DENY and stop causing a scene, Jeff. Nick (talk) 18:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann and Nick: The block log says "Abusing multiple accounts", so for the sake of transparency I want to know which other account or accounts were abused via categorization in the appropriate sockpuppet category. If Nick chose that explanation in error, I would like to see that error rectified. — Jeff G. ツ 18:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, I don't understand what you want. AFAIK this user was blocked for vandalism. Please see the block log. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Yann and Nick: Fine. Each of you had the information and the capability to act, yet neither acted. Please act. — Jeff G. ツ 17:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, This account was blocked by Nick, not by me. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)