User talk:Dual Freq

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive
Archives

Archive 1

Contact Information

[edit]

For a more rapid response, post a note at w:User talk:Dual Freq letting me know to check here. Thanks. --Dual Freq 16:06, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dual Freq is taking a long break and may be back at Commons sometime in the future.

Thank you for creating Barnstar with polished anchor.png

[edit]

Just wanted to let you know that your creation was put to good use: I have just been awarded it for a different purpose. (If you want to continue the conversation, please do so here and alert me at en:User talk:SebastianHelm, as I'm not usually active at Wikimedia.) SebastianHelm (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

calling for discussion

[edit]

I called for discussion over renaming a category you started -- for consistency with similar classes. Please see Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/01/Category:Cape class patrol boats. Geo Swan (talk) 03:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A_crewman_looks_at_TARPS_imagery_aboard_USS_George_Washington.jpg

[edit]
File:A_crewman_looks_at_TARPS_imagery_aboard_USS_George_Washington.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

182.178.224.19 19:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS John F Kennedy (CV-67) starboard stern 2002.jpg

[edit]
File:USS John F Kennedy (CV-67) starboard stern 2002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for permission to use image

[edit]

Dear Dual, I'm a publisher from Namibia. I would like to use your image of the solar panels in the Mojave Desert in one of my publications. I know that the image is in the public domain, however, I need your explicit permission to be able to use the image. Please contact me via email: malimap@nph.com.na top discuss this further. I look forward to hearing from you. Patrycja

I don't know what image you are describing, but I personally have never photographed any solar panels in the Mojave desert. You are likely looking at a US Department of Defense image, so if you feel you need explicit permission from someone, you should go to the US DoD for that. I usually like the website, in the image, you could go to the US Air Force or US Navy media website and seek permission there. I'm pretty sure I can not grant permission on behalf of the US Military. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Illinois BB-7 sea trials.jpg

[edit]
File:USS Illinois BB-7 sea trials.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:USS Illinois - 19-N-1-6-13.jpg.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Reventtalk 13:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Illinois BB-7 1919.jpg

[edit]
File:USS Illinois BB-7 1919.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:USS Illinois - NH 47030.jpg.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Reventtalk 14:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Odd since mine were uploaded years and years ago. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uss illinois bb-7.jpg

[edit]
File:Uss illinois bb-7.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:USS Illinois - NH 73783.jpg.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Reventtalk 08:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you uploaded a duplicate of the file I uploaded many years ago. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oklahoma City National Memorial 4915.jpg

[edit]
File:Oklahoma City National Memorial 4915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 06:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:USS_Dale_(CG-19)

[edit]
Category discussion warning

USS Dale (CG-19) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2603:9000:B111:F700:94AB:E41:B8CD:820F 15:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Resourceful (AFDM-5) and USNS Spica (T-AFS-9) at Subic Bay.jpg

[edit]
File:USS Resourceful (AFDM-5) and USNS Spica (T-AFS-9) at Subic Bay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

76.28.228.138 17:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Safeguard insignia.png

[edit]
File:Safeguard insignia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AlbertoDV (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Bunker Hill hit by two Kamikazes.jpg

[edit]
File:USS Bunker Hill hit by two Kamikazes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

108.184.8.239 16:19, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:RC-135S Cobra Ball landing at Travis Air Force Base (200523-F-UI914-0249).jpg

[edit]

Hi there, you updated this image to say it's a TC-135, but this suggests it was converted from a TC to an RC in 2016, and the photograph was taken in 2020. How would you suggest this and the aircraft's category be handled? — Huntster (t @ c) 23:03, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is an odd one. It is missing that 'cheek' pod that all the other RC-135's have, Hard to believe it could have a recon capability with no obvious antennas on the outside. This article says it is to be a NC-135, the platform used to test equipment for the RC-135 fleet. I'm not sure where the dossier page gets the conversion info from. It's pretty clear though that it is not a Cobra Ball though. --Dual Freq (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How important is it that deletions leave a clear deletion log entry...

[edit]

I have two heads-up, from you, Dual Freq, on User talk:Geo Swan, advising me that File:Canada 3000 - Airbus A310 (50498124406).jpg and File:Canada 3000 Airlines Airbus A310-304; C-GRYV, August 2001 (8487840892).jpg had been marked as possible copyright violations.

Administrator Yann's deletion log entry for File:Canada 3000 - Airbus A310 (50498124406).jpg said the flickr contributor had explicitly said that while the image was from his collection, he had not taken the photo.

Well, I checked https://www.flickr.com/photos/148888746@N08/50498124406/ %208487840892 Its description does not say that.

That is confusing. It puzzled me.

On further investigation I realized the flickr contributor had uploaded this image twice, and that only the description at https://www.flickr.com/photos/aero_icarus/8487840892 said it was not his image.

I suggest that, ideally, in the interests of leaving non-confusing deletion log entries, 50498124406 should have been deleted as a duplicate. Its deletion log should have said it was a duplicate.

Then 8487840892 should have been deleted, with a deletion log entry saying it is a copyright violation. Maybe that would have been slightly more work. Maybe that would have required the deletion of a redirect, but, I suggest, it would have left a clearer deletion log.

So, how important is it that deletions leave a clear deletion log entry? Geo Swan (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was confusing. The second one was not a direct duplicate, it was modified for rotation, scratch removal, etc. So I don't know that it should have been deleted as a duplicate. Both linked the same source image with an unknown photographer and unknown copyright status. The copyvio template askes for the original source of the copyright violation, so that's what I put in. I marked them both for deletion because the original photographer's intent is not known. Many of Aero Icarus' "not my shot" slide scans ended up on commons and there are a few left to delete. --Dual Freq (talk) 11:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know how close two images have to be, to be considered duplicates. Doesn't the wording say that if the two images are, forgetting the exact wording, but essentially indistinguishable to the naked eye, they should be considered duplicates, even if they are of different resolutions?
So, am I understanding you correctly? If we have two essentially identical images, with one highly visible difference - one has had its rotation corrected, and the other one has not yet had its rotation corrected, so it has a screwy rotation - are you saying they are not duplicates? Scratch that. I see now. The flickr contributor uploaded the image a second time because, they said thay applied, "color adjustment, image rotat[ation], remove noise, dust & scratches." Even so, they appear naked eye indistinguishable, to me.
What about when the two images have the same dimensions, but one is a lot smaller than the other? When I use my own tools to crop an image, on my own computer, I often find the cropped image's size goes way up. I've attributed that to the original image having had a lot smarter compression algorithm applied to it. I think this means, if there are two images, most of us can't tell whether the smaller image may not be the superior image. I notice images with identical dimensions, but wildly different sizes, in images that are in the public domain, due to age, that can be found on multiple museums, or reasonable equivalent.
When there are two very similar images that differ only in that one had a distracting border trimmed, I do not consider them duplicates.
Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dual_Freq&oldid=889212789"