User talk:Edhac-Edham

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Edhac-Edham!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urheberrechte

[edit]

Hi, Du hast eine Reihe von Scans von Wertpapieren in der Category:Bonds and Shares in the museum EDHAM e.V., Kuernbach, Germany hochgeladen und dort jeweils angegeben, Du seiest der Urheberrechtsinhaber. Urheberrechtsinhaber ist der Gestalter des Wertpapiers, wenn dort auch Photos verwendet werden (wie bei File:Sperry Corporation 1955.jpg) auch der Potograph. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass Du bei unterschiedlichen Wertpapieren aus unterschiedlichen Ländern und Zeiten jeweils der Urheberrchtsinhaber bist.--Karsten11 (talk) 15:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, auf diesen Wertpapieren werden keine Photos, sondern Stahlstiche verwendet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edhac-Edham (talk • contribs) 15:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dann ist eben der Stahlstecher der Urheberrechtsinhaber... Löst das Problem nicht. Im Regelfall haben diese Wetpapiere keine Schöpfungshöhe. Damit haben wir kein Urheberrechtsproblem. Diese Dateien müssen dann mit {{PD-ineligible}} gekennzeichnet werden. Erläuterungen findest Du unter Template:PD-ineligible. Ein andere Teil könnte gemeinfrei sein, weil der Urheber seit 70 Jahren tot ist. Dafür gäbe es Template:PD-old bzw. Template:PD-old-100. Und dann haben wir Fälle wie eben das genannte Sperry Corporation 1955. Das unterliegt dem Urheberrecht. Da brauchen wir dann eine Freigabe des Urheberrechtsinhabers.--Karsten11 (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, danke für die Info über verwendbare Templates. Neben mir scheinen noch mehrere andere die falschen Linzenzen auszuwählen! Die Wertpapiere der Sperry Corporation wurden bei der Security Banknote Company gedruckt. Diese Firma, wie ihrer Nachfolgerfirma gibt es nicht mehr. Die Firma Sperry Corporation gibt es auch nicht mehr. Von wo soll da eine Freigabe des Urheberrechtsinhabers kommen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edhac-Edham (talk • contribs) 18:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, es gibt viele Uploader, die die falschen Urheberrechtsbausteine verwenden (wohl vielfach im Sinne von: Ich bin der, der es eingescannt hat). Das andere was falsch machen, sollte uns aber nicht daran hindern, es richtig zu machen. Es geht darum, zu verhindern, dass jemand Löschanträge auf diese Dateien stellt und dass der Uploader, die Wikipedia oder ein Nachnutzer am Ende juristische Probleme wegen einer Urheberrechtsverletzung bekommt. Urheberrechtsinhaber ist immer zunächst eine natürliche Person. Diese übeträgt bei einem Werk wie einer Aktie typischerweise ein Nutzungsrecht an die AG. Freigeben könnte daher die AG (die ist im Beispiel aber untergegangen) oder der Urheber selbst (den wir nicht kennen und wohl auch nicht rauskriegen). Nach deutschem Recht ist das ein "Anonymes Werk" bei dem gemäß § 66 UrhG das Urheberrecht siebzig Jahre nach Schaffung abläuft. Aber es ist klar, dass das Risiko, dass jemand eine Klage wegen Urheberrechtsverletzung anstrebt, im Fall einer Aktie eines untergegangenen Unternehmens gering ist.--Karsten11 (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove problem tags

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dank und Anfrage

[edit]

Hallo Edhac-Edham

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in einigen von mir geschriebenen Artikeln jeweils Abbildungen von historischen Aktien eingefügt hast. Das sind sehr wertvolle Beiträge, für die ich mich hiermit herzlich bedanke. Bei dieser Gelegenheit hätte ich auch eine Anfrage: Wäre es evtl. möglich, eine Aktie der 1878 in Konkurs gegangenen Schweizerischen Nationalbahn einzuscannen? Das hier habe ich im Internet gefunden, die Abbildung ist aber ziemlich unscharf. Vielleicht hat der Verein etwas besseres zu bieten?

Vielen Dank --Voyager (talk) 14:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Voyager, es freut uns, dass unsere Abbildungen bei Dir gut angekommen sind. Leider gibt es zur Zeit kein Wertpapier der kurzlebigen Schweizerischen Nationalbahn in unserem Verein bzw. unserem Museum. Falls sich dies ändert, werden wir gerne Ihren Wikipedia-Artikel mit einer Abbildung davon "schmücken".

Mit freundlichem Gruss Edhac-Edham (talk) 13:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Voyager, es hat einige Zeit gedauert, aber jetzt wir auch bei der Schweizerischen Nationalbahn fündig geworden. Es gibt zwar schönere alte Wertpapiere aus der Schweiz, aber Schönheit ist nicht alles!

--Edhac-Edham (talk) 21:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:
  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Etabl. Industriels de Berdiansk John Greaves and Co 1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

149.135.69.44 09:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:1920_Stock_certificates_from_from_the_Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 12:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Kategorie sollte gelöscht werden! Die korrekte Kategorie hat den Namen "1920 Stock certificates from the Netherlands".Edhac-Edham (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reaction. I have closed the discussion and asked for deletion of the category. Next time, please:
  1. Give your reaction on the discussion page, not on your own page. There is a link in the message "its entry" that links to this discussion. In this way we keep together all the reactions to a discussion.
  2. If you accidently made a category with a wrong name, please ask for deletion right away. You may do so by placing {{speedydelete|reason}} in the file (use Edit source/Queltext anzeigen). Instead of "reason" you add the reason for deletion, for instance Empty category, bad name.
--JopkeB (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vereinigte Seidenwebereien AG 1978.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vereinigte Seidenwebereien AG 1978.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]